1
|
Davidson S. Monitoring of Antiplatelet Therapy. Methods Mol Biol 2023; 2663:381-402. [PMID: 37204725 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3175-1_25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
In the late 1990s, the antithrombotic antiplatelet agent, clopidogrel, a P2Y12 inhibitor, was introduced. Around the same time, there was an increase in a number of new methods to measure platelet function (e.g., PFA-100 in 1995), and this has continued. It became evident that not all patients responded to clopidogrel in the same way and that some patients had a relative "resistance" to therapy, termed "high on-treatment platelet reactivity." This then led to some publications to advocate platelet function testing being used for patients on antiplatelet therapy. Platelet function testing was also suggested for use in patients awaiting cardiac surgery after stopping their antiplatelet therapy as a way of balancing thrombotic risk pre-surgery and bleeding risk perioperatively. This chapter will discuss some of the commonly used platelet function tests used in these settings, particularly those that are sometimes referred to as point-of-care tests or that require minimal laboratory sample manipulation. The latest guidance and recommendations for platelet function testing will be discussed following several clinical trials looking at the usefulness of platelet function testing in these clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Davidson
- Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sahli SD, Rössler J, Tscholl DW, Studt JD, Spahn DR, Kaserer A. Point-of-Care Diagnostics in Coagulation Management. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2020; 20:E4254. [PMID: 32751629 PMCID: PMC7435714 DOI: 10.3390/s20154254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of point-of-care (POC) devices most commonly used for coagulation analyses in the acute settings. Fast and reliable assessment of hemostasis is essential for the management of trauma and other bleeding patients. Routine coagulation assays are not designed to visualize the process of clot formation, and their results are obtained only after 30-90 m due to the requirements of sample preparation and the analytical process. POC devices such as viscoelastic coagulation tests, platelet function tests, blood gas analysis and other coagulometers provide new options for the assessment of hemostasis, and are important tools for an individualized, goal-directed, and factor-based substitution therapy. We give a detailed overview of the related tests, their characteristics and clinical implications. This review emphasizes the evident advantages of the speed and predictive power of POC clot measurement in the context of a goal-directed and algorithm-based therapy to improve the patient's outcome. Interpretation of viscoelastic tests is facilitated by a new visualization technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian D. Sahli
- Institute of Anesthesiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.D.S.); (J.R.); (D.W.T.); (D.R.S.)
| | - Julian Rössler
- Institute of Anesthesiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.D.S.); (J.R.); (D.W.T.); (D.R.S.)
| | - David W. Tscholl
- Institute of Anesthesiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.D.S.); (J.R.); (D.W.T.); (D.R.S.)
| | - Jan-Dirk Studt
- Division of Hematology, University and University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Donat R. Spahn
- Institute of Anesthesiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.D.S.); (J.R.); (D.W.T.); (D.R.S.)
| | - Alexander Kaserer
- Institute of Anesthesiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.D.S.); (J.R.); (D.W.T.); (D.R.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gasecka A, Nieuwland R, Budnik M, Dignat-George F, Eyileten C, Harrison P, Huczek Z, Kapłon-Cieślicka A, Lacroix R, Opolski G, Pluta K, van der Pol E, Postuła M, Leroyer A, Siljander P, Sturk A, Filipiak KJ. Randomized controlled trial protocol to investigate the antiplatelet therapy effect on extracellular vesicles (AFFECT EV) in acute myocardial infarction. Platelets 2018; 31:26-32. [PMID: 30585111 DOI: 10.1080/09537104.2018.1557616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Activated platelets contribute to thrombosis and inflammation by the release of extracellular vesicles (EVs) exposing P-selectin, phosphatidylserine (PS) and fibrinogen. P2Y12 receptor antagonists are routinely administered to inhibit platelet activation in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), being a combined antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory therapy. The more potent P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor improves cardiovascular outcome in patients after AMI compared to the less potent clopidogrel, suggesting that greater inhibition of platelet aggregation is associated with better prognosis. The effect of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on the release of EVs from platelets and other P2Y12-exposing cells is unknown. This study compares the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on (1) the concentrations of EVs from activated platelets (primary end point), (2) the concentrations of EVs exposing fibrinogen, exposing PS, from leukocytes and from endothelial cells (secondary end points) and (3) the procoagulant activity of plasma EVs (tertiary end points) in 60 consecutive AMI patients. After the percutaneous coronary intervention, patients will be randomized to antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor (study group) or clopidogrel (control group). Blood will be collected from patients at randomization, 48 hours after randomization and 6 months following the index hospitalization. In addition, 30 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers will be enrolled in the study to investigate the physiological concentrations and procoagulant activity of EVs using recently standardized protocols and EV-dedicated flow cytometry. Concentrations of EVs will be determined by flow cytometry. Procoagulant activity of EVs will be determined by fibrin generation test. The compliance and response to antiplatelet therapy will be assessed by impedance aggregometry. We expect that plasma from patients treated with ticagrelor (1) contains lower concentrations of EVs from activated platelets, exposing fibrinogen, exposing PS, from leukocytes and from endothelial cells and (2) has lower procoagulant activity, when compared to patients treated with clopidogrel. Antiplatelet therapy effect on EVs may identify a new mechanism of action of ticagrelor, as well as create a basis for future studies to investigate whether lower EV concentrations are associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients treated with P2Y12 antagonists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Gasecka
- 1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.,Vesicle Observation Centre and Laboratory of Experimental Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rienk Nieuwland
- Vesicle Observation Centre and Laboratory of Experimental Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monika Budnik
- 1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Ceren Eyileten
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paul Harrison
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zenon Huczek
- 1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Romaric Lacroix
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, INRA, C2VN, Marseille, France
| | - Grzegorz Opolski
- 1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kinga Pluta
- 1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Edwin van der Pol
- Vesicle Observation Centre and Laboratory of Experimental Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marek Postuła
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Aurélie Leroyer
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, INRA, C2VN, Marseille, France
| | - Pia Siljander
- Division of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Auguste Sturk
- Vesicle Observation Centre and Laboratory of Experimental Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Krzysztof J Filipiak
- 1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|