Repeated intravenous bolus injections of omeprazole: effects on 24-hour intragastric pH, serum gastrin, and serum pepsinogen A and C

Future prospects for proton pump inhibitors

Future prospects for proton pump inhibitors depend on their efficacy and safety relative to H2-receptor antagonists, the therapeutic standard for acid peptic disorders. As safety concerns diminish, efficacy considerations become more important as these may pertain to cost effectiveness. Comparative, controlled trials show that omeprazole and lansoprazole are somewhat more effective than H2-blockers in healing duodenal and gastric ulcers, providing faster relief of symptoms. Relapse after cessation of therapy is similar between the two classes. The proton pump inhibitors are substantially more effective in healing lesions and relieving symptoms in patients with reflux oesophagitis, and are particularly effective in cases that have failed to heal after 12 weeks of treatment with H2-blockers. Relapse rates of oesophagitis are significantly less with prolonged treatment with omeprazole than ranitidine. A proton pump inhibitor combined with amoxicillin is less effective than triple therapy with antibiotics and bismuth in eradicating Helicobacter pylori infections, but is more convenient and associated with fewer side-effects. Efficacy might be improved by more optimal dosing regimens. Prospects for reversible proton pump inhibitors depend on the balance between their theoretical advantages and their acid inhibition profile which, at present, closely resembles that of H2-blockers.

Pepsinogens: physiology, pharmacology pathophysiology and exercise

Human gastric mucosa contains aspartic proteinases that can be separated electrophoretically on the basis of their physical properties into two major groups: Pepsinogen I (PGA, PGI); and Pepsinogen II (PGC, PGII). Pepsinogens consist of a single polypeptide chain with molecular weight of approximately 42,000 Da. Pepsinogens are mainly synthesized and secreted by the gastric chief cells of the human stomach before being converted into the proteolytic enzyme pepsin, which is crucial for the digestive processes in the stomach. Pepsinogen synthesis and secretion are regulated by positive and negative feed-back mechanisms. In the resting state pepsinogens are stored in granules, which inhibit further synthesis. After appropriate physiological or external chemical stimuli, pepsinogens are secreted in the stomach lumen where hydrochloric acid, secreted by the parietal cells, converts them into the corresponding active enzyme pepsins. The stimulus-secreting coupling mechanisms of pepsinogens appear to include at least two major pathways: one involving cAMP as a mediator, the other involving modification of intracellular Ca(2+)concentration. Physiological or external chemical stimuli acting through the intracellular metabolic adenyl cyclase are more effective in inducing ' de novo ' pepsinogen synthesis than those acting through intracellular Ca(2+). The activation of protein kinase C (PK-C) would appear to be involved in regulatory processes. The measurement of pepsinogens A and C in the serum is considered to be one of the non-invasive biochemical markers for monitoring peptic secretion and obtaining information on the gastric mucosa status of healthy subjects. Recently, pepsinogen measurements have been used as an effective biochemical method for evaluating and monitoring patients with gastrointestinal diseases and for checking the effects of drug treatment. The level of PGA in the serum is always high in normal gastritis, while in atrophic gastritis it is always low. In both cases the PGC level in the serum is high. In most gastrointestinal pathologies the ratio between the PGA/PGC decreases. Various reports concerning hormone and/or enzyme modification as well as gastrointestinal distress in the case of long distance exercise have been reported. It has been suggested that the origin of the gastrointestinal distress experienced by long distance runners is a transient ischaemia of the gastric mucosa; it is also suggested that a hypobaric-hypoxic environment could contribute to induce gastric mucosa necrosis. Interrelation between gastrointestinal distress, hypobaric-hypoxic environment and modifications of PGA and PGC, gastrin and cortisol was evaluated in 13 athletes after a marathon performed at 4300 m. Gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in approximately 40% of the athletes. After the race the athletes showed a significant increase of gastrin and cortisol, while the ratio between PGA/PGC decreased. No relationship was observed between gastrointestinal symptoms and hormonal changes after the race. A control group of five subjects, who had been exposed to the same environmental conditions, showed no gastrointestinal or hormonal alteration. Conversely, control subjects presented a significant decrease of cortisol related to the circadian rhythm. The same incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms at high altitude and at sea level and the absence of pathological alteration of PGA and PGC in the serum of the athletes indicates that running a marathon and living for 6 days at 4300 m does not induce gastric mucosa necrosis. Cortisol and gastrin alteration observed in the athletes at this altitude would seem to be related to an activation of the mesopontine and forebrain structures involved in the behavioural and metabolic integration of the autonomic control and arousal and psychophysical-exercise stress. 2000 Academic Press@p$hr

