Comparison of amoxycillin/clavulanate with amoxycillin in children and adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and infection with Haemophilus influenzae

Randomised trial of pivampicillin plus pivmecillinam vs. pivampicillin in children and young adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and infection with Haemophilus influenzae

A prospective, randomised, single-blind comparative trial was carried out to determine whether double beta-lactam treatment with pivampicillin plus pivmecillinam is more effective than pivampicillin alone in the treatment of recurrent and chronic lung infections with Haemophilus influenzae in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or cystic fibrosis (CF). Fifty-six children and young adults with COPD or CF were randomised to the clinical study. The patients were allocated at random to receive perorally either pivmecillinam, 40 mg/kg/day, combined with pivampicillin, 50 mg/kg/day, or pivampicillin 50 mg/kg/day alone for 14 days. A cross-over pharmacokinetic study using the same drugs was carried out in 10 CF patients to determine the antibiotic concentrations in serum and sputum after a single dose of each drug. The clinical study showed no significant differences in clinical scoring, lung function tests or adverse events after treatment with pivampicillin plus pivmecillinam or pivampicillin alone. Follow-up microbiological evaluation 2 and 6 weeks after the end of treatment showed that the offending pathogen was eradicated in 68% of the patients treated with pivampicillin plus pivmecillinam and in 67% of the patients treated with pivampicillin alone. Reinfection with another biotype was more common in the combination group (50% vs. 21%) than in the pivampicillin group. In the pharmacokinetic study the median peak serum concentration occurred two hours after intake of tablets. The efficacy of double beta lactam treatment in lung infections with H. influenzae appears to be equivalent to that of ampicillin on clinical lung symptoms, lung function tests, adverse effects and bacteriology.

Amoxycillin/clavulanic acid: a review of its efficacy in over 38,500 patients from 1979 to 1992

A review of the published literature detailing the clinical use of amoxycillin/clavulanic acid spanning the period 1979 to 1992 was undertaken to assess the clinical efficacy of the product and to determine whether any changes had occurred during this time. In the 415 publications meeting the selection criteria a total of over 38,500 patients were treated with amoxycillin/clavulanic acid. Analysis of the data confirms the efficacy of amoxycillin/clavulanic acid over a wide range of clinical indications and annual and triennial groupings of publications suggests that there has been little change in the clinical effectiveness of amoxycillin/clavulanic acid. Clinical efficacy rates (cure or improved) with amoxycillin/clavulanic acid were 88% and 92% in comparative and uncontrolled trials, respectively. Gastro-intestinal side effects are the most common adverse event but have been relatively infrequent. Amoxycillin/clavulanic acid should continue to be a useful antibiotic for upper and lower respiratory tract infections, skin structure infections, dental, head and neck infections, and selected urinary tract infections.