New Trends in the Science of Botulinum Toxin-A as Applied in Dystonia

AbobotulinumtoxinA provides flexibility for the treatment of cervical dystonia with 500 U/1 mL and 500 U/2 mL dilutions

INTRODUCTION

Cervical dystonia (CD) is a neurologic movement disorder with potentially disabling effects and significant impact on quality of life of those affected. AbobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) was initially approved for a dilution of 500 U/1 mL and subsequently for a dilution of 500 U/2 mL, providing flexibility for clinicians to treat CD. Here, we explore the safety and efficacy of the 500 U/2 mL dilution versus 500 U/1 mL dilution of aboBoNT-A in a retrospective analysis based on published clinical trial data.

METHODS

The safety and efficacy of aboBoNT-A in patients with CD was evaluated in three multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and open-label extensions. Trials 1 (NCT00257660) and 2 (NCT00288509) evaluated the 500 U/1 mL dilution in 80 and 116 patients, respectively; Trial 3 (NCT01753310) evaluated the 500 U/2 mL dilution in 125 patients.

RESULTS

Comparison of the adjusted mean difference in TWSTRS total scores at Week 4 from baseline for aboBoNT-A in Trial 1 (-6.0; 95% CI, -10.8, -1.3), Trial 2 (-8.8; 95% CI, -12.9, -4.7), and Trial 3 (-8.7; 95% CI, -13.2, -4.2) showed similar, significant improvements. Dysphagia and muscle weakness patterns were comparable across the three trials, indicating that an increased dilution of aboBoNT-A does not result in an increased risk of diffusion-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The results of these trials show that aboBoNT-A is similarly efficacious using either dilution, with similar safety and tolerability across trials. Having the 500 U/1 mL and 500 U/2 mL dilution volumes available provides further flexibility in administration, benefiting patient care.

Spasticity and Range of Motion Over Time in Stroke Patients Who Received Multiple-Dose Botulinum Toxin Therapy

OBJECTIVE

This study examined how the effects of botulinum toxin therapy changed over time by sequential evaluation of clinical improvements in spasticity and contracture in 24 chronic-stage stroke patients on repeated botulinum toxin therapy who were receiving fewer rehabilitation interventions.

METHODS

Botulinum toxin injection was administered into the spastic muscle of the paralyzed upper or lower limb 5 times with at least 3-month intervals. Modified Ashworth Scale and range of motion were measured before and 2 weeks after each dose in the extremities to compare the first measurement value with subsequent values. Each predose value was also compared with the first predose value.

RESULTS

Compared with predose scores, Modified Ashworth Scale significantly improved in all flexors after 2 weeks from the first to fifth doses. Range of motion significantly improved in wrist dorsiflexion and ankle dorsiflexion. Comparison of values before each dose versus the first predose value showed significant improvement both in the Modified Ashworth Scale score of wrist flexors, finger flexors, and ankle planter flexors, and the range of motion of elbow extension, wrist dorsiflexion, and ankle dorsiflexion.

CONCLUSION

The comparison of predose values versus 2-week postdose values indicated that the effect of botulinum toxin formulation would not lessen after repeated injections with continuous improvements of Modified Ashworth Scale and range of motion. The comparison of predose values versus the first predose value also suggested that multiple injections of botulinum toxin formulation could be more effective in reducing spasticity and increasing the range of motion than a single injection.

Spectrum of practice in the routine management of cervical dystonia with abobotulinumtoxinA: findings from three prospective open-label observational studies

Background

Cervical dystonia is a heterogeneous disorder with several possible presentations, for which first-line therapy is often botulinum toxin (BoNT). In routine clinical practice the success of each BoNT injection is dependent on several variables, including individual presentation and injection technique. Large multicenter, observational studies provide important information on individualized administration strategies that cannot be otherwise ascertained from controlled clinical trials. In this meta-analysis of patient level data, we aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with cervical dystonia undergoing routine treatment with botulinum toxin, specifically abobotulinumtoxinA. We also aimed to characterize current abobotulinumtoxinA injection techniques and parameters and to explore international differences in patient presentation and treatment.

Methods

This was a meta-analysis of baseline data from three prospective, international, multicenter, observational studies (NCT01314365, NCT00833196 and NCT01753349) of botulinum toxin treatment for the routine management of adult cervical dystonia.

