Participation in mass screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test

Validation of Microsimulation Models against Alternative Model Predictions and Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background. This study aimed to assess the validity of 2 microsimulation models of colorectal cancer (CRC), Policy1-Bowel and ASCCA. Methods. The model-estimated CRC risk in population subgroups with different health statuses, "dwell time" (time from incident precancerous polyp to symptomatically detected CRC), and reduction in symptomatically detected CRC incidence after a one-time complete removal of polyps and/or undetected CRC were compared with published findings from 3 well-established models (MISCAN, CRC-SPIN, and SimCRC). Furthermore, 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that provided screening using a guaiac fecal occult blood test (Funen trial, Burgundy trial, and Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study [MCCCS]) or flexible sigmoidoscopy (NORCCAP, SCORE, and UKFSST) with long-term follow-up were simulated. Model-estimated long-term relative reductions of CRC incidence (RR_inc) and mortality (RR_mort) were compared with the RCTs' findings. Results. The Policy1-Bowel and ASCCA estimates showed more similarities to CRC-SPIN and SimCRC. For example, overall dwell times estimated by Policy1-Bowel (24.0 years) and ASCCA (25.3) were comparable to CRC-SPIN (25.8) and SimCRC (25.2) but higher than MISCAN (10.6). In addition, ∼86% of Policy1-Bowel's and ∼74% of ASCCA's estimated RR_inc and RR_mort were consistent with the RCTs' long-term follow-up findings. For example, at 17 to 18 years of follow-up, the MCCCS reported RR_mort of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.83) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.62-0.97) for the annual and biennial screening arm, respectively, and the UKFSST reported RR_mort of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.62-0.79) for CRC at all sites and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.46-0.65) for distal CRC. The corresponding model estimates were 0.65, 0.74, 0.81, and 0.61, respectively, for Policy1-Bowel and 0.65, 0.70, 0.75, and 0.58, respectively, for ASCCA. Conclusion. Policy1-Bowel and ASCCA's estimates are largely consistent with the data included for comparisons, which indicates good model validity.

The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT

BACKGROUND

Population-wide screening for people at average risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by faecal occult blood test (FOBT) is under consideration in Australia.

METHODS

Qualitative methods were used to examine the views of community members who did (n = 18) or did not (n = 12) participate in a pilot program of FOBT screening. In addition, views were obtained from general practitioners (GPs) and specialist gastroenterologists directly involved in the implementation of the program. Two focus group sessions were conducted with screening participants and interviews were conducted with nonparticipants, GPs and gastroenterologists.

RESULTS

The findings suggest that CRC screening by FOBT distributed to households by mail was well accepted by the community and by the medical practitioners involved in its implementation. The trial had little negative effect on general practice. Both medical practitioners and consumers raised concerns about the efficacy of FOBT screening. Medical practitioners were also concerned about the potential burden mass screening could place on the public (government-funded) health care sector.

CONCLUSIONS

It would seem that CRC screening using FOBT will not enjoy unqualified support from the community or from medical practitioners involved in the continuum of screening. Information about the objectives of screening programs, in general, and the efficacy of FOBT screening in particular, needs to be provided to the community to ensure informed individual choice.

Declining the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer: a qualitative investigation of the decision-making process

Qualitative methods were used to investigate decision-making among a group of older adults who declined the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer. Interviews were conducted with 60 people (30 men and 30 women) who either had not responded to the screening letter or who responded saying that they were not interested in participating. The findings suggest that low perceived susceptibility to bowel cancer, in terms of current health status, family history or absence of bowel symptoms. was an important factor in the decision to decline screening. Procedural barriers such as embarrassment, pain/discomfort and perceived unpleasantness of the test were reported as relatively minor, although the test was considered more physically intrusive than other screening tests. Avoidant attitudes emerged as an important theme and were reported by a third of respondents. Distinct patterns of decision-making were also observed and three groups emerged from accounts: (i) forgetting or avoiding making a decision about the test (ii) a confident rejection of the test based on a few salient factors, and (iii) a more careful consideration of the test focusing on issues of susceptibility. The findings are discussed in the context of models of health behaviour and bowel cancer screening participation research.

