Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus effectively relieves dystonia secondary to Fahr's disease: a case report

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Globus Pallidus Internus for Secondary Dystonia: Clinical Cases and Systematic Review of the Literature Regarding the Effectiveness of Globus Pallidus Internus versus Subthalamic Nucleus

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a frequently applied therapy in primary dystonia. For secondary dystonia, the effects can be less favorable. We share our long-term findings in 9 patients with severe secondary dystonia and discuss these findings in the light of the literature.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone globus pallidus internus (GPi)-DBS for secondary dystonia were included. Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) scores, clinical improvement rates, follow-up periods, stimulation parameters and the need for internal pulse generator replacements were analyzed. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles describing GPi-DBS and subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS only for secondary dystonia cases. Keywords were "dystonia," "deep brain stimulation," "GPi," "dystonia," "deep brain stimulation," and "STN."

RESULTS

A total of 9 secondary dystonia patients (5 male, 4 female) had undergone GPi-DBS with microelectrode recording in our units. The mean follow-up period was 29 months. The average BFMDRS score was 58.2 before the surgery, whereas the mean value was 36.5 at the last follow-up of the patients (mean improvement, 39%; minimum, 9%; maximum, 63%). In the literature review, we identified 264 GPi-DBS cases (mean follow-up, 19 months) in 72 different articles about secondary dystonia. The mean BFMDRS improvement rate was 52%. In 146 secondary dystonia cases, reported in 19 articles, STN-DBS was performed. The average follow-up period was 20 months and the improvement in BFMDRS score was 66%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although GPi-DBS has favorable long-term efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with secondary dystonia, STN seems a promising target for stimulation in patients with secondary dystonia. Further studies including a large number of patients, longer follow-up periods, and more homogenous patients are necessary to establish the optimal target for DBS in the management of secondary dystonias.

Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Post-Infarct Dystonia

Dystonia secondary to cerebral infarcts presents months to years after the initial insult, is usually unilateral and causes significant morbidity. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is established as the most frequent target in the management of the dystonic symptoms. We report our experience with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS in 3 patients with post-infarct dystonia, in whom GPi DBS was not confidently possible due to the presence of striatal infarcts. Two patients had unilateral STN DBS implantation, whereas the third patient had bilateral STN DBS implantation for bilateral dystonic symptoms. Prospectively collected preoperative and postoperative functional assessment data including imaging, medication and neuropsychology evaluations were analyzed with regard to symptom improvement. Median follow-up period was 38.3 months (range 26–43 months). All patients had clinically valuable improvements in dystonic symptoms and pain control despite variable improvements in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scores. In our series, we have demonstrated that STN DBS could be an alternative in the management of post-infarct dystonia in patients with abnormal striatal anatomy which precludes GPi DBS. A multidisciplinary team-based approach is essential for patient selection and management.

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in isolated dystonia: A 3-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

To report long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of a large cohort of patients with medically refractory isolated dystonia treated with subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS).

METHODS

Twenty patients (12 male, 8 female; mean age 49 ± 16.3 years) with medically refractory isolated dystonia were studied (14 were followed for 36 months). The primary endpoints were change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) motor score and Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) total score at 36 months compared to preoperative baseline. Multiple secondary outcomes were also assessed (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00773604).

RESULTS

Eighteen of 20 patients showed improvement 12 months after STN DBS with sustained benefit persisting for 3 years (n = 14). At 36 months, BFMDRS motor scores improved 70.4% from a mean 17.9 ± 8.5 to 5.3 ± 5.6 (p = 0.0002) and total TWSTRS scores improved 66.6% from a mean 41.0 ± 18.9 to 13.7 ± 17.9 (p = 0.0002). Improvement at 36 months was equivalent to that seen at 6 months. Disability and quality of life measures were also improved. Three hardware-related and 24 stimulation-related nonserious adverse events occurred between years 1 and 3 (including 4 patients with dyskinesia).

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers support for long-term tolerability and sustained effectiveness of STN DBS in the treatment of severe forms of isolated dystonia.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that STN DBS decreases long-term dystonia severity in patients with medically refractory isolated dystonia.

Neuromodulation for dystonia: target and patient selection

Treatment of dystonia refractory to oral medications or botulinum toxin injections includes the use of deep brain stimulation (DBS). Expectations should be established based on patient-related factors, including type of dystonia, genetic cause, target symptoms, age at the time of surgery, disease duration, or the presence of fixed skeletal deformities. Premorbid conditions such as psychiatric illness and cognitive impairment should be considered. Target selection is an emerging issue in DBS for dystonia. Although efficacy has been established for targeting the globus pallidus internus for dystonia, other brain targets such as the subthalamic nucleus, thalamus, or cortex may be promising alternatives.