1
|
Chellapandian D, Lehrnbecher T, Phillips B, Fisher BT, Zaoutis TE, Steinbach WJ, Beyene J, Sung L. Bronchoalveolar lavage and lung biopsy in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:501-9. [PMID: 25559816 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.58.0480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to describe the diagnostic yield and complication rate of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and lung biopsy in the evaluation of pulmonary lesions in patients with cancer and recipients of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review and performed electronic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies were included if patients had cancer or were recipients of HSCT, and if they underwent BAL or lung biopsy for the evaluation of pulmonary lesions. Only English language publications were included. RESULTS In all, 14,148 studies were screened; 72 studies of BAL and 31 of lung biopsy were included. The proportion of procedures leading to any diagnosis was similar by procedure type (0.53 v 0.54; P = .94) but an infectious diagnosis was more common with BAL compared with lung biopsy (0.49 v 0.34; P < .001). Lung biopsy more commonly led to a noninfectious diagnosis (0.43 v 0.07; P < .001) and was more likely to change how the patient was managed (0.48 v 0.31; P = .002) compared with BAL. However, complications were more common with lung biopsy (0.15 v 0.08; P = .006), and procedure-related mortality was four-fold higher for lung biopsy (0.0078) compared with BAL (0.0018). CONCLUSION BAL may be the preferred diagnostic modality for the evaluation of potentially infectious pulmonary lesions because of lower complication and mortality rates; thus, choice of procedure depends on clinical suspicion of infection. Guidelines to promote consistency in the approach to the evaluation of lung infiltrates may improve clinical care of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- DeepakBabu Chellapandian
- DeepakBabu Chellapandian, Joseph Beyene, and Lillian Sung, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto; Joseph Beyene, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Thomas Lehrnbecher, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Bob Phillips, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom; Brian T. Fisher and Theoklis E. Zaoutis, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; and William J. Steinbach, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Thomas Lehrnbecher
- DeepakBabu Chellapandian, Joseph Beyene, and Lillian Sung, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto; Joseph Beyene, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Thomas Lehrnbecher, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Bob Phillips, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom; Brian T. Fisher and Theoklis E. Zaoutis, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; and William J. Steinbach, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Bob Phillips
- DeepakBabu Chellapandian, Joseph Beyene, and Lillian Sung, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto; Joseph Beyene, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Thomas Lehrnbecher, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Bob Phillips, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom; Brian T. Fisher and Theoklis E. Zaoutis, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; and William J. Steinbach, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Brian T Fisher
- DeepakBabu Chellapandian, Joseph Beyene, and Lillian Sung, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto; Joseph Beyene, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Thomas Lehrnbecher, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Bob Phillips, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom; Brian T. Fisher and Theoklis E. Zaoutis, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; and William J. Steinbach, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Theoklis E Zaoutis
- DeepakBabu Chellapandian, Joseph Beyene, and Lillian Sung, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto; Joseph Beyene, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Thomas Lehrnbecher, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Bob Phillips, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom; Brian T. Fisher and Theoklis E. Zaoutis, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; and William J. Steinbach, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - William J Steinbach
- DeepakBabu Chellapandian, Joseph Beyene, and Lillian Sung, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto; Joseph Beyene, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Thomas Lehrnbecher, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Bob Phillips, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom; Brian T. Fisher and Theoklis E. Zaoutis, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; and William J. Steinbach, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Joseph Beyene
- DeepakBabu Chellapandian, Joseph Beyene, and Lillian Sung, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto; Joseph Beyene, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Thomas Lehrnbecher, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Bob Phillips, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom; Brian T. Fisher and Theoklis E. Zaoutis, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; and William J. Steinbach, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Lillian Sung
- DeepakBabu Chellapandian, Joseph Beyene, and Lillian Sung, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto; Joseph Beyene, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Thomas Lehrnbecher, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; Bob Phillips, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom; Brian T. Fisher and Theoklis E. Zaoutis, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; and William J. Steinbach, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Forslöw U, Remberger M, Nordlander A, Mattsson J. The clinical importance of bronchoalveolar lavage in allogeneic SCT patients with pneumonia. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 45:945-50. [PMID: 19784077 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2009.268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Patients who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) are prone to pulmonary infections. Between 1998 and 2004, a total of 450 patients underwent HSCT at Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 167 patients (37%), including 42 children. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed on 68 occasions in 57 patients (six children). In 110 patients (36 children) with pneumonia, BAL was not performed. BAL contributed to the diagnosis in 43 cases (63%) and to relevant findings in 53 cases: bacteria (n=13, 24%), viruses (n=28, 53%) and fungi (n=12, 23%). In 25 cases BAL was negative. In 15 of these cases, BAL was performed >or=4 days after chest X-ray, and in four cases not in the same segment as the infiltrations. The median time between radiographic findings and positive BAL was 2 (0-15) days, and a negative BAL 6 (1-30) days (P<0.001). Antimicrobial treatment was administered to 79% patients with positive findings, and to 92% with negative findings at the time of BAL. No serious complications due to the procedure were reported. BAL resulted in a changed treatment in 32/68 (47%) episodes of pneumonia. To conclude, BAL is a safe and useful diagnostic procedure that should be performed early after the onset of pneumonia following allogeneic HSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Forslöw
- Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Azoulay E, Schlemmer B. Diagnostic strategy in cancer patients with acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32:808-22. [PMID: 16715324 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-006-0129-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2005] [Accepted: 02/22/2006] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Nearly 15% of cancer patients experience acute respiratory failure (ARF) requiring admission to the intensive care unit, where their mortality is about 50%. This review focuses on ARF in cancer patients. The most recent literature is reviewed, and emphasis is placed on current controversies, most notably the risk/benefit ratio of fiberoptic bronchoscopy and BAL in patients with severe hypoxemia. BACKGROUND Fiberoptic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is the cornerstone of the causal diagnosis. However, the low diagnostic yield of about 50%, related to the widespread use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy in cancer patients, has generated interest in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and primary surgical lung biopsy. In patients with hypoxemia, bronchoscopy and BAL may trigger a need for invasive mechanical ventilation, thus considerably decreasing the chances of survival. DISCUSSION The place for recently developed, effective, noninvasive diagnostic tools (tests on sputum, blood, urine, and nasopharyngeal aspirates) needs to be determined. The prognosis is not markedly influenced by cancer characteristics; it is determined chiefly by the cause of ARF, need for mechanical ventilation, and presence of other organ failures. Although noninvasive ventilation reduces the need for endotracheal intubation and diminishes mortality rate, its prolonged use in patients with severe disease may preclude optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management. The appropriateness of switching to endotracheal mechanical ventilation in patients who fail noninvasive ventilation warrants evaluation. CONCLUSION This review discusses risks and benefits from invasive and non invasive diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in critically ill cancer patients with acute respiratory failure. Avenues for research are also suggested in order to improve survival in these very high risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie Azoulay
- Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Saint-Louis et Université Paris 7, Paris, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|