Gastro-oesophageal reflux during 3 months of therapy with ranitidine in reflux oesophagitis

Effects of omeprazole or anti-reflux surgery on lower oesophageal sphincter characteristics and oesophageal acid exposure over 10 years

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of anti-reflux surgery (ARS) versus proton pump inhibitor therapy on lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) function and oesophageal acid exposure in patients with chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) over a decade of follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this randomised, prospective, multicentre study we compared LOS pressure profiles, as well as oesophageal exposure to acid, at baseline and at 1 and 10 years after randomisation to either open ARS (n = 137) or long-term treatment with omeprazole (OME) 20-60 mg daily (n = 108).

RESULTS

Median LOS resting pressure and abdominal length increased significantly and remained elevated in patients operated on with ARS, as opposed to those on OME. The proportion of total time (%) with oesophageal pH <4.0 decreased significantly in both the surgical and medical groups, and was significantly lower after 1 year in patients treated with ARS versus OME. After 10 years, oesophageal acid exposure was normalised in both groups, with no significant differences, and bilirubin exposure was within normal limits. After 10 years, patients with or without Barrett's oesophagus did not differ in acid reflux control between the two treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

Open ARS and OME were both effective in normalising acid reflux into the oesophagus even when studied over a period of 10 years. Anatomically and functionally the LOS was repaired durably by surgery, with increased resting pressure and abdominal length.

Reducing gastric secretions--a role for histamine 2 antagonists or proton pump inhibitors in malignant bowel obstruction?

GOALS OF WORK

Inoperable bowel obstructions are not uncommon in advanced cancer and are associated with a very poor prognosis. Symptom control includes reducing the frequency of vomiting by prescription of antisecretory medications. The most commonly used agents for this are either hyoscine butylbromide or octreotide. Either histamine 2 antagonists or proton pump inhibitors are sometimes recommended as adjuvants to reduce gastric secretions. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of histamine 2 antagonists and proton pump inhibitors and to objectively compare the effects of one agent over another.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Previously, electronic databases were searched for trials that compared ranitidine versus proton pump inhibitors in their effect on volume of gastric aspirates.

RESULTS

Seven trials were included in a meta-analysis. Pooled outcomes suggest that both proton pump inhibitors and ranitidine reduce gastric volumes, but the most superior agent is ranitidine, which reduces the volume of gastric secretions by an average of 0.22 ml.kg(-1); 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.41.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on well-conducted studies, objective evidence exists that confirms ranitidine will decrease the volume of gastric aspirates. This forms a sound basis from which to develop further research aimed at improving the care of people with malignant bowel obstructions.

Relationship between intragastric acid control and healing status in the treatment of moderate to severe erosive oesophagitis

AIM

To assess the relationship between the percentage of time intragastric pH >4.0 and healing of erosive oesophagitis.

METHODS

In this proof-of-concept study, adults with endoscopically verified Los Angeles grade C or grade D erosive oesophagitis were randomly assigned to oral esomeprazole 10 or 40 mg once daily for 4 weeks. On day 5, patients underwent 24-h pH monitoring. At 4 weeks, erosive oesophagitis healing status was endoscopically assessed. Investigators scored gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms on a 4-point scale [none to severe (0-3)] before and 4 weeks after treatment. The percentage of time intragastric pH was >4.0 and healing status were correlated and tested for significance using a Spearman rank correlation (r).

RESULTS

103 patients had evaluable data (mean age, 48.7 years; 65% men). Mean percentages of time with intragastric pH >4.0 on day 5 in patients with healed and unhealed erosive oesophagitis were 61% and 42%, respectively (P = 0.0002), indicating that erosive oesophagitis healing rates were positively related to the percentage of time intragastric pH was >4.0. Greater intragastric acid control correlated with lower final daytime and night-time heartburn and acid regurgitation symptom scores (r = -0.029, -0.029 and -0.021; P = 0.003, 0.003 and 0.032, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A positive relationship between intragastric acid control and erosive oesophagitis healing was demonstrated.

Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

AIM OF THE REVIEW AND METHODS: This review brings together information on the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Published manuscripts were identified from Medline. The articles were then screened for relevance prior to inclusion in the review.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Up to 40% of people in Western countries are estimated to regularly experience heartburn, the most characteristic symptom of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Treatment options available for GERD range from over-the-counter (OTC) antacids to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and anti-reflux surgery. Many patients self-medicate with OTC medications such as antacids and low-dose histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) to relieve episodic or food-related symptoms of GERD, and may not seek medical advice unless symptoms persist or worsen. However, GERD is a chronic disease that frequently affects health-related quality of life and, if not properly managed, the complications of GERD may include erosive oesophagitis (EO), Barrett's oesophagus and adenocarcinoma. Adequate control of acid secretion is key to the successful treatment of the condition. OTC medications provide effective symptom relief to about one quarter of patients suffering from GERD. H2RAs can also provide effective symptomatic relief, particularly in patients with milder GERD, but become less-effective over time. PPIs are the agents of choice for the suppression of gastric acid production and have become the mainstay of therapy for acid-related diseases. PPIs produce significantly faster and more complete symptomatic relief, significantly faster and more complete healing of erosive GERD compared with H2RAs and are also significantly more effective at preventing relapse of EO. There are a number of existing guidelines for the treatment of GERD. Recommendation for initial therapy consist of general measures, such as lifestyle advice in combination with antacids and/or alginates. When general measures fail, the next step is empirical therapy. Two options exist for the expirical treatment of GERD, so-called "step-up" or "step-down" therapy. There are no clear data to support either treatment strategy as a universal approach to all patients; consequently, physicians must always choose the course best suited to the individual patient.

Histamine-2 receptor antagonists at night improve gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms for patients on proton pump inhibitor therapy

While night-time symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are common, considerable controversy exists regarding the use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2Ras) for night-time reflux control. Some studies have suggested possible tolerance to H2RA while others have suggested that long-term efficacy of gastric acid control can be maintained with night-time H2RA use. The aim of this study was to identify if GERD patients have sustained symptom improvement with long-term use of night-time H2RA. Records of 56 consecutive GERD patients on twice daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and night-time H2RA therapy were reviewed. During a phone interview patients were asked a 5-item questionnaire, which included overall assessment of symptoms, night-time symptoms, sleep disturbance, duration and frequency of therapy. Of the 56 patients, 39 (31 women, mean age 56) completed the questionnaire (15 were not reached and 2 did not recall enough information). All respondents had taken night-time H2RA for at least 1 month (28/39 patients with > 6 months duration) with 33/39 patients taking H2RAs every night. The addition of H2RA led to an improvement in overall symptoms in 28/39 (72%) patients, improvement in night-time reflux symptoms in 25/34 (74%) patients and improvement of GERD-associated sleep disturbance in 18/27 (67%) patients. Five (13%) patients had stopped the H2RA on their own, stating that its efficacy waned after 1 month. Our results suggest that the majority of patients report persistent improvement in GERD symptoms from night-time H2RA use and that possible clinically important tolerance to H2RAs occurs in a small number of patients. Further prospective, placebo-controlled studies may help confirm that there is a role for night-time H2RAs in GERD symptom control.

Overview of medical therapy for gastroesophageal disease

The last twenty years have seen an evolution of much improved strategies in the medical treatment of GERD. Current therapy is targeted at acid suppression, to deal with consequences of mucosal injury and afford resolution of symptoms. Given their modest efficacy, there is no longer much support for initial treatment with H2RAs. PPIs have been shown to provide the highest levels of symptom relief and esophageal healing, in addition to preventing relapse and complications. With this class of agents, the clinician is able to prescribe a drug that is as highly effective as surgery for the purpose intended, without worrying about long term sequelae of acid suppression. It appears that patients with extraesophageal GERD must be treated with higher doses of pharmacologic therapy, principally with the PPIs, for longer periods of time to achieve complete relief of symptoms when compared to patients with heartburn and erosive esophagitis. There is still no clear consensus as to whether aggressive acid suppression alters the natural history of Barrett's esophagus. Based on their initial success, it appears that the next generation of evolving medical therapies will continue to play an important role in the management of GERD. The outcome from medical therapy is the standard against which the results of the novel endoscopy anti-reflux treatments will be measured.

Pharmacologic Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) results from its widespread prevalence and the unfavorable impact of its symptoms on well-being and quality of life. Whereas abnormalities of the antireflux barrier (lower esophageal sphincter) are important in the pathophysiology of GERD, pharmacologic therapy for GERD is based on suppression of acid, which is responsible for the majority of the symptoms and for epithelial damage. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the agents of choice for achieving the goals of medical therapy in GERD, which include symptom relief, improvement in quality of life, and healing and prevention of mucosal injury. As a class, these drugs are extremely safe. The newest PPI, esomeprazole, brings a statistically significant increase in healing of mucosal injury and symptom relief in patients with erosive esophagitis, compared with omeprazole and lansoprazole. This article reviews the role of medical therapy in the short- and long-term management of symptomatic patients with or without erosive esophagitis, including extraesophageal presentations, GERD during pregnancy, and Barrett's esophagus. Management of refractory patients is addressed.

