The auditory and speech performance of children with intellectual disability after cochlear implantation

Evaluating the long-term outcomes from cochlear implant surgery for children with single and multiple additional needs

Cochlear implant surgery is a cornerstone in the treatment of severe to profound hearing impairment. Despite comprising a significant proportion of the deaf population, children with additional needs have only been included for cochlear implant candidacy in recent years. This paper aims to evaluate the long-term progress of children with additional needs post-implantation compared to children without additional and assess how this trend changes over time.

METHODS

This is a longitudinal cohort study comparing the outcomes between children with no additional needs, children with a single additional need, and children with multiple additional needs. The five outcome measures used assessed both auditory perception and expressive and receptive language. For each outcome measure, subjects were assessed pre implant and one-, three-, and five-years post-implant.

RESULTS

The total cohort consisted of 334 subjects: 181 with no additional needs, 116 with a single additional need, and 37 with multiple additional needs. The results showed that children with additional needs performed significantly poorer in all outcome measures compared to those without additional needs, with a greater negative effect associated with multiple additional needs. In auditory perception, both additional needs groups increased in rate of progress over time, in contrast to language capabilities for which the rate plateaued at a significantly lower level than children without additional needs. Once again, both of these effects were greater for the multiple additional needs group.

CONCLUSION

It is clear that there is reduced progress in children with additional needs compared to those without, and that the number of additional needs present is an important factor in this. Despite initial delays, it seems as though children with additional needs may catch up over time in auditory perception scores, however for language skills, this cohort may achieve limited scores even as time progresses. It is important to investigate this further to gauge the factors that are causing this discrepancy to see if any can be limited to maximise outcome.

Cochlear implantation outcomes in children with multiple disabilities: a topic that's worth revisiting

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits of cochlear implantation in hearing loss children with multiple disabilities (MD) in terms of auditory outcomes, speech performance, and their quality of life.

METHODS

This was a cross sectional study from January 2019 to December 2020 in which thirty-one children with hearing loss and multiple disabilities were evaluated. Their improvement in auditory and speech performances were assessed using Categories of Auditory Performance version II (CAP-II) and the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scales. The assessment was done at 6-month intervals, with the baseline evaluation done at least six months after activation of the implant. Parents were asked to fill the Parents Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) diary and Perceived Benefit Questionnaire (PBQ) to evaluate the child's quality of life.

RESULTS

All 31 children have Global Developmental Delay (GDD), with 11 having an additional disability. Both mean CAP-II and SIR scores showed significant improvement with increased hearing age (p < 0.05) after 6-month intervals. In addition, 20 out of 31 children (64.5%) have achieved verbal communication after implantation. The mean PEACH score in quiet was significantly better than in noise (p = 0.007) and improved with the increased of hearing age. The majority of parents (96%‒100%) perceived a cochlear implant as beneficial to their child in terms of auditory response, awareness, interaction, communication, and speech development.

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear implantation had shown benefits in children with multiple disabilities. Outcome measures should not only focus on auditory and speech performances but the improvement in quality of life. Hence, individualized each case with realistic expectation from families must be emphasized in this group of children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Cochlear Implantation in Children with Additional Disabilities: A Systematic Review

This study examines the last 10 years of medical literature on the benefits of cochlear implantation in children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) with additional disabilities. The most recent literature concerning cochlear implants (CIs) in DHH children with additional disabilities was systematically explored through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from January 2012 to July 2023. Our two-stage search strategy selected a total of 61 articles concerning CI implantation in children with several forms of additional disabilities: autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, visual impairment, motor disorders, developmental delay, genetic syndromes, and intellectual disability. Overall, many children with additional disabilities benefit from CIs by acquiring greater environmental sound awareness. This, in turn, improves non-verbal communication and adaptive skills, with greater possibilities to relate to others and to be connected with the environment. Instead, despite some improvement, expressive language tends to develop more slowly and to a lesser extent compared to children affected by hearing loss only. Further studies are needed to better appreciate the specificities of each single disability and to personalize interventions, not restricting the analysis to auditory and language skills, but rather applying or developing cross-culturally validated instruments able to reliably assess the developmental trajectory and the quality of life of DHH children with additional disabilities before and after CI.

