Using event-related potentials to examine pharmacological effects on intervening cognitive functions in rats

Isoflurane effects on the N1 and other long-latency auditory evoked potentials in Wistar rats

Long-latency auditory evoked potentials (LLAEPs) may help further advances in understanding consciousness under general anesthesia and promote more objective means of assessing sedation depth than conventional clinical signs. Among the LLAEP components, the auditory N1 shows promise as a measure of sedation depth and a marker of consciousness, but findings are so far inconclusive. Research with animals can help elucidate the effects of various anesthetics on the N1 and other LLAEPs, but investigations of LLAEPs under anesthesia in animals is lacking. To address this deficit, we examined the P1, N1, P2, and N2, along with their corresponding peak-to-peak complexes, in 10 Wistar rats anesthetized with 1.5-2 % isoflurane in pure oxygen and again after recovery. While under anesthesia, subdermal needle electrodes were inserted and secured for electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings. LLAEPs were assessed during a 20-min, passive, two-tone (500 ms inter-tone interval) paradigm with randomized short (1 s) and long (5 s) inter-pair intervals (IPIs). Overall, while the LLAEP peaks under isoflurane were less defined, they were not eliminated. The peak-to-peak amplitudes, particularly the P1-N1, were significantly smaller under isoflurane than during post-recovery. Our preliminary findings indicate that isoflurane produces global suppression across LLAEP components, presumably reflecting impaired integration of top-down and bottom-up attention and sensory systems under profound sedation with isoflurane.

Sedation modulates recognition of novel stimuli and adaptation to regular stimuli in critically ill adults

BACKGROUND

Responsiveness of critically ill patients is affected by disease and by therapy. Subjective tests of responsiveness (e.g., modified Ramsay score) reflect global integrity of a response arc that includes transduction, perception, classification, and an overt response. The performance of individual components is usually not assessed.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an association exists among sedative medications and the brain's component information processing and adaptive abilities.

DESIGN

Initial observational study of a convenience sample.

SETTING

A surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 22 endotracheally intubated, mechanically ventilated patients chemically sedated with narcotics and a benzodiazepine (n = 12), or narcotics and propofol (n = 10) using sedation protocols.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

Patients were presented flashes of light and pulses of sound at fixed or random intervals. Patients receiving low doses of fentanyl and propofol adapted to stimuli presented at fixed intervals and retained the response to novelty. Patients receiving higher doses of those medications did not respond to novelty and responded to stimuli presented at fixed intervals as if they were novel. Patients receiving fentanyl and benzodiazepines had generally weaker responses to all stimuli. Moreover, their responses to fixed and random stimuli were similar. At low doses, the patients retained responses to novelty and adapted to fixed, whereas at higher doses the opposite was observed: the response to novelty was lost and the patients responded to fixed stimuli as if they were novel. These observations suggest that the sedative medications generally accelerate the physiologic decay of stimuli as they engage the brain's information processing and adaptive abilities and further suggest that different sedative medications may have different effects on the brain.

CONCLUSIONS

Commonly administered sedative medications may alter the brain's biophysical state and thereby modulate specific aspects of the brain's information processing and adaptive functions. These functions can be interrogated even when the patient is seemingly unresponsive. If this observation is confirmed in subsequent prospective controlled randomized trials, electrophysiologic interrogation of the brain's information processing and adaptive capacities could serve as an adjunct to clinical assessment of responsiveness and management of sedative medications.