Review article: acid suppression in non-variceal acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Despite a decreased incidence of ulcer disease and improvements in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, mortality remains at about 6-7%. Although endoscopic haemostatic therapy has been demonstrated to be the mainstay of management, the search continues for less invasive medical modalities that might also improve patient outcome. In vitro data have indicated the important role of acid in impairing haemostasis and causing clot digestion. Therefore, theoretically, maintenance of a high intragastric pH (above 6.0) during management of upper GI bleeding is warranted. Until recently, available agents did not permit such a sustained elevation in gastric pH. Early studies with H2-receptor antagonists have not demonstrated significant improvements in important patient outcomes, such as rebleeding, surgery or mortality. With the availability of intravenous formulations of proton pump inhibitors, it is now possible to aim at maintaining gastric pH above 6.0 for 24 h per day. Recent clinical trial data would appear to support the use of proton pump inhibitors to decrease the rate of rebleeding and the need for surgery. This paper provides a review of non-variceal acute GI bleeding, with special reference to the role of proton pump inhibitors in this clinical setting.

Individual and group dose-responses to intravenous omeprazole in the first 24 h: pH-feedback-controlled and fixed-dose infusions

1. Individual responses to intravenous boli of omeprazole have shown considerable variability. Data on the individual responses to the new omeprazole infusion formulation are lacking. 2. Individual dose-responses in the first 24 h of fixed-dose and pH-feedback-controlled infusions of omeprazole were assessed in two randomised, third-party blinded, cross-over studies, using two separate groups of eight healthy subjects. In study A, feedback-controlled infusions of omeprazole (target pH 5, dose range 0-12 mg h-1) and fixed-dose infusions (8 mg h-1) were compared, both with an initial bolus of 80 mg. Omeprazole plasma concentrations were measured. Study B assessed the effect on individual pH-control of a loading bolus of either 40 mg or 80 mg omeprazole, followed by feedback-controlled infusions. 3. Study A: the median % time of pH > 5 was 71.2 (total range: 48.9-83.2) with feedback infusions and 57.9 (28.0-95.3) with fixed-dose infusions (P = 0.06). The mean 24 h infusion doses were 173.1 mg (44.5-253.1) in the feedback group and 192 mg in the fixed-dose group. The AUC of omeprazole plasma concentrations ranged widely, but correlated with the % time of pH > 5 during fixed-dose infusions. Study B: initial boli of 40 mg and 80 mg of omeprazole resulted in similar 24 h median % of time with pH > 5, 69.2 (49.9-78.8) and 69.6 (44.4-87.7), respectively. Mean omeprazole doses infused by feedback pump were 187.6 mg (83.1-253.6) after 40 mg boli and 159.9 mg (61.8-227.0) after 80 mg boli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Omeprazole. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders

Omeprazole, a gastric acid pump inhibitor, dose-dependently controls gastric acid secretion: the drug has greater antisecretory activity than histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Omeprazole 20 to 40 mg/day is more effective than histamine H2-receptor antagonists in the short term treatment of duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. Available data suggest that omeprazole 10 to 40 mg/day is also more effective than ranitidine in the maintenance therapy of duodenal ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. The drug is also effective in patients with duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer or reflux oesophagitis poorly responsive to histamine H2-receptor antagonists. The efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg/day appears to be similar to that of lansoprazole 30 mg/day in the short term treatment of duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. However, most available studies have been reported in abstract form only, and 2 of 3 studies in patients with duodenal ulcer have shown greater healing rates at 2 (but not 4) weeks with lansoprazole. Helicobacter pylori eradication decreases duodenal ulcer relapse rates and appears to be associated with improved duodenal ulcer healing rates. Evidence also suggests that H. pylori eradication is associated with reduced gastric ulcer relapse rates. Omeprazole monotherapy may suppress but does not eradicate H. pylori infection. Eradication rates with omeprazole 20 or 40 mg twice daily plus amoxicillin usually up to 2 g/day (3 g/day in a few studies) for 2 weeks appear to be similar to those of standard triple therapy (bismuth salt plus metronidazole, plus tetracycline or amoxicillin) or omeprazole plus clarithromycin, although eradication rates vary widely. Omeprazole plus amoxicillin appears to be better tolerated than triple therapy and represents a first-line treatment alternative in patients with H. pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease. Omeprazole plus amoxicillin plus metronidazole appears to be more effective than omeprazole plus amoxicillin in patients with metronidazole-sensitive H. pylori infection. Omeprazole remains a treatment of choice in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. The dosages should be adjusted according to individual response. However, relatively low dosages of 10 to 40 mg/day may be sufficient in some patients. The drug has also shown promise in the treatment of children with severe reflux oesophagitis, in patients with reflux oesophagitis and coexisting systemic sclerosis, and in the prevention of aspiration pneumonia. Evidence suggests that omeprazole is more effective than ranitidine in patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastric damage who continue to take NSAIDs, especially in patients with large gastric ulcers; however, completion of ongoing studies is required to verify this.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Bolus infusion of famotidine: effects on gastric pH by repeated 12-hour doses of 20 mg in postoperative patients

