Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs)--20 years of clinical experience in Uppsala, Sweden

Long-term analysis of ABI auditory performance in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis

PURPOSE

This retrospective monocentric study aimed to evaluate long-term auditory brainstem implant (ABI) function in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2, and to investigate the prognostic factors for ABI use.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2022, 27 patients with at least five years of follow-up underwent implantation with 32 ABIs. At 1- and 5-years post-implantation and at last follow-up, ABIs were classified as used or non-used and the size of the ipsilateral tumor was recorded. For patients who used their ABIs, we assessed speech perception (disyllabic words, MBAA sentences) in quiet conditions with the ABI only, by lip-reading (LR), and with a combination of the two (ABI + LR). Hearing improvement was calculated as Δ ABI = (ABI + LR)-LR scores. Predictive factors for ABI use were analyzed.

RESULTS

One year post-implantation, 74% patients were ABI-users and 66% of the ABIs were used. Two of these patients were non-users at five years, and another two at last follow-up (14 ± 5.2 years); 54% of the patients were ABI-users at last follow-up. Δ ABI revealed a hearing improvement of 32-41% (disyllabic words) and 28-37% (MBAA sentences). Among 16 ABIs with at least LR improvement at 1-year post-implantation, 4 decreased their performance, coinciding with a large growing ipsilateral tumor in 3/4 ABIs. We identified no significant prognostic factors for ABI use.

CONCLUSIONS

ABIs are indicated in case of bilateral deafness with a non-functional cochlear nerve. Half the patients with ABIs used their implants and auditory performance remained stable over time, except in cases of ipsilateral tumor growth.

Auditory Brainstem Implant Outcomes in Tumor and Nontumor Patients: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the differences in auditory performance between auditory brainstem implant (ABI) patients with tumor or nontumor etiologies.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection from 1990 to 2021.

REVIEW METHODS

We included published studies with 5 or more pediatric or adult ABI users. Auditory outcomes and side effects were analyzed with weighted means for closed-set, open-set speech, and categories of auditory performance (CAP) scores. Overall performance was compared using an Adult Pediatric Ranked Order Speech Perception (APROSPER) scale created for this study.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies were included and underwent full-text review. Data were extracted for 662 tumor and 267 nontumor patients. 83% were postlingually deafened and 17% were prelingually deafened. Studies that included tumor ABI patients had a weighted mean speech recognition of 39.2% (range: 19.6%-83.3%) for closed-set words, 23.4% (range: 17.2%-37.5%) for open-set words, 21.5% (range: 2.7%-48.4%) for open-set sentences, and 3.1 (range: 1.0-3.2) for CAP scores. Studies including nontumor ABI patients had a weighted mean speech recognition of 79.8% (range: 31.7%-84.4%) for closed-set words, 53.0% (range: 14.6%-72.5%) for open-set sentences, and 2.30 (range: 2.0-4.7) for CAP scores. Mean APROSPER results indicate better auditory performance among nontumor versus tumor patients (3.5 vs 3.0, P = .04). Differences in most common side effects were also observed between tumor and nontumor ABI patients.

CONCLUSION

Auditory performance is similar for tumor and nontumor patients for standardized auditory test scores. However, the APROSPER scale demonstrates better ABI performance for nontumor compared to tumor patients.

Auditory brainstem implants for hearing rehabilitation in NF2-schwannomatosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

NF2-schwannomatosis (NF2) is an autosomal dominant disorder prone to hearing loss. Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) offer a promising solution for hearing rehabilitation in NF2.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize existing literature on ABI implantation in NF2, focusing on audiological outcomes and ABI-related complications.

METHODS

The systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022362155). Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CMB, and CNKI from inception to August 2023. Data on environmental sound discrimination, open-set discrimination, closed-set discrimination, and ABI-related complications were extracted and subjected to meta-analysis. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included. The pooled estimate was 58% (95% CI 49-66%) for environmental sound discrimination and 55% (95% CI 40-69%) for closed-set discrimination. Regarding open-set discrimination, the pooled estimates were 30% (95% CI 19-42%) for sound only, 46% (95% CI 37-54%) for lip-reading only, and 63% (95% CI 55-70%) for sound plus lip-reading. The pooled occurrence of ABI-related complications was 33% (95% CI 15-52%).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis underscores the effectiveness and safety of ABIs in NF2, providing valuable insights for evidence-based decision-making and hearing rehabilitation strategies.

Surgical anatomy of lateral recess in paediatric auditory brainstem implant patients and its clinical correlates including grades of flocculus

INTRODUCTION

Auditory brainstem implant (ABI), a standard technique in treatment of profound sensorineural hearing loss in patients with neurofibromatosis 2, is now being increasingly employed in children with congenital bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, as in Michele's deformity. A detailed knowledge of the relevant surgical anatomy of the lateral recess and its anatomical landmarks including the flocculus, the choroid plexus and the root entry zones of facial-vestibulocochlear and glossopharyngeal-vagus nerve complexes and their anatomical variants is mandatory, as it is the conduit for electrode array placement. The placement of electrode may be eased or impeded by these variations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two children with congenital bilateral hearing loss underwent surgery through retromastoid suboccipital approach for placement of auditory brainstem implant. The preoperative anatomy was reviewed in detail during procedure and again later in the operative videos.

