Common epithelial tumours of the ovary--a new look

Morphologic Heterogeneity of Cell Populations Isolated by Density Gradient Centrifugation from Serous Fluids of Ovarian Tumors

The cells of tumor fluid from patients with malignant and benign serous ovarian neoplasms were fractionated using Ficoll-Uropoline density gradient centrifugation. Density distribution and morphologic characteristics of cell fractions were analyzed. It was found that serous ovarian adenocarcinomas contained three to four types of morphologically malignant cells focused in low density layers. Borderline ovarian neoplasms showed the presence of one subpopulation of cells with some features of malignancy and cells with some atypical but non-malignant features. The fluids of serous cysts contained mainly normal epithelial cells representing different stages of morphological maturity and were focused in denser layers. The results allowed us to catalogue ovarian tumor cell subpopulations present in each density fraction of individual patients and confirmed that ovarian tumors could be diagnosed by morphologic identification of cells from tumor fluids.

Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian intestinal-type mucinous tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors and intraepithelial, microinvasive, invasive, and metastatic carcinomas

Histologic criteria for the distinction of ovarian mucinous borderline tumors (MBTs) from invasive mucinous carcinomas (MUCCAs) and the definitions of intraepithelial (noninvasive) carcinoma and microinvasion are controversial. Accurate assessment of the behavior of these tumors has been obscured by inclusion of cases of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), an entity of extraovarian origin, and misclassification of the ovarian tumors in PMP and metastatic mucinous carcinomas (METCAs) as either advanced-stage MBTs or primary ovarian MUCCAs. One hundred thirty-six intestinal-type ovarian mucinous tumors without PMP were evaluated for the presence of stromal invasion, marked cytologic atypia, epithelial stratification of more than three cell layers, and necrosis. Criteria for the diagnosis of MBT, MBT with intraepithelial carcinoma, MBT with microinvasion (MIBT), MUCCA, and METCA were established and correlated with behavior. Twenty-three (59%) of 39 patients whose tumors had stromal invasion of more than 5 mm died of disease. Stromal invasion of more than 5 mm was the sole feature that correlated with a poor prognosis. In the absence of this feature, marked cytologic atypia, epithelial stratification of more than three layers, microinvasion (<5 mm), or necrosis did not have an adverse effect on survival. Tumors were classified as MBT (n = 65; 48%) based on absence of stromal invasion, regardless of degree of cytologic atypia or epithelial stratification; of these, 28 (43%) qualified as intraepithelial carcinoma based on epithelial stratification of more than three cell layers or marked cytologic atypia. Tumors with stromal invasion of less than 5 mm were classified as MIBT (n = 8; 6%). Tumors with stromal invasion of more than 5 mm were classified as MUCCA (n = 24; 18%). Tumors with a nodular pattern of stromal invasion, morphology inconsistent with ovarian origin, or a primary site elsewhere were classified as METCA (n = 35; 26%). Four tumors could not be definitively classified. Of the 86 cases with follow-up (median, 33 months) all MBTs (n = 44) and MIBTs (n = 6) were stage I, with 5-year survival rates of 100%. MUCCAs (n = 17) that were stage I had a 5-year survival rate of 91%; all patients with advanced-stage MUCCA died of disease. Five-year survival rate for METCAs (n = 19) was 11%. METCAs were more common than MUCCAs but can mimic MUCCAs and MBTs clinically and histologically. In the absence of a primary site elsewhere, METCA should be strongly suspected when there is bilateral surface involvement and a characteristic nodular pattern of invasion. It is important to recognize this pattern because 5-year survival rate for METCA (11%) was substantially less than that of MUCCA (all stages, 51%) and MBT (100%). Because all MBTs, regardless of degree of atypia or stratification, were stage I and benign, we prefer to designate them as atypical proliferative mucinous tumors. Marked cytologic atypia, epithelial stratification of more than three layers, and microinvasion (<5 mm) had no effect on the behavior of MBT. Noninvasive mucinous tumors with marked cytologic atypia or excessive epithelial stratification can be interpreted as atypical proliferative tumors with intraepithelial carcinoma and those with microinvasion can be designated as atypical proliferative tumors with microinvasion; these tumors appear to represent transitional stages in ovarian mucinous carcinogenesis.

Immunohistochemical expression of placental alkaline phosphatase and vimentin in epithelial ovarian neoplasms

The immunohistochemical expression of PLAP and vimentin was assessed in 23 benign, 6 borderline malignant and 31 malignant epithelial ovarian neoplasms. PLAP and vimentin were expressed in some benign (3/23 and 5/23 respectively) and borderline malignant (2/6 for both markers) tumours and they were often expressed in malignant tumours (16/31 and 17/31 respectively). There was a significantly increased expression of PLAP and vimentin in serous cystadenomas and serous carcinomas compared to their mucinous counterparts. Although there was no significant correlation between PLAP expression and histologic grade of carcinomas there was a trend towards increased expression in more differentiated carcinomas. No correlation was found between vimentin expression and degree of differentiation.

Biological and NMR markers for cancer

The search for a universal tumor marker continues. Present markers range from tumor products (polyamines, glycoproteins, peptides, hormones or carbohydrate-linked markers) to reaction products produced by the host tissues during tumor invasion. Techniques used to identify them include the classical methods of histology and cytochemistry as well as the more recent radioimmunoassay and metabolic probes. The in vivo techniques of increasing use for patient monitoring are MRS (magnetic resonance spectroscopy) and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging). The efficiency of some markers and statistical methods used in analyzing data are discussed, as are the ethical problems surrounding the use of new testing methods. Recent developments in MRI and MRS, marker elucidation, and evidence for a new autocrine differentiation-inhibiting factor (ADIF) are reviewed. Future needs and approaches focus on greater utilization of indicators of the preneoplastic state and of risk to cancer, as well as more careful attention to statistical analysis.