Incidence of bacteria, L-form and mycoplasma in chronic sinusitis

Nasal Microbiota and Sensitivity Pattern in Rhinosinusitis

Aims

To know the microorganism causing rhinosinusitis & to study the antibiotic sensitivity pattern for the isolated nasal microbiota in this region.

Background

Rhinosinusitis is inflammatory condition of nose and paranasal sinuses [1]. It is multifactorial condition, in which microorganisms play pathogenic role [2]. Interactions between microorganisms, mucosa and environmental changes influence on composition of bacterial ecosystem [2]. Though antibiotics are frequently used for medical management of rhinosinusitis, sensitivity directed antibiotics are rarely prescribed. So, this study is directed to know microbial isolate in rhinosinusitis and its antibiotic sensitivity pattern.

Methodology

in this 6 months prospective study during March to September 2022, done at Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Raichur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raichur; patients attending Otorhinolaryngology outpatient department and diagnosed to have rhinosinusitis were selected. Nasal swabs were collected from the middle meatus by diagnostic nasal endoscopy and were sent for culture and sensitivity. Statistical tests were applied for results(Size = 100).

Results

Out of 100 patients, 52 were males, 48 were females; 88 were adults & 12 were paediatric patients. 59 patients had acute, 32 chronic and 9 had recurrent rhinosinusitis. Most common organisms isolated in acute rhinosinusitis was Klebsiella 28%, Staphylococcus aureus 56% & 66% in chronic & recurrent rhinosinusitis respectively. Klebsiella was sensitive to beta lactams & quinolones, while Staphylococcus aureus was sensitive to beta lactams & cephalosporins.

Conclusion

Increase in antibiotic use has led to antibiotic resistance. Hence judicious, sensitivity directed antibiotic usage reduces the risk of antibiotic resistance and unnecessary use of antibiotics.

Evaluation of the microbiology of chronic ethmoid sinusitis

In a prospective study, patients with the diagnosis of chronic ethmoid sinusitis were evaluated microbiologically by using biopsy specimens of the ethmoid sinus mucosa. Microbiology cultures were performed on 94 specimens from 59 patients. Staphylococcus aureus and members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were the most frequent classical pathogenic bacteria isolated. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most common overall isolates. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were infrequent isolates. No anaerobes, viruses, or Chlamydia trachomatis organisms were identified. Results of this study showed organism isolation frequencies different from those found in other studies of chronic sinusitis reported in the literature. The predominance of S. aureus and members of the family Enterobacteriaceae could have an effect on the antimicrobial therapy for chronic ethmoid sinusitis.

Haemolytic streptococcus infection of chronic maxillary sinusitis. An immunological study using the skin window test

The SWT was performed on 30 patients with chronic haemolytic streptococcus maxillary sinusitis, and 5 controls with no streptococcus in their nose and throat. Foreign and patient's own organism were used as antigen. The lymphoblastic transformation was higher in control streptococcus free patients than in chronic maxillary sinusitis, more when using foreign than patient's own organism. The failure of cellular immune response as a contributory factor to chronicity of maxillary sinusitis is discussed. The possible value of prepared foreign streptococcus vaccine in prevention and treatment is mentioned.

Sinusitis: an improved regime of investigation for the clinical laboratory

Clinical material from 200 patients suffering from acute sinusitis was examined cytologically and bacteriologically. Seventy per cent of specimens were collected by aspiration of the middle meatus, 20% by antral wash, and 10% by direct swabbing of the antra. A comparison of the results from these differing techniques is made. The bacteriological methods used and the isolates and their significance are discussed, and suggestions are offered for improving the routine demonstration of presumptive pathogens in this disease.

The microbiology of paranasal sinus infections: diagnosis and management

Study of the bacteriology of sinusitis and its diagnosis and treatment has been difficult. One problem is the anatomy of the paranasal sinuses; all communicate with a bacteriologically contaminated cavity. Access to all but the frontal sinus involves traversing either the nasal or oral cavity, both of which are teeming with aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. The criteria used to establish the diagnosis of sinusitis has varied widely. There are a number of examination techniques available, but none are foolproof. Therefore, patient populations may not be comparable. The absolute elimination of the possibility of contamination of culture specimens is impossible. Investigators have taken cultures in several ways: of the purulent secretions within the nose, of the contents lavaged from the sinus into the nose, of material aspirated from the sinus, and of tissue removed from the sinus. In most studies prior to 1974, anaerobic cultures were not performed. Studies of various treatment programs have used differing criteria to monitor the progress of treatment. No single method is completely reliable. Clinical signs and symptoms, radiologic appearance, the results of irrigation, and thermography have been used to follow patients. Many studies have used multiple therapeutic maneuvers concurrently, for example, antibiotics, lavage, and a decongestant. In some there were no controls. Because of these problems, as is true in many clinical areas of investigation, meaningful comparisons of various studies are difficult. Despite this, there are some areas of consensus in the literature.