Transgenic animals in the evaluation of compound efficacy and toxicity: will they be as useful as they are novel?

Genetically engineered animals in drug discovery and development: a maturing resource for toxicologic research

Genetically engineered mice that either over-express a foreign gene (transgenic) or in which the activity of a specific gene has been removed ("knock-out") or replaced ("knock-in") will be used increasingly to investigate molecular mechanisms of disease, to evaluate innovative therapeutic targets, and to screen novel agents for efficacy and/or toxicity. Recent innovations of relevance to toxicologic researchers include the construction of genetically engineered mice with (1) multiple engineered genes, (2) mutations that can be induced at specific sites and times throughout life, and (3) the substitution of human genes for their mouse counterparts ("humanized" mice) to allow in vivo investigation of xenobiotic toxicity. Contemporary applications of genetically engineered mice in toxicology include basic mechanistic research exploiting newly engineered mouse lines as well as applied screening for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity using commercially available animals. Many caveats must be considered when interpreting genetically engineered mice-derived toxicity data, the chief of which will be the extent to which the model's phenotype has been fully characterized, the type and incidence of background lesions for the given mouse strain and engineered gene, and the possibility of misinterpreting the presence or absence of a phenotype due to compensatory physiologic processes that mask the outcome produced by the engineering event. Toxicity data acquired using genetically engineered mice currently supplements and in time likely will supplant those gathered using the present "gold standard" bioassays, as genetically engineered mice typically develop more lesions after a shorter latency period than do age- and strain-matched, wild-type mice.

Use of genetically engineered mice in drug discovery and development: wielding Occam's razor to prune the product portfolio

Genetically engineered mice (GEMs) that either overexpress (transgenic) or lack (gene-targeted, or "knock-out") genes are used increasingly in industry to investigate molecular mechanisms of disease, to evaluate innovative therapeutic targets, and to screen agents for efficacy and/or toxicity. High throughput GEM construction in drug discovery and development (DDD) serves two main purposes: to test whether a given gene participates in a disease condition, or to determine the function(s) of a protein that is encoded by an expressed sequence tag (EST, an mRNA fragment for a previously uncharacterized protein). In some instances, phenotypes induced by such novel GEMs also may yield clues regarding potential target organs and toxic effects of potential therapeutic molecules. The battery of tests used in phenotypic analysis of GEMs varies between companies, but the goal is to define one or more easily measured endpoints that can be used to monitor the disease course--especially during in vivo treatment with novel drug candidates. In many DDD projects, overt phenotypes are subtle or absent even in GEMs in which high-level expression or total ablation of an engineered gene can be confirmed. This outcome presents a major quandary for biotechnology and pharmaceutical firms: given the significant expense and labor required to generate GEMs, what should be done with "negative" constructs? The 14th century philosophical principle known as Occam's razor-that the simplest explanation for a phenomenon is likely the truth-provides a reasonable basis for pruning potential therapeutic molecules and targets. In the context of DDD, Occam's razor may be construed to mean that correctly engineered GEMs lacking obvious functional or structural phenotypes have none because the affected gene is not uniquely essential to normal homeostasis or disease progression. Thus, a "negative" GEM construct suggests that the gene under investigation encodes a ligand or target molecule without significant therapeutic potential. This interpretation indicates that, at least in a market-driven industrial setting, such "negative" projects should be pruned aggressively so that resources may be redirected to more promising DDD ventures.

Preclinical development of keliximab, a Primatized anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody, in human CD4 transgenic mice: characterization of the model and safety studies

The preclinical safety assessment of biopharmaceuticals necessitates that studies be conducted in species in which the products are pharmacologically active. Monoclonal antibodies are a promising class of biopharmaceuticals for many disease indications; however, by design, these agents tend to have limited species cross-reactivity and tend to only be active in primates. Keliximab is a human-cynomolgus monkey chimeric (Primatized) monoclonal antibody with specificity for human and chimpanzee CD4. In order to conduct a comprehensive preclinical safety assessment of this antibody to support chronic treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in patients, a human CD4 transgenic mouse was used for chronic and reproductive toxicity studies and for genotoxic studies. In addition, immunotoxicity studies were conducted in these mice with Candida albicans, Pneumocystis carinii and B16 melanoma cells to assess the effects of keliximab on host resistance to infection and immunosurveillance to neoplasia. The results of these studies found keliximab to be well tolerated with the only effects observed being related to its pharmacologic activity on CD4+ T lymphocytes. The use of transgenic mice expressing human proteins provides a useful alternative to studies in chimpanzees with biopharmaceutical agents having limited species cross-reactivity.

Antisense approaches for investigating mechanisms of abnormal development

Although the use of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides in cell culture systems has been beneficial for examining functional roles of genes in biological processes, very few studies have adapted this valuable approach to developmental studies. This oversight may be due to the fact that many scientists are not familiar with the numerous in vitro approaches available for use as developmental system models. Increased knowledge concerning the mechanisms by which oligonucleotides are incorporated into the cell and how these molecules disrupt targeted gene expression has resulted in improved oligonucleotide design and better controls for these studies. The combined use of developmental in vitro approaches, with improved antisense oligodeoxynucleotide strategies presents valuable experimental models for examining functions and interactions of genes in embryogenesis. This review focuses on a comprehensive description of the characterized properties of oligodeoxynucleotides, control design, and various developmental in vitro approaches for accomplishing these studies in embryonic systems.