Misoprostol treatment exacerbates abdominal discomfort in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and erosive prepyloric changes. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study

Review article: endpoints used in functional dyspepsia drug therapy trials

BACKGROUND

The measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in treatment trials for functional gastrointestinal disorders is a matter of controversy.

AIM

To focus on instruments and endpoints that have been used to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic agents in functional dyspepsia (FD) trials, also considering the newly defined Rome III FD criteria.

METHODS

A Medline search was conducted to identify relevant studies pertaining to FD treatment, with particular emphasis on the studies to date which have used validated outcome measures.

RESULTS

Currently available outcome measures are heterogeneous across studies. They include global binary endpoints, analogue or categorical scoring scales, uni- or multi-dimensional disease specific questionnaires, global outcome evaluations and quality of life questionnaires. Across the available outcome measures, substantial heterogeneity is found, not only in the type of endpoint measure, but also in the number and types of symptoms that are considered to be part of the FD symptom complex. Especially based on content validity, none of the existing questionnaires or endpoints can be considered sufficiently validated to be recommended unequivocally as the primary outcome measure for FD trials according to the Rome III criteria. On the other hand, existing well-validated multi-dimensional questionnaires that include many non-FD symptoms can be narrowed down to evaluate only the cardinal symptoms according to Rome III.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an urgent need to develop Rome III-based patient-reported outcomes for functional dyspepsia. Well-validated multi-dimensional questionnaires may serve as a guidance for this purpose, and could also be considered for use in ongoing clinical trials.

WITHDRAWN: Pharmacological interventions for non-ulcer dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

The commonest cause of upper gastrointestinal symptoms is non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and yet the pathophysiology of this condition has been poorly characterised and the optimum treatment is uncertain. It is estimated that £450 million is spent on dyspepsia drugs in the UK each year.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to determine the effectiveness of six classes of drugs (antacids, histamine H2 antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, prokinetics, mucosal protecting agents and antimuscarinics) in the improvement of either the individual or global dyspepsia symptom scores and also quality of life scores patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2006), EMBASE (1988 to January 2006), CINAHL (1982 to January 2006), SIGLE, and reference lists of articles. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies. Trials were located through electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SIGLE, using appropriate subject headings and text words, searching bibliographies of retrieved articles, and through contacts with experts in the fields of dyspepsia and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing drugs of any of the six groups with each other or with placebo for non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 73 trials: prokinetics (19 trials with dichotomous outcomes evaluating 3178 participants; relative risk reduction (RRR) 33%; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 18% to 45%), H(2)RAs (12 trials evaluating 2,183 participants; RRR 23%; 95% CI 8% to 35%) and PPIs (10 trials evaluating 3,347 participants; RRR 13%; 95% CI 4% to 20%) were significantly more effective than placebo. Bismuth salts (six trials evaluating 311 participants; RRR 40%; 95% CI -3 to 65%) were superior to placebo but this was of marginal statistical significance. Antacids (one trial evaluating 109 participants; RRR -2%; 95% CI -36% to 24%) and sucralfate (two trials evaluating 246 participants; RRR 29%; 95% CI -40% to 64%) were not statistically significantly superior to placebo. A funnel plot suggested that the prokinetic results could be due to publication bias or other small study effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that anti-secretory therapy may be effective in NUD. The trials evaluating prokinetic therapy are difficult to interpret as the meta-analysis result could have been due to publication bias. The effect of these drugs is likely to be small and many patients will need to take them on a long-term basis so economic analyses would be helpful and ideally the therapies assessed need to be inexpensive and well tolerated.