RESULTS

The flocculus was classified into four grades based on its anatomy and relations. Among these, grade II (11 children) was the commonest while grade IV (five children) was least common. Choroid plexus was variable in size across grades of flocculus. Difficulty in defining the anatomy was significantly more (p value = 0.003) in the group with higher grade flocculus (grade III and IV) than in lower grade flocculus (grade I and II).

CONCLUSION

The flocculus in these patients is classifiable into one of the four grades and the surgical nuances such as difficulty in defining the anatomy for placement of ABI are dependent on the characteristics exhibited by the floccular anatomy and relations.

Auditory brainstem implant in postmeningitis totally ossified cochleae

INTRODUCTION

An auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is an option for auditory rehabilitation in patients with totally ossified cochleae who cannot receive a conventional cochlear implant.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes in audiometry and speech perception tests after the implantation of an ABI via the extended retrolabyrinthine approach in patients with postmeningitis hearing loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients, including children and adults, with postmeningitis hearing loss and bilateral totally ossified cochleae received an ABI in a tertiary center from 2009 to 2015. The extended retrolabyrinthine approach was performed in all the patients by the same surgeons. A statistical analysis compared pure tonal averages and speech perception tests before and at least 12 months after the ABI activation.

RESULTS

Eight patients (80%) showed improvements in tonal audiometry and the word and vowel perception tests after an average follow-up of 3.3 years. Two patients recognized up to 40% of the closed-set sentences without lip-reading. Two patients had no auditory response.

CONCLUSIONS

The ABI improved hearing performance in audiometry and speech perception tests in cases of postmeningitis hearing loss. The extended retrolabyrinthine approach is a safe surgical option for patients with postmeningitis hearing loss and bilateral totally ossified cochleae.

Favorable Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Safety of Auditory Brainstem Implants in Nontumor Patients

BACKGROUND

Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) were designed to restore hearing in deaf patients with auditory tumors or those unable to receive cochlear implants. Although ABIs may help some patients, their long-term outcomes have been rarely studied.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term benefits and safety of ABIs in nontumor patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the histories of 15 deaf patients (8 females, 7 males; mean age, 15.5 yr; range, 1-56 yr) who received ABIs for treatment of SNHL at our hospital from July 2008 to November 2015. These included 11 children with narrow internal auditory canals and 4 deaf adults with severe cochlear ossification. In each patient, a 12-channel ABI electrode was placed in the cochlear nucleus complex via a retrosigmoid approach. Auditory performance was evaluated using the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) index and sound detection and word identification tests.

RESULTS

One year after ABI placement, 13 of 15 patients showed adequate or significantly improved auditory function based on the CAP scores at the last follow-up. Generally, adult patients tended to show better CAP scores (3.50) than pediatric patients (2.15), but the difference was not significant (P = .058). Postoperative complications included electrode migration, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, nonauditory stimulation, and minor seizures without severe sequelae or mortality.

CONCLUSION

ABIs show favorable functional outcomes and long-term safety in nontumor deaf patients with limited treatment options. Collectively, our data indicate that ABIs represent an important treatment option for SNHL.

Auditory brainstem implant program development

OBJECTIVE

Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs), which have previously been used to restore auditory perception to deaf patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), are now being utilized in other situations, including treatment of congenitally deaf children with cochlear malformations or cochlear nerve deficiencies. Concurrent with this expansion of indications, the number of centers placing and expressing interest in placing ABIs has proliferated. Because ABI placement involves posterior fossa craniotomy in order to access the site of implantation on the cochlear nucleus complex of the brainstem and is not without significant risk, we aim to highlight issues important in developing and maintaining successful ABI programs that would be in the best interests of patients.

DATA SOURCES

Especially with pediatric patients, the ultimate benefits of implantation will be known only after years of growth and development. These benefits have yet to be fully elucidated and continue to be an area of controversy. The limited number of publications in this area were reviewed.

REVIEW METHODS

Review of the current literature was performed.

RESULTS

Disease processes, risk/benefit analyses, degrees of evidence, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals differ among various categories of patients in whom auditory brainstem implantation could be considered for use.

CONCLUSION

We suggest sets of criteria necessary for the development of successful and sustaining ABI programs, including programs for NF2 patients, postlingually deafened adult nonneurofibromatosis type 2 patients, and congenitally deaf pediatric patients. Laryngoscope, 127:1909-1915, 2017.