Neurobehavioral effects of general anesthesia and cochlear implantation on hearing-impaired infants: A prospective observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The potential adverse effects of prolonged exposure to anesthetics in pediatric patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss remain unclear. This study aimed to examine whether early bilateral cochlear implantation involving long-duration anesthetic exposure caused greater developmental impairment than that with unilateral cochlear implantation.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included normally developing infants with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss aged 6 months to 2 years who were candidates for unilateral/bilateral cochlear implantation surgery. Baseline (T0), 6-month (T1), and 1-year (T2) Gesell Scale scores were measured. The outcomes included fine motor, adaptability, gross motor, language, and social skills scale 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULT

The 90 enrolled children with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (unilateral n = 43; bilateral n = 47) had a younger bilateral group (11.00 ± 3.66 vs. 15.63 ± 6.99 months, p < .001). Anesthesia duration was longer in the bilateral group (271.57 ± 36.09 vs. 148.81 ± 25.60 min, p < .001). Gross motor, fine motor, adaptability, and language scores improved in both groups, and no significant between-group differences occurred in the fine motor scale at T1 and T2. Language developmental quotients improved significantly in the bilateral group compared with the unilateral group at T1 (mean differences: 25.07 ± 4.37 vs. 10.88 ± 4.61, p < .001) and T2 (mean differences: 34.98 ± 5.94 vs. 15.28 ± 6.55, p < .001). Stepwise regression revealed that gross motor, adaptability, language, and social skill developmental quotients at T1 were positively correlated with those at T0. Gross motor, fine motor, and social skill developmental quotients at T2 were negatively correlated with age at operation. Language developmental quotients were positively correlated with T0 values (p < .001) and in the bilateral group (p < .001) at T1 and T2.

CONCLUSIONS

When evaluating young children with bilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, despite longer exposures to general anesthesia, bilateral cochlear implantations were associated with more improvement in language scores and no differences in other skills compared with those with only unilateral implantation.

Hearables as a gateway to hearing health care: A review

The market for hearing technology is evolving—with the emergence of hearables, it now extends beyond hearing aids and includes any ear-level devices with wireless connectivity (i.e., wireless earbuds). However, will this evolving marketplace bring forth opportunities or challenges to individuals’ hearing health care and the profession of audiology and otolaryngology? The debate has been ongoing. This study explores the wide spectrum of hearables available in the market and discusses the necessity of high-quality clinical evidence prior to the implementation of over-the-counter devices into clinical practice.

A review of the outcomes of children with designated additional needs receiving cochlear implantation for severe to profound hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate one year outcomes of children with additional needs receiving cochlear implantation at the Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service (YAIS) over a ten-year period.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review yielded 270 children who received cochlear implants (CIs) at YAIS between 2007 and 2017; 49 children were classified as having additional needs. Audiological performance scales (Meaningful Auditory Information Scale (MAIS), Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS), Listening in Progress (LIP), Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), and Speech Intelligibility Rating Scale (SIR)) were analysed pre- and 12 months post-implantation. Comparison was made with children without additional needs.

RESULTS

Children with additional needs demonstrated significantly lower pre-implantation audiological performance in MAIS, LIP, and MUSS (P <0.05). Despite showing improvement, children with additional needs consistently achieved lower scores in all metrics at one year (P < 0.05). Similarly, the rate of change was statistically significantly lower in children with additional needs.

CONCLUSION

All children were able to gain access to sound following CI. Improvements were seen in all outcome measures especially in the MAIS, CAP and LIP whereas limited improvement was seen in measures assessing speech production and improvement. The rate of improvement was statistically significantly lower in children with additional needs.

Cognitive improvement after cochlear implantation in deaf children with associated disabilities

AIM

To monitor functional auditory and non-verbal cognitive skills in children with cochlear implants who had associated disabilities over a 24-month period and define how cochlear implantation may impact on non-verbal cognition by restoring functional auditory skills.

