1
|
Packer S, Pichon B, Thompson S, Neale J, Njoroge J, Kwiatkowska RM, Oliver I, Telfer M, Doumith M, Buunaaisie C, Heinsbroek E, Hopewell-Kelly N, Desai M, Hope V, Williams OM, Kearns A, Hickman M, Gobin M. Clonal expansion of community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people who inject drugs (PWID): prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology, Bristol, United Kingdom, 2012 to 2017. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 24. [PMID: 30940316 PMCID: PMC6446509 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2019.24.13.1800124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Background: In 2015, Bristol (South West England) experienced a large increase in cases of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in people who inject drugs (PWID). Aim: We aimed to characterise and estimate the prevalence of MRSA colonisation among PWID in Bristol and test evidence of a clonal outbreak. Methods: PWID recruited through an unlinked-anonymous community survey during 2016 completed behavioural questionnaires and were screened for MRSA. Univariable logistic regression examined associations with MRSA colonisation. Whole-genome sequencing used lineage-matched MRSA isolates, comparing PWID (screening and retrospective bacteraemia samples from 2012-2017) with non-PWID (Bristol screening) in Bristol and national reference laboratory database samples. Results: The MRSA colonisation prevalence was 8.7% (13/149) and was associated with frequently injecting in public places (odds ratio (OR): 5.5; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.34–22.70), recent healthcare contact (OR: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.34–13.80) and injecting in groups of three or more (OR: 15.8; 95% CI: 2.51–99.28). People reporting any one of: injecting in public places, injection site skin and soft tissue infection or hospital contact accounted for 12/13 MRSA positive cases (sensitivity 92.3%; specificity 51.5%). Phylogenetic analysis identified a dominant clade associated with infection and colonisation among PWID in Bristol belonging to ST5-SCCmecIVg. Conclusions: MRSA colonisation in Bristol PWID is substantially elevated compared with general population estimates and there is evidence of clonal expansion, community-based transmission and increased infection risk related to the colonising strain. Targeted interventions, including community screening and suppression therapy, education and basic infection control are needed to reduce MRSA infections in PWID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Packer
- Field Epidemiology Service, Public Health England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Bruno Pichon
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections Reference Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Thompson
- Public health laboratory Bristol, Public Health England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Neale
- Bristol Drugs Project, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jacquelyn Njoroge
- Blood Borne Virus Section, HIV & STI Department, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel M Kwiatkowska
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions at University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.,Field Epidemiology Service, Public Health England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Isabel Oliver
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions at University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.,Field Epidemiology Service, Public Health England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | - Michel Doumith
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Infectious Diseases Research Department, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections Reference Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ellen Heinsbroek
- Blood Borne Virus Section, HIV & STI Department, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Monica Desai
- Blood Borne Virus Section, HIV & STI Department, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Vivian Hope
- Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.,Blood Borne Virus Section, HIV & STI Department, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Owen Martin Williams
- Public health laboratory Bristol, Public Health England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Kearns
- Authors contributed equally to the work and share last authorship.,Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infections Reference Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mathew Hickman
- Authors contributed equally to the work and share last authorship.,School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.,NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions at University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Maya Gobin
- Authors contributed equally to the work and share last authorship.,Field Epidemiology Service, Public Health England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Antibiotic-resistant pathogens in different patient settings and identification of surveillance gaps in Switzerland - a systematic review. Epidemiol Infect 2019; 147:e259. [PMID: 31466538 PMCID: PMC6805757 DOI: 10.1017/s0950268819001523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) varies significantly among different patient populations. We aimed to summarise AMR prevalence data from screening studies in different patient settings in Switzerland and to identify surveillance gaps. We performed a systematic review, searching Pubmed, MEDLINE, Embase (01/2000–05/2017) and conference proceedings for Swiss studies reporting on carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL), mobilised colistin-resistance, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) within different patient settings. We identified 2345 references and included 46 studies. For acute care patients, most screening data come from admission screenings, whereas AMR prevalence among hospitalised patients is largely unknown. Universal admission screenings showed ESBL-prevalences of 5–8% and MRSA-prevalences of 2–5%. For targeted screening, ESBL-prevalence ranged from 14–21%; MRSA-prevalence from 1–4%. For refugees, high ESBL (9–24%) and MRSA (16–24%) carriage rates were reported; returning travellers were frequently (68–80%) colonised with ESBL. Screening data for other pathogens, long-term care facility (LTCF) residents and pediatric populations were scarce. This review confirms high ESBL- and MRSA-carriage rates for risk populations in Switzerland. Emerging pathogens (CPE and VRE) and certain populations (inpatients, LTCF residents and children) are understudied. We encourage epidemiologists and public health authorities to consider these findings in the planning of future surveillance studies.
Collapse
|