1
|
Park HJ, Kim BW, Lee JK, Park Y, Park JM, Bae JY, Seo SY, Lee JM, Lee JH, Chon HK, Chung JW, Choi HH, Kim MH, Park DA, Jung JH, Cho JY. 2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinical Practice Guidelines for Endoscopic Sedation. Gut Liver 2022; 16:341-356. [PMID: 35502587 PMCID: PMC9099381 DOI: 10.5009/gnl210530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Sedation can resolve anxiety and fear in patients undergoing endoscopy. The use of sedatives has increased in Korea. Appropriate sedation is a state in which the patient feels subjectively comfortable while maintaining the airway reflex for stable spontaneous breathing. The patient should maintain a state of consciousness to the extent that he or she can cooperate with the needs of the medical staff. Despite its benefits, endoscopic sedation has been associated with cardiopulmonary complications. Such cardiopulmonary complications are usually temporary, and most patients recover without sequelae. However, these events may progress to serious complications, such as cardiovascular collapse. Therefore, it is essential to screen high-risk patients before sedation and reduce complications by meticulous monitoring. Additionally, physicians should be familiar with the management of emergencies. The first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic sedation was developed based on previous worldwide guidelines for endoscopic sedation using an adaptation process. The guideline consists of nine recommendations based on a critical review of currently available data and expert consensus when the guideline was drafted. These guidelines should provide clinicians, nurses, medical school students, and policy makers with information on how to perform endoscopic sedation with minimal risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Jun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Byung-Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Kyu Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yehyun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Myung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Jun Yong Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Young Seo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Jae Min Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jee Hyun Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Seoul Metropolitan Children's Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung Ku Chon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University College of Medicine and Hospital, Iksan, Korea
| | - Jun-Won Chung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Hyun Ho Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung Ha Kim
- Yonsei Wonju Medical Library, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Dong Ah Park
- Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hung Jung
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine/Center of Evidence Based Medicine Institute of Convergence Science, Wonju, Korea
| | - Joo Young Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Park HJ, Kim BW, Lee JK, Park Y, Park JM, Bae JY, Seo SY, Lee JM, Lee JH, Chon HK, Chung JW, Choi HH, Kim MH, Park DA, Jung JH, Cho JY. [2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinical Practice Guidelines for Endoscopic Sedation]. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2022; 79:141-155. [PMID: 35473772 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2021.157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Sedation can resolve anxiety and fear in patients undergoing endoscopy. The use of sedatives has increased in Korea. Appropriate sedation is a state in which the patient feels subjectively comfortable while maintaining the airway reflex for stable spontaneous breathing. The patient should maintain a state of consciousness to the extent that he or she can cooperate with the needs of the medical staff. Despite its benefits, endoscopic sedation has been associated with cardiopulmonary complications. Cardiopulmonary complications are usually temporary. Most patients recover without sequelae. However, they may progress to serious complications, such as cardiovascular collapse. Therefore, it is essential to screen high-risk patients before sedation and reduce complications by meticulous monitoring. Additionally, physicians should be familiar with the management of emergencies. The first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic sedation was developed based on previous worldwide guidelines for endoscopic sedation using an adaptation process. The guideline consists of nine recommendations based on a critical review of currently available data and expert consensus when the guideline was drafted. These guidelines should provide clinicians, nurses, medical school students, and policy makers with information on how to perform endoscopic sedation with minimal risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Jun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Byung-Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Kyu Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yehyun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Myung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Jun Yong Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Young Seo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Jae Min Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jee Hyun Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Seoul Metropolitan Children's Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung Ku Chon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea
| | - Jun-Won Chung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Hyun Ho Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Uijungbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung Ha Kim
- Yonsei Wonju Medical Library, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Dong Ah Park
- Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hung Jung
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine/Center of Evidence Based Medicine Institute of Convergence Science, Wonju, Korea
| | - Joo Young Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cha University Gangnam Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park HJ, Kim BW, Lee JK, Park Y, Park JM, Bae JY, Seo SY, Lee JM, Lee JH, Chon HK, Chung JW, Choi HH, Kim MH, Park DA, Jung JH, Cho JY. 2021 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinical Practice Guidelines for Endoscopic Sedation. Clin Endosc 2022; 55:167-182. [PMID: 35473772 PMCID: PMC8995977 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Sedation can resolve anxiety and fear in patients undergoing endoscopy. The use of sedatives has increased in Korea. Appropriate sedation is a state in which the patient feels subjectively comfortable while maintaining the airway reflex for stable spontaneous breathing. The patient should maintain a state of consciousness to the extent that he or she can cooperate with the needs of the medical staff. Despite its benefits, endoscopic sedation has been associated with cardiopulmonary complications. Cardiopulmonary complications are usually temporary. Most patients recover without sequelae. However, they may progress to serious complications, such as cardiovascular collapse. Therefore, it is essential to screen high-risk patients before sedation and reduce complications by meticulous monitoring. Additionally, physicians should be familiar with the management of emergencies. The first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic sedation was developed based on previous worldwide guidelines for endoscopic sedation using an adaptation process. The guideline consists of nine recommendations based on a critical review of currently available data and expert consensus when the guideline was drafted. These guidelines should provide clinicians, nurses, medical school students, and policy makers with information on how to perform endoscopic sedation with minimal risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Jun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Byung-Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Correspondence: Byung-Wook Kim Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 56, Dongsu-ro, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon 21431, Korea Tel: +82-32-280-5908, Fax: +82-32-280-5987, E-mail:
