A 17-year Experience of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Cervical Dystonia

Efficacy and safety of long-term botulinum toxin treatment for acquired cervical dystonia: a 25-year follow-up

Botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) is the first-line treatment for idiopathic cervical dystonia (ICD) and is widely used in the clinical setting. To date, scanty data are available on the effectiveness of BoNT in treating acquired cervical dystonia (ACD). Here we present a long-term follow-up of ACD patients treated with BoNT/A that focused on safety and efficacy. The study included subjects who had received at least six treatments of three commercially available BoNT/A drugs [abobotulinumtoxinA (A/Abo), incobotulinumtoxinA (A/Inco) and onabotulinumtoxinA (A/Ona)]. Safety and efficacy were assessed based on patients' self-reports regarding adverse effects (AE), duration of improvement of dystonia and/or pain relief. Global clinical improvement was measured on a six-point scale. 23 patients with ACD were administered 739 treatments (A/Abo in 235, A/Inco in 72, A/Ona in 432) with a mean number of treatments of 31 ± 20 (range 6-76) and duration of 10 ± 6 weeks (range 2-25). The mean dose was 737 ± 292 U for A/Abo, 138 ± 108 U for A/Inco and 158 ± 80 U for A/Ona. The average benefit duration was 89 ± 26 (A/Abo), 88 ± 30 days (A/Inco), and 99 ± 55 days (A/Ona) (p = 0.011); global clinical improvement for all sessions was 4 ± 1. ANOVA one-way analysis indicated that A/Ona had the best profile in terms of duration (p < 0.05), whereas A/Abo had the best pain relief effect (p = 0.002). Side effects were reported in 9% of treatments (67/739), with ten treatments (1%) complicated by two side effects. Most side effects were rated mild to moderate; severe side effects occurred following three treatments with the three different BoNT; two required medical intervention. No allergic reactions were reported. Even after 25 years of repeated treatments, all serotypes of BoNT demonstrate positive effects in treating ACD with long-lasting efficacy and safety.

Targeting pain in the long-term treatment of cervical dystonia with botulinum toxin A

AIMS

Cervical pain is one of the most common non-motor symptoms of cervical dystonia (CD) and affects from 54.6% to 88.9% of patients. To date, minority of studies investigated the relevance of pain in a long-term botulinum toxin (BoNT) therapy of CD. The aim of the study was to define an impact of cervical pain on the disease severity and disability, as well as to assess antinociceptive BoNT efficacy in a long-term treatment of CD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this case-control study, CD patients who received stable doses of BoNT for at least 3 years were assessed with the use of validated scales. Participants were divided into two groups depending on the occurrence of CD-related pain.

RESULTS

We examined 50 participants who received a mean of 24 injection cycles (6-51) of BoNT during a mean treatment period of 10.3 years (3.0-23.5). Participants with cervical pain (68.0%) were characterized by higher scores in all scales used in this study: TWSTRS severity (p = 0.030), disability (p < 0.001), total (p < 0.001) and TSUI score (p = 0.046). Pain reduction following BoNT injection lasted longer than muscle relaxation in 85.3% of patients. Pain improvement between first and last BoNT injection cycle was reported by 76.5% of patients with CD-related pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of cervical pain in CD may increase the severity of muscular symptoms and disease-related disability. BoNT has a noticeable antinociceptive effect in the long-term treatment of CD.

Use of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Adults with Cervical Dystonia: A Systematic Literature Review

Cervical dystonia (CD) is a neurological movement disorder characterized by sustained involuntary muscle contractions. First-line therapy for CD is intramuscular injections of botulinum neurotoxin (e.g., abobotulinumtoxinA) into the affected muscles. The objective of this systematic literature review is to assess the clinical evidence regarding the effects of abobotulinumtoxinA for treatment of CD in studies of safety, efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and economic outcomes. Using comprehensive electronic medical literature databases, a search strategy was developed using a combination of Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords. Results were reviewed by two independent reviewers who rated the level of evidence. The search yielded 263 publications, of which 232 were excluded for being duplicate publications, not meeting the selection criteria, or failing to meet predefined eligibility criteria, leaving a total of 31 articles. Clinical efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and safety data were in 6 placebo-controlled trials (8 articles), 6 active-controlled trials, and 16 observational studies (17 articles). Data on health economic outcomes were provided in one of the clinical trials, in two of the observational studies, and in one specific cost-analysis publication. This review demonstrated that the routine use of abobotulinumtoxinA in CD is well-established, effective, and generally well-tolerated, with a relatively low cost of treatment.

