Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS-SR) in a Norwegian material of patients with functional dyspepsia, duodenal ulcer, and urinary bladder dysfunction. Clinical validation of the instrument

Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale: Factor structure, reliability, and validity assessment in a sample of Greek breast cancer patients

The study and measurement of psychosocial adjustment is important for evaluating patients' well-being, and assessing the illness's course, treatment's success, and patients' recovery. In this study, internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Greek version of the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale-Self-Report (PAIS-SR) were examined. Demographic and psychosocial data were collected from a sample of 243 women with breast cancer, recruited from September 2011 to December 2012. With some exceptions in specific items, the original conceptually-derived PAIS-SR subscales emerged in a seven-factor solution. Social Environment, Job and Household Duties, and Psychological Distress accounted for more of the total variance than other subscales. PAIS-SR showed good internal consistency reliability, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients >0.62. Correlations of PAIS-SR domains with measures of quality of life and posttraumatic stress symptoms supported the convergent validity of the PAIS-SR and its significance for cancer research. The Greek version of the PAIS-SR has acceptable internal consistency reliability and construct validity, as well as satisfactory convergent validity. Results provide some suggestions for the development of programs to evaluate adjustment status and implement psychosocial interventions among breast cancer survivors.

The frequency of the psychiatric symptoms in the patients with dyspepsia at a university hospital

OBJECTIVE

According to the psychiatric hypothesis, the symptoms of dyspepsia may be due to depression, anxiety or a somatization disorder. We investigated the frequency of psychiatric symptoms in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures with dyspepsia, either with or without pathological findings, and compared this with control subjects without dyspeptic symptoms.

METHODS

Ninety patients with dyspeptic symptoms and 90 control subjects participated in the study. Both the patients and the controls were asked to complete a questionnaire about socio-demographic characteristics, the Turkish version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Symptom Check List-90 (SCL-90). In order for us to determine whether the criteria for any of the conditions listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) were met, the patients were asked to take part in the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders.

RESULTS

Of the participants, 47.8% had a psychiatric disorder according to DSM-IV criteria, somatoform disorder (44.2%) being the most common. While 42.2% patients were determined to have a pathological finding using endoscopic evaluation, 57.8% had no findings. Together with the somatization and obsessive-compulsive disorder subscale scores, the total SCL-90 score and the mean trait anxiety score were statistically significantly higher in participants with no pathological findings. There were trends for anxiety (13.2% vs. 7.7%) and mood (2.6% vs. 0.0%) disorders to be more frequent in patients with pathological findings, while somatoform disorder+depressive disorder (17.3% vs. 5.2%) was more frequent in patients with no findings, although the differences were not statistically significant (Z=0.7, P>.05). The scores of state-trait anxiety, somatization, obsession-compulsion, depression, anxiety, phobic anxiety and psychotism subscales, and the total SCL-90 score were statistically significantly higher in those participants without a pathological finding than in the controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding the high frequency of psychiatric disorders in patients with dyspeptic symptoms, we think that such patients should be evaluated by two separate departments, gastroenterology and psychiatry.

Health-related quality of life and gastrointestinal disease

Society is changing rapidly, and new aspects need to be considered when evaluating treatment of disease. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a relatively new addition to the tools clinicians use to gain a better understanding of the impact of disease and its treatment. The questions 'What is it?', 'How it is measured?' and 'How can the information be used?' are now better understood than a few years ago. Generic instruments to capture HRQL enable a broad assessment of a range of aspects and can be used to make comparisons between different patient populations. Irrespective of the choice of instrument, they can classify the influence of different factors, such as gender, age, general health status and disease severity. Health-related quality of life assessments have been made in many areas of gastroenterology, such as reflux disease, inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome, to describe the burden of illness and the impact of treatment. Health-related quality of life as a prediction of treatment response is another interesting option. Its ability in the context of surgical intervention and outcomes is also emerging even though more work must be done in this area. Health-related quality of life evaluations, as an additional tool in the management of patients, are here to stay.

Psychologic and psychiatric aspects of gastrointestinal disease

There has been an explosion in understanding of the psychosocial concomitants of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Detecting psychologic disturbance and eliciting a history of physical or sexual abuse are critical in suggesting comprehensive and efficacious treatment strategies for these patients. The challenge is to define further the use of psychopharmacologic agents, including the newer antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and anxiolytic agents, in the treatment of chronic functional gastrointestinal disorders. Further research to evaluate the usefulness of various forms of psychotherapeutic and behavioral interventions needs to be undertaken. Establishing a multicomponent treatment program delivered by a team of caregivers, each bringing their unique skills (internist, psychiatrist, psychologist, and others) to patients, must be based on further research on the efficacy of these modalities as opposed to empiric treatment.