| | - Jun Kyu Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yehyun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Myung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Jun Yong Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Young Seo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Jae Min Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jee Hyun Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Seoul Metropolitan Children’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung Ku Chon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University College of Medicine and Hospital, Iksan, Korea
| | - Jun-Won Chung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Hyun Ho Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Uijungbu St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung Ha Kim
- Yonsei Wonju Medical Library, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Dong Ah Park
- Division of Healthcare Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hung Jung
- Department of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine/Center of Evidence Based Medicine Institute of Convergence Science, Wonju, Korea
| | - Joo Young Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cha University Gangnam Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Unsedated Outpatient Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Stroke Patients: Is It Feasible and Safe? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2019; 29:383-388. [PMID: 31033632 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is an established practice for long-term nutrition in dysphagia-suffering stroke patients. This study sought to determine the feasibility and safety of outpatient, unsedated PEG implementation in stroke patients. This retrospective cohort study involved stroke victims who underwent unsedated outpatient PEG insertion from 2014 to 2017 at our Surgical Endoscopy Unit. Patients were given pharyngeal anesthesia with lidocaine 10% spray, while the PEG tube was placed under local anesthesia. The incidence of intraprocedural and postprocedural complications and 30-day mortality rate were recorded. Data from 127 cases were analyzed. The procedures were performed with minor, transient complications, which resolved after rescue maneuvers. No intraprocedural and postprocedural major complications or death were observed. During the 30-day follow-up, the most important complication involved a single case of accidental PEG removal that was successfully resolved surgically. Unsedated PEG insertion appears to be a feasible, well-tolerated, and safe option for stroke-related dysphagia.
Collapse
|
5
|
Conigliaro R, Fanti L, Manno M, Brosolo P. Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SIED) position paper on the non-anaesthesiologist administration of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2017; 49:1185-1190. [PMID: 28951114 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.08.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2017] [Revised: 07/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Propofol sedation by non-anesthesiologists in GI endoscopy, despite generally considered a safe procedure, is still a matter of debate. Benefits of propofol sedation include rapid onset of action, greater patient comfort and fast recovery with prompt discharge from the endoscopy unit. The use of propofol for sedation in GI endoscopy, preceded by dedicated training courses, has been approved by several anaesthesiologist and gastroenterologist societies but an Italian position paper taking into account the Italian law is lacking. In the present document, the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SIED) Sedation Group, on behalf of the SIED, presents a series of updated position statements concerning propofol sedation in GI endoscopy. The paper summarizes the advantages of propofol, how it should be administered and how patients should be monitored. Moreover, details concerning proper training of non-anaesthesiologist personnel involved in its use are provided. Protocols concerning propofol use s must be shared with the hospital's anaesthesiology staff and approved by the hospital's Executive Director.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Conigliaro
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale S. Agostino-Estense Hospital/Hospital-University Institution, Modena, Italy.
| | - Lorella Fanti
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, University-Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Manno
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale di Carpi, Ramazzini Hospital, Carpi, Modena, Italy
| | - Piero Brosolo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale S. Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Da B, Buxbaum J. Training and Competency in Sedation Practice in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2016; 26:443-62. [PMID: 27372769 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2016.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The practice of endoscopic sedation requires a thorough understanding of preprocedural assessment, sedation pharmacology, intraprocedure monitoring, adverse event management, and postprocedural care. The training process has become increasingly standardized and entails knowledge and practice-based components. The use of propofol in particular requires a higher level of structured training owing to its narrow therapeutic window. Simulation has increased opportunities for practice-based training in a controlled environment. After completion of training, the endoscopist must demonstrate competence in theoretical understanding and technical ability to administer sedation. Although individual institutions have certification processes, there is a lack of validated, standardized methods to confirm competence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Da
- Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - James Buxbaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim BD, Smith TR, Lim S, Cybulski GR, Kim JYS. Predictors of unplanned readmission in patients undergoing lumbar decompression: multi-institutional analysis of 7016 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 20:606-16. [DOI: 10.3171/2014.3.spine13699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Object
Unplanned hospital readmission represents a large financial burden on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, commercial insurance payers, hospitals, and individual patients, and is a principal target for cost reduction. A large-scale, multi-institutional study that evaluates risk factors for readmission has not been previously performed in patients undergoing lumbar decompression procedures. The goal of this multicenter retrospective study was to find preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative predictive factors that result in unplanned readmission (UR) after lumbar decompression surgery.
Methods
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was retrospectively reviewed to identify all patients who received lumbar decompression procedures in 2011. Risk-adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate independent predictors of UR.
Results
The overall rate of UR among patients undergoing lumbar decompression was 4.4%. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, anemia (odds ratio [OR] 1.48), dependent functional status (OR 3.03), total operative duration (OR 1.003), and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class 4 (OR 3.61) remained as independent predictors of UR. Postoperative complications that were significantly associated with UR included overall complications (OR 5.18), pulmonary embolism (OR 3.72), and unplanned reoperation (OR 56.91).
Conclusions
There were several risk factors for UR after lumbar spine decompression surgery. Identification of high-risk patients and appropriate allocation of resources to reduce postoperative incidence may reduce the readmission rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby D. Kim
- 1Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago Medical School, North Chicago; and
| | | | - Seokchun Lim
- 1Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago Medical School, North Chicago; and
| | | | - John Y. S. Kim
- 3Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|