Unhealed duodenal ulcers despite Helicobacter pylori eradication

Cost-effectiveness modelling of use of urea breath test for the management of Helicobacter pylori-related dyspepsia and peptic ulcer in the UK

OBJECTIVE

Clinical data comparing diagnostic strategies in the management of Helicobacter pylori-associated diseases are limited. Invasive and noninvasive diagnostic tests for detecting H. pylori infection are used in the clinical care of patients with dyspeptic symptoms. Modelling studies might help to identify the most cost-effective strategies. The objective of the study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of a 'test-and-treat' strategy with the urea breath test (UBT) compared with other strategies, in managing patients with H. pylori-associated dyspepsia and preventing peptic ulcer in the UK.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness models compared four strategies: 'test-and-treat' with either UBT or faecal antigen test (FAT), 'endoscopy-based strategy' and 'symptomatic treatment'. A probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a simulation model in order to identify probabilities and costs associated with relief of dyspepsia symptoms (over a 4-week time horizon) and with prevention of peptic ulcers (over a 10-year time horizon). Clinical and cost inputs to the model were derived from routine medical practice in the UK.

RESULTS

For relief of dyspepsia symptoms, 'test-and-treat' strategies with either UBT (€526/success) and FAT (€518/success) were the most cost-effective strategies compared with 'endoscopy-based strategy' (€1317/success) and 'symptomatic treatment' (€1 029/success). For the prevention of peptic ulcers, 'test-and-treat' strategies with either UBT (€208/ulcer avoided/year) or FAT (€191/ulcer avoided/year) were the most cost-effective strategies compared with 'endoscopy-based strategy' (€717/ulcer avoided/year) and 'symptomatic treatment' (€651/ulcer avoided/year) (1 EUR=0,871487 GBP at the time of the study).

CONCLUSION

'Test-and-treat' strategies with either UBT or FAT are the most cost-effective medical approaches for the management of H. pylori-associated dyspepsia and the prevention of peptic ulcer in the UK. A 'test-and-treat' strategy with UBT has comparable cost-effectiveness outcomes to the current standard of care using FAT in the UK.

Review article: Helicobacter pylori-negative duodenal ulcer disease

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection rates in duodenal ulcer (DU) patients may be lower than previously estimated.

AIM

To review the real prevalence of H. pylori-negative DUs and its possible causes.

METHODS

Bibliographical searches in MEDLINE looking for the terms 'H. pylori' and 'duodenal ulcer'.

RESULTS

Mean prevalence of H. pylori infection in DU disease, calculated from studies published during the last 10 years including a total of 16 080 patients, was 81%, and this figure was lower (77%) when only the last 5 years were considered. Associations with H. pylori-negative DU were: (1) False negative results of diagnostic methods, (2) NSAID use (21% in studies with <90% infection rate), (3) Complicated DU (bleeding, obstruction, perforation), (4) Smoking, (5) Isolated H. pylori duodenal colonization, (6) Older age, (7) Gastric hypersecretion, (8) Diseases of the duodenal mucosa, (9) Helicobacter'heilmanii' infection and (10) Concomitant diseases.

CONCLUSION

In patients with H. pylori-negative DU disease, one should carefully confirm that the assessment of H. pylori status is reliable. In truly H. pylori-negative patients, the most common single cause of DU is, by far, the use of NSAIDs. Ulcers not associated with H. pylori, NSAIDs or other obvious causes should, for the present, be viewed as 'idiopathic'. True idiopathic DU disease only exceptionally exists.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: is 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy sufficient to heal peptic ulcer?

AIMS

To systematically review the efficacy on ulcer healing of 1-week combination of a proton pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics and to perform a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to evaluate whether 7 days of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy is sufficient to heal peptic ulcer.

METHODS

Studies where 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy was administered to heal peptic ulcer were included. Randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy on ulcer healing of 7-day proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy versus this same regimen but prolonging the proton pump inhibitor for several more weeks were included in the meta-analysis. Electronic and manual bibliographical searches were conducted. Meta-analysis was performed combining the odds ratios of the individual studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies (2342 patients) assessed ulcer healing with 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy. Mean healing rate was 86%, and 95% in Helicobacter pylori-eradicated patients. Six studies (862 patients), were included in the meta-analysis. Mean ulcer healing rate with a 7-day treatment was 91% versus 92% when proton pump inhibitor was prolonged for 2-4 more weeks (odds ratio = 1.11; 95% confidence interval = 0.71-1.74).

CONCLUSION

In patients with peptic ulcer and H. pylori infection, prolonging therapy with proton pump inhibitor after a triple therapy for 7 days with a proton pump inhibitor and two antibiotics is not necessary to induce ulcer healing.

