Vuohelainen V, Hämäläinen M, Paavonen T, Karlsson S, Moilanen E, Mennander A. Inhibition of monoamine oxidase A increases recovery after experimental cardiac arrest.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2015;
21:441-9. [PMID:
26116370 DOI:
10.1093/icvts/ivv175]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2014] [Accepted: 05/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) with ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a devastating entity occurring in 1-2% of patients after cardiac surgery. The molecular pathway leading to myocardial cellular destruction after MI may include monoamine oxidases. We experimentally investigated whether moclobemide, a monoamine oxidase inhibitor, enhances myocardial recovery after cardiac arrest and MI.
METHODS
Fifty-six syngeneic Fischer rats underwent heterotopic cardiac transplantation to induce reversible IRI after cardiac arrest. Twenty-eight rats also underwent permanent ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery to induce MI after cardiac arrest. Twenty-eight rats with or without MI were treated with subcutaneous moclobemide 10 mg/kg/day. Methods used to study myocardial recovery were microdialysis for intramyocardial metabolism, histology and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction for high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), haeme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), interleukin-6, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and macrophages (CD68).
RESULTS
Pyruvate increased in MI treated with moclobemide versus IRI with moclobemide (29.19 ± 7.64 vs 13.86 ± 8.49 µM, P = 0.028), reflecting metabolic activity after cardiac arrest and reperfusion. Myocardial inflammation increased in MI compared with IRI after 1 h (0.80 ± 0.56 vs 0, point score units [PSUs], P = 0.003), but decreased after 5 days in MI treated with moclobemide versus MI alone (0.80 ± 0.83 vs 2.00 ± 0.70, PSU, P = 0.033). Expressions of HMGB1, CD68 and HO-1 decreased in MI treated with moclobemide versus MI alone (1.33 ± 0.20 vs 1.75 ± 0.24, fold changes [FCs], P = 0.028; 5.15 ± 1.10 vs 9.59 ± 2.75, FC, P = 0.050; 10.41 ± 4.17 vs 21.28 ± 10.01, FC, P = 0.047), indicating myocardial recovery and increased cellularity of remote intramyocardial arteries.
CONCLUSIONS
Moclobemide enhances myocardial recovery after cardiac arrest and MI; inhibition of remote myocardial changes may be achieved by targeting treatment against monoamine oxidase.
Collapse