METHOD

Sixty-four children with cochlear implants (36 females, 28 males; mean age 4y 3mo, SD 3y 5mo, 9mo-14y 5mo) were recruited and divided into three groups: children with typical development group (TDG); children with associated disabilities not linked to non-verbal cognitive disorders group (ADG1); and children with associated disabilities linked to non-verbal cognitive disorders group (ADG2). Tests of functional auditory, communicative, and non-verbal cognitive skills were performed before cochlear implantation and at 12 and 24 months after cochlear implantation.

RESULTS

Functional auditory and communicative skills improved similarly in the three groups at 12 and 24 months after implantation. An increase in non-verbal cognitive scores was present in children in the ADG2 from baseline to 12 and 24 months (p<0.01), whereas scores remained stable in children in the TDG and ADG1. The increased functional auditory skills scores after cochlear implantation corresponded to an increase in non-verbal cognitive scores (p=0.032) in children in the ADG2.

INTERPRETATION

Children with associated disabilities, especially if linked to non-verbal cognitive disorders, benefitted from cochlear implantation. They improved their comprehension of acoustic information inferred from the environment, improving not only functional auditory skills but also non-verbal cognition.

Developmental delays assessed using the Enjoji Scale in children with cochlear implants who have intellectual disability with or without autism spectrum disorder

OBJECTIVE

Intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are common among children who are candidates for cochlear implants. However, the implications of these comorbidities for cochlear implant placement have been not fully established. This study sought to identify these implications by comparing developmental delays among children with these conditions.

METHODS

Participants were children who were followed up at least every 6 months for 24 months after cochlear implant surgery. Developmental delays were assessed using the Enjoji Scale of Infant Analytical Development (Enjoji Scale) and compared in three groups with hearing loss: those with ID (ID group, n=4); those with ASD and ID (ASD+ID group, n=4); and those with typical development (control group, n=5). Developmental delay was evaluated longitudinally before and after cochlear implant placement for 18 months.

RESULTS

Among the six subscales that make up the Enjoji Scale, language development and intelligence development were significantly delayed in all three groups and were exacerbated over time except for language development in the control group. Emotional development and social behavior were significantly delayed only in the ASD+ID group. Comparison of intergroup differences revealed delays in language development in the ID and ASD+ID groups compared with the control group.

CONCLUSION

The Enjoji Scale successfully demonstrated developmental delays characteristic to the underlying comorbidities of ID with or without ASD in children with cochlear implants. The Enjoji Scale can be a useful diagnostic tool for screening children with cochlear implants for ID with or without ASD.

Bilateral cochlear implantation in a child with Johanson Blizzard Syndrome

Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) occurs in more than 80% of cases of Johanson Blizzard Syndrome (JBS). However, limited knowledge exists in medical literature of cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes in children with JBS. We report the case of a 5 year-old male with JBS and bilateral CI. While minimal progress in spoken language scores was noted after 4 years of bilateral CI use, substantial improvements in discrimination of speech sounds and audibility of spoken language and environmental sounds were documented. Cochlear implantation is an available treatment option of profound SNHL in children with JBS even if spoken language outcomes are marginal.

Cognitive and outcome measures seem suboptimal in children with cochlear implants - a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates whether cognition as a single variable significantly influences the hearing and speech outcomes of children with cochlear implants (CIs). More specifically, it identifies various types of cognitive disorders among children with CI, comparing these children's cognitive abilities to the outcomes of CI in terms of hearing and speech performance.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional cognitive testing of children with CIs.

SETTING

West Danish CI Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight CI children underwent postoperative cognitive evaluation. Cognitive tests included Bayley Scales of Infant Development (Bayley-III), Snijders-Oomen Nonverbal Intelligence Test Revised (SON-R) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV), depending on the age of the child. Outcome measures of hearing and speech capacity after CI consisted of Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) and Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-4 (PPVT-4).

RESULTS

Only PPVT-4 correlated significantly with cognition scores. Over time, the value of CAP and SIR seems limited by a pronounced ceiling effect.

CONCLUSION

The most widely used outcome tests after CI, that is CAP and SIR, may not reflect cognitive disabilities sufficiently due to pronounced ceiling effects. International guidelines suggesting a panel of robust age-matched tests are warranted to optimise rehabilitation programmes as well as the counselling of parents.