Somatostatin and D cells in patients with gastritis in the course of Helicobacter pylori eradication: a six-month, follow-up study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

As well as causing chronic gastritis, Helicobacter pylori predisposes patients to peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer, and induces gastric functional disorders. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of H. pylori eradication therapy on the morphological and functional recovery of gastric antral and corpus D cells in patients with chronic gastritis during 6 months of follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty consecutive, dyspeptic patients referred for endoscopy (31 with H. pylori infection and nine controls; mean age 49 years; 17 men, 23 women) entered the study. All patients had histological signs of gastritis but no signs of peptic ulcer or gastric cancer. Antrum (n=8) and corpus (n=6) biopsy specimens were collected for routine histology, radioimmunoassay tissue somatostatin levels, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, prior to and 6 months after therapy. Basal plasma somatostatin levels were determined prior to eradication, plus 6 weeks and 6 months after therapy. Eradication therapy consisted of amoxicillin, metronidazole and omeprazole.

RESULTS

Basal somatostatin plasma values in antral and corpus tissue were lower in infected patients than in the H. pylori-negative controls at the beginning of the study. A significant increase occurred after successful eradication therapy, together with an increase in the number of D cells in both regions. Changes in the D-cell ultrastructure in antral and corpus mucosa after eradication therapy suggest an increase in somatostatin synthesis and secretion.

CONCLUSIONS

The structural and functional restoration of D cells following eradication therapy indicates possible recovery of the diseased mucosa.

[Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with peptic ulcer after two treatment failures: a prospective culture-guided study]

AIM

To determine the effectiveness of a third, culture-guided, treatment of H. pylori infection after two unsuccessful attempts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two consecutive patients with a diagnosis of peptic ulcer were included in an open prospective and multicenter study. After two unsuccessful attempts at eradication (demonstrated by positive urea breath test), all patients underwent endoscopy and H. pylori infection was confirmed by urease test, histology and culture (Pylori-Agar, Bio Merieux, France). Antibiotic susceptibility to metronidazole, amoxicillin, tetracycline and clarithromycin was defined by E-test. Thirty-nine patients received a two-week quadruple culture-guided therapy defined by the protocol, which considered sensitivity data and previous allergies to antibiotics (one culture was contaminated, one patient refused treatment and one was allergic to tetracycline and amoxicillin and was resistant to metronidazole and clarithromycin). Compliance was monitored by pill counting and eradication was defined as a negative urea breath test six weeks after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

Sensitivity data were obtained in 41 patients. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that overall eradication was achieved in 60% (24/40). Eighteen strains (43.9%) were resistant to metronidazole, 21 (51.2%) were resistant to clarithromycin and 8 (19.5%) were resistant to both drugs. None of the strains were resistant to amoxicillin or tetracycline. We used mainly two kinds of quadruple therapy in the 39 patients. Despite good compliance with treatment based on omeprazole (20 mg/12 h), bismuth subcitrate (120 mg/6 h), tetracycline (500 mg/4 h) and clarithromycin (500 mg/ 12 h) (OBTC) eradication was achieved in only 9 of 19 patients (47.4%; CI: 24.4-71.1) (one patient failed to attend the urea breath test). Nineteen clarithromycin-resistant patients received amoxicillin (1,000 mg/12 h) instead of clarithromycin (OBTA) and this treatment was effective in 14 (73.7%; CI: 48.8-90.9). Eradication was achieved in one patient who was allergic to amoxicillin and resistant to clarithromycin and metronidazole and who received ciprofloxacin (500 mg/8 h) instead of clarithromycin (OBTCipro). No clinical factors associated with eradication failure were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the use of two-week, high-dose, quadruple and culture-guided combinations of drugs, a third treatment was frequently unsuccessful. The lowest eradication rate was obtained in patients with H. pylori strains sensitive to all antibiotics; therefore, we believe that other factors could influence eradication rates. New prospective and randomized studies are needed in this subgroup of patients to find effective treatments.

Review article: should we kill or should we save Helicobacter pylori?

