Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of the CD64 index in very low birth weight neonates as a marker of early-onset sepsis

Evaluation of HLA-DR expression in monocytes and CD64 in neutrophils as A predictor of SEPSIS/sirs in the infectious-inflammatory process

Sepsis is a highly fatal disease that affects millions of people worldwide every year. Currently, the diagnosis of sepsis is made by identifying at least two symptoms of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), along with confirming the presence of microorganisms using a blood culture examination. Some biomarkers are already used to aid in the diagnosis, such as increased levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocytes, immature granulocytes (IG), and bands. In addition, studies have shown a relationship between the expression of certain antigen receptors in the body's defense cells and its infectious state. CD64 is a receptor expressed in monocytes, and, in cases of infection, its expression is strongly observed in neutrophils. On the other hand, the class II MHC (major histocompatibility complex) marker, HLA-DR (human leukocyte antigen-DR), decreases its expression in monocytes in response to infection. This cohort study was conducted with 77 adult patients from a university hospital, divided into two groups: Non-Sepsis/SIRS and Sepsis/SIRS. The selected samples were analyzed by flow cytometry, identifying the expression of CD64 and HLA-DR according to their MFI, and calculating the sepsis index (SI) for each patient. All three parameters exhibited significant differences in expression between the two groups. When compared to the laboratory tests already in use, the utilization of HLA-DR, CD64, and the new index has shown greater sensitivity and specificity in identifying sepsis. This study contributes to knowledge about the relationship between the expression of antigens on defense cells and sepsis. The use of these biomarkers can help to improve the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis, which may contribute to the reduction of mortality related to the disease.

Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: The Role of Inflammatory Markers

This is a narrative review on the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. We describe the difficulties to obtain standardized definitions in neonatal sepsis and discuss the limitations of published evidence of cut-off values and their sensitivities and specificities. Maternal risk factors influence the results of inflammatory markers as do gestational age, the time of sampling, the use of either cord blood or neonatal peripheral blood, and some non-infectious causes. Current evidence suggests that the use of promising diagnostic markers such as CD11b, CD64, IL-6, IL-8, PCT, and CRP, either alone or in combination, might enable clinicians discontinuing antibiotics confidently within 24-48 h. However, none of the current diagnostic markers is sensitive and specific enough to support the decision of withholding antibiotic treatment without considering clinical findings. It therefore seems to be justified that antibiotics are often initiated in ill term and especially preterm infants. Early markers like IL-6 and later markers like CRP are helpful in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis considering the clinical aspect of the neonate, the gestational age, maternal risk factors and the time (age of the neonate regarding early-onset sepsis) of blood sampling.

Role of serum (1,3)-β-d-glucan assay in early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in a neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVES

To study the microbiological pattern of late onset neonatal sepsis cultures and to assess the diagnostic performance of serum (1,3)-β-d-glucan level for early diagnosis of invasive fungemia in high-risk infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter clinical trial conducted on infants at high risk for invasive fungal infections, with suspected late onset sepsis, admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit at Mansoura University Children's Hospital and Mansoura General Hospital between March 2014 and February 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 77 newborn infants with high risk of invasive fungal infection were classified based on blood culture into three groups: no fungemia (41 neonates with proven bacterial sepsis), suspected fungemia (25 neonates with negative blood culture), and definite fungemia group (11 neonates with culture-proven Candida). The growing organisms were Klebsiella spp. (14/54); Escherichia coli (12/54); Staphylococcus spp. (12/54; coagulase-negative Staphylococcus [9/54]; Staphylococcus aureus [3/54]); Pseudomonas aerouginosa (3/54); and Proteus spp. (2/54). Moreover, 11/54 presented Candida. Serum (1,3)-β-d-glucan concentration was significantly lower in the no fungemia group when compared with the definite fungemia group. The best cut-off value of (1,3)-β-d-glucan was 99pg/mL with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 63.6%, 95.1%, 77.8%, 90.7%, and 88.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

(1,3)-β-d-glucan assay has a limited sensitivity with excellent specificity and negative predictive value, which allow its use as an aid in exclusion of invasive neonatal fungal infection. Accurate diagnosis and therapeutic decisions should be based on combining (1,3)-β-d-glucan assay with other clinical, radiological, and microbiological findings.

The role of the neutrophil Fcγ receptor I (CD64) index in diagnosing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of the neutrophil Fcγ receptor I (CD64) index in the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

A total of 123 cirrhotic patients with ascites who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. Ascites and blood samples were collected; the polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) count, bacterial culture, and related laboratory tests were performed. The CD64 index was determined for each sample using flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The neutrophil CD64 index results were significantly higher in cirrhotic patients with SBP than in those without SBP (p<0.001). There was a positive correlation between the neutrophil CD64 index and the PMN count in ascites. In the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.894 (95% confidence interval 0.823-0.964, p<0.001). The optimal cut-off value for the neutrophil CD64 index was 2.02. The sensitivity and specificity of the neutrophil CD64 index for cirrhotic patients with SBP were 80.49% and 93.90%, respectively. The elevated neutrophil CD64 index was down-regulated by antibiotic therapy (p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The neutrophil CD64 index could be used as a sensitive and specific indicator for the diagnosis of SBP in cirrhotic patients with ascites and is also modulated by antibiotic therapy.

Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of neutrophil CD64 for neonatal sepsis

Background

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of nCD64 for neonatal sepsis.

Methods

Computer retrieval was conducted for the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Springer databases up to March 18, 2015 to select the relevant studies on nCD64 and neonatal sepsis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for diagnostic efficiency of nCD64 were pooled. In addition, the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was also conducted based on the sensitivity and specificity.

Results

Seventeen studies including 3478 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.74–0.79), 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.72–0.75), 3.58 (95 % CI: 2.85–4.49), 0.29 (95 % CI: 0.22–0.37) and 15.18 (95 % CI: 9.75–23.62), respectively. In addition, the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.8666, and no threshold effect was found based on the Spearman correlation analysis (P = 0.616). Besides, subgroup analysis showed higher sensitivity, specificity and AUC in term infants and proven infection group than those in preterm infants and clinical infection group, respectively.

Conclusions

The n CD64 expression alone is not a satisfactory marker for diagnosing neonatal sepsis with relatively low sensitivity, specificity, PLR and NLR, in spite of relatively high SROC area. Therefore, the n CD64 expression used in diagnosis of neonatal sepsis should be treated with caution.

Diagnostic utility of biomarkers for neonatal sepsis--a systematic review

Neonatal sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and treatment of the neonate with suspected sepsis are essential to prevent life-threatening complications. Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is a challenge due to non-specific clinical signs and the fact that infection markers are difficult to interpret in the first and critical phase of neonatal sepsis. The objective of the present study was to systematically evaluate existing evidence of the diagnostic utility of biomarkers for prediction of sepsis in neonates. We conducted a systematic literature search performed in PubMed and Embase. The study population was neonates with gestation age > 24 weeks in their first 28 days of life with suspected sepsis. The included manuscripts were rated due to criteria from a modified rating scale developed by Douglas Altman. Of 292 potentially relevant manuscripts, 77 fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria; 16 (21%) were rated as high-quality studies. C-reactive protein (CRP) was the most extensively studied biomarker evaluated. The high-quality studies indicated that the acute phase protein serum amyloid A had high sensitivity, both at onset of symptoms and 2 days after. The studies evaluating serum amyloid A presented a variable positive predictive value (PPV, 0.67 and 0.92) with a high negative predictive value (NPV, 0.97 and 1.00). The existing evidence of the diagnostic value of serum amyloid A for neonatal sepsis showed promising results, and should be further investigated in clinical settings.