Colorectal cancer screening beliefs. Focus groups with first-degree relatives

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this paper is to describe the perceived benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening reported by first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, the authors used focus groups to identify perceived benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening among parents and children of colorectal cancer patients. Four focus groups were conducted with relatives of colorectal cancer patients seen at two university medical centers in the Midwest. The groups ranged in size from five to eight members each and were stratified by gender.

RESULTS

Four benefits of colorectal cancer screening were identified by participants: finding colorectal cancer early, decreasing the chances of dying from colorectal cancer, freedom from worry about colorectal cancer, and reassurance that one was cancer-free. Four main barriers were identified that applied to all four types of colorectal cancer screening or to colorectal cancer screening in general. These included inadequate public awareness of colorectal cancer, inconsistent recommendations from healthcare providers, concerns about the efficacy of screening tests, and embarrassment. Barriers unique to each screening test also were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding individual beliefs about the benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening will allow clinicians and researchers to develop effective interventions to increase screening. Results from the focus groups have been used to develop an instrument to measure benefits and barriers to colorectal cancer screening, which now needs to be tested with more culturally and socioeconomically diverse groups.

Promoting cancer screening among the first-degree relatives of breast and colorectal cancer patients: the design of two randomized trials

BACKGROUND

In this paper two large nationwide trials are described, both of which will test a comparable telephone-based counseling intervention to promote cancer screening among the first-degree relatives (FDRs) of breast and colorectal cancer patients. The unit of randomization will be the family unit of eligible FDRs. Access to FDRs will be obtained from their relatives with cancer. Selected intervention and design issues are reviewed, including how both projects will respond to FDRs who exhibit significant levels of cancer-specific anxiety or distress and how potential high-risk cancer families will be accommodated.

METHODS

Pursuant to the development of both studies, two feasibility surveys were conducted to determine whether patients would grant access to their FDRs and whether the FDRS identified by these patients would be receptive to the telephone intervention.

RESULTS

Approximately 80% (106 of 132) of breast cancer patients agreed to provide access to their eligible FDRs when contacted on-site at participating hospitals and clinics. Of those subsequently selected for telephone follow-up (n = 95 or 90%), 80% (n = 76) were successfully contacted by telephone, and of these 97% (n = 74) provided the names and telephone numbers of their FDRs. Among colorectal cancer patients contacted on-site (n = 46), 96% (n = 44) agreed to provide access to their FDRs, and of those contacted by telephone (n = 33 or 75%), 91% (n = 30) provided the requested information about their FDRs. Once contacted, 95% of breast cancer FDRs (55 of 58) and 91% of colorectal cancer patients (51 of 56) endorsed the intervention strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

It is argued that this intervention, if proven effective, could provide an exportable strategy for reaching large numbers of high-risk individuals to promote cancer screening.

Participation in faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer in a well defined French population: results of five screening rounds from 1988 to 1996

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence on compliance of demographic variables and of the way of proposing a faecal occult blood test in a colorectal cancer mass screening programme.

SETTING

Well defined population in Burgundy (France).

METHODS

From 1988 to 1996 five screening rounds were conducted in people aged 45 to 74 on entering the study. The screening test was provided free of charge by primary care physicians over a four month period, then mailed to non-consultants, followed by a potential reminder letter. The whole population was invited to participate in each screening campaign.

RESULTS

During the five successive rounds, compliance was 52.8%, 54.0%, 57.3%, 58.3%, and 56.2%. It was higher in women than in men, in those initially aged 50 to 69 than in the extreme age groups, and in urban than in rural areas. Overall, 68.7% of the invited population completed at least one screening test and 37.2% completed the five rounds. Among those who participated once in a screening campaign, between 79.6% and 87.6% participated in the succeeding ones. Compliance was higher when the test was proposed by GPs (varying between 85.2% and 94.0% according to the screening campaign) than when it was sent by post (varying between 26.0% and 33.7%).

CONCLUSION

In France, a participation rate of over 50% can be achieved in colorectal cancer screening by means of a faecal occult blood test. To achieve this, primary care physicians have to play an active part in the programme and the test must be mailed to non-consultants.

Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the published literature on adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy. Specifically, the review addresses the following: 1) prevalence of FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; 2) interventions to increase adherence to FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; 3) correlates or predictors of adherence to FOBT and sigmoidoscopy; and 4) reasons for nonadherence. Other objectives are to put the literature on CRC screening adherence in the context of recently reported findings from experimental interventions to change prevention and early detection behaviors and to suggest directions for future research on CRC screening adherence. CRC screening offers the potential both for primary and for secondary prevention. Data from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey show that 26% of the population more than 49 years of age report FOBT within the past 3 years and 33% report ever having had sigmoidoscopy. The Year 2000 goals set forth in Healthy People 2000 are for 50% of the population more than 49 years of age to report FOBT within the past 2 years and for 40% to report that they ever had sigmoidoscopy. Thus, systematic efforts to increase CRC screening are warranted. To date, attempts to promote CRC screening have used both a public health model that targets entire communities, e.g., mass media campaigns, and a medical model that targets individuals, e.g., general practice patients. Most of these efforts, however, did not include systematic evaluation of strategies to increase adherence. The data on FOBT show that the median adherence rate to programmatic offers of FOBT is between 40% and 50%, depending on the type of population offered the test, e.g., patients or employees. Approximately, 50% of those initially offered testing in unselected populations will respond to minimal prompts or interventions. A salient issue for FOBT, however, is whether or not the behavior can be sustained over time. Fewer studies examined adherence to sigmoidoscopy. Adherence was highest in relatives of CRC cases and in employer-sponsored programs offered to workers at increased risk of CRC. At present, we know very little about the determinants of CRC screening behaviors, particularly as they relate to rescreening.

Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test

BACKGROUND

Case-control studies and a voluntary-based follow-up study have suggested that repeated screening with faecal-occult-blood (FOB) tests can lead to a reduction in mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this randomised study was to compare mortality rates after FOB tests every 2 years during a 10-year period with those of unscreened similar controls.

METHODS

140,000 people aged 45-75 years lived in Funen, Denmark, in August, 1985, and were considered for inclusion in our study. Before randomisation we excluded individuals who had CRC or precursor adenomas and those who had taken part in a previous pilot study. Randomisation of 137,485 people in blocks of 14 allocated three per 14 to the screening group (30,967), three per 14 to the control group (30,966), and eight not to be enrolled in the study (75,552). Controls were not told about the study and continued to use health-care facilities as normal. Hemoccult-II blood tests (with dietary restrictions but without rehydration) were sent to screening-group participants. Only those participants who completed the first screening round were invited for further screening--five rounds of screening during a 10-year period. Participants with positive tests were asked to attend to full examination and were offered colonoscopy whenever possible. The primary endpoint was death from CRC.

FINDINGS

Of the 30,967 screening-group participants, 20,672 (67%) completed the first screening round and were invited for further screening; more than 90% accepted repeated screenings. During the 10-year study, 481 people in the screening group had a diagnosis of CRC, compared with 483 unscreened controls. There were 205 deaths attributable to CRC in the screening group, compared with 249 deaths in controls. CRC mortality, including deaths attributable to complications from CRC treatment, was significantly lower in the screening group than in controls (mortality ratio 0.82 [95% CI 0.68-0.99]) p = 0.03).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings indicate that biennial screening by FOB tests can reduce CRC mortality. This study is being continued to improve its statistical power and to assess the effect of the removal of more precursor adenomas in the screening-group participants than in controls on CRC incidence.

Colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic populations

Colorectal cancer is the second commonest cause of cancer death in the UK. An effective national screening programme is urgently required to reduce the substantial morbidity and mortality from the disease. The success of any screening programme will depend on the screening test detecting early Dukes's A carcinomas and adenomatous polyps. Prognosis is directly related to tumour staging and a proportion of carcinomas are thought to arise from polyps. Two screening methods exist--faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy. Large trials of faecal occult blood testing show that it detects more early lesions than in patients presenting with symptoms, but whether this reduces mortality is not yet confirmed and lack of sensitivity for cancers and polyps may ultimately limits its usefulness. The role of sigmoidoscopy in screening, particularly flexible sigmoidoscopy, has not been fully investigated. Flexible sigmoidoscopy has a greater sensitivity for distal lesions than stool testing and a randomised controlled trial of its efficacy is planned in Britain. Compliance with screening is essential to ensure its cost effectiveness in both health and economic terms. Large trials of faecal occult blood testing conducted over several years achieved compliance rates in excess of 60%, although in smaller studies these are often much less. Women frequently participate more than men. There are many reasons for non-compliance including lack of appreciation of the concept of asymptomatic illness and fear of the screening tests and cancer itself. Colorectal cancer screening is relatively cheap compared with breast and cervical cancer screening. Provisional cost estimates suggest that the amount spent to detect or prevent cancer by screening is similar to the amount required to treat a symptomatic patient.

