Emerging strategies in ulcer therapy: pumps and receptors

Pharmacokinetic changes of drugs in a rat model of liver cirrhosis induced by dimethylnitrosamine, alone and in combination with diabetes mellitus induced by streptozotocin

Rats with liver cirrhosis induced by N-dimethylnitrosamine (LC) and rats with LC with diabetes mellitus induced by streptozotocin (LCD) have been developed as animal models for human liver cirrhosis and liver cirrhosis with diabetes mellitus, respectively. Changes in the pharmacokinetics of drugs (mainly non-renal clearance, CLNR) in LC and LCD rats reported in the literature compared with respective control rats were reviewed. This review mainly explains the changes in the CLNRs of drugs (which are mainly metabolized via hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450s, CYPs) in LC and LCD rats, in terms of the changes in in vitro hepatic intrinsic clearance (CLint; mainly due to the changes in CYPs in the disease state), free (unbound) fraction of a drug in the plasma (fp) and hepatic blood flow rate (QH) depending on the hepatic excretion ratio of the drug. Generally, changes in the CLNRs of drugs in LC and LCD rats could be well explained by the above-mentioned three factors. The mechanism of urinary excretion of drugs (such as glomerular filtration or renal active secretion or reabsorption) in LC and LCD rats is also discussed. The pharmacokinetics of the drugs reported in the LC and LCD rats were scarce in humans. Thus, the present rat data should be extrapolated carefully to humans.

Faster clearance of omeprazole in rats with acute renal failure induced by uranyl nitrate: contribution of increased expression of hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A1 and intestinal CYP1A and 3A subfamilies

It has been reported that omeprazole is mainly metabolized via hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1/2, CYP2D1 and CYP3A1/2 in male Sprague-Dawley rats, and the expression of hepatic CYP3A1 is increased in male Sprague-Dawley rats with acute renal failure induced by uranyl nitrate (U-ARF rats). Thus, the metabolism of omeprazole would be expected to increase in U-ARF rats. After intravenous administration of omeprazole (20 mgkg−1) to U-ARF rats, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC) was significantly reduced (371 vs 494 μg min mL−1), possibly due to the significantly faster non-renal clearance (56.6 vs 41.2 mL min−1 kg−1) compared with control rats. This could have been due to increased expression of hepatic CYP3A1 in U-ARF rats. After oral administration of omeprazole (40 mg kg−1) to U-ARF rats, the AUC was also significantly reduced (89.3 vs 235 μg min mL−1) compared with control rats. The AUC difference after oral administration (62.0% decrease) was greater than that after intravenous administration (24.9% decrease). This may have been primarily due to increased intestinal metabolism of omeprazole caused by increased expression of intestinal CYP1A and 3A subfamilies in U-ARF rats, in addition to increased hepatic metabolism.

Pharmacokinetics of omeprazole after intravenous and oral administration to rats with liver cirrhosis induced by dimethylnitrosamine

The aim of this study is to report the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole after intravenous (20 mg/kg) and oral (40 mg/kg) administration to rats with liver cirrhosis induced by dimethylnitrosamine (cirrhotic rats) with respect to CYP isozyme changes. The expressions of CYP1A2 and 3A1 decreased in cirrhotic rats and omeprazole is reported to be mainly metabolized via CYP1A1/2, 2D1, and 3A1/2 in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Hence, the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole could be changed in cirrhotic rats. After intravenous administration to cirrhotic rats, the AUC (1180 microg min/ml versus 474 microg min/ml) and CL(NR) (17.4 ml/min/kg versus 42.3 ml/min/kg) of omeprazole were significantly greater and slower, respectively, than the controls. This could be due to decrease in the expressions of CYP1A2 and 3A1 in cirrhotic rats. The significantly slower CL(NR) could be supported by significantly slower in vitro CL(int) for the disappearance of omeprazole from hepatic microsomal study (0.102 ml/min/mg protein versus 0.144 ml/min/mg protein) and slower hepatic blood flow rate in cirrhotic rats. After oral administration to cirrhotic rats, the AUC difference was considerably greater (451% versus 149%) than that after intravenous administration, possibly due to decrease in intestinal first-pass effect of omeprazole in addition to decrease in hepatic metabolism of omeprazole in cirrhotic rats.

Pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in rats with water deprivation for 72 hours

Dehydration can occur by excessive sweating, polyuria, severe diarrhea and hyperthermia. Previous studies reported that the expressions of CYP1A1/2 and 3A1(23)/2 were not changed in male Sprague-Dawley rats with 72 h water deprivation (dehydrated rats), and that the metabolism of omeprazole is mainly catalysed via CYP1A1/2, 2D1 and 3A23/2 in rats. Hence, it could be expected that the hepatic metabolism of omeprazole would not be changed considerably in dehydrated rats, if the contribution of CYP2D1 to the metabolism of omeprazole in dehydrated rats is not considerable. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole were compared after intravenous (20 mg/kg) and oral (40 mg/kg) administration in control rats and in dehydrated rats. After intravenous administration, the time-averaged nonrenal clearance (Cl(nr)) values of omeprazole were comparable between the two groups of rats. This could be supported by comparable in vitro intrinsic clearance (Cl(int)) values for the disappearance of omeprazole in rat hepatic microsomes and the comparable free (unbound to plasma proteins) fractions of omeprazole in plasma in the two groups of rats. After oral administration, the AUC values of omeprazole were also comparable in the two groups of rats. The above data suggest that the dehydration state did not affect considerably the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in rats.

Effects of enzyme inducers and inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous omeprazole in rats

A series of experiments using various inducers and inhibitors of the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes were conducted to find CYP isozymes responsible for the metabolism of omeprazole in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Omeprazole, 20 mg/kg, was administered intravenously. In rats pretreated with SKF 525-A (a nonspecific CYP isozyme inhibitor in rats), the time-averaged nonrenal clearance (Cl(nr)) was significantly slower (77.1% decrease) than that in untreated rats. This indicated that omeprazole is metabolized via CYP isozymes in rats. Hence, rats were pretreated with various enzyme inducers and inhibitors. In rats pretreated with 3-methylcholanthrene and dexamethasone (main inducers of CYP1A1/2 and 3A1/2 in rats, respectively), the Cl(nr) values were significantly faster (43.8% and 26.3% increase, respectively). In rats pretreated with troleandomycin and quinine (main inhibitors of CYP3A1/2 and 2D1 in rats, respectively), the Cl(nr) values were significantly slower (20.9% and 12.9% decrease, respectively). However, the Cl(nr) values were not significantly different in rats pretreated with orphenadrine, isoniazid and sulfaphenazole (main inducers of CYP2B1/2 and 2E1, and a main inhibitor of 2C11, respectively, in rats) compared with those of respective control rats. The above data suggested that omeprazole could be mainly metabolized via CYP1A1/2, 3A1/2 and 2D1 in male rats.

Advanced method for determination of omeprazole in plasma by HPLC

An advanced and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for determination of omeprazole in human plasma has been developed. After omeprazole was extracted from plasma with diethylether, the organic phase was transferred to another tube and trapped back with 0.1 N NaOH solution. The alkaline aqueous layer was injected into a reversed-phase C8 column. Lansoprazole was used as an internal standard. The mobile phase consisted of 30% of acetonitrile and 70% of 0.2 M KH2P04, pH 7.0. Recoveries of the analytes and internal standard were >75.48%. The coefficients of variation of intra- and inter-day assay were <5.78 and 4.59% for plasma samples. The detection limit in plasma was 2 ng/ml. The clinical applicability of this assay method was evaluated by determining plasma concentration-time courses of the respective analytes in 24 healthy volunteers after oral administration 40 mg of omeprazole. The present assay is considered to be simple, accurate, economical and suitable for the study of the kinetic disposition of omeprazole in the body.

