The topography of 4 subtraction ERP-waveforms derived from a 3-tone auditory oddball task in healthy young adults

A Signature of Passivity? An Explorative Study of the N3 Event- Related Potential Component in Passive Oddball Tasks

BACKGROUND

Many passive oddball experiments show a sharp negative deflection N3 after P3b, peaking between 400 and 500 ms, but this wave has never been analyzed properly. We conducted five passive oddball experiments, in which the number of deviants (i.e., one or two), their alleged meaning, and their distinctiveness varied.

RESULTS

Mastoid- or common-referenced waveforms showed a fronto-central N3 in all experiments. The data were CSD (Current Source Density) transformed and underwent a Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The PCA revealed N3 containing two subcomponents with very stable peak latencies of about 415 and 455 ms, respectively. Both topography of the subcomponents and their variation with experimental conditions were very similar, indicating a midfrontal sink and a posterior temporal source. An analysis of P3a and P3b components replicated previously known effects.

CONCLUSION

We discuss the similarities and differences between the passive N3 and other components including the MMN, N1, late positive Slow Wave, and reorienting negativity. We also make general hypotheses about a possible functional meaning of N3; on this basis, specific hypotheses are formulated and further experiments are suggested to test these hypotheses.

Temporal Stability of Auditory Event-Related Potentials in Healthy Individuals and Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury

Historically, cognitive event-related potentials (ERPs) have received limited acceptance for clinical use due to lack of evidence for their reliability. However, recent advances in computer technology and artifact rejection methods have greatly enhanced the fidelity of ERP measurements. The present study examined the test-retest reliability of ERP measurement by using current data processing methods. We assessed the temporal stability of the most commonly used ERP paradigm, auditory pure-tone "odd ball" detection, and compared it with other commonly used clinical measures reported in the literature. Auditory ERPs were collected in 19 healthy subjects and 7 patients with traumatic brain injury at two time points, 2 days to 2 months apart. Test-retest reliability was calculated for four ERP components: N1, MMN (mismatch negativity), P3, and N4. In healthy subjects, temporal stabilities of these four commonly studied ERP components' amplitude measurements were moderate to high, with intraclass correlations ranging from 0.6 to 0.8. In contrast, in patients with traumatic brain injury, ERPs were stable only for the N1 component (intraclass correlation = 0.7).

Mental chronometry of target detection: human thalamus leads cortex

Attentive monitoring of environmental stimuli is most fundamental for rapid target detection. The aim of this study was to assess the timing of thalamic versus cortical processes involved in this cognitive operation. To this end, simultaneous depth and scalp EEG was recorded in eight patients with essential tremor, undergoing thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS), when the DBS electrodes could be accessed via their temporarily externalized leads. The patients performed an oddball task consisting of 300 presentations of one frequent and two rare visual cues, appearing in randomized order. One of the rare cues was defined as a target, the occurrences of which had to be indicated by a button press (motor condition) or silently counted (non-motor condition). At the scalp and the thalamus, event-related potentials (ERP) were largest upon target presentation, with peak latencies in the time domain of classical P300 responses. Remarkably, target-specific thalamic ERP emerged significantly prior to scalp P300. Furthermore, whereas scalp ERP had a higher amplitude upon rare than upon frequent non-target signals, thalamic ERP were independent of stimulus probability. This pattern was identified during motor and non-motor task execution. We conclude that the human thalamus specifically supports the early recognition of target events and can widely distribute this label through its divergent cortical projections.

Development and topography of auditory event-related potentials (ERPs): mismatch and processing negativity in individuals 8-22 years of age