Results

Data presented illustrate the significant heterogeneity of CD presentation in routine practice. Most subjects presented with a complex pattern of dystonic movements and the majority had additional components of shoulder elevation, tremor and/or jerk. Dosing was generally in accordance with that recommended in the abobotulinumtoxinA prescribing information, although the range of dosing also indicates that injections are tailored to individual presentation. Sub-group analyses at the country level revealed distinct differences in injection practice.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis is based on the largest dataset of subjects with cervical dystonia studied to date. The heterogeneity revealed in our baseline findings support the need to develop consistent, practical and comprehensive best practice guidelines.

A simple, rapid and sensitive FRET assay for botulinum neurotoxin serotype B detection

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), the most potent naturally-occurring neurotoxins known to humans, comprise seven distinct serotypes (BoNT/A-G), each of which exhibits unique substrate specificity. Many methods have been developed for BoNT detection, in particular for BoNT/A, with various complexity and sensitivity, while substrate based FRET assay is considered as the most widely used approach due to its simplicity and sensitivity. In this study, we designed a vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 (VAMP2) based FRET assay based on the understanding of the VAMP2 and light chain/B (LC/B) interactions in our previous studies. The current design constituted the shortest peptide, VAMP2 (63–85), with FRET dyes (EDAN and Dabcyl) labelled at position 76 and 85, respectively, which showed minimal effect on VAMP2 substrate catalysis by LC/B and therefore enhanced the sensitivity of the assay. The FRET peptide, designated as FVP-B, was specific to LC/B, with a detection sensitivity as low as ∼20 pM in 2 h. Importantly, FVP-B showed the potential to be scaled up and used in high throughput screening of LC/B inhibitor. The currently developed FRET assay is one of the most economic and rapid FRET assays for LC/B detection.

Abo-, inco-, ona-, and rima-botulinum toxins in clinical therapy: a primer

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is an acetylcholine release inhibitor and a neuromuscular-blocking agent used for the treatment of a variety of medical and cosmetic indications. Currently, in the United States, there are four BoNT formulations licensed for use: abobotulinumtoxinA, incobotulinumtoxinA, onabotulinumtoxinA, and rimabotulinumtoxinB. These revised name designations were established to reinforce the understanding that each BoNT product has an individual potency and is not interchangeable with any other BoNT product. The therapeutic use of BoNTs is expanding and new formulations are on the horizon. This article is a primer that describes distinctions among currently available, licensed BoNT formulations. Toxin pharmacology, product characteristics, storage, handling, preparation, and dosages will be reviewed. In addition, issues related to dose equivalency ratios, immunogenicity, potency, and toxin spread will be discussed. Therapeutic indications and safety are discussed briefly. Knowledge of the available and licensed BoNT formulations and the ability to make distinctions in toxin pharmacology, product characteristics, and indications are vital for product selection, preparation, drug information, avoidance of drug errors, quality assurance, and patient safety.

Accurate targeting of botulinum toxin injections: how to and why

Botulinum toxin (BTX), the exotoxin of the obligate anaerobe, Clostridium botulinum, is used to ameliorate pain and treat conditions associated with glandular, smooth and skeletal muscle overactivity. The benefits derived from the injection of BTX may be negated by unintended weakness of uninjected muscles. Performance of BTX injections may be facile, requiring only surface marking or clinical-localisation techniques but may be more technically demanding, necessitating the use of equipment, such as electromyography (EMG) or ultrasonography (U/S). Less often, endoscopic, fluoroscopic or computed tomographic (CT) guidance may be required. Despite evidence to support the efficacy of BTX injections in treating many conditions, there is no evidence to support the superiority of any one injection technique over needle localisation using surface anatomy. This is possibly due to the lack of well-designed controlled studies, that is, current studies are hampered by small patient numbers, lack of consistency of injection technique and the application of different rating scales. Intuitively, certain injection techniques are more suited to injection of specific muscles or conditions, for example, U/S or passive-monitoring EMG should be used to treat cervical dystonia, active-monitoring EMG applied for strabismus injections, whereas either active-monitoring EMG or endoscopy is indicated when giving BTX for spasmodic dysphonia. Finally, electrical-stimulation EMG or U/S (or a combination of both) would be most suitable when injecting the forearm muscles for spasticity or writer's cramps.