1
|
Nozawa H, Sakamoto A, Murono K, Sasaki K, Emoto S, Ishihara S. Feasibility and outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with preexisting colostomy. Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:102. [PMID: 39138696 PMCID: PMC11322400 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02980-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diverting colostomy followed by neoadjuvant treatment is a treatment of choice for obstructive rectal cancer. Such patients may be treated via a robotic approach with several advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery. Conversely, the existing stoma may interfere with the optimal trocar position and thus affect the quality of robotic surgery. Moreover, the console surgeon does not face the patient, which may endanger the stoma. METHODS Patients with rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery were retrospectively investigated using a robotic platform after neoadjuvant treatment at our hospital. Based on pretreatment stoma creation, patients were divided into the NS (those without a stoma) and S groups (patients with a stoma). Baseline characteristics, types of neoadjuvant treatment, short-term surgical outcomes, postoperative anorectal manometric data, and survival were compared between the groups. RESULTS The NS and S groups comprised 65 and 9 patients, respectively. Conversion to laparotomy was required in three patients in the NS group. The S group required a longer console time than the NS group (median: 367 vs. 253 min, respectively, p = 0.038); however, no difference was observed in the total operative time (p = 0.15) and blood loss (p = 0.70). Postoperative complication rates, anorectal function, and oncological outcomes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Although console time was longer in patients with a stoma, robotic surgery could be performed safely like in those without a stoma after neoadjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - A Sakamoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - K Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - K Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - S Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - S Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tang C, He F, Yang F, Chen D, Xiong J, Zou Y, Qian K. Development and validation of a nomogram for preoperatively predicting permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery with ileostomy: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:874. [PMID: 39039481 PMCID: PMC11265037 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12642-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with rectal cancer, the utilization of temporary ileostomy (TI) has proven effective in minimizing the occurrence of severe complications post-surgery, such as anastomotic leaks; however, some patients are unable to reverse in time or even develop a permanent stoma (PS). We aimed to determine the preoperative predictors associated with TS failure and develop and validate appropriate predictive models to improve patients' quality of life. METHODS This research included 403 patients with rectal cancer who underwent temporary ileostomies between January 2017 and December 2021. All patients were randomly divided into either the developmental (70%) or validation (30%) group. The independent risk factors for PS were determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Subsequently, a nomogram was constructed, and the prediction probability was estimated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A calibration plot was used to evaluate the nomogram calibration. RESULTS Of the 403 enrolled patients, 282 were randomized into the developmental group, 121 into the validation group, and 58 (14.39%) had a PS. The development group consisted of 282 patients, of whom 39 (13.81%) had a PS. The validation group consisted of 121 patients, of whom, 19 (15.70%) had a PS; 37 related factors were analyzed in the study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant associations between the occurrence of PS and various factors in this patient cohort, including tumor location (OR = 6.631, P = 0.005), tumor markers (OR = 2.309, P = 0.035), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR = 4.784, P = 0.004), T4 stage (OR = 2.880, P = 0.036), lymph node metastasis (OR = 4.566, P = 0.001), and distant metastasis (OR = 4.478, P = 0.036). Furthermore, a preoperative nomogram was constructed based on these data and subsequently validated in an independent validation group. CONCLUSION We identified six independent preoperative risk factors associated with PS following rectal cancer resection and developed a validated nomogram with an area under the ROC curve of 0.7758, which can assist surgeons in formulating better surgical options, such as colostomy, for patients at high risk of PS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenglin Tang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Fan He
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Fuyu Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Defei Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Junjie Xiong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Yu Zou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Kun Qian
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Where Are We and Where Are We Going? Curr Oncol 2023; 30:3111-3137. [PMID: 36975449 PMCID: PMC10047700 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30030236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains one of the most severe complications following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Indeed, leaks that may occur after any type of intestinal anastomosis are commonly associated with a higher reoperation rate and an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. At first, our review aims to identify specific preoperative, intraoperative and perioperative factors that eventually lead to the development of anastomotic dehiscence based on the current literature. We will also investigate the role of several biomarkers in predicting the presence of ALs following colorectal surgery. Despite significant improvements in perioperative care, advances in surgical techniques, and a high index of suspicion of this complication, the incidence of AL remained stable during the last decades. Thus, gaining a better knowledge of the risk factors that influence the AL rates may help identify high-risk surgical patients requiring more intensive perioperative surveillance. Furthermore, prompt diagnosis of this severe complication may help improve patient survival. To date, several studies have identified predictive biomarkers of ALs, which are most commonly associated with the inflammatory response to colorectal surgery. Interestingly, early diagnosis and evaluation of the severity of this complication may offer a significant opportunity to guide clinical judgement and decision-making.