Pharmacologic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

The burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) results from its widespread prevalence and the unfavorable impact of its symptoms on well-being and quality of life. Whereas abnormalities of the antireflux barrier (lower esophageal sphincter) are important in the pathophysiology of GERD, pharmacologic therapy for GERD is based on suppression of acid, which is responsible for the majority of the symptoms and for epithelial damage. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the agents of choice for achieving the goals of medical therapy in GERD, which include symptom relief, improvement in quality of life, and healing and prevention of mucosal injury. As a class, these drugs are extremely safe. The newest PPI, esomeprazole, brings a statistically significant increase in healing of mucosal injury and symptom relief in patients with erosive esophagitis, compared with omeprazole and lansoprazole. This article reviews the role of medical therapy in the short- and long-term management of symptomatic patients with or without erosive esophagitis, including extraesophageal presentations, GERD during pregnancy, and Barrett's esophagus. Management of refractory patients is addressed.

Pharmacological and pharmacodynamic essentials of H(2)-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors for the practising physician

The suppression of gastric acid secretion with anti-secretory agents has been the mainstay of medical treatment for patients with acid-related disorders. Although the majority of Helicobacter pylori -related peptic ulcers can be healed with antibiotics, ulcer healing and symptom control can be significantly improved when antibiotics are given with anti-secretory agents, especially with a proton pump inhibitor. There is a dynamic relationship between the suppression of intragastric acidity and the healing of peptic ulcer and erosive oesophagitis and control of acid-related symptoms. The suppression of gastric acid secretion achieved with H(2)-receptor antagonists has, however, proved to be suboptimal for effectively controlling acid-related disorders, especially for healing erosive oesophagitis and for the relief of reflux symptoms. H(2)-receptor antagonists are also not effective in inhibiting meal-stimulated acid secretion, which is required for managing patients with erosive oesophagitis. Furthermore, the rapid development of tolerance to H(2)-receptor antagonists and the rebound acid hypersecretion after the withdrawal of an H(2)-receptor antagonist further limit their clinical use. Although low-dose H(2)-receptor antagonists are currently available as over-the-counter medications for self-controlling acid-related symptoms, their pharmacology and pharmacodynamics have not been well studied, especially in the self-medicating population. Proton pump inhibitors have been proved to be very effective for suppressing intragastric acidity to all known stimuli, although variations exist in the rapidity of onset of action and the potency of acid inhibition after oral administration at the approved therapeutic doses, which may have important clinical implications for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and perhaps for eradicating H. pylori infection when a proton pump inhibitor is given with antibiotics. Once-daily dosing in the morning is more effective than dosing in the evening for all proton pump inhibitors with respect to the suppression of intragastric acidity and daytime gastric acid secretion in particular, which may result from a better bio-availability being achieved with the morning dose. When higher doses are needed, these drugs must be given twice daily to achieve the optimal suppression of 24 hour intragastric acidity. Preliminary results have shown that esomeprazole, the optical isomer of omeprazole, given at 40 mg, is significantly more effective than omeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg for suppressing gastric acid secretion. However, more studies in different patient populations are needed to compare esomeprazole with the existing proton pump inhibitors with regard to their efficacy, cost-effectiveness and long-term safety for the management of acid-related disorders.

Histamine receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors and their combination in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

The medical treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is accomplished with the appropriate use of anti-secretory therapy, principally H(2)-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors. In fact, there is a direct correlation between the length of time, in terms of the number of hours per day that the intragastric pH is above 4, and the healing of the oesophagitis. Nowadays, H(2)-receptor antagonists are of limited use as primary treatment, being inferior to proton pump inhibitors in both healing and symptom relief. Although the majority of patients can be effectively managed with carefully titrated doses of proton pump inhibitors, a small number will continue to show difficulty in the management of their disease, principally because of inadequate nocturnal acid control. These patients may benefit from a combination of proton pump inhibitors twice daily with an H(2)-receptor antagonist at bedtime. This article reviews the use of H(2)-antagonists, proton pump inhibitors and their combination in the management of the patient with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Stability of gastric secretory inhibition during 6-month treatment with omeprazole in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

A trend toward relapse of reflux symptoms and esophagitis during long-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors has been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the existence of tachyphylaxia to the effect of proton pump inhibitors on gastric acidity and gastroesophageal reflux over time.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients with reflux esophagitis underwent 24-h intragastric and intraesophageal pH-metry after 7, 90, and 180 days of continued dosing with 20 mg of omeprazole once daily before breakfast.

RESULTS

The total median percentages of time gastric pH <4 (interquartile range) were 49% (35-70%), 60% (36-76%), and 42% (26-66%) after 7, 90, and 180 days (p = 0.14). Percentages of time gastric pH <3 were 41%, 54%, and 34%, respectively (p = 0.19). The median percentages of total time esophageal pH <4 were 1.1%, 2.5%, and 1.1%, respectively (p = 0.70). Healing of esophagitis was achieved in 84% of the patients after 6 months. Heartburn improved in six, worsened in three, and was unchanged in 10 patients (p = 0.16). There was no statistical significant relationship between change in esophageal acid exposure and change in severity of heartburn.

