Severe complications after endoscopic injection of polydimethylsiloxane for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in early childhood

Evaluation of renal oxygenation by near-infrared spectroscopy during endoscopic injection of bulking agents in children with vesicoureteral reflux

BACKGROUND

Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is the measuring of regional tissue oxygenation (rSO2) by interpreting oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin signals that come back by transmitting near infrared light to tissues. The effect of endourological interventions on renal perfusion in children is largely unknown.

AIMS

To evaluate the effects of endoscopic injection of bulking agents (EIBA) for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) on renal oxygenation (RO) using renal NIRS monitoring, which shows renal perfusion and oxygenation changes.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study.

METHODS

Group I had bilateral inguinal surgery, Group II cystoscopy, and Group III, EIBA for VUR with 30 patients in each group. During the operation, vital signs, peripheral oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and renal regional oxygen saturation index (rSO2) values by bilateral renal NIRS monitoring were recorded. NIRS values before induction (T0) to postoperative (Tend) were determined. A 20% or more reduction in renal rSO2 (%20↓rSO2) was considered significant. Group III was also evaluated as subgroup III-A (not having "%20↓rSO2") and subgroup III-B ("%20↓rSO2").

RESULTS

The rSO2 decrease was observed in the first 5 min for both sides in group III. The most significant drop was at T30 for the right kidney and a significant decrease in rSO2, 20% or more, was observed in 6 renal units of 4 patients having higher SFU grading and renal scar in group III.

CONCLUSION

EIBA may transitionally impair renal oxygenation. Higher SFU grading and renal scar may increase the risk of renal hypoxia during EIBA.

Endoscopic treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children with two different bulking agents, high success and low complication rates: Comparison of Dexell and Vantris

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the results in terms of efficacy and safety of the endoscopic management for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in two different standardized primary VUR cohorts treated with Dexell and Vantris.

PATIENTS

128 refluxing renal units (RRU) in 87 patients with primary VUR (64 females, 23 males). Patients with secondary VUR and severe bladder and bowel dysfunction were excluded. A total of 22 continent children with mild bladder-bowel dysfunction underwent bladder-bowel training before the implantation. All procedures were performed in the presence of sterile urine using a conventional subureteral transurethral injection technique.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of mean age, sex, RRU side, ^99mTc-DMSA uptake, and reflux grade. The overall resolution rates based on the number of RRUs for up to three endoscopic treatments were 80% (56/70) in Dexell group and 94.8% (55/58) in Vantris group (P = .012). No postoperative recurrences or vesicoureteral junction obstructions were seen in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexell and Vantris provided an effective and safe endoscopic VUR treatment in the early and mid-term follow up of children with primary VUR. The effectiveness of these substances, which can produce different mass effects with different particle sizes, in safe VUR resolution, needs further investigations.

Endoscopic treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children with two different bulking agents, high success and low complication rates: comparison of Dexell and Vantris

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the results in terms of efficacy and safety of the endoscopic management for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in two different standardized primary VUR cohorts treated with Dexell and Vantris.

PATIENTS

128 refluxing renal units (RRU) in 87 patients with primary VUR (64 females, 23 males). Patients with secondary VUR and severe bladder and bowel dysfunction were excluded. A total of 22 continent children with mild bladder-bowel dysfunction underwent bladder-bowel training before the implantation. All procedures were performed in the presence of sterile urine using a conventional subureteral transurethral injection technique.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of mean age, sex, RRU side, 99mTc-DMSA uptake, and reflux grade. The overall resolution rates based on the number of RRUs for up to three endoscopic treatments were 80% (56/70) in Dexell group and 94.8% (55/58) in Vantris group (p = 0.012). No postoperative recurrences or vesicoureteral junction obstructions were seen in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexell and Vantris provided an effective and safe endoscopic VUR treatment in the early and mid-term follow up of children with primary VUR. The effectiveness of these substances, which can produce different mass effects with different particle sizes, in safe VUR resolution, needs further investigations.

Postoperative ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux

Purpose

We undertook this study to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, management, and outcome of postoperative ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).

Materials and Methods

Ninety patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for VUR were retrospectively reviewed and classified into two groups according to ureteral obstruction: the nonobstruction group (83 cases, 122 ureters; mean age, 7.0±2.8 years) and the obstruction group (7 cases, 10 ureters; mean age, 6.2±8.1 years). We analyzed the following factors: age, sex, injection material, laterality, voiding dysfunction, constipation, renal scarring, preoperative and postoperative ultrasound findings, endoscopic findings, injection number, and injection volume. Additionally, we reviewed the clinical manifestations, natural course, management, and outcome of ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment.

Results

The incidence of ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment was 7.6% (10/132 ureters). The type of bulking agent used and injection volume tended to be associated with ureteral obstruction. However, no significant risk factors for obstruction were identified between the two groups. Three patients showed no symptoms or signs after the onset of ureteral obstruction. Most of the patients with ureteral obstruction experienced spontaneous resolution within 1 month with conservative therapy. Two patients required temporary ureteral stents to release the ureteral obstruction.

