The effects of utilizing a near-patient e-learning tool on medical student learning

Learning technology in health professions education: Realising an (un)imagined future

CONTEXT

Technology is being introduced, used and studied in almost all areas of health professions education (HPE), often with a claim of making HPE better in one way or another. However, it remains unclear if technology has driven real change in HPE. In this article, we seek to develop an understanding of the transformative capacity of learning technology in HPE.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

We first consider the wider scholarship highlighting the intersection between technology and pedagogy, articulating what is meant by transformation and the role of learning technology in driving educational transformation. We then undertake a synthesis of the current high visibility HPE-focused research. We sampled the literature in two ways-for the five highest impact factor health professional education journals over the past decade and for all PubMed indexed journals for the last 3 years-and categorised the extant research against the Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition model. We found that the majority of research we sampled focussed on substituting or augmenting learning through technology, with relatively few studies using technology to modify or redefine what HPE is through the use of technology. Of more concern was the lack of theoretical justification for pedagogical improvement, including transformation, underpinning the majority of studies.

CONCLUSIONS

While all kinds of technology use in learning have their place, the next step for HPE is the robust use of technology aiming to lead transformation. This should be guided by transformational educational theory and aligned with pedagogical context. We challenge HPE practitioners and scholars to work thoughtfully and with intent to enable transformation in education for future health professionals.

The Impact of Patient-Centric Interactive E-Module in Pathology Among Medical Undergraduates

Introduction

COVID pandemic shifted healthcare-related education to digital platforms. With the widespread availability of learning management systems like MOODLE, many opportunities exist to create innovative e-modules. Its success depends on the interactive multimedia resources and structural framework. The present study aims to create two patient-centric e-modules on Diabetes and Alcoholic liver disease in Pathology by a medical undergraduate facilitated by faculty and to assess its impact on learning outcomes and learners' perceptions in relation to student seminars.

Methodology

This mixed-method intervention study combines quantitative and qualitative research methods to gain deeper insight into learners' experiences. By random allocation, half of the second-year medical undergraduates (n = 60) attended an e-module, and the other half listened to a student seminar on the same topic with the same specific learning objectives. Pre- and post-test scores and feedback questionnaires were quantitatively analysed. Student-led focus group discussions (FGD) for learners' experiences underwent thematic analysis.

Results

Pre- and post-tests for both learning techniques were statistically significant, while the feedback questionnaire's responses favoured e-module. Four focus group discussions yielded six themes for the e-module: Patient-driven holistic learning experience, Inquiry-based learning, Immersive learning, Higher level cognitive skills, Flexibility, repeatability and accessibility, and No human involvement. The five themes for the seminar were: Peer-driven camaraderie learning dynamic, Teacher-centric synchronous learning, Active vs passive listening, Basic learning, and Teacher-student interaction.

Conclusion

While both learning techniques had comparable effects on test scores, they have merits and demerits. Hence, blending both techniques where seminars impart basic knowledge and e-module for deeper reinforcement will benefit the students.

Perception of Technology-Enhanced Learning by Medical Students: an Integrative Review

This review aims to explore the perception of technology-enhanced learning by medical students. From the initial 2947 records found, 38 studies from journals indexed in the Web of Science database were included after screening. Several main topics were isolated, based on a thematic analysis: student's attitude towards e-learning and modern technologies in medical education; social networks, video, and mobile devices as information source and communication tool; and barriers to the use of technologies in medical education. The results have shown that a positive attitude towards technologies in medical education and learning is prevalent among students. The popularity of blended learning was confirmed.

Paediatric clinical exposure for medical students: Are they seeing enough?

AIM

To determine whether students are exposed to the 25 clinical presentations included in a comprehensive paediatric curriculum based on presenting features, as well as to evaluate for any variation in case exposure between the different locations and seasons of the student attachments.

METHODS

Students in the final 2 years of a 6-year medical degree completed logbooks during their 8-week paediatric attachment, recording which of 25 listed clinical presentations they had seen. Data were then collected regarding the period and location of the clinical placement, and which presentations had been seen by each student. Analysis was performed to detect differences in student case exposure depending on location and season of attachment, as well as the frequency with which each presentation was seen.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-one student logbooks were included for analysis. Only one student had seen all 25 presentations; the median (range; interquartile range) number of cases seen was 14 (4-25; 11-17). There was no significant difference in the number of cases seen relating to location (rural, metropolitan or tertiary children's hospital) or season of the paediatric attachment. Only three presentations (infant/child with fever, breathing difficulties and vomiting/diarrhoea) had been seen by more than 90% of students; nine presentations had been seen by less than 50% of students.

CONCLUSIONS

Students rarely gain exposure to all clinical presentations suggested in a comprehensive paediatric curriculum based on presenting features during an 8-week clinical attachment. Students have a similar experience regardless of the hospital or season of attachment.