On demand therapy of reflux oesophagitis--a prospective study of symptoms, patient satisfaction and quality of life

BACKGROUND

In patients with low-grade reflux oesophagitis adequate symptom control is the aim of treatment. Effervescent tablets alleviate heartburn more rapidly than ordinary tablets.

AIM

To investigate symptom control, patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life and disease progress when ranitidine 150 mg effervescent tablets were offered as on demand treatment. We also wanted to investigate whether any biological or psycho-social factor could predict patient satisfaction.

METHOD

Consecutive patients with endoscopically verified reflux oesophagitis grade I-II were followed up for 12 months. 24 h pH-metry, disease history, symptoms and several psycho-social factors were registered at baseline and 12 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included. Mean age was 50.7 years (range 21-82), 63% were men. Mean tablet consumption was 1.21 per day (range 7-1016 tablets/year). At the 1-year follow-up discomfort resulting from reflux symptoms was significantly reduced (P<0.001), and the patients' social and vocational life improved. Eighty-four percentage of the patients were satisfied with the treatment. 24 h pH-metry or number of reflux episodes did not change. We did not find any factors able to predict patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

On demand therapy with ranitidine effervescent tablets was well accepted by the majority of patients with reflux oesophagitis grade I. Even though the number of reflux episodes did not change, the patients experienced less discomfort due to reflux symptoms, and their social and vocational life was better. There was no significant progression of the disorder during the 1-year follow-up. No predictive factor for patient satisfaction was found.

Are psychosocial factors of aetiological importance in functional dyspepsia?

The causes of functional dyspepsia remain unclear. Research has linked other functional gastrointestinal disorders, particularly irritable bowel syndrome, to a history of physical or sexual abuse, psychosocial distress and certain psychiatric disorders. In functional dyspepsia, there is a possibility of certain psychiatric disorders, particularly alcohol abuse and eating disorders, indirectly influencing the development of functional dyspepsia-like symptoms. However, the literature on possible psychosocial correlates in functional dyspepsia is not as mature as the literature on irritable bowel syndrome. This paper critically reviews the psychosocial dimensions and implications for the psychotherapeutic treatment of functional dyspepsia.

Does endoscopy have a positive impact on quality of life in dyspepsia?

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether normal endoscopy results in patients investigated for dyspepsia has therapeutic value. Therefore the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the endoscopy on quality of life and dyspeptic symptoms.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-six symptomatic patients (85 men and 111 women, mean age 42.9 years), who were receiving no treatment, were investigated before and 1 week after endoscopy with the use of a battery of validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

Before endoscopy the health-related quality of life was compromised in comparison with a normal population, but 1 week after a negative endoscopy it is increased to a level which was close to the normal range despite no major change in symptoms. Physical activity and sleep scores improved significantly after endoscopy.

CONCLUSION

The present results suggest that a negative endoscopy improves quality of life in the short-term in patients with dyspepsia, even though symptoms may persist.

Quality of life: a reflection of symptoms and concerns

BACKGROUND

Upper gastrointestinal complaints are common in the general population. Most patients consulting have no or only minimal markers of disease. It is important to evaluate new methods for the assessment and follow-up of treatment of these new patient groups.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Recent publications on Quality of Life (QOL) and upper gastrointestinal disease are reviewed with the specific aim of relating the effect of disease symptoms and patient concerns to the outcome of investigations. We found that QOL is adversely affected in upper gastrointestinal disorders and that effective treatment medically or surgically normalizes the scores. There is a good correlation between degree of symptoms and QOL outcome. Patients' concern affects the outcome.

CONCLUSION

QOL assessments are helpful in evaluating the impact of upper gastrointestinal disease.

Psychosocial factors and their role in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional dyspepsia

Patients with symptoms of GERD and dyspepsia are among the most common consulters in general practice and are different from their counterparts in the community who choose not to consult although they suffer from similar symptoms. They represent a heterogeneous group with considerable symptom overlap. They have a relatively poor quality of life and endoscopic findings can only explain symptoms in about half of these patients. Thus psychosocial factors which could contribute to their morbidity should be explored. While some studies have methodological shortcomings, main findings are that key psychological factors are anxiety, tension, neuroticism, somatization, fears of malignancy, negative assessment of health, depression, a poor social network and less effective coping strategies. Physical illness is likely to bring on psychological distress due to discomfort or threat of ill health. Cognizance of psychosocial factors will facilitate an understanding of the underlying problems and will improve diagnosis and selection of optimal treatment.