Conclusions

In our experience, the incidence of ureteral obstruction was slightly higher than in previous reports. Our study identified no predictive risk factors for developing ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment. Although most of the ureteral obstructions resolved spontaneously within 1 month, some cases required drainage to relieve symptoms or to prevent renal function deterioration.

Acute and delayed vesicoureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer: why and how to manage

OBJECTIVE

To present our cases of ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/HA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected data from patients who had suffered ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment of VUR with Dx/HA in our institution.

RESULTS

From April 2002 to April 2011 we treated endoscopically 475 ureters with VUR, and detected 5 ureteral obstructions. Median age at reflux treatment was 39 months. Reflux grade before treatment was III in one patient and IV in four. Three ureterovesical junctions (UVJ) were blocked after a second endoscopic treatment. The median of Dx/HA injected was 1 ml (0.6-1.1). In two patients ureteral obstruction presented acutely and was treated with a ureteral stent. In the other three, the ureteral obstruction appeared gradually and was detected by ultrasound scans and MAG3 diuretic renogram; one underwent nephrectomy because of poor renal function, and the other two were treated with endoscopic dilatation of the UVJ. In all these patients both reflux and obstructions have resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

On preoperative cystography, three of the patients had a narrowed distal ureter, and probably had a refluxing and obstructive megaureter. Other causes are not clear, except for those patients with acute presentation in whom edema of the UVJ was found. Ureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment of VUR is rare. Endoscopic intervention such as ureteral stent placement or high-pressure balloon dilatation of the UVJ has good results as a treatment of acute and delayed obstruction.

Long-term results of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children: comparison of different bulking agents

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term effect in children of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) using different bulking agents. VUR status, recurrence of urinary tract infection (UTI), and recurrence of febrile UTI were evaluated as endpoints.

METHODS

From 1993 to 2005, we injected 229 refluxive ureters (VUR grade II-IV) in 135 children. Mean age of the children was 55.7 months. We used collagen in 98 (years 1993-2000), polydimethylsiloxane in 32 (years 1999-2000), and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/HA) in 99 ureters (years 2000-2005). Of the 135 children, 127 underwent a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) (radiologic or nuclid) 3 months after the first injection, and 88 children a second VCUG (nuclid) after 37 months (mean) postoperatively. Clinically, patients were monitored for non-febrile or febrile UTI. Data were collected and analyzed retrospectively by chart review.

RESULTS

After first injection with collagen, polydimethysiloxane and Dx/HA, 52%, 55% and 81.5% of the children were without VUR, respectively. Repeated injections were successful in only 21% (collagen) to 42% (Dx/HA). Of the 88 with a second VCUG, 48.5% of the initially reflux-free children developed relapse VUR after collagen, 45.5% after polydimethylsiloxane and 21.5% after Dx/HA injection. Clinically, there was a significant difference in postoperative UTI occurrence in favor of the Dx/HA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically and radiologically, Dx/HA exhibited the best results, giving better protection against UTIs and a better VUR cure rate. There was still a risk of VUR recurrence in successfully treated children after 3 years of follow up.

Ureteral obstruction following injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer: an infrequent but relevant complication

PURPOSE

To report our experience with ureteral obstruction after injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/Ha) to treat vesicoureteral reflux, and analyze its possible causes, management and outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of patients undergoing injection of Dx/Ha. The charts of patients with clinically relevant ureteral obstruction were evaluated for indications, prior interventions, technique of injection and volume injected. Video recordings obtained during injection were analyzed to detect possible technical errors.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients (87 ureters) were treated with Dx/Ha injection in a 5-year period. Five ureters (5.7%) in five patients (9.3%) developed significant ureteral obstruction requiring intervention. Manifestations of obstruction included pain in two patients, urinary tract infections in one and loss of function in one. Increased serum creatinine was observed in a patient with a transplanted kidney. Four obstructions resolved spontaneously (two after percutaneous nephrostomy, two after placement of a ureteral stent) and one required reimplantation. Review of the videos did not reveal any deviation from the usual technique. The volumes injected in the obstructed cases (0.7-1.2 ml) were in the usual range.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, the incidence of post Dx/Ha ureteral obstruction was higher than previously reported. Although 4/5 cases resolved spontaneously, they required drainage to relieve symptoms or to improve renal function. Surgeons need to be aware of this complication and include its possible occurrence in the informed consent obtained prior to injection.

Delayed onset ureteral obstruction following Deflux® injection for vesicoureteral reflux

Endoscopic injection treatment of vesicoureteral reflux is an increasingly common and successful option. Obstruction is an infrequent postoperative complication, occurring in 1% of patients; delayed onset of obstruction is even rarer. There is a paucity of literature describing possible treatments. We present a novel approach by excision of the implanted material.