Collapse
|
4
|
A diversion stoma after anterior resection for rectal cancer. КЛИНИЧЕСКАЯ ПРАКТИКА 2022. [DOI: 10.17816/clinpract108920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
This review covers the problem of forming a diverting stoma during resections of the rectum with primary anastomosis. The incidence of rectal cancer tends to increase, and surgical resection remains the main method of treatment. Anastomotic leakage significantly increases the postoperative mortality. The most effective way to prevent severe complications is the formation of a diverting stoma. However, the indications, the choice of a specific technique and the timing of the stoma elimination are not clearly defined. This review discusses the state of the problem, special attention is paid to the choice of the level of stoma formation (ileostomy or transversostomy).
Collapse
|
5
|
Mathew AP, M S, K C, Muralee M, Wagh M. Morbidity of Temporary Loop Ileostomy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol 2022; 13:468-473. [PMID: 36187539 PMCID: PMC9515269 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01501-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Leakage of low colorectal anastomoses after total mesorectal excision is a dreaded complication. Hence, an ileostomy is commonly performed during anterior resection especially in patients who have received neoadjuvant radiation. The aim of this study was to quantify the temporary loop ileostomy-related benefits as well as morbidity in patients with colorectal cancer. We did a retrospective study including all patients who underwent anterior resection with diversion ileostomy for biopsy-proven rectal carcinoma at our institute from 1 Jan 2016 to 31 Dec 2017 with follow-up of 2 years. A total of 104 patients were included in the study. In our series, 6.7% patients had an anastomotic dehiscence which precluded patients from stoma reversal. 12.5% of the patients had a stoma-related complication. 5.7% patients had complications following a stoma reversal. Eighty percent of the patients who developed clinically evident dehiscence in the immediate postoperative period were managed conservatively because of the presence of stoma. We did not have any mortality related to the stoma. 18.3% patients did not have their stomas reversed. The stoma non-reversal due to anastomotic dehiscence or stricture could be attributed to in 7.7% patients. 3.8% had to have their ileostomies converted to a permanent colostomy due to either a rectovaginal fistula or dehiscence or stricture. The complications associated with ileostomy are not insignificant. In our study, the tumor location in lower rectum was the only significant factor for non-reversal. We have to objectively identify patients who are at low risk for leakage and avoid ileostomy in them, and also try to minimize the morbidity of ileostomy by methods like early closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arun Peter Mathew
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, India
| | - Srinidhi M
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, India
| | - Chandramohan K
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, India
| | - Madhu Muralee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, India
| | - Mira Wagh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zarnescu EC, Zarnescu NO, Costea R. Updates of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11122382. [PMID: 34943616 PMCID: PMC8700187 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Anastomotic leakage is a potentially severe complication occurring after colorectal surgery and can lead to increased morbidity and mortality, permanent stoma formation, and cancer recurrence. Multiple risk factors for anastomotic leak have been identified, and these can allow for better prevention and an earlier diagnosis of this significant complication. There are nonmodifiable factors such as male gender, comorbidities and distance of tumor from anal verge, and modifiable risk factors, including smoking and alcohol consumption, obesity, preoperative radiotherapy and preoperative use of steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Perioperative blood transfusion was shown to be an important risk factor for anastomotic failure. Recent studies on the laparoscopic approach in colorectal surgery found no statistical difference in anastomotic leakage rate compared with open surgery. A diverting stoma at the time of primary surgery does not appear to reduce the leak rate but may reduce its clinical consequences and the need for additional surgery if anastomotic leakage does occur. It is still debatable if preoperative bowel preparation should be used, especially for left colon and rectal resections, but studies have shown similar incidence of postoperative leak rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenia Claudia Zarnescu
- Department of General Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.Z.); (R.C.)
