The effect of jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence on hearing and balance

Prevalence of Cochlear-Facial and Other Non-Superior Semicircular Canal Third Window Dehiscence on High-Resolution Temporal Bone CT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The radiologic prevalence of superior semicircular canal dehiscence in the asymptomatic population has been widely studied, but less is known about the rates of other forms of third window dehiscence. Per the existing literature, the radiologic prevalence of cochlear-facial nerve dehiscence, for example, exceeds that seen in histologic studies, suggesting that conventional CT is unreliable for cochlear-facial dehiscence. These studies relied on nonisometric CT acquisitions, however, and underused multiplanar reformatting techniques, leading to false-positive findings. Our purpose was to determine the rate of cochlear-facial dehiscence and other non-superior semicircular canal third window dehiscences on optimized CT in asymptomatic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-four-channel temporal bone CT scans from 602 patients in emergency departments were assessed for cochlear-facial and other non-superior semicircular canal third window dehiscences by using high-resolution, multiplanar oblique reformats. Confidence intervals for dehiscence prevalence were calculated using the Newcombe 95% interval confidence method.

RESULTS

Of 602 patients, 500 were asymptomatic, while 102 had an imaging indication consistent with possible third window syndrome (symptomatic). Eight asymptomatic patients (1.6%) had cochlear-facial dehiscence, while 43 (8.4%) had jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence. There was no statistically significant difference between the prevalence of cochlear-facial dehiscence or jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence in asymptomatic patients compared with symptomatic patients. Cochlear-carotid canal, cochlear-internal auditory canal, and cochlear-petrosal sinus dehiscences were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Sixty-four-channel CT with multioblique reformatting is sensitive and specific for identifying cochlear-facial dehiscence, with rates similar to those in postmortem series. Jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence is a common incidental finding and is unlikely to produce third window physiology. Other non-superior semicircular canal third window dehiscences are rare in asymptomatic patients.

Comparison of radiological abnormalities between the jugular bulb and the vestibular aqueduct in patients with Ménière's disease

Objective

Anatomical variations of the inner ear may contribute to the development of Ménière's disease (MD), which is a complex inner ear disorder histopathologically characterized by idiopathic endolymphatic hydrops (ELH). Abnormalities of the vestibular aqueduct (VA) and the jugular bulb (JB) have been suggested as predisposing factors. Yet, few studies have investigated the correlation between JB abnormalities and VA variations as well as its clinical relevance in these patients. In this retrospective study, we investigated the differences in the incidence of radiological abnormalities of the VA and JB in patients with definite MD.

Methods

Anatomical variations of JB and VA were evaluated based on high-resolution CT (HRCT) in a series of 103 patients with MD (93 unilateral cases and 10 bilateral cases). JB-related indices included JB anteroposterior and mediolateral diameter, JB height, JB type regarding to Manjila classification system, and incidences of JB diverticulum (JBD), JB related inner ear dehiscence (JBID), and inner ear adjacent JB (IAJB). VA-related indices included CT-VA visibility, CT-VA morphology (funnel, tubular, filiform, hollow, and obliterated-shaped type), and peri-VA pneumatization. Radiological indices were compared between MD ears and control ears.

Results

Radiological JB abnormalities were comparable between MD ears and control ears. As for VA-related indices, the CT-VA visibility was lower in MD ears than in control ears (p = 0.004). The distribution of CT-VA morphology was significantly different between MD and control ears (p = 0.013), with a higher proportion of obliterated-shaped type in MD ears (22.1%) than in control ears (6.6%).

Conclusion

Compared with JB abnormalities, the anatomical variations of VA are more likely to be an anatomically predisposing factor for MD.

Classifying the Large Vestibular Aqueduct: Morphometry to Audiometry

OBJECTIVE

Large vestibular aqueduct (LVA) is the most common inner ear dysplasia identified in patients with hearing loss. Our objective was to systematically quantify LVA morphologies and correlate imaging findings with established audiometric outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients with large vestibular aqueduct identified radiographically, with or without hearing loss.