Carbohydrate intolerance in patients with self-reported food hypersensitivity: comparison of lactulose and glucose

OBJECTIVE

Malabsorption of low-digestible carbohydrates is physiological, but poorly tolerated in some patients. We investigated symptom anticipation and microbial fermentation as possible mechanisms of carbohydrate intolerance in patients with self-reported food hypersensitivity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study, 27 consecutive patients with unexplained, self-reported food hypersensitivity were given 10 g lactulose and 10 g glucose (placebo). Symptoms and pulmonary excretion of hydrogen and methane were assessed. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), lactate and prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) were analyzed in rectal dialysis fluid, and compared to dialysates from nine healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Post-lactulose symptom scores were correlated with habitual symptom scores (r = 0.6, p = 0.001), significantly higher than post-glucose symptom scores (p = 0.01) and significantly higher in patients than controls (p = 0.0007). Levels of SCFAs, lactate and PGE(2) in rectal dialysates were not significantly different after lactulose and glucose, or between patients and controls. Hydrogen excretion was not correlated with symptom scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that self-reported food hypersensitivity is related to microbial fermentation of malabsorbed carbohydrates and not to symptom anticipation solely. Levels of SCFAs, lactate and PGE(2) in rectal dialysates could not explain the fermentation-associated hypersensitivity.

Effects of Seal Oil on Meal-Induced Symptoms and Gastric Accommodation in Patients with Subjective Food Hypersensitivity: A Pilot Study

Background

Food hypersensitivity is a prevalent condition with poorly characterized underlying mechanisms. In the present pilot study we investigated effects of seal oil and soy oil on meal-induced symptoms and gastric accommodation in patients with subjective food hypersensitivity (FH). Single dose experiment: On three consecutive days, 10 mL of seal oil, soy oil, or saline were randomly administered into the duodenum of 10 patients with subjective FH and 10 healthy volunteers through a nasoduodenal feeding tube 10-20 minutes before the ingestion of a test meal. Short-term treatment study: 24 patients with subjective FH were randomly allocated to 10 days’ treatment with either 10 mL of seal or soy oil, self-administrated through an indwelling nasoduodenal feeding tube, 3 times daily. In both experiments meal-induced abdominal symptoms and gastric accommodation were measured by visual analogue scales and external ultrasound respectively.

Results

Symptoms and gastric accommodation were not significantly influenced by single doses of seal or soy oil. When given daily for 10 days, seal oil, but not soy oil, reduced total symptom scores significantly ( P = 0.03). The symptomatic improvement was not associated with improvements in gastric accommodation.

Conclusion

Daily administration of seal oil may benefit patients with subjective FH. The beneficial effect of seal oil in patients with subjective FH can not be ascribed to improved gastric accommodation.

Pharmacological interventions for non-ulcer dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

The commonest cause of upper gastrointestinal symptoms is non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and yet the pathophysiology of this condition has been poorly characterised and the optimum treatment is uncertain. It is estimated that pound450 million is spent on dyspepsia drugs in the UK each year.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to determine the effectiveness of six classes of drugs (antacids, histamine H(2) antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, prokinetics, mucosal protecting agents and antimuscarinics) in the improvement of either the individual or global dyspepsia symptom scores and also quality of life scores patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2006), EMBASE (1988 to January 2006), CINAHL (1982 to January 2006), SIGLE, and reference lists of articles. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies. Trials were located through electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SIGLE, using appropriate subject headings and text words, searching bibliographies of retrieved articles, and through contacts with experts in the fields of dyspepsia and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing drugs of any of the six groups with each other or with placebo for non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 73 trials: prokinetics (19 trials with dichotomous outcomes evaluating 3178 participants; relative risk reduction (RRR) 33%; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 18% to 45%), H(2)RAs (12 trials evaluating 2,183 participants; RRR 23%; 95% CI 8% to 35%) and PPIs (10 trials evaluating 3,347 participants; RRR 13%; 95% CI 4% to 20%) were significantly more effective than placebo. Bismuth salts (six trials evaluating 311 participants; RRR 40%; 95% CI -3 to 65%) were superior to placebo but this was of marginal statistical significance. Antacids (one trial evaluating 109 participants; RRR -2%; 95% CI -36% to 24%) and sucralfate (two trials evaluating 246 participants; RRR 29%; 95% CI -40% to 64%) were not statistically significantly superior to placebo. A funnel plot suggested that the prokinetic results could be due to publication bias or other small study effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that anti-secretory therapy may be effective in NUD. The trials evaluating prokinetic therapy are difficult to interpret as the meta-analysis result could have been due to publication bias. The effect of these drugs is likely to be small and many patients will need to take them on a long-term basis so economic analyses would be helpful and ideally the therapies assessed need to be inexpensive and well tolerated.