- Second Department of Surgery, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Narcis Octavian Zarnescu
- Department of General Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.Z.); (R.C.)
- Second Department of Surgery, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +40-723-592-483
| | - Radu Costea
- Department of General Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (E.C.Z.); (R.C.)
- Second Department of Surgery, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Borucki JP, Schlaeger S, Crane J, Hernon JM, Stearns AT. Risk and consequences of dehydration following colorectal cancer resection with diverting ileostomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:1721-1732. [PMID: 33783976 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIM This systematic review aims to assess dehydration prevalence and dehydration-related morbidity from diverting ileostomy compared to resections without ileostomy formation in adults undergoing colorectal resection for cancer. METHOD MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies of any design that reported dehydration, renal function and dehydration-related morbidity in adult colorectal cancer patients with diverting ileostomy (last search 12 August 2020). Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. RESULTS Of 1927 screened papers, 22 studies were included (21 cohort studies and one randomized trial) with a total of 19 485 patients (12 209 with ileostomy). The prevalence of dehydration was 9.00% (95% CI 5.31-13.45, P < 0.001). The relative risk of dehydration following diverting ileostomy was 3.37 (95% CI 2.30-4.95, P < 0.001). Three studies assessing long-term trends in renal function demonstrated progressive renal impairment persisting beyond the initial insult. Consequences identified included unplanned readmission, delay or non-commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy, and development of chronic kidney disease. DISCUSSION Significant dehydration is common following diverting ileostomy; it is linked to acute kidney injury and has a long-term impact on renal function. This study suggests that ileostomy confers significant morbidity particularly related to dehydration and renal impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph P Borucki
- Sir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.,Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Jasmine Crane
- Sir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - James M Hernon
- Sir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.,Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Adam T Stearns
- Sir Thomas Browne Academic Colorectal Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.,Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Du R, Zhou J, Tong G, Chang Y, Li D, Wang F, Ding X, Zhang Q, Wang W, Wang L, Wang D. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: A updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:1514-1525. [PMID: 33622575 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the perioperative morbidity after anterior resection with diverting loop ileostomy (LI) versus colostomy (LC) and its reversal for rectal cancer. The studies on the application of loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy in anterior resection published from January 2000 to January 2020 were searched in the databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Clinical trials. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies were included according to inclusion criteria. Eight studies (2 RCTs and 6 cohort studies) totaling 1451 patients (821 LI and 630 LC) were included in the meta-analysis. The morbidity related to stoma formation and closure did not demonstrate significant differences. Significantly more LCs were complicated by stoma prolapse & retraction (OR:0.26,95%CI:0.11-0.60,P = 0.001), parastomal hernia (OR = 0.52,95%CI:0.30-0.88, P = 0.01), surgical site infection (SSI) (OR = 0.24,95%CI:0.11-0.49,P < 0.0001) and incisional hernias (OR = 0.39,95%CI:0.19-0.83,P = 0.01) than by LIs. Patients with LI demonstrated significantly more complications related to the stoma, such as dehydration (OR = 0.52,95%CI:0.30-0.88, P = 0.01) and ileus (OR = 2.23,95%CI:1.12-4.43, P = 0.02) than patients with LC. While after the subgroup analysis of different publication years, LI could reduce the risk of the morbidity after stoma formation in previous years group (P = 0.04) with a lower heterogeneity (I2 = 37%); LC could reduce the incidence of parastomal dermatitis in recent years group (P < 0.0001) without heterogeneity in each subgroup (I2 = 0%). Cumulative meta-analysis detected significant turning points in dehydration, SSI, and ileus. This meta-analysis recommends diverting LI in the anterior resection for rectal cancer, but there is a risk of dehydration, irritant dermatitis, and ileus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Du
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, West Section of Lvshun South Road No. 9, Dalian 116044, China
| | - Jiajie Zhou
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, West Section of Lvshun South Road No. 9, Dalian 116044, China
| | - Guifan Tong
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, West Section of Lvshun South Road No. 9, Dalian 116044, China
| | - Yue Chang
- Graduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Boyang Lake Road No. 10, Tianjin 301617, China
| | - Dongliang Li
- Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Huaihai Road No.7, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - Feng Wang