Auditory brainstem implantation: anatomy and approaches

BACKGROUND

Auditory brainstem implantation at the cochlear nuclei used mainly for neurofibromatosis type 2 patients with bilateral loss of the cochlear nerves has more recently been extended to the inferior colliculus.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the microsurgical and endoscopic anatomy of the cochlear nuclei and inferior colliculus as seen through the translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approaches used for cochlear nuclei and inferior collicular implantation.

METHODS

Ten cerebellopontine angles of formalin-fixed adult cadaveric heads were examined with the aid of the surgical microscope and endoscope. The ascending auditory pathways between the cochlear nuclei and inferior colliculi and above were examined by the fiber dissection technique.

RESULTS

Both the translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid routes provide sufficient exposure for concurrent tumor removal and implantation at either the cochlear nuclei or inferior colliculus. The position of the inferior colliculus in the auditory pathways and its accessibility in the infratentorial supracerebellar exposure directed through either the translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid approach makes it an alternative site for electrode placement if the cochlear nuclei are not functionally or structurally suitable for implantation. Endoscopic assistance may aid the exposure and electrode placement at either site.

CONCLUSION

The translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid approaches provide access to the cochlear nuclei for implantation and also to the inferior colliculus through the translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid infratentorial supracerebellar route. The endoscope may aid in exposing either site.

Self-reported benefit, sound perception, and quality-of-life in patients with auditory brainstem implants (ABIs)

CONCLUSION

The majority of the patients used their auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) all the time, reporting that he/she would make the decision to receive an implant again if the decision were reconsidered. The findings support that the ABI is a valuable treatment in patients with type 2 neurofibromatosis (NF2) and in children with congenital inner ear and nerve anomalies or cochlear ossification.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the patients who underwent ABI implantation in Uppsala during 1993-2013. This study analyzed patients' implant use, perception of environmental sounds, perceived benefit from the implant, and quality-of-life (QoL).

METHOD

The NF2-patients (n = 20) comprised the majority of the patients, and there were a few non-NF2 pediatric patients (n = 4). The exclusion criteria included deceased patients (n = 4) and patients with no hearing sensations from the implant, or those with an inactivated ABI (n = 2). The data were collected from a questionnaire survey.

RESULTS

Eleven adult patients and two pediatric patients answered the questionnaires. Eight of the adult patients used their implants 'always'. The two children always used their implants. Hearing problems had the largest negative effect on the QoL. The non-users and the users scored equally on the NFTI-QoL.

Systematic Review of Nontumor Pediatric Auditory Brainstem Implant Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) was initially developed for patients with deafness as a result of neurofibromatosis type 2. ABI indications have recently extended to children with congenital deafness who are not cochlear implant candidates. Few multi-institutional outcome data exist. Herein, we aim to provide a systematic review of outcomes following implantation of the ABI in pediatric patients with nontumor diagnosis, with a focus on audiometric outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review of literature was performed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) recommendations. Variables assessed included age at implantation, diagnosis, medical history, cochlear implant history, radiographic findings, ABI device implanted, surgical approach, complications, side effects, and auditory outcomes.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 304 articles; 21 met inclusion criteria for a total of 162 children. The majority of these patients had cochlear nerve aplasia (63.6%, 103 of 162). Cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred in up to 8.5% of cases. Audiometric outcomes improved over time. After 5 years, almost 50% of patients reached Categories of Auditory Performance scores >4; however, patients with nonauditory disabilities did not demonstrate a similar increase in scores.

CONCLUSION

ABI surgery is a reasonable option for the habilitation of deaf children who are not cochlear implant candidates. Although improvement in Categories of Auditory Performance scores was seen across studies, pediatric ABI users with nonauditory disabilities have inferior audiometric outcomes.

Ipsilateral cochlear implantation in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma in the only or best hearing ear and in patients with NF2

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cochlear implant (CI) performances in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients with bilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS) and in patients with sporadic VS in the only or better hearing ear. All patients with bilateral VS or sporadic VS in the only or better hearing ear who underwent cochlear implantation, either simultaneous to VS surgery or staged after treatment for VS, in the tumor side were chosen for the study. Postimplantation audiometric scores (sound detection, closed-set and open-set discrimination scores) and device use patterns were the main outcome measures. 15 patients were implanted. Eight patients (53 %) were NF2 and seven patients had VS in the only or better hearing ear. One patient was explanted for cerebrospinal fluid leak. In the CI-only condition, the other 14 patients obtained sound detection, 64 % of them achieving open-set discrimination (mean 70 ± 38 %) and 85 % achieving closed-set discrimination (mean 41 ± 33 %). At the last follow-up 10 patients (67 %) were using the CI. Cochlear implantation provides hearing in particular cases of patients with bilateral VS or VS in the only or better hearing ear. As long as anatomic preservation of the cochlear nerve is achieved, cochlear implantation may offer improvement in communication skills for most patients.