Short-term gentamicin therapy and risk of renal toxicity in patients with bacteraemia

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Various Patient Populations and Consequences for Optimal Dosing for Gram-Negative Infections: An Updated Review

Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic with a small therapeutic window that is currently used primarily as part of short-term empirical combination therapy. Gentamicin dosing schemes still need refinement, especially for subpopulations where pharmacokinetics can differ from pharmacokinetics in the general adult population: obese patients, critically ill patients, paediatric patients, neonates, elderly patients and patients on dialysis. This review summarizes the clinical pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in these patient populations and the consequences for optimal dosing of gentamicin for infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, highlighting new insights from the last 10 years. In this period, several new population pharmacokinetic studies have focused on these subpopulations, providing insights into the typical values of the most relevant pharmacokinetic parameters, the variability of these parameters and possible explanations for this variability, although unexplained variability often remains high. Both dosing schemes and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets varied widely between these studies. A gentamicin starting dose of 7 mg/kg based on total body weight (or on adjusted body weight in obese patients) appears to be the optimal strategy for increasing the probability of target attainment (PTA) after the first administration for the most commonly used PK/PD targets in adults and children older than 1 month, including critically ill patients. However, evidence that increasing the PTA results in higher efficacy is lacking; no studies were identified that show a correlation between estimated or predicted PK/PD target attainment and clinical success. Although it is unclear if performing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for optimization of the PTA is of clinical value, it is recommended in patients with highly variable pharmacokinetics, including patients from all subpopulations that are critically ill (such as elderly, children and neonates) and patients on intermittent haemodialysis. In addition, TDM for optimization of the dosing interval, targeting a trough concentration of at least < 2 mg/L but preferably < 0.5–1 mg/L, has proven to reduce nephrotoxicity and is therefore recommended in all patients receiving more than one dose of gentamicin. The usefulness of the daily area under the plasma concentration–time curve for predicting nephrotoxicity should be further investigated. Additionally, more research is needed on the optimal PK/PD targets for efficacy in the clinical situations in which gentamicin is currently used, that is, as monotherapy for urinary tract infections or as part of short-term combination therapy.

Interest of therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides administered by a monodose regimen

BACKGROUND

Although the once-daily regimen of aminoglycosides (AG) is considered as predominantly used by many centers, the level of evidence of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of AG in cases of once-daily has not been clearly defined. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of TDM in achievement or maintaining target serum concentrations in patients receiving once-daily administration of AG.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients having received a once daily amikacin or gentamicin and underwent routine TDM. A longitudinal follow up was performed. Data were analyzed according to the adhesion or not to recommendations. A logistic regression was performed in order to evaluate the effect of covariates (age, gender, weight, creatinine clearance [CLcr], TDM-based dose adjustment, weighted dose of AG) on the achievement of non-toxic Cmin.

RESULTS

A total 437 blood samples issued from 324 patients were analyzed. The cut-off value of Clcr associated with a risk of toxic Cmin was≤41.66mL/min (OR: 11.29; 95%CI: 7.21-17.61; P<0.0001). Eighty-eight patients (27.1%) have at least two sampling points. The univariate analysis showed that the age, weight, CLcr and TDM-based dose adjustment were found to be significant factors in the achievement of non-toxic Cmin. In multivariate analysis, only TDM-based dose adjustment remains a significant factor in the achievement of non-toxic Cmin (OR: 6.66; 95%CI: 2.26-19.63; P=0.0006).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the usefulness of TDM-based dosing adjustment of AG antibiotics in achieving nontoxic trough concentrations, particularly in critically ill patients, as they are prone to a renal impairment.

Incidence and predictors of intravenous acyclovir-induced nephrotoxicity

To assess the incidence, predictive factors, and prognosis of acyclovir-induced nephrotoxicity. We conducted a historical prospective cohort study of patients treated with intravenous acyclovir in North Denmark Region from 2009 to 2016. Information on baseline demographics, co-morbidities, plasma creatinine, and treatment was obtained from the medical records. The primary outcome was an increase of ≥ 40 μmol/L in plasma creatinine level from baseline. We included 276 patients treated with intravenous acyclovir of which 29 (10.5%) met the primary outcome. In 14 cases, the treating physician considered acyclovir the main reason for nephrotoxicity, whereas a potential competing cause of renal impairment was present among the 15 remaining patients. Hypertension was the only predictive factor associated with nephrotoxicity (risk ratio (RR), 2.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41-5.46), while having no co-morbidities was protective (RR, 0.32; CI, 0.16-0.63). In all cases, the nephrotoxicity was reversible following rehydration and dose reduction or discontinuation of the drug. However, the normalized plasma creatinine upon treatment was significantly higher between cases with acyclovir-induced nephrotoxicity than cases with a potential competing cause (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 93.5 μmol/L [85-108] vs 75 μmol/L [66.5-88]; p = 0.019). Acyclovir-induced, reversible nephrotoxicity was observed in 5.1-10.5% of patients. It is difficult to predict who will develop acyclovir-induced nephrotoxicity; it may occur late in treatment and hypertension was the only independent predictive factor, while the absence of co-morbidities was protective. Ensuring hydration, frequent evaluations of renal function, and corresponding dose adjustment of intravenous acyclovir treatment seem prudent.