Cervical dystonia: factors deteriorating patient satisfaction of long-term treatment with botulinum toxin

OBJECTIVES

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is an effective first-line treatment for cervical dystonia (CD). Despite generally good therapeutic efficacy, approximately 20-40% of CD patients do not achieve acceptable relief of the dystonic symptoms. The aim of this study was to identify factors of low patient satisfaction of long-term BoNT therapy for CD.

METHODS

In this case-control study CD patients treated with BoNT intramuscular injections for up to 24 years were assessed by two independent assessors in three validated scales: TWSTRS, Tsui and VAS for pain measurement. Data on received BoNT doses and treatment duration were obtained from medical history. All of participants rated their long-term treatment satisfaction compared to the therapy onset on a 0-3 scale.

RESULTS

Study was completed by 58 participants who were treated with BoNT for 9.0 ± 6.3 years and received a median of 19 injection cycles. None/low therapy satisfaction was reported by 20.7% of participants. Compared to moderate/good treatment satisfaction, CD patients with none/low BoNT efficacy had increased incidence of cervical pain (p =.018), enhanced mean VAS score for pain (p =.037) and had higher coexistence of oromandibular dystonia (p =.018). In addition, worse treatment satisfaction correlated with shorter time intervals between treatment cycles, enhanced scores of Tsui total, TWSTRS total, as well as TWSTRS subscales: severity, disability and pain.

CONCLUSION

Cervical pain and coexistence of oromandibular dystonia deteriorated long-term treatment satisfaction in CD patients. Higher scores of Tsui and TWSTRS subscales were correlated with worse subjective BoNT treatment response.

Selective Cervical Denervation for Cervical Dystonia: Modification of the Bertrand Procedure

BACKGROUND

Cervical dystonia, commonly referred to as spasmodic torticollis, is a neurological disorder characterized by aberrant, involuntary contraction of the muscles of the neck and shoulders. One surgical option that can be considered is selective cervical denervation.

OBJECTIVE

To report our modification of the Bertrand procedure for selective cervical denervation.

METHODS

Our modification of the Bertrand procedure for selective cervical denervation is reported with intraoperative photographs and schematic depictions of the operative steps.

RESULTS

We report our modification of the Bertrand procedure for selective cervical denervation, which consists of a combination of C2-6 denervation, myectomy of the splenius capitis and/or semispinalis capitis, myotomy of the levator scapulae when indicated, and myotomy and selection denervation of the sternocleidomastoid. The combination of techniques utilized depends on the subtype and severity of cervical dystonia.

CONCLUSION

Our modification of the original Bertrand procedure for selective cervical denervation represents an alternative surgical strategy for the treatment of cervical dystonia, with the potential advantages and disadvantages discussed.

Factors influencing response to Botulinum toxin type A in patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia: results from an international observational study

OBJECTIVES

Real-life data on response to Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) in cervical dystonia (CD) are sparse. An expert group of neurologists was convened with the overall aim of developing a definition of treatment response, which could be applied in a non-interventional study of BoNT-A-treated subjects with CD.

DESIGN

International, multicentre, prospective, observational study of a single injection cycle of BoNT-A as part of normal clinical practice.

SETTING

38 centres across Australia, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, The Netherlands, Portugal, Russia and the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

404 adult subjects with idiopathic CD. Most subjects were women, aged 41-60 years and had previously received BoNT-A.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were classified as responders if they met all the following four criteria: magnitude of effect (≥25% improvement Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale), duration of effect (≥12-week interval between the BoNT-A injection day and subject-reported waning of treatment effect), tolerability (absence of severe related adverse event) and subject's positive Clinical Global Improvement (CGI).

RESULTS

High rates of response were observed for magnitude of effect (73.6%), tolerability (97.5%) and subject's clinical global improvement (69.8%). The subjective duration of effect criterion was achieved by 49.3% of subjects; 28.6% of subjects achieved the responder definition. Factors most strongly associated with response were age (<40 years; OR 3.9, p<0.05) and absence of baseline head tremor (OR 1.5; not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

Three of four criteria were met by most patients. The proposed multidimensional definition of response appears to be practical for routine practice. Unrealistically high patient expectation and subjectivity may influence the perception of a quick waning of effect, but highlights that this aspect may be a hurdle to response in some patients. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: (NCT00833196; ClinicalTrials.gov).