Rapid initial gastric emptying and hypersensitivity to gastric filling in functional dyspepsia: effects of duodenal lipids

OBJECTIVE

Impaired distension-induced gastric accommodation and hypersensitivity to distension have been demonstrated by gastric barostat in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). In this study we investigated distension-induced responses to gastric filling with water in healthy volunteers and FD patients, using non-invasive ultrasonography.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighteen healthy volunteers and 18 FD patients were given infusions of 10 ml saline or lipid (3 kcal/ml) through a nasoduodenal tube. After tube retraction, the stomach was filled with 1000 ml water during 10 min. Intragastric volume was monitored by 3D ultrasonography, and fullness, pain and nausea were assessed.

RESULTS

Compared with healthy volunteers, patients with FD had faster gastric emptying at 5 min (p = 0.0008) and reported more fullness (p = 0.006) during gastric filling with water. Prior duodenal lipid exposure reduced initial gastric emptying rate in FD patients to the level seen in healthy volunteers. However, despite similar gastric volumes, the patients still reported greater fullness (p = 0.002) and nausea (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with FD had abnormally rapid initial gastric emptying of water and hypersensitivity to gastric filling. Though normalizing gastric emptying rate and volumes, duodenal lipid exposure did not improve hypersensitivity. Rapid initial gastric emptying of water might be a sign of impaired distension-induced gastric accommodation.

Funktionelle Dyspepsie – eine Verlegenheitsdiagnose?

Dyspepsia comprises a broad spectrum of predominantly upper abdominal symptoms, such as pain, indigestion, nausea, early satiety and bloating. While these symptoms are highly prevalent, in less than 50% of patients presenting with dyspepsia, structural lesions or biochemical abnormalities are found that explain the symptoms when routine clinical tests are used. In patients without structural lesions the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia is justified. Exclusion of life-threatening disorders as the cause of symptoms and reassurance of the patient as well as proper explanation of the diagnosis and its underlying disease mechanisms (i.e. symptoms are due to a sensitive gut) is crucial and can be considered as an essential element of treatment. Since there is a remarkable comorbidity of anxiety and depression, psychosomatic interventions might be necessary in selected patients. Based on controlled clinical trials few drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors, prokinetics, tricyclic antidepressants, simethicone and selected herbal preparations have been found to be effective for treatment of functional dyspepsia. Effects of H. pylori eradication, even though strongly advocated, are most likely due to undiagnosed peptic ulcer disease in a very small group of patients. While there is currently no therapy that cures functional dyspepsia, the therapeutic target is to control symptoms.

Management of functional dyspepsia: Unsolved problems and new perspectives

The common characteristic criteria of all functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are the persistence and recurrence of variable gastrointestinal symptoms that cannot be explained by any structural or biochemical abnormalities. Functional dyspepsia (FD) represents one of the important GI disorders in Western countries because of its remarkably high prevalence in general population and its impact on quality of life. Due to its dependence on both subjective determinants and diverse country-specific circumstances, the definition and management strategies of FD are still variably stated. Clinical trials with several drug classes (e.g., proton pump inhibitors, H2-blockers, prokinetic drugs) have been performed frequently without validated disease-specific test instruments for the outcome measurements. Therefore, the interpretation of such trials remains difficult and controversial with respect to comparability and evaluation of drug efficacy, and definite conclusions can be drawn neither for diagnostic management nor for efficacious drug therapy so far. In view of these unsolved problems, guidelines both on the clinical management of FD and on the performance of clinical trials are needed. In recent years, increasing research work has been done in this area. Clinical trials conducted in adequately diagnosed patients that provided validated outcome measurements may result in better insights leading to more effective treatment strategies. Encouraging perspectives have been recently performed by methodologically well-designed treatment studies with herbal drug preparations. Herbal drugs, given their proven efficacy in clinical trials, offer a safe therapeutic alternative in the treatment of FD which is often favored by both patients and physicians. A fixed combination of peppermint oil and caraway oil in patients suffering from FD could be proven effective by well-designed clinical trials.

Prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal mucosal injury: risk factors for serious complications

BACKGROUND

1-2% of all patients under non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy are exposed to serious upper gastrointestinal complications. The policy of prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal mucosal injury by using misoprostol or suppressing acid secretion is still a matter of debate.

AIMS

To discuss the effectiveness of prophylaxis of a gastrointestinal complication during non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment, according to the number and relevance of risk factors.

PATIENTS

A total of 8.843 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, admitted to the widest prospective multicentre mega-trial, on 6-month complication prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers.

METHODS

The results are presented in terms of the number of patients to be treated (number needed to treat) in order to prevent one serious upper gastrointestinal complication, and corrected for the number of patients, that receiving the prophylaxis therapy, would lead to one additional withdrawal (number needed to harm).

RESULTS

The base-line risk for a complication strongly depended on the number and relevance of risk factors: history of peptic ulcer disease, of gastrointestinal bleeding, of cardiovascular disease, and age. In the general study population, the relative risk reduction of gastrointestinal complications with misoprostol was 40%: thus the number needed to treat to prevent 1 event was 250 in the experimental period (6 months) or 125 when normalized at one-year treatment (1 year number needed to treat]. When considering the prophylaxis gain in intermediate (risk 1-2%) or high risk subjects (patients with a probability of an event over 2%, for the presence of 1 important risk factor or multiple factors), the 1-year number needed to treat rapidly drops from about 100 to about 17. The number needed to harm for one withdrawal was 18. The number needed to treat corrected for withdrawals in order to avoid major complications rises from 125 to 132 in the general population of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users; from 102 to 105 in subjects at intermediate risk, such as patients with history of cardiovascular disease; in the groups at high risk, from 26 to 27 (patients with history of peptic ulcer disease), and from 16 to 17 (patients with history of peptic ulcer disease, cardiovascular disease and aged over 65 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at intermediate and high risk for complications from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers should be considered for prophylaxis. In this group of patients, misoprostol prevention of severe complications is effective, and its clinical relevance similar to that of other preventive measures in medical practice.

Management of gastroduodenal ulcers caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, probably resulting in the death of 1200 patients per annum in the UK. The main mechanism of toxicity involves an inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis that results in mucosal erosion as a result of the abrogation of defence mechanisms. However, acid peptic attack can deepen this initial injury. Thus, logical treatments include prostaglandin analogues as 'replacement therapy', acid suppression, enteric coating to avoid topical effects and the use of safer NSAIDs, including those that have little or no effect on gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis. There is less logic to the strategy of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication, and the status of this approach is controversial. Overall, proton pump inhibitors have the best profile of efficacy and side-effects for the healing and prevention of NSAID-associated ulcers. Misoprostol is also effective and appears to be superior to proton pump inhibitors for superficial erosive injury. Early indications are that selective inhibitors of the inducible cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme have little or no effect in causing ulcers. Growing experience with these agents will probably revolutionize the management of patients with arthritic conditions. However, the increasing use of low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis means that gastroenterologists will have to continue to grapple with the problems of NSAID-associated ulcers for some time to come.

Cost effectiveness of replacing diclofenac with a fixed combination of misoprostol and diclofenac in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the costs and health consequences of replacing treatment with diclofenac 50 mg with a fixed combination of diclofenac 50 mg and misoprostol 0.2 mg 3 times a day in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A decision tree was developed to simulate 6 months of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment for RA. The probabilities of the clinical outcomes were based on a literature review. A survey of Norwegian rheumatologists was undertaken to explore their clinical management of dyspepsia in RA patients taking NSAIDs. Valuation of health states was based on results of the Short Form 36 health survey.

RESULTS

In female RA patients without any risk factors associated with serious gastrointestinal (GI) complications, the incremental cost of replacing diclofenac with the fixed misoprostol/diclofenac combination therapy was $72,700 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. For patients with 1 risk factor, the cost was less than $16,000. With 2 or 3 risk factors, the use of misoprostol was cost saving. The cost-effectiveness ratios in males were approximately 20% higher than in females.