Results from epidemiological studies and therapeutic clinical trials have shown that Helicobacter pylori infection causes acute and chronic active gastritis and is the initiating factor for the majority of peptic ulcer disease. Eradication of the infection with antibiotics resolves gastritis and restores normal gastric physiology, accelerates healing of peptic ulcer disease, and virtually eliminates recurrence of duodenal ulcer disease. The infection also plays an important role in the initiation and/or progression of gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia, which may eventually lead to the development of distal gastric cancer. Furthermore, almost all patients with gastric MALT lymphoma are infected with H. pylori and cure of the infection leads to histological regression of the tumor and maintains the regression in over 80% of patients during long-term follow-up. Preliminary uncontrolled data from Japan show that eradication of the infection significantly reduced metachronous intestinal-type gastric cancer following initial endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer and might also prevent the progression of gastric adenoma to gastric dysplasia or gastric cancer. Although this overwhelming evidence has demonstrated that H. pylori infection is bad for humans, some have questioned the wisdom of eradicating the infection in all those infected. Their arguments are largely based on hypothesis and circumstantial evidence: 1) Less than 20% of all H. pylori infected persons will develop significant clinical consequences in their lifetime. 2) H. pylori strains are highly diverse at a genetic level and are of different virulence. 3) The antiquity of H. pylori infection in humans and their co-evolution suggests that H. pylori may be a commensal to humans. Eradication of H. pylori may remove some beneficial bacterial strains and may provoke esophageal disease or gastric cancer at the cardia. However, careful review of the literature confirms that H. pylori infection is a serious pathogen albeit in a minority of those infected. It remains for carefully designed prospective studies, rather than hypothesis to make changes in the current consensus position.

A systematic comparison of triple therapies for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection with proton pump inhibitor/ ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or a nitroimidazole

BACKGROUND

Triple therapies with proton pump inhibitor/ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC), clarithromycin (C) and either amoxicillin (A) or a nitroimidazole (I) are widely accepted as treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. However, it is not clear which of these antibiotic combinations should be preferred.

AIM

To evaluate whether there is a difference in efficacy between triple therapies with proton pump inhibitor/RBC, clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or a nitroimidazole.

METHODS

The literature was examined for randomized trials comparing proton pump inhibitor/RBC-C-A and proton pump inhibitor/RBC-C-I. Studies were grouped according to the type of acid inhibitor used (proton pump inhibitor or RBC) and differences between pooled cure rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were identified: seven using RBC, 39 using proton pump inhibitor, one using both. RBC-C-I was somewhat superior to RBC-C-A, although this difference only reached statistical significance in intention-to-treat analysis. Overall, proton pump inhibitor-C-I and proton pump inhibitor-C-A were equally effective, but in nitroimidazole-susceptible strains, proton pump inhibitor-C-I performed better, in nitroimidazole-resistant strains, proton pump inhibitor-C-A performed better. No serious side-effects were reported and pooled drop-out rates were equal.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, proton pump inhibitor-C-I and proton pump inhibitor-C-A are equally effective and therefore other factors such as local prevalence of resistant strains, cost of therapy and options for second-line treatment should determine which regimen should be preferred. When using RBC, the RBC-C-I combination is somewhat superior to RBC-C-A.

Cure of Helicobacter pylori-positive active duodenal ulcer patients: a double-blind, multicentre, 12-month study comparing a two-week dual vs a one-week triple therapy. GISU (Interdisciplinary Group for Ulcer Study)

AIMS

To compare a two-week dual therapy to a one-week triple therapy for the healing of duodenal ulcer and the eradication of the Helicobacter pylori infection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 165 patients with active duodenal ulcer were enrolled in the study. At entry, endoscopy, clinical examination and laboratory tests were performed. Histology and the rapid urease test were used to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection. Patients received either lansoprazole 30 mg plus amoxycillin 1 g bid for two weeks (two-week, dual therapy) or lansoprazole 30 mg plus amoxycillin 1 g plus tinidazole 500 mg bid for one week plus lansoprazole qd for an additional week (one-week, triple therapy). Two and twelve months after cessation of therapy, endoscopy and clinical assessments were repeated.

RESULTS

Duodenal ulcer healing and Helicobacter pylori eradication were both significantly greater (p<0.0001) in the triple therapy group (healing: 98.6%; Helicobacter pylori cure rate: 72.6%) than in the dual therapy group (healing: 77.3%; Helicobacter pylori cure rate: 33.3%). Ulcers healed more frequently in Helicobacter pyloricured than in Helicobacter pylori-not cured patients (94.9% vs. 77.2%; p<0.0022). After one year, Helicobacter pylori eradication was re-confirmed in 46/58 patients previously treated with the triple therapy and in 10/40 patients treated with the dual therapy [p<0.0001]. Only three duodenal ulcer relapses were observed throughout follow-up: all were in Helicobacter pylori-not cured patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple therapy was more effective than dual both in curing Helicobacter pylori infection and healing active duodenal ulcers. The speed of ulcer healing obtained after only 7 days of antibiotics and 14 days of proton pump inhibitors confirmed that longer periods of anti ulcer therapy were not necessary. Helicobacter pylori -not cured patients had more slowly healing ulcers which were more apt to relapse when left untreated.