This study was carried out to assess the efficacy of intravenous (IV) famotidine in suppressing gastric secretion over a 48-hour period. Twenty postoperative patients requiring a nasogastric tube received famotidine 20 mg IV every 12 hours and gastric pH was measured continuously by means of an indwelling probe. A baseline recording was performed over the first 4 hours and then the drug was infused every 12 hours (q12h) over a 15-minute period for the subsequent 48 hours. The mean pH value achieved during each time segment under active treatment was significantly higher (P < .001) than the mean basal value. Also the density distributions of minutes spent at the various pH units confirm that famotidine is highly effective (P < .001) in raising and maintaining gastric pH above 4.0 units during most of the drug-related period (44 hours). It can be concluded that repeated intravenous boli of famotidine 20 mg every 12 hours allow us to obtain an effective control of intragastric acidity. The antisecretory action is consistent over the total 48-hour period examined and therefore the use of intermittent infusion of famotidine seems to be advisable, as opposed to the recommended continuous IV administration of cimetidine and ranitidine. There is, however, a considerable intersubject variability in the antisecretory response to the drug.

Do continuous infusions of omeprazole and ranitidine retain their effect with prolonged dosing?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Prolonged infusions of H2-antagonists are commonly used in intensive care units, although little is known about their antisecretory efficacy beyond the initial 24 hours of dosing. The aim of this study was to assess the antisecretory effects of infusions of ranitidine and omeprazole for a period of 72 hours.

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers received individually titrated 72-hour intravenous infusions of omeprazole, ranitidine, or placebo in a double-blind, crossover study. Gastric pH and dosing requirements were compared.

RESULTS

The median percentage of time with pH > 4 (interquartile range) was 93% (88%-95%) on day 1 and 96% (94%-99%) on day 3 with omeprazole and 67% (56%-78%) and 43% (31%-51%), respectively, with ranitidine (both P < 0.001 vs. omeprazole). The mean doses (+/- SD) required on days 1 and 3 for omeprazole were 235.8 +/- 44 mg and 134.0 +/- 37 mg (P < 0.0001), and ranitidine doses were 502.5 +/- 76 mg and 541.8 +/- 25 mg, respectively (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole infusions consistently maintained gastric pH above 4 over a period of 72 hours with progressively lower doses. Significant tolerance to the antisecretory effect of ranitidine infusion developed in 72 hours, which was not overcome despite individually titrated doses of more than 500 mg/24 hours. Consequently, application of pharmacodynamic results of single-day H2-blocker and proton-pump inhibitor studies to prolonged infusion trials for stress ulcer-related bleeding is inappropriate.

Pepsinogens in health and disease

Pepsinogens, precursors of pepsins (potent and abundant digestive enzymes that are the primary products of the gastric chief cells), are members of the family of aspartic proteases. Because of the heterogeneity of pepsinogens, several classifications have appeared in the literature. I describe the recommended classification and nomenclature of the aspartic proteases and discuss their genetics, biochemistry (structure, activation of zymogens, mechanism of proteolytic activity and inhibitors), and physiology. The focus will be on the zymogens of pepsin, the so-called pepsinogens. The measurement of these enzymes in serum is a reliable noninvasive biochemical method for evaluating peptic secretion and obtaining information on the gastric mucosal status. A detailed review of the methods for the measurement of pepsinogens in serum, urine, and gastric mucosa is also provided. Data on pepsinogen levels in healthy subjects are discussed with respect to sex, age, smoking habit, and the presence of a circadian rhythm. The value of pepsinogen measurements in peptic ulcer to determine ulcer outcome and recurrence, in gastric cancer, and in Helicobacter pylori infection is reviewed. Finally, the effects of drugs on peptic secretion are discussed. In light of these data, the measurement of aspartic proteases, and in particular that of pepsinogen A and C, may be regarded as an effective biochemical approach to the evaluation and monitoring of patients with upper gastrointestinal diseases.