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, West Section of Lvshun South Road No. 9, Dalian 116044, China
| | - Xu Ding
- Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Huaihai Road No.7, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - Qi Zhang
- Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Huaihai Road No.7, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, General Surgery Institute of Yangzhou-Yangzhou University, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Nantong Road No.98, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - Liuhua Wang
- Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, General Surgery Institute of Yangzhou-Yangzhou University, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Nantong Road No.98, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - Daorong Wang
- Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, General Surgery Institute of Yangzhou-Yangzhou University, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Nantong Road No.98, Yangzhou 225001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Low preoperative maximum squeezing pressure evaluated by anorectal manometry is a risk factor for non-reversal of diverting stoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 406:131-139. [PMID: 33074347 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-02011-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A diverting stoma is created to prevent anastomotic leakage and related complications impairing sphincteric function in rectal surgery. However, diverting stoma may be left unclosed. This study is aimed to analyze preoperative factors including anorectal manometric data associated with diverting stoma non-reversal before rectal surgery. We also addressed complications related to diverting stoma in patients undergoing surgery for rectal malignant tumor. METHODS A total of 203 patients with rectal malignant tumor who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery with diverting stoma were retrospectively evaluated. The risk factors for non-reversal of diverting stoma were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. For these analyses, anorectal manometric data were measured before rectal surgery. The association between stoma-related complications and other clinicopathological features was also analyzed. RESULTS During the median follow-up of 46.4 months, 24% (49 patients) did not undergo stoma reversal. Among parameters that were available before rectal surgery, age ≥ 75 years, albumin < 3.5 g/dl, tumor size ≥ 30 mm, tumor distance from the anal verge < 4 cm, and maximum squeezing pressure (MSP) < 130 mmHg measured by anorectal manometry (ARM) were independent factors associated with stoma non-reversal. The most common stoma-related complication was peristomal skin irritation (25%). Ileostomy was the only factor associated with peristomal skin irritation. CONCLUSION The current study demonstrated that low preoperative MSP evaluated by ARM, old age, hypoalbuminemia, and a large tumor close to the anus were predictive of diverting stoma non-reversal. Stoma site should be well deliberated when patients have the aforementioned risk factors for diverting stoma non-reversal.
Collapse
|
10
|
Management of colorectal injuries: A Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2019; 85:1016-1020. [PMID: 29659471 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000001929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
11
|
The influence of diverting loop ileostomy vs. colostomy on postoperative morbidity in restorative anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404:129-139. [PMID: 30747281 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01758-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the morbidity of loop ileostomy (LI) and loop colostomy (LC) creation in restorative anterior resection for rectal cancer as well as the morbidity of their reversal. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE via Ovid, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for records published from 1980 to 2017 by three independent researchers. The primary endpoint was overall morbidity after stoma creation and reversal. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR) was used to compare categorical variables. Clinical significance was evaluated using numbers needed to treat (NNT). RESULTS Six studies (two randomized controlled trials and four observational studies) totaling 1063 patients (666 LI and 397 LC) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall morbidity rate after both stoma creation and closure was 15.6% in LI vs. 20.4% in LC [OR(95%CI) = 0.67 (0.29, 1.58); p = 0.36] [NNT(95%CI) = 21 (> 10.4 to benefit, > 2430.2 to harm)]. Morbidity rate after stoma creation was both statistically and clinically significantly lower after LI [18.2% vs. 30.6%; OR(95%CI) = 0.42 (0.25, 0.70); p = 0.001; NNT(95%CI) = 9 (4.7, 29.3)]. Dehydration rate was 3.1% (8/259) in LI vs. 0% (0/168) in LC. The difference was not statistically or clinically significant [OR(95%CI) = 3.00 (0.74, 12.22); p = 0.13; NNT (95%CI) = 33 (19.2, 101.9)]. Ileus rates after stoma closure were significantly higher in LI as compared to LC [5.2% vs. 1.7%; OR(95%CI) = 2.65 (1.13, 6.18); p = 0.02]. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis found no difference between LI and LC in overall morbidity after stoma creation and closure. Morbidity rates following the creation of LI were significantly decreased at the cost of a risk for dehydration.