INTERVENTIONS

Diagnostic only.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Vestibular aqueduct (VA) width at midpoint, width at external aperture, and length were measured on cross-sectional imaging. Morphology was classified as type I (borderline), type II (tubular), or type III (funneled). Audiometric endpoints included air/bone conduction, pure tone averages, and air-bone gaps at 250 and 500 Hz. Statistical associations were evaluated using linear regression models, adjusted for age at first audiogram and sex.

RESULTS

One hundred seventeen patients (197 ears) were included, with mean age at first audiogram of 22.2 years (standard deviation, 21.7 yr). Imaging features associated with poor audiometric outcomes were increasing VA width at midpoint and external aperture, decreasing VA length, dilated extraosseous endolymphatic sac, cochleovestibular malformations, and increasing VA type (III > II > I).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative LVA measurements and a standardized morphologic classification system aid in prediction of early audiometric endpoints.

Prevalence of otic capsule dehiscence in temporal bone computed tomography scan

PURPOSE

To investigate the radiologic prevalence of otic capsule dehiscence in temporal bone computed tomography (CT) scan.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. The temporal bone CT scans of the patients presenting to a tertiary center were evaluated for possible dehiscence in any part of the otic capsule; then, all of the dehiscence were confirmed by a trained academic radiologist. For each type of otic capsule dehiscence, at least three planes were used with a specific type of reconstruction. When a dehiscence was present in at least two consecutive images in all planes, it was considered as a true dehiscence.

RESULTS

Six hundred patients (mean age: 40 ± 18.1 years) were enrolled. The prevalence of superior and posterior semicircular canal dehiscence was 6.0% and 2.7%, respectively. The prevalence of cochlear-facial dehiscence, cochlear-internal auditory canal dehiscence, and cochlear-carotid dehiscence was 6.3%, 0.7%, and 0.7%, respectively. The prevalence of vestibular aqueduct-jugular bulb dehiscence was 6.3% and the prevalence of posterior semicircular canal-jugular bulb dehiscence was 0.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering different types of otic capsule dehiscence described, care should be taken in patients with vestibular and auditory signs and symptoms to diagnose these dehiscences.

High jugular bulb with a diverticulum and vestibular aqueduct dehiscence: an anatomical variant to be aware in patients with hearing loss

PURPOSE

To describe an anatomical variant that should be consider in patients with hearing loss.

METHODS

An 8-year-old girl underwent to temporal bone computed tomography for the evaluation of bilateral conductive hearing loss and further assessment of possible enlarged vestibular aqueduct or high jugular bulb on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

CT of temporal bone showed a cystic cavity with bony sclerotic margins extending from the right jugular foramen to the vestibular aqueduct. Bony dehiscence of the jugular foramen with the right carotid canal was also noted. On brain MRI, there was no evidence of enlargement of the endolymphatic duct and sac on T2 thin-section gradient echo sequence. Time of flight MR angiography did not show arterial flow in the cavity. Contrast enhanced MR venography confirmed the presence of a high right jugular bulb with a diverticulum extending into the vestibular aqueduct due to jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of high jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence is important in the assessment of patients with otologic symptoms such as vertigo, tinnitus and hearing loss.

Radiological, clinical and audiological evaluation of jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence (JBVAD) in patients undergoing temporal bone multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and assess the relationship between JBVAD and hearing loss with the findings of audiometry.

METHODS

About 1503 temporal bone MDCT scans were evaluated for the prevalence of JBVAD. Correlation of the imaging findings and audiometric data was performed. Patients were divided into two groups, those with and those without hearing loss, and were statistically compared.

RESULTS

Jugular bulb-vestibular aqueduct dehiscence was detected in 124 of the 1503 patients with a prevalence of 8.2%. MDCT images of 56 of the 124 patients were normal except for JBVAD (n = 38) and close proximity of the jugular bulb (JB) and vestibular aqueduct (VA) (n = 18). A total of 23 of 38 patients with JBVAD and 7 of 18 patients with close proximity of the JB and VA had hearing loss detected by audiometric evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common hearing loss was detected as sensorineural hearing loss in patients with JBVAD. Also, median air and bone conduction and air bone gap values were found statistically higher in patients with hearing loss versus those without hearing loss.