Wooden's pyramid: building a hierarchy of skills for successful communication

Doing the hard work of learning: oncologists' enduring impressions of a year-long communication skills training program

PURPOSE

Few studies have examined the long-term impact of communication skills training for oncologists. We developed a year-long communication skills curriculum for medical oncology fellows with the primary goals of fostering life-long learning of patient-centered communication skills and internalization of associated attitudes and beliefs. We engaged learners through reflection, narrative methods, and action methods, thereby creating a non-threatening, team-based environment. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether learners perceived that they had acquired enduring skills, attitudes, and knowledge years after they participated.

METHODS

Former fellows completed an online cross-sectional survey from June to July 2019 that included demographic information, 21 items on a numerical scale, and 3 narrative prompts. Survey items pertained to 4 domains, including skills, attitudes, confidence with specific scenarios, and overall impressions. The numerical scale ranged from "strongly agree" = 1 to "strongly disagree" = 5.

RESULTS

A total of 114 fellows, including 27 teaching assistants, participated in the communication skills training over 8 years. The average time between the end of the training program and completion of the survey was 5.2 years. The response rate was 68/114 (64%). Forty-one (60%, 95% CI: 49.3-73.8) fellows agreed or strongly agreed that the curriculum profoundly impacted their practice of medicine. Forty-three (64%, 95% CI: 51.5-75.5) fellows strongly agreed or agreed that they often found themselves informally sharing lessons they learned during the series. Overall average domain scores were 1.89 (SD = 0.84) for skills, 2.16 (0.79) for attitudes, 2.05 (0.81) for confidence with specific challenges, and 2.38 (0.94) for lasting impressions. Results were significantly more favorable for teaching assistants than for others.

CONCLUSION

Engaging, interactive, safe, and learner-centered communication skills training has an enduring and favorable impact on oncologists' self-perceived skills, confidence with specific challenges, and attitudes.

Validated checklist for assessing communication skills in undergraduate medical students: bridging the gap for effective doctor-patient interactions

Communication skills are fundamental in healthcare, but assessing them among medical students presents challenges. In the Indian context, the lack of a specific assessment tool further compounds the issue. Thus this study aimed to develop and validate an observation-based communication skills checklist tailored to Phase I Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students. The checklist was developed using both inductive and deductive approaches and underwent rigorous testing to ensure its reliability and validity. After piloting, the finalized version was administered to 84 Phase I MBBS students. Results indicated a critical content validity ratio of 0.78, face validity of 0.80, and an impressive Cronbach's alpha of 0.91, indicating good internal consistency and reliability of the checklist. The students scored over 80% in all checklist domains, except for empathy (73%) and support (74%), highlighting areas for potential improvement. Nonetheless, about 75% of students expressed satisfaction with the checklist's communication skills assessment. The feedback from faculty members was positive, as they found the checklist was easy to use, quick, and effective for evaluating communication skills. Consequently, the checklist's introduction has been well received by both students and faculty. In conclusion, the developed checklist proves to be an effective and valid instrument for assessing communication skills in Phase I MBBS students. By integrating this tool into observed station clinical examinations, medical educators can comprehensively evaluate students' communication behaviors. Moreover, the checklist serves as a valuable resource for bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, enabling future physicians to excel in doctor-patient interactions, a crucial aspect of patient-centered care.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This article presents a highly unique and novel approach by introducing a structured checklist for communication skill assessment in medical students. Its rigorous validation process ensures reliability and effectiveness, while its adaptation to sociocultural norms highlights its relevance and applicability. The user-friendly design with a single-page layout and dichotomous scale further enhances its practicality in objective structured clinical examinations. The developed checklist equips educators with a valuable resource to assess and improve students' communication abilities.

Teaching and Assessing Communication Skills in Medical Undergraduate Training

Good communication skills are essential for an optimal doctor-patient relationship, and also contribute to improved health outcomes. Although the need for training in communication skills is stated as a requirement in the 1997 Graduate Medical Education Regulations of the Medical Council of India, formal training in these skills has been fragmentary and non-uniform in most Indian curricula. The Vision 2015 document of the Medical Council of India reaffirms the need to include training in communication skills in the MBBS curriculum. Training in communication skills needs approaches which are different from that of teaching other clinical subjects. It is also a challenge to ensure that students not only imbibe the nuances of communication and interpersonal skills, but adhere to them throughout their careers. This article addresses the possible ways of standardizing teaching and assessment of communication skills and integrating them into the existing curriculum.

'I don't want to burden my family': handling communication challenges in geriatric oncology

Oncologists need excellent communication skills to effectively handle challenging conversations regarding prognosis, transition to palliative care, code status, and other sensitive topics. Foundational skills include: 1) posing open-ended, exploratory questions, 2) allowing for appropriate silence in the conversation, 3) listening actively, 4) recognizing emotions, 5) responding to emotions with empathy rather than biomedical information, and 6) speaking with clarity by avoiding technical jargon and offering small chunks of information. Conversations about sensitive topics can be particularly challenging with geriatric patients, who experience functional and sensory limitations. The risk-benefit ratio of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions tips precariously in older patients as many develop geriatric syndromes. Older cancer patients have the unique perspective of looking back on a long life and looking forward to impending death. Higher order skills can be very powerful in helping geriatric cancer patients find meaning and dignity at the end of life. These skills include exploring spirituality and coping strategies and engaging the patient in conversation and reflection about their legacy.