Collapse
|
12
|
The application of defunctioning stomas after low anterior resection of rectal cancer. Surg Today 2018; 49:451-459. [DOI: 10.1007/s00595-018-1736-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 09/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
13
|
Reichert M, Weber C, Pons-Kühnemann J, Hecker M, Padberg W, Hecker A. Protective loop ileostomy increases the risk for prolonged postoperative paralytic ileus after open oncologic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33:1551-1557. [PMID: 30112664 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3142-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative gut dysmotility is a physiologic and frequent temporary reaction after major abdominal surgery. If paralysis merges into a prolonged ileus state, it causes significant morbidity and subsequently worse outcome and discomfort for the patients. Pathophysiology of pathologic prolonged postoperative paralytic ileus remains multifactorial. METHODS We present a retrospective single-center analysis of patients, who underwent a primary open oncologic anterior rectal resection with primary anastomosis with or without defunctioning loop ileostomy during a 43-month period of observation. Primary endpoint was the rate of prolonged postoperative paralytic ileus, defined by the intravenous administration of neostigmine. Confounders for regression analysis were assessed by univariate analysis and correlations between confounders were examined. Odds ratio for prolonged postoperative paralytic ileus in patients with defunctioning loop ileostomy was estimated by a logistic regression model. RESULTS Of 101 patients (62 male), 62 (61.39%) received defunctioning loop ileostomy. In univariate analysis, male gender and patients with ileostomy showed more frequently prolonged paralysis by tendency (both p = 0.07). Logistic regression analysis proves the influence of a defunctioning ileostomy on the development of prolonged postoperative paralytic ileus after oncologic rectal resection (p = 0.047). Odds ratio for prolonged postoperative paralytic ileus in patients with ileostomy was 4.96 [95% CI 1.02-24.03]. CONCLUSIONS Although the construction of defunctioning loop ileostomies during rectal resection is a safe, uncomplicated surgical procedure, they can cause significant postoperative morbidity for the patients. High fluid and electrolyte loss are well-known complications, but herewith we raise the evidence for prolonged gut paralysis in patients with defunctioning loop ileostomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Reichert
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Strasse 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
| | - Christian Weber
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Strasse 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| | - Jörn Pons-Kühnemann
- Medical Statistics, Institute of Medical Informatics, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim Strasse 6, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| | - Matthias Hecker
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Giessen, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| | - Winfried Padberg
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Strasse 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| | - Andreas Hecker
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Strasse 7, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Risk Factors Associated With Nonclosure of Defunctioning Stomas After Sphincter-Preserving Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60:544-554. [PMID: 28383455 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some patients receiving defunctioning stomas will never undergo stoma reversal, but it is difficult to preoperatively predict which patients will be affected. OBJECTIVE The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify the risk factors associated with nonclosure of temporary stomas after sphincter-preserving low anterior resection for rectal cancer. DATA SOURCES We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Library databases for all of the studies analyzing risk factors for nonclosure of defunctioning stomas. STUDY SELECTION We only included articles published in English in this meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) original article with extractable data, 2) studies including only defunctioning stomas created after low anterior resection for rectal cancer, 3) studies with nonclosure rather than delayed closure as the main end point, and 4) studies analyzing risk factors for nonclosure. INTERVENTION Defunctioning stomas were created after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Stoma nonclosure was the only end point, and it included nonclosure and permanent stoma creation after primary stoma closure. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess methodologic quality of the studies, and risk ratios and 95% CIs were used to assess risk factors. RESULTS Ten studies with 8568 patients were included. The nonclosure rate was 19% (95% CI, 13%-24%; p < 0.001; I= 96.2%). Three demographic factors were significantly associated with nonclosure: older age (risk ratio= 1.50 (95% CI, 1.12-2.02); p = 0.007; I= 39.3%), ASA score >2 (risk ratio = 1.66 (95% CI, 1.51-1.83); p < 0.001; I= 0%), and comorbidities (risk ratio = 1.58 (95% CI, 1.29-1.95); p < 0.001; I= 52.6%). Surgical complications (risk ratio = 1.89 (95% CI, 1.48-2.41); p < 0.001; I= 29.7%), postoperative anastomotic leakage (risk ratio = 3.39 (95% CI, 2.41-4.75); p < 0.001; I= 53.0%), stage IV tumor (risk ratio = 2.96 (95% CI, 1.73-5.09); p < 0.001; I= 88.1%), and local recurrence (risk ratio = 2.84 (95% CI, 2.11-3.83); p < 0.001; I= 6.8%) were strong clinical risk factors for nonclosure. Open surgery (risk ratio = 1.47 (95% CI, 1.01-2.15); p = 0.044; I= 63.6%) showed a borderline significant association with nonclosure. LIMITATIONS Data on some risk factors could not be pooled because of the low number of studies. There was conspicuous heterogeneity between the included studies, so the pooled data were not absolutely free of exaggeration or influence. CONCLUSIONS Older age, ASA score >2, comorbidities, open surgery, surgical complications, anastomotic leakage, stage IV tumor, and local recurrence are risk factors for nonclosure of defunctioning stomas after low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer, whereas tumor height, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are not. Patients with these risk factors should be informed preoperatively of the possibility of nonreversal, and joint decision-making is preferred.
Collapse
|
15
|
Su X, Zhen L, Zhu M, Kuang Y, Qin F, Ye X, Yin X, Wang H. Determinants of self-efficacy and quality of life in patients with temporary enterostomy: a cross-sectional survey. J Clin Nurs 2016; 26:477-484. [DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Su
- Guangzhou Medical University; Guangzhou China
| | - Li Zhen
- Nanfang Hospital; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
| | - Mulan Zhu
- Nanfang Hospital; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
| | - Yinyi Kuang
- The Sixth Affiliated Hospital; Sun Yat-sen University; Guangzhou China
| | - Fang Qin
- Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
| | - Xinmei Ye
- The Sixth Affiliated Hospital; Sun Yat-sen University; Guangzhou China
| | - Xuexia Yin
- The Second Affiliated Hospital; Guangzhou Medical University; Guangzhou China
| | - Huizhen Wang
- School of Nursing; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vermeer TA, Orsini RG, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Rutten HJT, Daams F. Stoma placement in obstructive rectal cancer prior to neo-adjuvant treatment and definitive surgery: A practical guideline. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 42:273-80. [PMID: 26681383 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Revised: 11/01/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mechanical bowel obstruction in rectal cancer is a common problem, requiring stoma placement to decompress the colon and permit neo-adjuvant treatment. The majority of patients operated on in our hospital are referred; after stoma placement at the referring centre without overseeing final type of surgery. Stoma malpositioning and its effects on rectal cancer care are described. METHODS All patients who underwent surgery for locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer between 2000 and 2013 in our tertiary referral centre were reviewed and included if they received a stoma before curative surgery. Patients with recurrent rectal cancer were only included if the stomas from the primary surgery had been restored. The main outcome measures are stoma malpositioning, postoperative and stoma-related complications. RESULTS A total of 726 patients were included; of these, 156 patients (21%) had a stoma before curative surgery. In the majority of patients, acute or pending large bowel obstruction was the main indication for emergent stoma creation; some of the patients had tumour-related fistulae. In 53 patients (34%), the stoma required revision during definitive surgery. No significant differences were found regarding postoperative complications. CONCLUSION One-third of the previously placed emergency stomas were considered to be located inappropriately and required revision. We were able to avoid increased complication rates in patients with a malpositioned stoma, however unnecessary surgery for an inappropriately placed stoma should be avoided to decrease patient inconvenience and risks. An algorithm is proposed for the placement of a suitable stoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T A Vermeer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - R G Orsini
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - G A P Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - H J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - F Daams
