Quantitative bone scintigraphy in patients with prostatic carcinoma treated with LH-RH analogues

Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with [18F]NaF PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer patients prior to radionuclide therapy

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer (PC) patients scheduled for radionuclide therapy in comparison to [¹⁸F]sodium fluoride (¹⁸F-NaF) PET/CT.

METHODS

Sixteen metastatic PC patients with known skeletal metastases, who underwent both ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT for assessment of metastatic burden prior to radionuclide therapy, were analysed retrospectively. The performance of both tracers was calculated on a lesion-based comparison. Intensity of tracer accumulation of pathologic bone lesions on ¹⁸F-NaF PET and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET was measured with maximum standardized uptake values (SUV_max) and compared to background activity of normal bone. In addition, SUV_max values of PET-positive bone lesions were analysed with respect to morphologic characteristics on CT. Bone metastases were either confirmed by CT or follow-up PET scan.

RESULTS

In contrast to 468 PET-positive lesions suggestive of bone metastases on ¹⁸F-NaF PET, only 351 of the lesions were also judged positive on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET (75.0%). Intensity of tracer accumulation of pathologic skeletal lesions was significantly higher on ¹⁸F-NaF PET compared to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET, showing a median SUV_max of 27.0 and 6.0, respectively (p < 0.001). Background activity of normal bone was lower on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET, with a median SUV_max of 1.0 in comparison to 2.7 on ¹⁸F-NaF PET; however, tumour to background ratio was significantly higher on ¹⁸F-NaF PET (9.8 versus 5.9 on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET; p = 0.042). Based on morphologic lesion characterisation on CT, ¹⁸F-NaF PET revealed median SUV_max values of 23.6 for osteosclerotic, 35.0 for osteolytic, and 19.0 for lesions not visible on CT, whereas on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET median SUV_max values of 5.0 in osteosclerotic, 29.5 in osteolytic, and 7.5 in lesions not seen on CT were measured. Intensity of tracer accumulation between¹⁸F-NaF PET and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET was significantly higher in osteosclerotic (p < 0.001) and lesions not visible on CT (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

In comparison to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT detects a higher number of pathologic bone lesions in advanced stage PC patients scheduled for radionuclide therapy. Our data suggest that ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET should be combined with ¹⁸F-NaF PET in PC patients with skeletal metastases for restaging prior to initiation or modification of therapy.

18F-fluoride PET: changes in uptake as a method to assess response in bone metastases from castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with 223Ra-chloride (Alpharadin)

BACKGROUND

A qualitative assessment of conventional bone scintigraphy with 99mTc methylene diphosphonate is perceived as an insensitive method for monitoring the treatment response of bone metastases, and we postulated that semi-quantitative 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography (PET) might serve as a suitable alternative biomarker of the treatment response.

METHODS

Five patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases with no known soft tissue disease received 100 kBq/kg of radium-223 (223Ra)-chloride (Alpharadin) therapy at 0 and 6 weeks and had whole body 18F-fluoride PET scans at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks with concurrent prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) measurements. A qualitative comparison of the PET scans was performed blinded to the PSA and ALP results. A semi-quantitative comparison was made by measuring the maximum standardised uptake values (SUVmax) in five bone metastases in each patient. The means of the five SUVmax measurements in each subject were used as a quantitative measure of global metastatic activity at each time point.

RESULTS

Three patients showed a PSA decline at 12 weeks (-44%, -31%, -27% reduction) whilst two patients showed PSA increases (+10%, +17%). All five patients showed a reduction in ALP of greater than 25%. The qualitative assessment of the 18F-fluoride scans recorded a stable disease in each case. However, the semi-quantitative assessment showed agreement with the PSA decline in three patients (-52%, -75%, -49%) and minimal change (+12%, -16%) in two patients with increased PSA at 12 weeks. Four patients showed similar reductions in mean SUVmax and ALP at 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The semi-quantitative 18F-fluoride PET is more accurate than the qualitative comparison of scans in assessing response in bone metastases, correlating with the PSA response and ALP activity and offering a potential imaging biomarker for monitoring treatment response in bone metastases following treatment with 223Ra-chloride.