New computerized Finnish speech in noise test and binaural hearing

Evaluating Spatial Hearing Using a Dual-Task Approach in a Virtual-Acoustics Environment

Spatial hearing is critical for communication in everyday sound-rich environments. It is important to gain an understanding of how well users of bilateral hearing devices function in these conditions. The purpose of this work was to evaluate a Virtual Acoustics (VA) version of the Spatial Speech in Noise (SSiN) test, the SSiN-VA. This implementation uses relatively inexpensive equipment and can be performed outside the clinic, allowing for regular monitoring of spatial-hearing performance. The SSiN-VA simultaneously assesses speech discrimination and relative localization with changing source locations in the presence of noise. The use of simultaneous tasks increases the cognitive load to better represent the difficulties faced by listeners in noisy real-world environments. Current clinical assessments may require costly equipment which has a large footprint. Consequently, spatial-hearing assessments may not be conducted at all. Additionally, as patients take greater control of their healthcare outcomes and a greater number of clinical appointments are conducted remotely, outcome measures that allow patients to carry out assessments at home are becoming more relevant. The SSiN-VA was implemented using the 3D Tune-In Toolkit, simulating seven loudspeaker locations spaced at 30° intervals with azimuths between -90° and +90°, and rendered for headphone playback using the binaural spatialization technique. Twelve normal-hearing participants were assessed to evaluate if SSiN-VA produced patterns of responses for relative localization and speech discrimination as a function of azimuth similar to those previously obtained using loudspeaker arrays. Additionally, the effect of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the direction of the shift from target to reference, and the target phonetic contrast on performance were investigated. SSiN-VA led to similar patterns of performance as a function of spatial location compared to loudspeaker setups for both relative localization and speech discrimination. Performance for relative localization was significantly better at the highest SNR than at the lowest SNR tested, and a target shift to the right was associated with an increased likelihood of a correct response. For word discrimination, there was an interaction between SNR and word group. Overall, these outcomes support the use of virtual audio for speech discrimination and relative localization testing in noise.

Speech recognition in background noise: monaural versus binaural listening conditions in normal-hearing patients

HYPOTHESIS

Patients with unilateral conductive hearing impairment often experience a great advantage in improved hearing thresholds after reconstructive ear surgery because the binaural hearing leads to increased speech recognition in competing noise. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical audiometric test to quantify the ability of speech recognition in background noise preoperatively and postoperatively.

METHODS

A model consisting of phonetically balanced (PB) monosyllabic words and/or a just-follow-conversation test (JFC) was used in 16 normal-hearing listeners. In 8 of the participants, JFC at two levels of background noise (60 and 40 dB sound pressure level) was used as the only method. The tasks were performed in an anechoic chamber with varying spatial separations of speech and noise sources under free field conditions. The tests were made binaurally and monaurally; the latter condition was achieved by occluding one ear with a hearing protector. In PB word tests, the percent of correctly repeated words was scored. In the JFC task, the speech signal was adjusted by the listener to a level where he or she could just understand what was being said. This was expressed as a signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio.

RESULTS

In both types of tests, the subjects achieved significantly better speech recognition scores in the binaural situations. In summary, compared with monaural conditions, the subjects achieved 17% to 18% better speech recognition in PB tests, and in JFC tests a 2-to 3-dB lower S/N ratio in binaural conditions.

CONCLUSION

These free field tests can be developed further as a clinical tool preoperatively and postoperatively to evaluate the effect of binaural hearing after ear surgery.