Duodenal ulcer relapse is not always associated with recurrence of H. pylori infection: a prospective three-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Long-term data concerning the reappearance of Helicobacter pylori infection and duodenal ulcer (DU) recurrence after successful eradication are still few and conflicting. Inadequate histological assessment or use of indirect tests for the determination of H. pylori and bias in the selection of patients to be controlled can influence reported results. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of recurrence of H. pylori infection and ulcer relapse in a population of cured DU patients followed up for 3 years irrespective of their symptomatology.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 1994, 126 patients with DU disease were treated with double or triple therapy. Patients using nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or aspirin or receiving maintenance antisecretory therapy were excluded. H. pylori infection was assessed by three bioptic tests from both the antrum and the body (culture, urease, histopathological examination). After 2 months from cessation of treatment, DU had healed and H. pylori infection was cured in 102 of 126 patients (81%). These patients were endoscopically followed up after 1 and 3 years, respectively, and were advised to contact us at symptom recurrence. At 1 and 3 years, we studied 95 (93.2%) and 79 (77.4%) patients, respectively, of the 102 who were cured. The other patients were untraceable or refused endoscopy because they were asymptomatic.

RESULTS

After 1 year, no patient had H. pylori recurrence, whereas three patients had a relapse of DU without evidence of infection. After 3 years, recurrence of H. pylori occurred in six patients (annual rate, 2.5%), DU relapsed in five H. pylori-positive patients (6.3%) and in two H. pylori-negative patients (annual rate, 1.9%). Fasting gastrin and acid secretion values studied in all relapsed patients were within the normal range except for one H. pylori-positive patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence of H. pylori infection is very low where treatment is effective, but a DU relapse, not related to acid hypersecretion, can occur in a small percentage of cured patients.

The therapeutic effect of proton pump inhibitors on Helicobacter pylori-positive gastric ulcers

The aim of the present study was to elucidate the risk factors that could delay gastric ulcer healing when either a proton pump inhibitor or an H2-receptor antagonist is used for gastric ulcer treatment. Endoscopically-diagnosed gastric ulcer patients (216 men and 96 women, mean age: 57+/-13 years) were investigated. All patients were consecutively recruited and randomly assigned to receive H2-receptor antagonist (n = 196) or proton pump inhibitor (n = 116) treatment for eight weeks. Chi-squared tests and multivariate analysis to determine factors influencing ulcer healing were used to analyse the patients profiles, endoscopic findings, and Helicobacter pylori-infection status. In the H2-receptor antagonist group, the most important risk factor was a large ulcer size (> 2 cm diam.), followed by a linear shape of the ulcer, undermining tendency of ulcer, previous history of gastric ulcer, and H. pylori infection. In the proton pump inhibitor group, linear shape of the ulcer was the only significant risk factor for slow ulcer healing; other factors, including H. pylori infection, were insignificant. These results indicate that ulcer morphology may be the most important information for predicting ulcer healing, and that H. pylori infection does not delay gastric ulcer healing when proton pump inhibitor treatment is used.

Helicobacter pylori eradication and ulcer healing with daily lansoprazole, plus 1 or 2 weeks co-therapy with amoxycillin and clarithromycin

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitor based combination therapy is one standard strategy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

AIM

To compare the eradication and duodenal ulcer healing efficacy of two 2-week, single dose, lansoprazole based combination therapies.

METHODS

Healthy adult patients with endoscopically confirmed, H. pylori associated duodenal ulcer disease (3 mm > ulcer < 20 mm) were eligible for the study. All patients received a 14 day course of lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., and were randomized to receive either 7 or 14 days of amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. Patients were endoscoped at entry and 14-17 days later. Symptomatic, unhealed patients received a further 14 days of therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg o.m. Eradication was confirmed a minimum of 28 days after cessation of all therapy by urease reaction and histological assessment of gastric body and antral biopsies (three biopsies each site).

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were randomized to a treatment arm, of which 58 could be included in an intention-to-treat and key-point-available analysis. H. pylori eradication rates were identical, at 93% (95% CI: 73-98% (1 week), 78-99% (2 week)). In the combined group, all but 13 ulcers were healed at 2 weeks; six required further therapy because of symptoms, while six of the seven asymptomatic patients went on to heal.

CONCLUSION

An eradication regimen, based on a 2-week course of single dose lansoprazole with 1 week of antibiotic co-therapy, is effective in eradicating H. pylori, while the 2 weeks of acid suppression is usually effective in duodenal ulcer healing.