Efficacy of assessment in fetal behaviour by four dimensional ultrasonography

Sorting pain out of salience: assessment of pain facial expressions in the human fetus

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Acute pain facial expressions can be detected/scored in human fetuses. We propose a seven-item scale to differentiate pain facial expressions from rest/acoustic stimuli ones.

Introduction:

The question of whether the human fetus experiences pain has received substantial attention in recent times. With the advent of high-definition 4-dimensional ultrasound (4D-US), it is possible to record fetal body and facial expressions.

Objective:

To determine whether human fetuses demonstrate discriminative acute behavioral responses to nociceptive input.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study included 5 fetuses with diaphragmatic hernia with indication of intrauterine surgery (fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion) and 8 healthy fetuses, who were scanned with 4D-US in 1 of 3 conditions: (1) acute pain group: Fetuses undergoing intrauterine surgery were assessed in the preoperative period during the anesthetic injection into the thigh; (2) control group at rest: Facial expressions at rest were recorded during scheduled ultrasound examinations; and (3) control group acoustic startle: Fetal facial expressions were recorded during acoustic stimulus (500–4000 Hz; 60–115 dB).

Results:

Raters blinded to the fetuses’ groups scored 65 pictures of fetal facial expressions based on the presence of 12 items (facial movements). Analyses of redundancy and usefulness excluded 5 items for being of low discrimination capacity (P>0.2). The final version of the pain assessment tool consisted of a total of 7 items: brow lowering/eyes squeezed shut/deepening of the nasolabial furrow/open lips/horizontal mouth stretch/vertical mouth stretch/neck deflection. Odd ratios for a facial expression to be detected in acute pain compared with control conditions ranged from 11 (neck deflection) to 1,400 (horizontal mouth stretch). Using the seven-item final tool, we showed that 5 is the cutoff value discriminating pain from nonpainful startle and rest.

Conclusions:

This study inaugurates the possibility to study pain responses during the intrauterine life, which may have implications for the postoperative management of pain after intrauterine surgical interventions

Antenatal and Postnatal Assessment of Neurobehavior: Which One should be used?

It is obvious that this environment is quite different from one man is experiencing after birth, but, although different, intrauterine environment is ideal at that stage of human development. There is a question of the environmental discontinuity between intrauterine conditions characterized by existence of microgravity (baby astronaut hypothesis), and extrauterine life with gravity as developmental condition sine qua non. The human brain is one of the organs which is very sensitive to environmental changes affecting its growth and development. The brain of very tiny prematurely born babies is unable to follow the genetically determined growth pattern in extrauterine environment, even when postnatal nutrition and nurturing of the babies according to our best knowledge are appropriate. Is this fact of any significance to make distinction between normal and abnormal neurodevelopment pre- and postnatally is still unclear?

Kurjak antenatal neurodevelopmental test (KANET) using four-dimensional ultrasound (4D US) has been introduced using ten parameters and after attempt of standardization only eight parameters remained for neurodevelopmental assessment of low- and high-risk fetuses. We believe that at present level of knowledge, KANET test could be considered as a good test for the detection of fetuses with high neurological risk, without the possibility to define reliable long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. This is also hardly possible based on postnatal neurological assessment with 27 different postnatal tests. They were primarily neurobehavioral or neuromotor assessments that were suitable for use with preterm infants, and were discriminative, predictive or evaluative.

There was a high willingness of clinician to find postnatal neurodevelopmental test which could be predictive for short- term and long-term outcome of low and high-risk infants.

Although, there are many tests available for prenatal and postnatal assessment of neurodevelopment, none of them is reliable in the prediction of neurodevelopmental outcome in low-risk population, while many could be used with fairly acceptable predictivity in high-risk population. Although, many studies have been conducted in order to solve this problem, still there is a space for improvement. In postnatal period we are dealing with infant in front of the clinician with direct observation, while pretnatally we are dealing with quite different environment and less mature brain.

How to cite this article

Stanojevic M. Antenatal and Postnatal Assessment of Neurobehavior: Which One should be used? Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;9(1):67-74.