Economic assessment of peptic ulcer disease treatments

An economic model of long-term use of celecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis

Background

Previous evaluations of the cost-effectiveness of the cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitor celecoxib (Celebrex, Pfizer Inc, USA) have produced conflicting results. The recent controversy over the cardiovascular (CV) risks of rofecoxib and other coxibs has renewed interest in the economic profile of celecoxib, the only coxib now available in the United States. The objective of our study was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of celecoxib compared with nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (nsNSAIDs) in a population of 60-year-old osteoarthritis (OA) patients with average risks of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) complications who require chronic daily NSAID therapy.

Methods

We used decision analysis based on data from the literature to evaluate cost-effectiveness from a modified societal perspective over patients' lifetimes, with outcomes expressed as incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity tests were performed to evaluate the impacts of advancing age, CV thromboembolic event risk, different analytic horizons and alternate treatment strategies after UGI adverse events.

Results

Our main findings were: 1) the base model incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for celecoxib versus nsNSAIDs was $31,097 per QALY; 2) the ICER per QALY was $19,309 for a model in which UGI ulcer and ulcer complication event risks increased with advancing age; 3) the ICER per QALY was $17,120 in sensitivity analyses combining serious CV thromboembolic event (myocardial infarction, stroke, CV death) risks with base model assumptions.

Conclusion

Our model suggests that chronic celecoxib is cost-effective versus nsNSAIDs in a population of 60-year-old OA patients with average risks of UGI events.

Clinical and economic outcomes of individuals with severe peptic ulcer hemorrhage and nonbleeding visible vessel: an analysis of two prospective clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

We report the clinical outcomes and direct medical costs of 155 patients with severe peptic ulcer hemorrhage and a nonbleeding visible vessel at emergency endoscopy treated with endoscopic hemostasis or medical-surgical therapy.

METHODS

In two consecutive, prospective, randomized, controlled trials, patients were randomly assigned to endoscopic hemostasis (heater probe, bipolar electrocoagulation, or injection sclerosis) or medical-surgical treatment. Study endpoints included the incidence of severe ulcer rebleeding and emergency surgery, length of hospital stay, blood transfusion requirements, mortality rate, and direct costs of utilized health care. Direct medical costs were estimated using combined fixed and variable institutional costs for consumed resources and Medicare reimbursement rates.

RESULTS

Compared with medical-surgical treatment, endoscopically treated patients had significantly lower rates of severe ulcer rebleeding (p = 0.004), emergency surgery (p = 0.002 and p = 0.019, 0.024), and blood transfusions (p = 0.025). Observed inter-trial differences in ulcer rebleeding rates may be partially explained in a multivariate model by covariates of comorbid disease and inpatient ulcer bleeding. In both trials, length of hospital stay, mortality rates, and treatment-related complications were similar. Estimated median direct costs per patient differed: The first trial had lower costs with endoscopic hemostasis ($4254, vs $4620 for electrocoagulation and $5909 for medical-surgical treatment), yet the second trial yielded lower costs with medical-surgical treatment ($3169, vs $3477 for injection sclerosis and $4098 for heater probe).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with medical-surgical therapy, endoscopic hemostasis for severe ulcer hemorrhage and a nonbleeding visible vessel yielded significantly better patient outcomes and was safe. This procedure may or may not yield lower direct medical costs and cost savings.

Estimating the cost of lost productivity in dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

In the field of gastrointestinal disease, productivity costs are highly relevant because work loss is substantial in dyspeptic patients. Productivity costs are normally calculated by multiplying days absent valued by gross earnings. This, however, might lead to an overestimation.

AIM

To use a conservative approach to calculating productivity costs, taking absence compensating mechanisms into account.

METHODS

Patients who visited their general practitioner for the first time with dyspeptic complaints and patients who were known to have persistent dyspeptic complaints were enrolled in two studies. In total, 136 patients completed a questionnaire about their employment situation, absence from work and absence compensating mechanisms.