U.S. experience with omeprazole in duodenal ulcer. Multicenter double-blind comparative study with ranitidine. The Omeprazole DU Comparative Study Group

To assess the comparative efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg, a proton pump inhibitor, versus ranitidine 150 mg twice a day, an H2-receptor antagonist, in healing duodenal ulcers we performed a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial in 309 patients with endoscopically diagnosed ulcers. Patients were treated for up to four weeks and were seen at week 2 and at week 4, if unhealed at week 2, for determination of ulcer status by endoscopy, review of daily self-assessment symptom diaries, and clinical laboratory including fasting serum gastrin. Gastrin levels were repeated two weeks after cessation of study medication. Evaluation of baseline demographic and laboratory parameters demonstrated no significant differences between the two groups at entry. At week 2, 42% of the omeprazole and 34% of the ranitidine-treated patients were healed (P = NS). At week 4, there was a 19% advantage in ulcer healing for the omeprazole-treated patients in comparison to those treated with ranitidine (82% vs 63%, respectively, P less than 0.05). Healing of ulcers greater than or equal to 1.0 cm occurred in 83% of those treated with omeprazole versus 37% treated with ranitidine (P less than 0.01). There were no significant differences in rate of pain relief or incidence of clinical laboratory abnormalities. Mean fasting serum gastrin value during treatment increased over the baseline in both groups, (P less than 0.05). The percent change was significantly greater with omeprazole but few patients had elevations above the upper limit of normal for the assay. Both drugs were well tolerated. Omeprazole 20 mg demonstrated superiority in healing duodenal ulcers at four weeks in comparison to ranitidine 150 mg twice daily and was more effective in healing ulcers greater than or equal to 1.0 cm.

Effect of omeprazole on duodenal ulcer-associated antral gastritis and Helicobacter pylori

This study set out to investigate the effects of omeprazole or ranitidine on the progression of antral gastritis and Helicobacter pylori in patients with active duodenal ulcer. A double-blind, double-dummy trial was performed in 270 patients, 241 of whom were studied histologically for the presence of H. pylori. Patients were randomized to receive omeprazole, 10 mg every morning, omeprazole, 20 mg every morning, or ranitidine, 150 mg twice a day, for four weeks. Endoscopy was performed on entry and at weekly intervals during the study; at least two antral biopsies were taken on each occasion to assess the activity and degree of chronic inflammation, as reflected by the degree of polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration and mononuclear cell infiltration, respectively. Biopsy specimens also were assessed histologically for H. pylori. The sex, age and maximal acid output were comparable in the three treatment groups. The percentages of patients showing an improvement in the activity of gastritis in the four consecutive weeks of treatment were 9%, 40%, 51%, and 53% for omeprazole, 10 mg (N = 78); 14%, 42%, 49%, and 53% for omeprazole, 20 mg (N = 81); and 2%, 23%, 30%, and 33% for ranitidine, 150 mg twice a day (N = 82) (life table analysis gave P less than 0.01 for both omeprazole regimens compared with ranitidine). The degree of chronic inflammation showed similar changes. The density of H. pylori decreased significantly after treatment with omeprazole, 10 mg or 20 mg, (both, P less than 0.00001) but not with ranitidine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Omeprazole. Overview and opinion

Omeprazole, a substituted benzimidazole, is a specific inhibitor of the enzyme H+/K(+)-ATPase, which is found on the secretory surface of the parietal cell. This enzyme, the "proton pump," catalyzes the final step in acid secretion. Omeprazole is a powerful inhibitor of gastric acid secretion. At the time of writing, omeprazole has been licensed in the United States for the treatment of severe grades of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as well as GERD unresponsive to treatment with currently available agents, and for the treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and other gastric hypersecretory states. Most recently, it has been recommended by the FDA advisory committee for approval as first-line therapy in duodenal ulcer disease.

[The second generation of gastric antisecretory agents: omeprazole]

Omeprazole is the first representative of a new class of gastric acid secretion inhibitors. It acts by specific and prolonged inhibition of H+K+ ATPase, or proton pump, which is the terminal and compulsory stage of acid secretion by the parietal cells. The drug therefore inhibits both basal and stimulated secretion. It appears from therapeutic trials that omeprazole administered in doses of 20 mg a.m. once a day is superior to the H2-receptor antagonists in the healing of active duodenal ulcers and ulcerated reflux oesophagitis. It is as active or slightly more active than histamine inhibitors in gastric ulcers. Finally, it is the treatment of choice to prevent ulcerations in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. These are the 4 indications for omeprazole at the moment. The use of that drug for periods of a few weeks has not given rise to any significant side-effect.

