Relationship between globus sensation and esophageal clearance

A prospective cohort study of 122 adult patients presenting to an otolaryngologist's office with globus pharyngeus

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the epidemiology of globus pharyngeus in adult patients presenting to the otolaryngologist's office. Also, the predictors of persisting symptoms, prevalence of anxiety and the effect of clinical assessment were analysed.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study. Follow-up was carried out using a postal questionnaire.

SETTING

One otolaryngologists' office comprising three medical doctors.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 122 consecutive globus patients presenting to one otolaryngology office in a 1-year period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Globus incidence, gender and age distribution, predictors of persisting symptoms and the patient's health-related concerns.

RESULTS

3.8% of first-time visits were regarding globus. The mean age was 48 years [range 20-88 years], and a female predominance was found (ratio 1.49). Eighty-four per cent experienced anxiety, mainly due to fear of cancer. The most common pathological findings were reflux (15.6%) and post-infectious inflammation (10.6%). 21.4% of questionnaire responders reported full remission of their symptoms. Three predictors regarding symptom persistence were identified: male gender (OR 1.52), smoking (OR 3.4) and difficulties in breathing (OR 8.7). Patients with concomitant foreign body sensation were less likely to have persisting symptoms (OR 0.42). No cases of malignant disease were encountered. 94.7% was reassured by the office visit.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of globus is 3.8% in the otolaryngologist's office. Female gender and concomitant foreign body sensation were predictive for presenting to the clinic even if symptom remission had occurred. Male gender, smoking and self-perceived breathing difficulties were predictive for persisting symptoms. Globus is an anxiety-causing symptom, but reassurance is provided by clinical examination by the otolaryngologist.

The complexity of globus: a multidisciplinary perspective

Globus is a topic of interest for many specialties including otorhinolaryngology, gastroenterology and psychiatry/psychosomatic medicine, but, although many hypotheses have been suggested, key questions about its aetiology remain. This Review provides an overview of the extensive literature concerning this topic and discusses the quality of the evidence to date. Globus has been associated with oropharyngeal structural lesions, upper oesophageal sphincter disorders, oesophageal disorders, GERD, psychosocial factors and psychiatric comorbidity. However, findings are often contradictory and the literature remains highly inconclusive. Indeed, with the exception of patients with structural-based globus, the Rome III criteria for functional globus only apply to a subgroup of patients with idiopathic globus. In clinical reality, there exists a group of patients who present with idiopathic (nonstructural) globus, but nevertheless have dysphagia, odynophagia or GERD-exclusion criteria for globus diagnosis according to Rome III. The symptomatology of patients with globus might be broader than previously thought. It is therefore crucial to approach globus not from one single perspective, but from a multifactorial point of view, with focus on the coexistence and/or interactions of different mechanisms in globus pathogenesis. This approach could be translated to clinical practice by adopting a multidisciplinary method to patients presenting with globus.

Association between swallow perception and esophageal bolus clearance in patients with globus sensation

BACKGROUND

Globus sensation is common, but its pathogenesis is not yet clear.

AIMS

Our purpose was to investigate subjective perception of swallowing and esophageal motility by combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry (MII-EM) for patients with globus sensation.

METHODS

Combined MII-EM was performed for 25 globus patients and 15 healthy controls. Swallows were abnormal if hypocontractivity or simultaneous contractions occurred. Esophageal bolus transit was incomplete if bolus exit was not found at one or more of all measurement sites. Perception of each swallow was assessed by use of a standardized scoring system, and was enhanced if the score was >1.

RESULTS

Few globus patients reported enhanced perception during viscous or solid swallows. Incomplete bolus transit and enhanced perception occurred similarly between viscous and solid boluses. Agreement between enhanced perception and proximal bolus clearance was greater during solid swallows (κ = 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.32-0.58) than during viscous swallows (κ = 0.13, 95 % CI: 0-0.25) (P < 0.05). Similarly, agreement between enhanced perception and total bolus clearance was greater during solid swallows (κ = 0.46, 95 % CI: 0.34-0.58) than during viscous swallows (κ = 0.11, 95 % CI: 0-0.22) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced swallow perception is uncommon in patients with globus sensation, although there is a significant association between enhanced esophageal perception and solid bolus clearance. Application of a solid bolus may help better delineation of the interrelationship between the subjective perception of bolus passage and the objective measurement of bolus clearance.

Esophageal motor dysfunction plays a key role in GERD with globus sensation--analysis of factors promoting resistance to PPI therapy

OBJECTIVE

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) also have various extra-esophageal symptoms. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a subtype of GERD associated with globus sensation, but proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy achieves disappointing results. This study investigated esophageal motility in GERD patients with globus sensation who were resistant to PPI therapy.

DESIGN

The subjects were 350 patients with globus sensation. All patients underwent both laryngoscopy and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to exclude organic disease. After 4 weeks of treatment with rabeprazole sodium (20 mg daily), the patients were divided into PPI-responsive and PPI-resistant groups. Then we investigated esophageal motility in the PPI-resistant group by a multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry study.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients (55.6%) were resistant to PPI therapy, among whom 57 patients (47.9%) had abnormal esophageal motility. They included 36 patients (66.4%) with ineffective esophageal motility, 9 patients (14.4%) with achalasia, 6 patients (9.6%) with diffuse esophageal spasm, 5 patients (8%) with nutcracker esophagus, and 1 patient (1.6%) with hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter. There were significant differences of upper esophageal sphincter pressure and esophageal body peristalsis between the patients with PPI-resistant LPRD and healthy controls matched for age and sex.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with PPI-resistant LPRD, 47.9% had abnormal esophageal motility.