CONCLUSION

Replacing diclofenac with a fixed diclofenac/misoprostol combination is cost effective when restricted to RA patients at increased risk of serious GI events.

Placebo in functional dyspepsia: symptomatic, gastrointestinal motor, and gastric sensorial responses

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic trials in functional dyspepsia consistently show a substantial placebo response, but there is no clear explanation for such an effect. Our aim was to evaluate symptomatic, gastrointestinal motor, and gastric sensorial responses to placebo treatment in patients with chronic and severe functional dyspepsia who were part of a therapeutic trial.

METHODS

Thirty patients were treated during 8 wk with placebo (white-colored 8-mm tablets containing cellulose) by mouth, 20 min before breakfast, lunch, and dinner. We quantified the symptomatic response to placebo as a change in global health status, and also as a change in the individual and combined (global symptom index) of a five-symptom complex: upper abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, bloating/fullness, and early satiety. Gastroduodenal motility, during fasting and postprandially, was evaluated by manometry in all patients pretreatment and in 17 patients posttreatment. Gastric sensitivity to distension was evaluated in 18 patients pretreatment and in five patients posttreatment (all of them clinical responders).

RESULTS

Placebo treatment produced a striking symptomatic improvement; by 8 wk 80% of the patients reported an improved global health status and their global symptom index markedly decreased (23.9+/-1.3 pretreatment vs 9.1+/-1.2; p < 0.05). Placebo increased the number of gastric phases III starting in the antrum during the fasting period (1.1+/-0.1 vs 1.6+/-0.2; p < 0.05). As a group, no significant changes in postprandial gastroduodenal motility were observed after placebo treatment. However, after placebo a significant improvement in the antral motility index (MI) was observed in the subset of patients with antral hypomotility (MI pretreatment: 7.9+/-1.0; MI posttreatment: 11.7+/-0.4; p < 0.05). Before placebo treatment, patients with functional dyspepsia showed increased sensitivity to stepwise distension of the stomach relative to healthy individuals. After 8 wk of placebo treatment sensitivity to distension remained unchanged, even though patients' clinical status was markedly improved.

CONCLUSION

In patients with functional dyspepsia, the symptomatic response to placebo is substantial. Some significant changes were also observed in gastric motility: increase in the gastric phase III number as well as in the postprandial antral motility index in those with hypomotility pretreatment. Remarkably, however, clinical improvement seems to occur independently of detectable changes in gastroduodenal motor activity or gastric hypersensitivity to distension.

Review article: functional dyspepsia--should treatment be targeted on disturbed physiology?

In patients who present with chronic unexplained upper abdominal pain or discomfort (functional dyspepsia), therapy should ideally be targeted on correcting the individual's disturbed pathophysiology. Here, putative mechanisms implicated in functional dyspepsia and potential approaches to therapy are critically reviewed in order to determine if targeting treatment is of value. Pharmacological therapies reviewed include those that aim to correct disordered gastric emptying (e.g. cisapride, dopaminergic receptor antagonists, macrolides), reduce visceral hypersensitivity (e.g. somatostatin analogues, cholecystokinin antagonists, opioid agonists, serotonin type 3 receptor antagonists), reduce gastric acid secretion (e.g. H2-blockers, acid pump inhibitors), cure Helicobacter pylori infection, enhance muscosal defence (e.g. sucralfate, bismuth) or modify central nervous system processes. It is concluded that the imperfectly understood pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia contributes to the paucity of established efficacious therapies.

Differential effects of misoprostol and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac and gastrointestinal symptoms

1. The effects of oral misoprostol (800 microg day(-1)) and ranitidine (300 mg day(-1)) on the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac (100 mg) were assessed in a three-way randomized crossover study in 18 healthy male subjects. 2. Subjects were studied over three 8 day periods, during which they received twice-daily placebo, misoprostol, or ranitidine. A single dose of diclofenac was given orally on days 1 and 8, and plasma diclofenac concentrations were measured by h.p.l.c. over 24 h. 3. Misoprostol caused a non-significant 19% increase in the mean Cmax value of diclofenac on both days 1 and 8. After 8 days of dosing with misoprostol there was a significant (P = 0.04) 20% decrease in the AUC of diclofenac. 4. Ranitidine had no statistically significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac. 5. Co-administration of misoprostol and diclofenac was associated with a higher frequency and severity of gastrointestinal symptoms and frequency of bowel opening, and a decrease in faecal consistency when compared with either placebo or ranitidine plus diclofenac (P < 0.01).