The potential benefits and harms of screening for colorectal cancer

Australian guidelines for colorectal cancer screening for average-risk populations vary from recommendations for annual screening by faecal occult blood testing for those over 40 years to recommendations that screening may be appropriate if requested by an informed patient aged 50 to 75 years. There are five large screening trials, of which three have published mortality data. A meta-analysis of the mortality data suggests a 19 per cent reduction in colorectal cancer mortality (95 per cent confidence intervals 0.68 to 0.96) with Hemoccult screening. Because of the width of the confidence interval, decisions about the magnitude of the effect of screening should await further trial results, which should be available in the next few years. In the interim, we should examine issues of harm and costs in Australia. For example, in the major trials, over 80 per cent of positive results have been falsely positive and have required invasive investigation. Estimates of the cost-effectiveness of screening for the Australian health system are not yet available and are essential. If the benefits of screening outweight the harms and costs, a successful screening program would require provision of screening infrastructure and appropriate information to target populations, quality control for screening tests and investigations, recall mechanisms to ensure appropriate follow-up of persons with positive results and the active participation of the Australian public and health practitioners.

Screening for colorectal cancer: reasons for refusal of faecal occult blood testing in a general practice in England

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To ascertain reasons for non-compliance with faecal occult blood tests in colorectal cancer screening programmes.

DESIGN

A standard interview by a trained nurse of a random sample of those who declined screening.

SETTING

The Leicestershire town of Market Harborough, where most of the 25,000 population are served by a single general practice of 10 partners.

PARTICIPANTS

Altogether 4185 residents aged 51 to 70 years were invited to receive a free faecal occult blood test (Haemoccult). Eighty one subjects from a sample of 351 who wrote declining the offer were interviewed.

MAIN RESULTS

Non-compliers were divided into those who did not request a test kit and those who returned an unused kit. In the former group the commonest reasons given were intercurrent illness (39%), fear of further tests and surgery (24%), and feeling well (22%). For those who returned unused kits the commonest reasons were the unpleasantness of the stool collection procedure (65%), feeling well (30%), intercurrent illness (23%), and fear of further tests and surgery (20%). In both groups the main concern of those who did not comply were fear of further diagnostic tests and surgery rather than concern at the lack of effective treatment for cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

To increase compliance, education and publicity must explain the concept of asymptomatic illness and allay people's fear of hospital investigation and treatment. The benefits of screening should be particularly emphasised to those who return kits so they may overcome their reservations.

Factors associated with participation in screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood testing

BACKGROUND

Factors associated with attending screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood testing was studied.

METHODS

Sixty-eight per cent of 34,144 subjects participated in the primary screening and/or rescreening in a randomized screening study. The mortality and causes of death in the two groups were studied. A sample of the subjects received a questionnaire, in which they were asked about their reaction to the invitation. A statistical sample was called for a telephone interview.

RESULTS

The mortality among the non-attenders was higher than among the attenders (p < 0.001), which might reflect a higher morbidity among the non-attenders. The mortality was equal in the test and control groups. There was no difference among the attenders and non-attenders who had a full or 50% pension. Among immigrants the attitude to screening was less positive among those born in 1918 but was the same as that of the whole group among those born in 1929. Significantly fewer persons among the non-attenders than among the attenders could be reached for a telephone interview (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is a possibility that the compliance can be increased. The non-attenders' attitude to screening was more negative than that of the attenders.

