Transcatheter arterial embolization should be the salvage treatment of choice in all patients with bleeding from duodenal ulcers resistant to endoscopic hemostasis

Transcatheter arterial embolization is the first-line therapy of choice in peptic ulcer bleeding not responding to endoscopic therapy

OBJECTIVE

In 5-10% of patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) it is impossible to achieve endoscopic hemostasis because of severe bleeding. These patients have traditionally been treated surgically. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) may, however, be associated with a better outcome because of the less-invasive nature of the procedure. The aim of the present study was to identify the treatment of choice in endoscopy-refractory PUB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study. Consecutive patients treated with surgery or TAE for endoscopy-refractory PUB during a period of 16 years at a university hospital were included. Primary hemostasis, rebleeding rate, mortality, and complications were assessed. Mortality was compared between groups after adjustment for age, comorbidity, and anemia using logistic regression analyses. Comorbidity was quantified using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).

RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen patients were included. Patients treated with TAE had a higher CCI (mean: 2.33 vs 1.42; p = .003), and more severe anemia (mean: 6.8 vs 7.9 g/dl; p = .007) compared with patients treated with surgery. Surgery was associated with a higher rate of primary hemostasis (100% vs 91%; p = .007), lower rate of rebleeding (15% vs 40%; p = .004) but also higher rate of complications (60% vs 38%; p = .02) than TAE. Surgery was associated with an increased mortality (Odds ratio: 3.05; p = .033) when adjusting for confounding factors and excluding patients (n = 3) who were not candidates for both interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose use of TAE as first-line therapy in these patients as it may be associated with lower mortality and lower rate of complications compared with surgery.

Supplementary arteriel embolization an option in high-risk ulcer bleeding--a randomized study

OBJECTIVE

One of the major challenges in peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) is rebleeding which is associated with up to a fivefold increase in mortality. We examined if supplementary transcatheter arterial embolization (STAE) performed after achieved endoscopic hemostasis improves outcome in patients with high-risk ulcers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was designed as a non-blinded, parallel group, randomized-controlled trial and performed in a university hospital setting. Patients admitted with PUB from Forrest Ia - IIb ulcers controlled by endoscopic therapy were randomized (1:1 ratio) to STAE of the bleeding artery within 24 h or continued standard treatment. Randomization was stratified according to stigmata of hemorrhage. Patients were followed for 30 days. Primary outcome was a composite endpoint where patients were classified into five groups based on transfusion requirement, development of rebleeding, need of hemostatic intervention and mortality. Secondary outcomes were rebleeding, number of blood transfusions received, duration of admission and mortality.

RESULTS

Totally 105 patients were included. Of the 49 patients allocated to STAE 31 underwent successful STAE. There was no difference in composite endpoint. Two versus eight patients re-bled in the STAE and control group, respectively (Intention-to-treat analysis; p = .10). After adjustment for possible imbalances a strong trend was noted between STAE and rate of rebleeding (p = .079).

CONCLUSIONS

STAE is potentially useful for preventing rebleeding in high-risk PUB. STAE can safely be performed in selected cases with high risk of rebleeding. Further studies are needed in order to confirm these findings; ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT01125852.