Functional dyspepsia. Current treatment recommendations

Symptoms of functional dyspepsia are frequent; the prevalence of dyspepsia (defined as pain or discomfort centred in the upper abdomen) in the general population approaches 25%. By definition, patients with functional dyspepsia do not have a structural or biochemical explanation for their symptoms. Disorders of function (e.g. delayed gastric emptying) are detectable in a proportion of patients but remain poorly understood. Nevertheless, the current rationale for drug treatment is based on altering pathophysiological mechanisms which are believed to be associated with the development of symptoms. Although the placebo response rates approach 60%, prokinetics, acid-suppressing agents and bismuth-containing compounds have been shown to be significantly better than placebo in reducing symptoms. Antacids are widely used, but no controlled study has been able to demonstrate a significant benefit over placebo. The efficacy of sucralfate is uncertain. Rational guidelines on which drug should be used for a given patient are lacking, although approaches based on symptom profiles have been proposed; the duration of treatment needed to achieve long-lasting relief of symptoms is also poorly defined. Identifying optimal treatment for the individual patient, therefore, continues to be largely a trial and error process. Further research efforts are needed to elucidate the pathophysiological basis of functional dyspepsia so that specific therapy can be tailored to underlying pathophysiological disturbances.

Co-administration of misoprostol or ranitidine with indomethacin: effects on pharmacokinetics, abdominal symptoms and bowel habit

This three-way randomized crossover study in 18 healthy male volunteers compared the pharmacokinetics of 50 mg indomethacin b.d. during concomitant twice daily dosing with 400 micrograms misoprostol, 150 mg ranitidine or placebo. Plasma indomethacin concentrations were determined by HPLC assay of samples collected over 12 h after the first dose, and over 14 h after the last dose on Day 8 of each dosing period. A daily diary of bowel habits, and the occurrence and severity of abdominal symptoms, was kept by each subject throughout the study. Statistical comparisons were made by analysis of variance. In the presence of misoprostol there was a 13% decrease in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of indomethacin over one dosing interval on Day 1 (P less than 0.01), and at steady state there was a 24% decrease in the maximum plasma concentration (P less than 0.02). The pharmacokinetics of indomethacin were not affected by co-administration of ranitidine. Accumulation of indomethacin after repeated oral dosing was not significantly altered by the co-administration of either misoprostol or ranitidine. The frequency and severity of abdominal symptoms was significantly increased (P less than 0.01) during misoprostol dosing, compared with either ranitidine or placebo plus indomethacin. When the dosing phase (Days 1-8) was compared with the washout phase (Days 9-15) in each period, misoprostol, but not ranitidine or placebo, plus indomethacin resulted in an increase (P less than 0.001) in abdominal symptom severity, frequency of bowel motions and a decrease in faecal consistency.

Cisapride treatment of patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and erosive prepyloric changes. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

One hundred and twenty consecutive outpatients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and erosive prepyloric changes (EPC) were, after a 2-week placebo run-in period, randomly allocated to double-blind treatment with either 10-mg cisapride tablets or placebo three times daily for 4 weeks. The patients' global evaluation and total symptom score were significantly in favour of cisapride at 2 weeks (p less than 0.05). At 4 weeks the effect of cisapride was no longer significant (p = 0.22). Similarly, the investigators' global evaluation showed marked to moderate symptom improvement in 47% of the cisapride-treated patients as compared with 30% of the placebo-treated patients at 2 weeks. The 95% confidence interval of the difference (18%) was 0% to 35%. At 4 weeks the intergroup difference was only 10% (cisapride, 50% versus placebo 40%). Pain on awakening was the only symptom improved in favour of cisapride at 4 weeks. Thus, when patients with NUD and EPC are treated with cisapride, the therapeutic gain might vanish after the 2nd week of treatment.