A simple strategy to improve patient adherence to outpatient fecal occult blood testing

Poor patient adherence reduces the effectiveness of fecal occult blood testing for colon cancer. Patients at the inner-city clinic involved in the study have historically completed only one-third of the tests administered to them. The authors studied three ways of returning test kits (by hand, by mail, and by mail with prepaid postage). Among 146 randomly assigned patients, the completion rates were 37%, 57%, and 71%, respectively. The difference was significant between the first and third groups (p = 0.003), and the cost was less for the third group ($1.71 vs $2.24 per completed test). The authors recommend that clinics serving indigent populations use postage-paid return envelopes with fecal occult blood testing to improve its effectiveness and save money.

Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study

BACKGROUND

Although tests for occult blood in the feces are widely used to screen for colorectal cancers, there is no conclusive evidence that they reduce mortality from this cause. We evaluated a fecal occult-blood test in a randomized trial and documented its effectiveness.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 46,551 participants 50 to 80 years of age to screening for colorectal cancer once a year, to screening every two years, or to a control group. Participants who were screened submitted six guaiac-impregnated paper slides with two smears from each of three consecutive stools. About 83 percent of the slides were rehydrated. Participants who tested positive underwent a diagnostic evaluation that included colonoscopy. Vital status was ascertained for all study participants during 13 years of follow-up. A committee determined causes of death. A single pathologist determined the stage of each tissue specimen. Differences in mortality from colorectal cancer, the primary study end point, were monitored with the sequential log-rank statistic.

RESULTS

The 13-year cumulative mortality per 1000 from colorectal cancer was 5.88 in the annually screened group (95 percent confidence interval, 4.61 to 7.15), 8.33 in the biennially screened group (95 percent confidence interval, 6.82 to 9.84), and 8.83 in the control group (95 percent confidence interval, 7.26 to 10.40). The rate in the annually screened group, but not in the biennially screened group, was significantly lower than that in the control group. Reduced mortality in the annually screened group was accompanied by improved survival in those with colorectal cancer and a shift to detection at an earlier stage of cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Annual fecal occult-blood testing with rehydration of the samples decreased the 13-year cumulative mortality from colorectal cancer by 33 percent.

Interval cancers in screening with fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer

Interval cancers, which are cancers diagnosed in spite of one or more negative screening tests, were studied in a randomized population with Hemoccult-II for colorectal cancer in 61,938 persons between 45 and 74 years old. Three biannual screenings were performed from 1985 to 1991, and 52% of all the cancers detected after doing at least one Hemoccult-II test were interval cancers (81 persons). These were more advanced than cancers diagnosed after a positive Hemoccult-II test, of larger size, less frequently of Dukes stage A, more often invading neighboring organs, and less often resectable for cure. They were located in the rectum more often than cancers diagnosed by screening and cancers in controls. Otherwise, interval cancers did not differ from cancers in controls or cancers in non-responders, and all characteristics suggested that no delay in diagnosis resulted from one or more negative Hemoccult-II tests, compared with controls. However, even if screening with Hemoccult-II demonstrates a reduction in mortality from colorectal cancer, the present high number of interval cancers makes it necessary to look for other methods of screening populations for colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer screening: optimal compliance with postal faecal occult blood test

Five approaches to postal faecal occult blood test (FOBT) were compared in a population sample of 966 subjects collected from three general practitioner patient lists in Southern Sydney. The highest compliance rate (59.8%) was achieved by a method using a general practitioner letter, with no dietary restrictions with FOBT. This was also the least expensive method. Compliance rates can be affected by incorrect address information and screenees not considering themselves to be current patients. An explanation from the family doctor addressed personally to the patient with an enclosed FOBT kit can achieve high compliance rates.

Can Hemoccult-II replace colonoscopy in surveillance after radical surgery for colorectal cancer and after polypectomy?

Surveillance after colorectal carcinoma and adenoma includes colonoscopy, which is a demanding procedure for the patient, doctor, and society. Therefore, it was investigated whether a simple fecal occult blood test could replace colonoscopy. Hemoccult-II (H-II) was performed before 1,244 colonoscopies in patients with previous cancer and before 328 colonoscopies in an adenoma surveillance program. The H-II test was positive in 3 of 9 patients with local recurrence, in 2 of 13 with metachronous cancer, and in 31 of 186 with adenomas. The test was positive more often in patients with large and multiple adenomas, sigmoid adenomas, and adenomas with villous elements and moderate-to-severe dysplasia, but the sensitivity did not reach more than 25 to 40 percent. It was concluded that markers more sensitive than H-II are needed to detect metachronous cancers and new adenomas. In the meantime, colonoscopy has to be used with intervals of several years, but not for detection of local recurrent cancer, which in most cases may be found by simpler means.