RESULTS

Sixty-six of the respondents had a paid job, of which 25 (38%) reported absence from work during the previous 4 weeks (average 3.0 days, 1.9 days related to dyspeptic complaints). More than 50% of the employed respondents answered that absence could be compensated for by colleagues, and only in 8% of the cases was absence compensated for by overtime. Using our conservative approach, only one-quarter of the productivity costs remained, compared to the current approach of valuing each day absent as a loss of productivity.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest using both the current and the conservative approaches, analogous to the principles of sensitivity analysis, to avoid overestimation of productivity costs.

An economic analysis of patients with active arterial peptic ulcer hemorrhage treated with endoscopic heater probe, injection sclerosis, or surgery in a prospective, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

There are no published, detailed assessments of the direct costs of endoscopic hemostasis for actively bleeding peptic ulcers. We compared the direct costs of care for patients with active ulcer hemorrhage treated with endoscopic or medical-surgical therapies and correlated these costs with patient outcomes.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 31 patients with active ulcer hemorrhage at emergency endoscopy were randomly assigned to heater probe, injection, or medical-surgical treatment. For further ulcer bleeding, heater probe and injection patients were re-treated endoscopically and medical-surgical patients were referred for surgery. Direct costs were estimated using fixed and variable costs for resources consumed and Medicare reimbursement rates for physician fees.

RESULTS

Compared to medical-surgical treatment, the heater probe and injection groups had significantly higher primary hemostasis rates (100% and 90% vs 8%) and lower rates of emergency surgery (0% and 10% vs 75%), blood transfusions, and median direct costs per patient ($4153 and $5247 vs $11,149). Furthermore, compared to medical-surgical treatment, the heater probe group had a significantly lower incidence of severe ulcer rebleeding (11% vs 75%).

CONCLUSIONS

Heater probe and injection sclerosis are similarly efficacious treatments for active ulcer hemorrhage, and both treatments yield significantly lower direct costs of medical care and cost savings.

Concurrent use of antiulcerative agents

Many physicians prescribe more than one antiulcerative agent (AUA) simultaneously to the same patient, although there is little evidence to support this practice. The purposes of this study were to (a) determine patient factors associated with the concurrent use of these agents and (b) estimate the excess costs generated by the prescription of multiple rather than a single agent. We conducted a case-control study of concurrent AUA users among New Jersey Medicaid enrollees age 65 years and older. To evaluate the excess cost generated by the ongoing prescription of an additional AUA, we measured the additional drug expenditures associated with each regimen of concurrent use. Nearly 1 in 15 AUA users (6.6%) met our conservative definition of concurrent AUA use. In a multiple logistic regression model, previous gastrointestinal procedure, use of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, nursing home residency, and recent hospitalization for more than 20 days were all predictors of concurrent use of more than one AUA. No association was found with age, sex, or number of pharmacies used. The upper bound estimate of the cost generated by the concurrent prescription of a second AUA was $210 (range: $2-$942) over the 180-day study period, with a lower bound of $151 (range: $1-$449). Annually, such excess cost would range from $301 to $420 per patient. This would account for between $457 million and $637 million per year for the nation's elderly if these patterns are generalizable. Despite the lack of evidence of therapeutic benefit from multiple concurrent AUA use in most patients, this practice is fairly common. Besides introducing the risk of additional costs and side effects in the absence of additional efficacy, the costs of such duplicative prescribing are substantial.

Resolution of chronic anal fissures after treatment of contiguous internal hemorrhoids with direct current probe

PURPOSES

(1) to prospectively evaluate efficacy and safety of direct current (DC) probe treatment of chronic anal fissures associated with internal hemorrhoids, and (2) to estimate direct and indirect costs of anoscopic treatment versus surgery.

METHODS

Ten patients with chronic fissures of 11 mm (mean length) had symptoms for 5 months (mean) in spite of medical management; all had internal hemorrhoidal disease. DC coagulation was applied to two or three contiguous internal hemorrhoids per outpatient session. Eleven mA (mean) of DC current was delivered for 7 minutes (mean) per hemorrhoid segment.