How do event-related potentials (ERPs) reflecting auditory processing develop across adolescence? Such development was described for five ERP components in four groups of 11 healthy participants with mean ages of 10, 14, 17, and 21 years. Data from 19 sites during diffuse (passive) and focused (discrimination) attention in a three-tone oddball were analyzed to see how ERP loci varied with age for tone type, attention condition, and for four types of difference waves reflecting nontarget and target comparisons. Age interacted with site for most components. P1 loci sensitive to rare tones moved posteriorly and N1 loci lost their right bias in early puberty. The P2 loci did not move anterior to Cz until adulthood. N2 amplitude, sensitive to attention condition, developed a frontal focus by 17 years. Right-biased P3 loci moved to the midline with focused attention similarly in all age groups. Difference waves developed in three stages: In 10-year-old participants, early deflections (< 150 ms) were diffusely distributed; in midadolescent participants, the main frontal negative component (150-300 ms) became well formed and lost an earlier right bias; and for participants 17 years old and older, the late positive complex developed a right bias in target-derived waves. Latency decreases for early frontal components were marked in participants 10-14 years old and for later posterior components in participants 14-17 years old. Major developments appeared at the onset of adolescence in early stimulus selection processes and during adolescence in the differential use of this information (N2- and P3-like latencies).

Impaired attention-dependent augmentation of MMN in nonparanoid vs paranoid schizophrenic patients: a comparison with obsessive-compulsive disorder and healthy subjects

Mismatch negativity (MMN), in the deviant-minus-standard event-related potential (ERP) difference-waveform, may represent a working memory trace of the tone difference. Most but not all studies find MMN reduced in schizophrenic patients. This report investigates if differences may be attributable to experimental condition (diffuse vs focused attention), component identification (N1-like vs N2-like), topographic distribution, and clinical condition (with/without paranoid-hallucinatory symptoms, PH/NP). Comparisons were made for 12 PH, 12 NP schizophrenic patients with 13 obsessive compulsive and 25 normal control subjects. Frontal MMN reduction in schizophrenics largely resulted from an absence of an increase in focused attention conditions as in comparison groups. But there was a marked temporal activity locus in NP patients. These features were not reflected in other components except for a visible but nonsignificant N1-like temporal locus in NP patients. Further, schizophrenic patients did not show an increase in late positivity with focused attention like the comparison groups. The results show that so-called automatic processing deficits (amount and locus of MMN) are best seen in situations requiring the activation of controlled attentional processes. It is suggested that impaired processing of irrelevant stimuli and reduced frontal MMN in NP patients may reflect reduced dopaminergic responsivity.

Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) and mismatch negativity (MMN) in healthy children and those with attention-deficit or tourette/tic symptoms

The study compares 5 auditory event-related potential (ERP) components (P1 to P3) after 3 tones differing in pitch and rarity, and contrasts the mismatch negativity (MMN) between them in 12 children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; mean 10.2 years of age), 12 healthy controls pairwise matched for age (controls), and 10 with Chronic Tic or Tourette Syndrome (TS). Topographic recordings were derived from 19 scalp electrodes. Four major effects are reported. (a) Shorter latencies in ADHD patients were evident as early as 100 ms. (b) Both ADHD and TS groups showed very large P2 components where the maxima were shifted anteriorly. The differences in the later potentials were of a topographical nature. (c) Frontal MMN was non-significantly larger in the ADHD group but normalized data showed a left rather than a right frontal bias as in control subjects. Maxima for TS were usually posterior. (d) ADHD patients did not show the usual right-biased P3 asymmetry nor the frontal versus parietal P3 latency difference. From these results it is suggested that ADHD patients process perceptual information faster from an early stage (N1). Further, along with the TS group, ADHD patients showed an unusually marked inhibitory phase in processing (P2), interpreted as a reduction of the normal controls on further processing. Later indices of stimulus processing (N2-P3) showed a frontal impairment in TS and a right hemisphere impairment in ADHD patients. These are interpreted in terms of the difficulties in sustaining attention experienced by both ADHD and TS patients.

Mismatch negativity (MMN) is altered by directing attention

MMN is a negative component resulting from the difference in event-related potential (ERP) waveforms elicited by a standard and a deviant stimulus. It is usually studied in the absence of attentional requirements. We compared this measure of perceptual comparison in a non-task situation (three tones presented) with that obtained in a task requiring focused attention and response to the third tone. MMN (comparison of standard and deviant irrelevant tones) increased with focused attention to the third (target) tone and frontal maxima shifted slightly posteriorly. The succeeding P3 in the difference waveform increased more posteriorly than frontally confirming continued differential processing of irrelevant stimuli under active conditions. This demonstrates that not only attending to stimuli, but the active processing of irrelevant stimuli (vs passive perception) involves small changes in the amount and distribution of neural activity.