Causes of death during the first 5 years of a randomized trial of mass screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test

The main purpose of population screening for colorectal cancer is to reduce mortality from the disease. The criteria of death from colorectal cancer are defined in the present randomized trial of 61,938 persons between 45 and 74 years old, and the need for an impartial death review committee was demonstrated. Causes of death within the first 5 years are described within subgroups of the test group and compared with those in the control group. Death rates were higher among non-responders to screening than among controls and among those in whom Hemoccult-II had been performed at least once. Persons with negative Hemoccult-II had a lower death rate than controls. The overall autopsy rate was 32%. Lethal complications from treatment of colorectal neoplasia were evaluated per se. Death from colorectal cancer occurred in 74 persons in the total screening group and in 91 among controls. Sources of bias are discussed. A method of evaluating possible benefit to those being screened is suggested. Final results cannot be expected before 1996.

Population screening for colorectal cancer, the goals and means

The causes of colorectal cancer are complex and in most cases obscure, making primary prevention impossible at present. Secondary prevention by finding and treating early asymptomatic cancers may possibly reduce mortality from this very common cancer. Results from conventional treatment have changed little during recent decades and are unsatisfactory, with more than half of the patients dying from the disease. The incidence has increased during recent years in many countries, making it vital to evaluate possible benefits from screening. This review considers different methods of screening for colorectal cancer and includes an overview of continuing European controlled randomised trials with the faecal occult blood test, Haemoccult-II. No final evaluation is possible, but advantages and drawbacks of different strategies are discussed. Assuming that the goal of reducing mortality is achieved, several other problems remain unsolved: the organisation of screening, the training of doctors in endoscopy, cost benefit and cost effectiveness all of which will have to be solved before a population screening can be recommended. Present screening tools are not ideal and we have to continue the search for better markers of early colorectal cancers and even possible precursors like adenomas.

Participation and screening programmes for colorectal cancer: more would be better?

In clinical terms, a screening compliance rate of 100% may be deemed optimal in that the number of abnormalities detected is thereby maximized. This paper explores optimum compliance rates from the cost-effectiveness point of view by modelling the individual's decision to participate in the screening programme. Using data derived from contemporary colorectal screening trials, it assesses the compliance and cost effects of utilizing differing methods of screening invitation, and explores the incremental cost and benefits associated with compliance enhancement techniques. Given the estimated costs and benefits, attempts to attain higher levels of compliance would appear justifiable.

Adenomas and hyperplastic polyps in screening studies

A survey is given of colorectal polyps detected in a prospective randomized screening study with the fecal occult blood test. It is demonstrated that colonoscopy in persons with positive Hemoccult-II tests results in detection of and removal of a higher number of adenomas than among controls. The strategy may, therefore, possibly be followed by a reduction of the incidence of colorectal cancer. Screen-detected adenomas were most often in males and were larger than among controls; they were most often in the sigmoid colon, whereas the rectum was the most frequent location for adenomas in controls. Eight percent of persons with screen-detected adenomas had some symptoms, which could be referred to adenomas, in contrast to 50% among controls. Hyperplastic polyps served as markers for adenomas in persons with positive Hemoccult-II as well as in controls with adenomas detected by colonoscopy; however, most persons with adenomas had no hyperplastic polyps. Endoscopic polypectomy did not result in any severe complications, but surgical removal in 2 of 22 patients proved fatal. The results presented are compared with those of other prospective randomized trials. The optimistic view--that the incidence of cancer may be reduced by polypectomy in persons with positive Hemoccult-II tests--stresses the importance of securing optimal colonoscopy service.