RESULTS

All 10 patients had relief of chronic anal pain within two treatments and nine anal fissures healed within 4 weeks. One patient developed a perianal abscess and fistula requiring surgery. There were no recurrences in 20 months (mean) of follow-up with medical management. Mean direct and indirect costs (in terms of lost time from work or usual activity) of DC probe treatments were estimated to be 10% to 30% lower and 2 to 10 times less, respectively, than standard surgery for chronic anal fissures.

CONCLUSION

DC probe treatment for chronic anal fissures associated with internal hemorrhoidal disease is an important advance as an effective, safe, and cost-effective nonsurgical treatment in selected patients.

Policy analysis of the conversion of histamine2 antagonists to over-the-counter use

OBJECTIVES

The authors assess the costs associated with treatment of dyspepsia with histamine2 antagonists versus without availability of over-the-counter (OTC).

METHODS

A cost analysis was performed using a decision-analysis model. Patients with an initial episode of dyspepsia were studied. The model includes costs associated with consumption of OTC and prescription (Rx) medications for dyspepsia, physician visits and associated diagnostic testing, time spent for physician visits and diagnostic tests, and hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

The model is sensitive to the relative cost of histamine2 antagonists when purchased Rx or OTC, as well as to the efficacy of these drugs in relieving dyspeptic symptoms. For patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (the largest group of likely consumers), the model demonstrates a cost savings if the OTC cost of the medication is slightly less than one third the Rx cost. Costs are similar whether or not histamine2 antagonists are available OTC. If the symptom relief efficacies of histamine2 antagonists are equivalent whether purchased by prescription only or OTC, then the health-care expenditures for a typical patient with dyspepsia are $204 for OTC availability and $203 for Rx-only use. Viewing costs from the perspective of a managed-care organization, expenditures for an episode of dyspepsia are $149 regardless of whether or not histamine2 antagonists are available OTC. Restricting the analysis to patients with underlying nonulcer dyspepsia yields similar results. Variation of numerous assumptions and probabilities other than histamine antagonist cost and efficacy, including costs associated with physician visits and diagnostic tests, and the likelihood of seeking medical care, do not substantially affect the results of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

Health-care costs associated with initial treatment of dyspepsia are similar regardless of the availability of histamine2 antagonists OTC. This is due largely to the similar efficacy of these drugs compared with antacids and the predicted increase in diagnostic testing that may result if a patient visits a physician after failure to achieve symptom relief with OTC use of histamine2 antagonists.

The risks and costs of upper gastrointestinal disease attributable to NSAIDs

NSAIDs, including both aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs, are among the most frequently used drugs, and their use may result in serious adverse gastrointestinal outcomes and significant medical costs. The increased risks for adverse upper GI hemorrhage and peptic ulcer disease associated with NSAID use have been demonstrated in observational studies and clinical trials; an overview of these results is presented in this article. The magnitude of these risks should play an important role in clinical decision making and should influence decisions regarding the use of this class of drugs.

A controlled study of ranitidine for the prevention of recurrent hemorrhage from duodenal ulcer

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage is the most common complication of duodenal ulcer disease, but there is little information about the effectiveness and safety of long-term maintenance therapy with histamine H2-receptor blockers.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind study in patients with endoscopically documented hemorrhage from duodenal ulcers. Patients were randomly assigned to maintenance therapy with ranitidine (150 mg at night) or placebo and were followed for up to three years. Endoscopy was performed at base line (to document that the ulcers had healed), at exit from the study, and when a patient had persistent ulcer symptoms unrelieved by antacids or had gastrointestinal bleeding. Symptomatic relapses without bleeding were treated with ranitidine; if the ulcer healed within eight weeks, the patient resumed taking the assigned study medication.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar at entry, which usually occurred about three months after the index hemorrhage. After a mean follow-up of 61 weeks, 3 of the 32 patients treated with ranitidine had recurrent hemorrhage, as compared with 12 of the 33 given placebo (P < 0.05). Half the episodes of recurrent bleeding were asymptomatic. One patient in the ranitidine group withdrew from the study because of asymptomatic thrombocytopenia during the first month.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients whose duodenal ulcers heal after severe hemorrhage, long-term maintenance therapy with ranitidine is safe and reduces the risk of recurrent bleeding.

