The vestibular effects of meclizine hydrochloride-niacin combination (Antivert)

The effects of meclizine on motion sickness revisited

AIMS

Antihistamines make up the first line of treatments against motion-sickness. Still, their efficacy and specific mechanism have come into question. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of meclizine on motion-sensitivity.

METHODS

This study was carried out as a triple-blinded randomized trial involving 12 healthy subjects who were exposed to (i) vestibular (VES), (ii) visual (VIS) and (iii) visual-vestibular (VIS+VES) stimulations in the roll plane. Subjects were divided into 2 groups by stratified randomization, receiving either meclizine or a placebo. Stimulations were carried out before, and after, drug administration, presented at 2 intensity levels of 14 and 28°/s² . Eye movements were tracked, and torsional slow-phase velocities, amplitudes and nystagmus beats were retrieved. Subjects initially graded for their motion-sickness susceptibility.

RESULTS

Susceptibility had no effect on intervention outcome. Despite large variations, repeated ANOVAS showed that meclizine led to a relative increase in torsional velocity compared to placebo during vestibular stimulation for both intensities: 2.36 (7.65) from -0.01 (4.17) during low intensities, and 2.61 (6.67) from -3.49 (4.76) during high. The visual-vestibular stimuli yielded a decrease during low acceleration, -0.40 (3.87) from 3.75 (5.62), but increased during high, 3.88 (6.51) from -3.88 (8.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Meclizine had an inhibitory effect on eye movement reflexes for low accelerations during VIS+VES trials. This indicates that meclizine may not primarily work through sensory-specific mechanisms, but rather on a more central level. Practically, meclizine shows promise in targeting motion-sickness evoked by everyday activities, but its use may be counterproductive in high-acceleration environments.

Effect of the novel histamine H4 receptor antagonist SENS-111 on spontaneous nystagmus in a rat model of acute unilateral vestibular loss

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Histamine H₄ receptors are expressed in the peripheral vestibular system, and their selective inhibition improves vertigo symptoms in rats with unilateral vestibular lesions. The effects of SENS-111, a selective oral H₄ receptor antagonist with high affinity to both animal and human receptors, on vertigo symptoms was evaluated in a translational in vivo model of unilateral vestibular loss.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Pharmacokinetics of SENS-111 in rats was determined to aid dose selection for efficacy testing. Vestibular lesions were induced in rats by unilateral transtympanic injection of kainic acid. The effect of SENS-111 (10 or 20 mg·kg^-1 ) on spontaneous nystagmus was evaluated compared with placebo vehicle using video-nystagmography, and the effective dose was compared with those of similar drugs used clinically, as single agents or combined with SENS-111.

KEY RESULTS

Doses were selected for plasma exposure were consistent with published phase 1 results from healthy volunteers. SENS-111 of 10 mg·kg^-1 gave a 21-22% reduction in nystagmus at 1 hr post-administration, whereas a loss of efficacy was seen with 20 mg·kg^-1 . Compared with SENS-111, meclizine and methylprednisolone had minimal effects on nystagmus as single agents, and meclizine abolished the effect of SENS-111 when combined with SENS-111. All evaluated drugs were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The exposure-efficacy relationship for improved spontaneous nystagmus seen with SENS-111 in this in vivo model is consistent with phase 1 clinical results and provides preclinical support for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and selection of effective clinical drug concentrations.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on New Uses for 21st Century. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v177.3/issuetoc.

Management of peripheral vertigo with antihistamines: New options on the horizon

Vertigo is associated with a wide range of vestibular pathologies. It increasingly affects the elderly, with a high cost to society. Solutions include vestibular suppressants and vestibular rehabilitation, which form the mainstay of therapy. Antihistamines represent the largest class of agents used to combat vestibular vertigo symptoms. Agents targeting the H₁ and H₃ receptors have been in clinical use for several decades as single agents. Nonetheless, effective management of vertigo proves elusive as many treatments largely address only associated symptoms, and with questionable efficacy. Additionally, the primary and limiting side effect of sedation is counterproductive to normal functioning and the natural recovery process occurring via central compensation. To address these issues, the timing of administration of betahistine, the mainstay H₃ antihistamine, can be fine-tuned, while bioavailability is also being improved. Other approaches include antihistamine combination studies, devices, physical therapy and behavioural interventions. Recently demonstrated expression of H₄ receptors in the peripheral vestibular system represents a new potential drug target for treating vestibular disorders. A number of novel selective H₄ antagonists are active in vestibular models in vivo. The preclinical potential of SENS-111 (Seliforant), an oral first-in-class selective H₄ antagonist is the only such molecule to date to be translated into the clinical setting. With an excellent safety profile and notable absence of sedation, encouraging outcomes in an induced vertigo model in healthy volunteers have led to ongoing clinical studies in acute unilateral vestibulopathy, with the hope that H₄ antagonists will offer new effective therapeutic options to patients suffering from vertigo.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the novel H4 receptor inhibitor SENS-111 using a modified caloric test in healthy subjects

AIM

A Phase 1 study was performed to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the selective histamine H₄ receptor antagonist SENS-111, an oral small molecule.

METHODS

One hundred healthy subjects were randomized in a placebo-controlled, double-blind study evaluating single-ascending doses (SAD; 100-500 mg) and multiple-ascending doses (MAD; 50-150 mg day^-1 , 4 days; 200-250 mg day^-1 , 7 days). Effects of SENS-111 on nystagmus and vertigo induced by modified caloric tests were measured in the MAD studies. Population PK and PK/PD models were developed using a nonlinear mixed-effects approach.

RESULTS

SENS-111 was well tolerated with mild to moderate events. No sedation was reported. A maximal tolerated dose was not reached. Dose-proportional increases in concentrations were seen up to 200 mg and more than dose-proportional thereafter, with mean half-life between 24 and 56 h. The caloric test induced mild but measurable vertigo and nystagmus with large intra/inter-individual variation for all parameters. SENS-111 did not significantly impact nystagmus but significantly improved latency of vertigo appearance/disappearance, duration and European Evaluation of Vertigo questionnaire parameters vs. baseline. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption, distribution and elimination best fit the data. PK/PD indirect modelling applied to vertigo duration and latency of appearance indicated maximum activity between 100 and 500 ng ml^-1 plasma concentrations, corresponding to 100 and 200 mg day^-1 , which are appropriate for clinical efficacy evaluations in vestibular diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

SENS-111 is a well-tolerated first-in-class H₄ receptor antagonist with acceptable PK for oral daily dosing. PK/PD modelling determined plasma concentrations and doses for efficacy studies in patients with vertigo symptoms.

The diagnostic value of cerebellar-vestibular tests in detecting learning disabilities, dyslexia, and attention deficit disorder

Neurological and optokinetic measures of cerebellar-vestibular (CV) dysfunctioning were shown to be of significant diagnostic value in differentiating between learning disabled subjects and controls matched for chronological age, sex, handedness, IQ, and background (ns = 35). Although traditionally used electronystagmographic positional and caloric parameters were not similarly discriminating, quantitative measures of vertical nystagmus in various eyes-closed positions appeared to have diagnostic potential and were related significantly to such CV-determined neurological signs as positive monopedal Romberg. As a substantial majority of learning disabled (82.9%) evidenced ADD-like symptoms and since learning disabled subsamples with and without Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) shared similar coexisting symptoms and CV signs, it appeared probable that learning disabilities and ADD were reflections of the same underlying CV determinants.