Effect of omeprazole on acute gastric stress ulceration in cervical cord transected rats

Patients with acute paraplegia from trauma have an increased frequency of developing gastric stress ulceration and subsequent hemorrhage. Current treatment of gastric stress ulcer is by antacids or H2 antagonists, but despite such therapy stress ulceration still occurs, probably because these agents are unable to maintain gastric pH above 4. Omeprazole, which blocks the terminal step of acid secretion--the proton pump, can produce long-lasting achlorhydria. This study examined the efficacy of omeprazole in preventing stress ulcer in rats with acute cervical cord transection. Omeprazole was administered intraduodenally at 1.725, 2.625, 3.5, and 17.5 mg/kg, and the ulcer incidence and gastric acid output were measured. Omeprazole produced a dose-dependent inhibition of gastric acid output in the cervical cord transected rat. At the highest dose, complete achlorhydria was achieved. The quantity of gastric ulceration was inversely proportional to the omeprazole dosage with nearly complete prevention of ulceration at the highest dose. In conclusion, omeprazole is very effective in preventing gastric stress ulcers in the spinal cord transected rat. This appears to be related to its potent long-lasting inhibitory effect on gastric acidity.

Recent advances in pharmaceutical chemistry--review II. Histamine H2-receptor antagonists

The concept of histamine receptors is outlined and the rationale for the synthesis of H2-antagonists presented. Structure-activity relationships among these compounds are described and aspects of absorption, distribution and elimination discussed with particular reference to cimetidine and ranitidine. Oxmetidine, lupitidine and loxtidine are also considered. Methods for the analysis of these drugs in body fluids are presented followed by a discussion of their toxicology. Volunteer and patient studies are also surveyed.

Omeprazole. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in peptic ulcer disease and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

Omeprazole is a substituted benzimidazole derivative which markedly inhibits basal and stimulated gastric acid secretion. It has a unique mode of action, irreversibly blocking the so-called proton pump of the parietal cell which is supposedly the terminal step in the acid secretory pathway. In animals, on a weight basis, omeprazole is 2 to 10 times more potent than cimetidine in inhibiting gastric acid secretion. Toxicological studies in rats have shown that very high doses of omeprazole administered for 2 years produce hyperplasia of gastric enterochromaffin-like cells and carcinoids, a few with proliferations into the submucosa. The significance of such findings to the clinical situation is wholly speculative and requires further research. Preliminary studies in patients with duodenal ulcers or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome have found no mucosal changes which would suggest that the drug represents a risk for development of carcinoid tumours at therapeutic dosages. In patients with duodenal ulcers omeprazole, at dosages of at least 20mg once daily, produced ulcer healing rates of between 60 and 100% after 2 weeks and between 90 and 100% after 4 weeks, even in patients resistant to treatment with H2-receptor antagonists. Comparative trials clearly demonstrated that omeprazole 20 to 40 mg administered once daily was significantly more effective than usual dosage regimens of cimetidine and ranitidine in healing duodenal ulcers during 2 to 4 weeks of treatment. At present no data are available evaluating omeprazole as maintenance therapy once ulcers have healed. Other clinical trials have also shown that omeprazole is effective for treating gastric ulcers, ulcerative peptic oesophagitis, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. In patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome the profound and long lasting antisecretory activity of omeprazole may make it the drug of choice for treating the massive acid hypersecretion associated with the disease, especially when H2-receptor antagonists are ineffective. During clinical trials reported to date omeprazole has been very well tolerated but further clinical experience is essential to fully evaluate its safety profile. Thus, omeprazole represents a pharmacologically unique antisecretory drug which is very effective for rapidly healing peptic ulcers and peptic oesophagitis, and for reducing gastric acid hypersecretion in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. If the apparent absence of undesirable mucosal morphological changes during treatment with usual doses in patients with peptic ulcer disease is confirmed, it may be a major advance in the treatment of these diseases.