Repeated screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test. A prospective randomized study at Funen, Denmark

Two screenings with Hemoccult-II were performed in a randomized study, allocating 30,970 persons to screening and 30,968 as controls in a population of 140,000 between 45 and 74 years old on the island of Funen, Denmark. The test was completed in 20,672 initially and in 18,779 of these during rescreening 2 years later. Positive H-II tests were found in 215 and 159 persons during the two screenings, respectively. A total colonoscopy was performed in 187 and 144, and cancer was detected in 37 and 13 and adenomata in 86 and 76, respectively. Interval cancers had developed in 40 persons at the end of the second screening, and 39 non-responders had developed cancer. Cancer was diagnosed in 115 controls and an adenoma in 100 during the same period. Interval cancers presented as rectal cancers more frequently than those detected by screening. Early cancers were more frequent in the screening group, and, accordingly, more patients had curative and also less extensive surgery, with a low postoperative mortality. The total number of deaths from colorectal cancer was 37 in the screening group, including interval cancers and cancers in non-responders and persons who developed cancer before they could be invited, which suggests a reduction in mortality of 27% (51 deaths among controls, compared with 37). The reduction is as yet not statistically significant, and final evaluation must await at least one more screening, ending in 1990, and a follow-up of some years. Removal of more large adenomas during screening makes it possible that the incidence of cancer will decrease.

Screening for colorectal carcinoma

Colorectal carcinoma will occur in some 147,000 Americans this year. This disease accounts for 15% of all cancers and 12% of all cancer deaths. Screening for colorectal carcinoma may allow the disease process to be found earlier and, in some situations such as when polyps are found and removed, may even prevent the disease. The two main modalities of screening are fecal occult blood tests and sigmoidoscopy. By general screening of asymptomatic patients as well as by selective screening of those at high risk, there is hope that the incidence and mortality of this cancer will diminish. Absolute confirmation of this benefit is still lacking, making the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of this screening somewhat questionable. Current educational efforts are designed to increase compliance and to help solve some of these unanswered questions.

Screening of colorectal tumours using an improved faecal occult blood test. Quantitative aspects

A recently developed double test for detecting faecal occult blood (a sensitive guaiac test combined with a quantitative immunological human haemoglobin test), was adapted to population screening. The study involved an unselected population of 10,343, aged 49-74 years. There was 66.5% participation. 174 colonoscopies were done, yielding seven adenocarcinomas, 44 adenomas and four hyperplastic polyps. By eliminating benign anal tract bleeding, the number of endoscopies decreased from 340 to 174. Most tumours showed an absorbance over 0.80, and it is suggested that by setting the lower limit of positivity at the 0.80 absorbance level, the number of clinical examinations could fall to about 1%, without substantially missing tumours.

Colorectal carcinoma and Haemoccult. A study of its value in mass screening using meta-analysis

Meta-analysis has been performed on the world literature relating to Haemoccult screening for colorectal cancer. The analysis indicated a sensitivity of about 50%, specificity of about 97%, positive predictive value of 4.3% and negative predictive value of 99.85%. These figures assume a prevalence of colorectal cancer in the population of 0.3%. A model calculation using these figures together with some additional realistic assumptions suggests no reduction in mortality compared to an unscreened population. It is concluded that many questions about faecal occult blood screening remain and that uncontrolled mass population screening is not justified at this stage.

Initial mass screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test. A prospective randomized study at Funen in Denmark

A Danish study allocated at random 30,970 persons to screening with Hemoccult-II and 30,968 as controls in a population of 140,000 between 45 and 74 years old. Persons with known colorectal cancer, adenoma, and distant spread from all types of cancer were excluded. The test was completed in 20,672 persons from August 1985 to September 1986, and 215 (1%) were found to be positive. Colonoscopy in 203 and double-contrast barium enema in 6 detected 37 persons with cancer and 86 with adenomas. Dukes A cancer was detected in 19 in the screening group, in contrast to 2 among controls. Synchronous adenomas were found in 23 with a positive test and 10 controls. Interval cancer was found in nine persons within 1-11 months after a negative test. Eighteen persons got cancer before invitation and six defectors as well. In all, colorectal cancer was detected in 70 persons in the screening group and in 38 controls; the figures for adenomas alone were 103 and 38, respectively. The study is designed to detect a possible reduction in mortality from colorectal cancer of 25% within 5 years after three screenings with intervals of 2 years. The second screening will begin in September 1987. It remains to be shown whether a reduction may be obtained both in mortality and in incidence of colorectal cancer.