CONCLUSIONS

A dose of 20 mg of omeprazole once daily consistently controlled patients' symptoms and kept gastric acidity at a stable level over a period of 6 months. There is no evidence of diminution in the effects of 20 mg of omeprazole over time that could indicate the development of tolerance.

Medical therapy. Management of the refractory patient

Although relatively rare, GERD patients refractory to medical therapy remain a challenge for the clinician. Refractoriness can be diagnosed only if the patient is properly studied on medication and if what should be adequate medical therapy has been given a sufficient therapeutic trial. Use of 24-hour intragastric and intraesophageal pH-metry has improved the ability to manage patients who appear to be nonresponders. Simple advice and minor adjustments to medical therapy are usually all that is needed for most patients, but in some, management requires knowledge of the principles outlined in this article. If followed, only a small group of patients should be medically refractory.

The influence of Helicobacter pylori on oesophageal acid exposure in GERD during acid suppressive therapy

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori exaggerates the effect of acid suppressive drugs on intragastric pH. It is unknown whether this is relevant for the treatment of GERD.

AIM

To compare oesophageal acid exposure and symptoms in H. pylori-negative and H. pylori-positive GERD patients during low and profound acid suppression.

METHODS

Barrett's oesophagus patients with gastro- oesophageal acid reflux were studied by 24-h oesophageal pH-metry at baseline and during randomized treatment with omeprazole 40 mg b.d. or ranitidine 150 mg b.d. H. pylori status was determined by a serum IgG ELISA. Symptoms were scored on a four-graded scale.

RESULTS

Of 58 patients, 26 (14 H. pylori-negative, 12 H. pylori-positive) were randomized to omeprazole, 32 (16 H. pylori-negative, 16 H. pylori-positive) to ranitidine. At baseline, oesophageal acid exposure and symptoms did not differ between H. pylori-negative and H. pylori-positive: mean time proportion pH < 4 per 24 h was 16.1% (95% CI 11.5-23.2) in H. pylori-negative, and 15.8% (11.3-21.4) in H. pylori-positive patients. Omeprazole treatment resulted in a decrease of acid reflux per 24 h from 23.4% (7.9-39.3) to 0.0% (0.0-2.9) in H. pylori-negative, and from 17.3% (8.9-38.8) to 0.1% (0.0-1.7) in H. pylori-positive patients; ranitidine resulted in a decrease from 14.4% (10.5-18.5) to 9.3% (5.6-12.8) in H. pylori-negative, and from 15.1% (9.8-21.0) to 9.0% (3.1-20.1) in H. pylori-positive patients, the difference between H. pylori-negative and H. pylori-positive patients being N.S. There was no significant difference between H. pylori-negative and H. pylori-positive patients with respect to erect and supine acid reflux, or symptom scores in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori infection does not influence oesophageal acid reflux and symptoms in patients with Barrett's oesophagus, either at baseline or during low as well as profound acid suppressive therapy. We conclude that the dose of acid suppression does not have to be titrated upon H. pylori status in GERD.

Nocturnal gastric acidity and acid breakthrough on different regimens of omeprazole 40 mg daily

BACKGROUND

On chronic intake of omeprazole, most healthy volunteers and patients still have nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB), defined as night-time periods with gastric pH < 4.0 lasting for longer than 1 h. Gastro-oesophageal reflux during NAB may be particularly injurious to the oesophageal mucosa, contributing to the chronic lesions complicating the condition.

AIM

To compare the effect of three different dosing regimens of omeprazole 40 mg daily with regard to suppressing nocturnal gastric acidity and avoiding NAB.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy volunteers were given three different regimens of omeprazole for 7 days each in randomized order: 40 mg before breakfast (qAM), 40 mg before dinner (qPM) and 20 mg before breakfast and dinner (b.d.). On day 7, 24-h intragastric and intraoesophageal pH-metry was performed. Tracings were analysed for the period from 22.00 h until 06.00 h with regard to the percentage of time at which gastric pH was below 4.0, 3.0 and 2.0, and also the occurrence and duration of NAB.

RESULTS

Nocturnal acid breakthrough was significantly more common on qAM than on qPM and b.d. (P < 0.05) dosing. The percentage of time gastric pH was less than 4.0 overnight was significantly lower on qPM (median 31.3) and b.d. (median 20.5) than on qAM (median 66.3) dosing (P=0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively). A pH threshold of 3 and 4 showed the same differences, as did median 24-h gastric pH. Daytime acidity was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy volunteers, dinner time or split dosing of omeprazole 40 mg daily is significantly more effective than dosing before breakfast in preventing NAB and controlling gastric acidity. These regimens should be preferred in patients in whom suppression of nocturnal gastric acidity is desirable.