- Department of Surgery, VU Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lupinacci RM, Agostini J, Chirica M, Balladur P, Chafaï N, Parc Y, Tiret E, Paye F. Combined stoma reversal and liver resection: a matched case–control study. Am J Surg 2015; 210:501-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2015] [Revised: 03/15/2015] [Accepted: 03/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
18
|
McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 2015; 102:462-79. [PMID: 25703524 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 517] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2014] [Revised: 09/09/2014] [Accepted: 10/08/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leak (AL) represents a dreaded complication following colorectal surgery, with a prevalence of 1-19 per cent. There remains a lack of consensus regarding factors that may predispose to AL and the relative risks associated with them. The objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature, focusing on the role of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors in the development of colorectal ALs. METHODS A systematic review was performed to identify adjustable and non-adjustable preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors in the pathogenesis of AL. Additionally, a severity grading system was proposed to guide treatment. RESULTS Of 1707 papers screened, 451 fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the review. Significant preoperative risk factors were: male sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists fitness grade above II, renal disease, co-morbidity and history of radiotherapy. Tumour-related factors were: distal site, size larger than 3 cm, advanced stage, emergency surgery and metastatic disease. Adjustable risk factors were: smoking, obesity, poor nutrition, alcohol excess, immunosuppressants and bevacizumab. Intraoperative risk factors were: blood loss/transfusion and duration of surgery more than 4 h. Stomas lessen the consequences but not the prevalence of AL. In the postoperative period, CT is the most commonly used imaging tool, with or without rectal contrast, and a C-reactive protein level exceeding 150 mg/l on day 3-5 is the most sensitive biochemical marker. A five-level classification system for AL severity and appropriate management is presented. CONCLUSION Specific risk factors and their potential correction or indications for stoma were identified. An AL severity score is proposed to aid clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F D McDermott
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pérez Domínguez L, García Martínez MT, Cáceres Alvarado N, Toscano Novella A, Higuero Grosso AP, Casal Núñez JE. Morbidity and mortality of temporary diverting ileostomies in rectal cancer surgery. Cir Esp 2014; 92:604-8. [PMID: 24969349 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2013] [Revised: 12/04/2013] [Accepted: 12/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A temporary diverting ileostomy is frequently used to reduce the consequences of a distal anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer surgery. This surgical technique is associated with high morbidity and a not negligible mortality. The aim of this study is to evaluate the morbidity and mortality rate associated with an ileostomy and its posterior closure. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 2001 and 2012, 96 patients with temporary diverting ileostomy were retrospectively analyzed. Morbidity and mortality were analyzed before and after the stoma closure. The studied variables included age, sex, comorbidities, time to bowel continuity restoration and adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS In 5 patients the stoma was permanent and another 5 died. The morbidity and mortality rates associated with the stoma while it was present were 21 and 1% respectively. We performed a stoma closure in 86 patients, 57% of whom had previously received adjuvant therapy. There was no postoperative mortality after closure and the morbidity rate was 24%. The average time between initial surgery and restoration of intestinal continuity was 152.2 days. This interval was significantly higher in patients who had received adjuvant therapy. No statistically significant difference was found between the variables analyzed and complications. CONCLUSIONS Diverting ileostomy is associated with low mortality and high morbidity rates before and after closure. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly delays bowel continuity restoration, although in this study did not influence in the rate of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucinda Pérez Domínguez
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, España.
| | - María Teresa García Martínez
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, España
| | - Nieves Cáceres Alvarado
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, España
| | - Angeles Toscano Novella
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, España
| | - Antonio Pedro Higuero Grosso
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, España
| | - José Enrique Casal Núñez
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Pontevedra, España
| |
Collapse
|