Electrovestibulogram: first results in the guinea pig

Functional and Anatomic Alterations in the Gentamicin-Damaged Vestibular System in the Guinea Pig

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to investigate the expected functional and morphologic effect of gentamicin on the vestibular system simultaneously by measurement of vestibular evoked potentials and electron microscopic evaluation.

BACKGROUND

Vestibular short-latency evoked potentials to linear acceleration have been shown to be a useful parameter of vestibular function. In gentamicin-treated animals, the morphologic damage has been well documented, although this has seldom been quantified.

METHODS

Fifteen guinea pigs were divided into three equal groups. Two groups received different dosages of intramuscular gentamicin for 3 weeks; the third group was the control group. Vestibular short-latency evoked potentials to linear acceleration pulses were measured. After the last gentamicin dose, the utricles were prepared for scanning and transmission electron microscopy. On scanning electron microscopy photographs, the surface area damage ratio of the utricles, a simple method of quantifying gross morphologic damage, was calculated.

RESULTS

The vestibular short-latency evoked potential of gentamicin-treated guinea pigs showed a slow-developing, damaging, dose-response effect on the function of the vestibular system (p = 0.01). Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy showed severe morphologic damage in the sensory hair cells of the utricle. The surface area damage ratio showed a dose-response relationship (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Functional and anatomic alterations in the gentamicin-damaged vestibular system in the guinea pig are related.

Changes in electrovestibular brainstem responses after aminoglycoside intoxication in guinea pigs

OBJECTIVE

To verify the usefulness of short-latency vestibular responses evoked by a combination of round window electrical stimulation and sinusoidal rotation (electrovestibular brainstem responses; EVBRs) as a new monitoring tool of the vestibular function in animal experiments.

METHODS

EVBRs were obtained before, during, and after treatment with aminoglycosides, along with compound action potential (CAP) audiograms. The changes in EVBRs were compared with morphological changes observed by scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

EVBR amplitudes did not change in the group of guinea pigs treated with amikacin, but markedly decreased in the streptomycin and gentamicin- treated groups. CAP audiograms indicated a significant threshold elevation in the amikacin group, a moderate elevation in the gentamicin group, and no change in the streptomycin group. Under scanning electron microscopy, the loss of the sensory hair cells observed in the cristae ampullares was slight to moderate in the amikacin group, moderate to severe in the streptomycin group, and severe in the gentamicin group.

CONCLUSION

EVBRs reflect overall pathological changes undergone by vestibular hair cells, and support the vestibular specificity of EVBRs.

Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea

In the electrical stimulation (ES) of auditory pathways, the type of stimulus and the electrode/tissue interface are critical parameters for the safety and efficacy of the protocol. In this study the influence of alternate pulses, applied between round window and vertex electrodes in chronically implanted guinea pigs, and maintained during 1 and 25 daily periods of 2 h (short-term and long-term experiments, respectively), was investigated. ES consisted of monophasic current pulses of +/- 70 microA and 300 (micro)s in duration at a rate of 167/s, with alternate polarity. Compound Action Potential (CAP) audiograms, amplitudes and latencies of click-evoked CAPs, amplitudes and latencies of electrically-evoked auditory responses (EARs), and electrode impedances, were measured periodically outside or during the ES periods. Short-term ES induced no change in CAP thresholds, amplitude and latency in response to clicks at 80 dB above normal threshold, but induced a slight latency increase and amplitude decrease of the EAR, correlated with an exponential decay of the electrode impedance. On a long-term basis, CAP audiograms and latencies did not change significantly, whereas CAP amplitudes and electrode impedances increased, in correlation with each other. In control guinea pigs receiving no ES, the same CAP amplitude and impedance changes were observed over the same long-term period. The EAR and CAP changes can be explained by a variation of the electrical impedance of the electrode/tissue interface. This is possibly due to a change in electrolytes around the electrode under the influence of the ES for the short-term variation, and to an electrode encapsulation by fibrous tissue independent of the ES for the long-term change. In itself, and under the conditions of this experiment, the ES demonstrated no adverse effects on the auditory function and can be safely used for inner-ear exploration.

Differential sensitivity to rotation measured on potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the guinea-pig ear

Responses to electrical stimulation of the ear applied between round-window and vertex electrodes were recorded in awake guinea-pigs from the same electrodes or from separate vertex/mastoid subdermal needle electrodes. They were averaged during opposite phases of sinusoidal rotation or before and after constant velocity rotation. In both cases the responses were subtracted from each other and yielded differential per- or post-rotatory "electrovestibular" responses. For comparison, responses were also recorded in the same animals and conditions of electrical stimulation during silence and during silence and during presentation of a broad-band noise. The difference yielded "electroacoustic" responses. In round-window records, electrovestibular and electroacoustic responses presented typical compound nerve action potential patterns. Electrovestibular responses could be recorded for head angular velocities as low as 3 degrees sec-1 at 0.1 Hz. Response amplitude showed a logarithmic relation to head velocity. Changes in amplitude, as a function of time after rotation, were comparable to those reported for vestibular nerve fibre responses. In vertex/mastoid records, electroacoustic responses presented a sequence of peaks similar to the click-evoked auditory brain-stem responses, and electrovestibular responses presented two peaks, presumably representing contributions of central vestibular structures. Such "electrovestibulography" permits the study of an individual ear and makes available to the investigator a large range of vestibular stimulation conditions.