Current trends in outcome studies for children with hearing loss and the need to establish a comprehensive framework of measuring outcomes in children with hearing loss in China

Since the 1970s, outcome studies for children with hearing loss expanded from focusing on assessing auditory awareness and speech perception skills to evaluating language and speech development. Since the early 2000s, the multi-center large scale research systematically studied outcomes in the areas of auditory awareness, speech-perception, language development, speech development, educational achievements, cognitive development, and psychosocial development. These studies advocated the establishment of baseline and regular follow-up evaluations with a comprehensive framework centered on language development. Recent research interests also include understanding the vast differences in outcomes for children with hearing loss, understanding the relationships between neurocognitive development and language acquisition in children with hearing loss, and using outcome studies to guide evidence-based clinical practice. After the establishment of standardized Mandarin language assessments, outcomes research in Mainland China has the potential to expand beyond auditory awareness and speech perception studies.

Complexity: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experiences of mothers of deaf children with cochlear implants and autism

The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of parenting a child with a dual diagnosis of childhood deafness and autism spectrum disorder who underwent cochlear implantation. Experiences of these parents are rarely discussed within the literature. Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis was used to examine nine mothers of boys (4–9 years old) for understanding their parenting experiences. Three superordinate themes were identified: complexity, personal and family sacrifices and parent–professional partnerships. These themes provide a rich account of mothers’ interpretations of their experiences, and reflect the numerous challenges they face. This study helps expand the literature on cochlear implantation for children with autism spectrum disorder, and discusses implications for clinical and educational practice.

Comparison of Auditory Perception in Cochlear Implanted Children with and without Additional Disabilities

BACKGROUND

The number of children with cochlear implants who have other difficulties such as attention deficiency and cerebral palsy has increased dramatically. Despite the need for information on the results of cochlear implantation in this group, the available literature is extremely limited. We, therefore, sought to compare the levels of auditory perception in children with cochlear implants with and without additional disabilities.

METHODS

A spondee test comprising 20 two-syllable words was performed. The data analysis was done using SPSS, version 19.

RESULTS

Thirty-one children who had received cochlear implants 2 years previously and were at an average age of 7.5 years were compared via the spondee test. From the 31 children, 15 had one or more additional disabilities. The data analysis indicated that the mean score of auditory perception in this group was approximately 30 scores below that of the children with cochlear implants who had no additional disabilities.

CONCLUSION

Although there was an improvement in the auditory perception of all the children with cochlear implants, there was a noticeable difference in the level of auditory perception between those with and without additional disabilities. Deafness and additional disabilities depended the children on lip reading alongside the auditory ways of communication. In addition, the level of auditory perception in the children with cochlear implants who had more than one additional disability was significantly less than that of the other children with cochlear implants who had one additional disability.

Social skills and developmental delay: importance in predicting the auditory and speech outcomes after cochlear implantation in children

CONCLUSION

Preoperative evaluation of social interaction and global development levels using the Vineland Social Maturity Scale (VSMS) and Bayley Scales of Infant Development-2nd edition (BSID-II) may be beneficial in predicting the postoperative outcome in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. In particular, cautious preoperative counseling regarding the poor postoperative prognosis may be necessary in children with low social skills and developmental status.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical benefit of preoperative evaluation of social interaction and global development levels using VSMS and BSID-II in predicting the postoperative outcome in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.

PATIENTS

A total of 65 deaf children who underwent cochlear implantation (CI) were included in this study. Age at the time of implantation ranged from 12 to 76 months. All of the children underwent a comprehensive preimplant psychological assessment by a clinical psychologist. The VSMS and BSID-II were used for evaluating social skills and a child's development preoperatively. A social quotient (SQ) was calculated by using the VSMS for each subject using the following formula: (social age/chronological age) × 100. The auditory perception and speech production abilities were evaluated using the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) scale and the Korean version of the Ling's stage (K-Ling), respectively, at 1 year after CI. The associations between the preoperative SQ/developmental levels and the postoperative auditory/speech outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean SQ was significantly decreased in the enrolled children (90.6 ± 26.1). The improvement in CAP score at 1 year after CI was correlated with preoperative SQ. The improvements in phonemic and phonologic levels of K-Ling were correlated with preoperative VSMS and BSID-II scores.