Discriminant analysis of factors distinguishing patients with functional dyspepsia from patients with duodenal ulcer. Significance of somatization

Patients with duodenal ulcer or functional dyspepsia do not differ on dyspeptic symptoms. The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that functional dyspepsia and duodenal ulcer are two different diagnostic entities by examining the discriminating power of several anamnestic, biological, and psychosocial variables. Ninety-four patients with duodenal ulcer and 86 patients with functional dyspepsia were included. Anamnestic data, global assessment, Helicobacter pylori status, blood group, Lewisa+ phenotype, and several measures of psychological distress and somatic complaints were registered. Compared to patients with functional dyspepsia, the duodenal ulcer patients were more often infected by Helicobacter pylori and had their stomach discomfort more often relieved by eating. Compared to patients with duodenal ulcer, patients with functional dyspepsia had higher scores of depression, trait anxiety, general psychopathology and different somatic complaints (called somatization). They were also less satisfied with the health care system, their disorder had a greater negative impact on their quality of life, and their global assessment of own health was poorer. Discriminant analysis including age, smoking, Helicobacter pylori status, global assessment, and somatic complaint classified 86.1% of the patients correctly (77.9% of the patients with functional dyspepsia and 93.6% of the patients with duodenal ulcer). It is concluded that duodenal ulcer and functional dyspepsia are two separate diagnostic entities. Patients with duodenal ulcer are older, smoke more often, and almost all are infected with Helicobacter pylori, while patients with functional dyspepsia are characterized by somatization and a negative assessment of their own health.

Clinical effects of octreotide compared to placebo in patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours. Report on a double-blind, randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of octreotide with f placebo on symptoms, tumour marker and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours and liver metastases.

DESIGN

A blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over study was performed. The number of flushing epidodes and diarrhoea episodes were registered for 1 week prior to the study and for the 8-week duration of the study. Quality of life and 24-h urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) excretion were measured before the start, and at 4 and 8 weeks. Quality of life was registered with the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS) and 5-HIAA measured by high-performance chromatography with electrochemical detection. 5-HIAA values exceeding 45 mumol 24 h-1 were considered to be elevated.

SETTING

The study was performed in a tertiary referral centre.

SUBJECTS

Twelve patients were approached; eleven patients were included, with a mean age of 56.5 (range 30-72) years. The primary tumour originated from the small intestine in nine and from the pancreas in two patients. The main symptoms were diarrhoea, flushing and nausea. The 24-h excretion of 5-HIAA was increased in all patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were treated for 4 weeks with octreotide (100 micrograms) subcutaneously, twice daily, and for 4 weeks on placebo (octreotide vehicle) in random starting order.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were the number of episodes of the main clinical symptom(s) and 24-h 5-HIAA excretion.

RESULTS

Octreotide lowered diarrhoea and flushing frequency significantly compared to placebo. 5-HIAA excretion was reduced during treatment with the active drug. Two domains of the PAIS were significantly improved, indicating that the reduction of tumour marker and symptoms were clinically important.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical effect of octreotide on symptoms in patients with neuroendocrine tumours was demonstrated in a controlled, prospective trial.

Quality of life in upper gastrointestinal disorders

BACKGROUND

There is increased interest in the concept 'quality of life'. Available instruments are defined and discussed, with special emphasis on reliability and validity. Research on quality of life in patients with upper gastrointestinal disorders is reviewed, and our own results presented.

METHODS

The Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale was used to compare 100 patients with functional dyspepsia and 100 patients with duodenal ulcer in a cross-sectional study, and to monitor the quality of life of 74 duodenal ulcer patients in a longitudinal phase.

RESULTS

The quality of life of patients with functional dyspepsia was more negatively affected than that of patients with duodenal ulcer. After half of the patients had received short-term cognitive psychotherapy and all had received prophylactic H2-blocker treatment after ulcer relapse, quality of life improved in both the treatment group and the control group. Seventy-four patients with recurrent duodenal ulcers reported higher satisfaction with the health care system, improved sexual relationship, and less psychological distress one year after cure of the ulcer disease by the eradication of Helicobacter pylori compared to before.

CONCLUSIONS

Reliable and valid instruments are available to measure quality of life, and will probably gain increased importance in future medical research. In patients with recurrent duodenal ulcer disease, quality of life improves with the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.