Local pattern electroretinograms and ganglion cell activity in the turtle eye

The buzz around spatial resolving power and contrast sensitivity in the honeybee, Apis mellifera

Most animals rely on vision to perform a range of behavioural tasks and variations in the anatomy and physiology of the eye likely reflect differences in habitat and life history. Moreover, eye design represents a balance between often conflicting requirements for gathering different forms of visual information. The trade-off between spatial resolving power and contrast sensitivity is common to all visual systems, and European honeybees (Apis mellifera) present an important opportunity to better understand this trade-off. Vision has been studied extensively in A. mellifera as it is vital for foraging, navigation and communication. Consequently, spatial resolving power and contrast sensitivity in A. mellifera have been measured using several methodologies; however, there is considerable variation in estimates between methodologies. We assess pattern electroretinography (pERG) as a new method for assessing the trade-off between visual spatial and contrast information in A.mellifera. pERG has the benefit of measuring spatial contrast sensitivity from higher order visual processing neurons in the eye. Spatial resolving power of A.mellifera estimated from pERG was 0.54 cycles per degree (cpd), and contrast sensitivity was 16.9. pERG estimates of contrast sensitivity were comparable to previous behavioural studies. Estimates of spatial resolving power reflected anatomical estimates in the frontal region of the eye, which corresponds to the region stimulated by pERG. Apis mellifera has similar spatial contrast sensitivity to other hymenopteran insects with similar facet diameter (Myrmecia ant species). Our results support the idea that eye anatomy has a substantial effect on spatial contrast sensitivity in compound eyes.

Effects of lorazepam on human contrast sensitivity

The anxiolytic lorazepam was studied for its effects on contrast sensitivity to gratings flickering in counterphase in normal volunteers. The drug significantly reduced contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequencies in a dose-related manner. The results are discussed with reference to possible GABA-mediated processes in the retina and lateral geniculate nucleus.

Reflections on visual evoked cortical potentials and selective attention: methodological and historical

Details of research in which Russ Harter participated in his formative years are reviewed. Harter's participation in the early work on Visual Selective Attention (Eason, Harter & White, 1969) probably contributed most importantly to his career. While reviewing Russ's early experience with basic vision research and pioneer visual evoked potentials (VEPs), there is reference to extensive information regarding stimulus effects on VEPs (exogenous components of the ERP). There can be complex early and late waveforms and waveform changes with changes in certain stimulus conditions. There are critical peripheral vision effects at various loci over the visual field on VEP and reaction time. Special emphasis is given to effects of individual differences in training and skill of experienced subjects, as well differences in ability. These observations may suggest methods for optimizing sensitivity of ERPs and possibly some clues toward further understanding of ERPs.

Spatial properties of ganglion cell activity in the turtle retina

Ganglion cell activity in response to drifting or alternating stimulus patterns was recorded in an eyecup preparation of the turtle. The stimuli were sinusoidal gratings with various spatial frequencies and spatial phases. Spike histograms of the activity were Fourier-analyzed. The results indicated that the retinal circuitry always functioned in a nonlinear manner. The average, first, and second harmonics of the activity were all a function of stimulus conditions, including spatial phase. Similar outcomes were obtained with full-field (retina-wide) and a small-field (1 mm diameter) stimulation. In the middle of the spatial-frequency range, the ratio of second to first harmonic activity was higher in response to static, contrast-reversing gratings than for drifting, constant-contrast ones. The findings suggest that, as distinct from the usual X, Y, and W segregation of ganglion cell properties in other retinas, there is a single class of cells whose responses seem to have attributes of one or another of the usual categories depending on stimulus characteristics. This may be the result of a degree of stimulus-dependent functional modification in the retinal input circuitry to the turtle ganglion cells.