Cost-effectiveness of cimetidine maintenance therapy in chronic gastric and duodenal ulcer

The effects of cimetidine maintenance therapy on the socioeconomic life of patients with peptic ulcers in the 3 years after healing and the extent to which treatment was cost-effective were studied. Three hundred eleven patients with healed ulcers (184 gastric, 127 duodenal) were studied for periods of up to 3 years; 261 patients (152 gastric ulcer, 109 duodenal ulcer) completed the 3-year follow-up. Cimetidine (400 mg at night) was compared with placebo in a double-blind, randomized prospective study. Intention-to-treat analysis was used. In the placebo group, the major costs of ulcer disease in gastric ulcer patients were attributable to endoscopic procedures and absenteeism; in duodenal ulcer patients, the major costs were endoscopic procedures, absenteeism, and surgery. Cimetidine was cost-effective in both gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer patients in the first 2 years after healing. Over the 3-year period it was also cost-effective, but no benefit was seen in the third year.

Endoscopic laser treatment for rectosigmoid villous adenoma: factors affecting the results

Endoscopic laser treatment is reported in 264 patients with benign rectosigmoid villous adenomas revealed by biopsy. Patients include 100 who had contraindications to surgery, 60 who had a tumor recurrence after a nonlaser treatment, 101 for whom surgical resection appeared to be too drastic for a tumor found benign on biopsy, and 3 who refused surgery. Two types of lasers were used: the Nd:YAG and the argon laser. In some patients, both lasers were used. Treatment was completed in 226 patients. Total tumor destruction was attained in 92% of them, a carcinoma was detected in 7% on biopsy specimens obtained during laser treatment, and benign villous tissue persisted in 1%. During the average 25.9-mo follow-up period of the patients with total tumor destruction, 13% had a tumor recurrence. Treatment was well-tolerated with no major complications. The circumferential extension of the tumor base was the only factor affecting the duration of treatment, and the rate of complications. The recurrence rate after initial treatment was higher in patients treated for a recurrence after a previous nonlaser treatment than in patients treated only by laser (p = 0.04). It was also higher when the initial histology was low-grade dysplasia than if it was high-grade dysplasia (p = 0.017) and when the tumor was located in the lower or middle rectum as opposed to the upper rectum or sigmoid (p = 0.04). We estimated that the direct cost of laser treatments was 28%-40% of the surgery charges for lesions of identical size in our hospital and 31%-69% at UCLA Center for the Health Sciences. Because treatment is long and difficult and the cancer rate is high, endoscopic laser for patients with a circumferential villous adenoma should be limited to nonsurgical candidates. The risk of a fatal complication after surgery has to be balanced against the risk of undetected carcinoma in the other patients and the indication for endoscopic laser treatment should be discussed case by case.

Sucralfate maintenance therapy in duodenal ulcer disease. A review

There are a large number of patients with chronic duodenal ulcer disease who warrant long-term maintenance therapy to diminish the risk of recurrence and thereby the risk of further complications such as gastrointestinal bleeding. The efficacy of sucralfate has been compared with both placebo and histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists and sucralfate in a dose of 1 g twice a day or 2 g taken at night. It is a safe and effective medication in preventing duodenal ulcer recurrence. However, duodenal ulcer relapse rates always exceed 20 percent and frequently approach 50 percent, whether the therapy be H2-receptor antagonists or sucralfate, and the use of dosages that are half the healing dose seems irrational. It would therefore seem reasonable to continue maintenance therapy at the healing dose, whatever medication is used. Any increased costs for drugs should be outweighed by savings in indirect costs.