The definition, aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and management of previous caesarean scar defects

Outcomes of vaginal repair and vaginal repair combined with GnRHa administration in the treatment of cesarean section scar defects: A randomized clinical trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To prospectively investigate whether the application of vaginal repair (VR) of cesarean section scar defect (CSD) combined with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) achieve better clinical outcomes than VR alone.

DESIGN

A randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 124 women with CSD were undergoing expectant management from December 2016 to September 2021. 61 were randomised to VR+ GnRHa and 63 to VR alone.

INTERVENTION

Vaginal repair combined with GnRHa and vaginal repair alone.

MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was the duration of menstruation and thickness of the remaining muscular layer (TRM) at 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the length, width and depth of the CSD; operation time; estimated blood loss; hospitalization time; and operative complications. Women were treated with either VR (n = 63) or VR + GnRHa (n = 61). Menstruation and TRM in patients pre. vs. post comparisons either with VR or VR + GnRHa are significant improved (P < .05). Significant differences in menstruation duration and TRM occurred in patients treated with VR + GnRHa compared with those treated with VR (P < .05). Moreover, the rate of CSD after surgery in the VR group was significantly higher than that in the VR + GnRHa group (P = .033), and CSD patients in the VR + GnRHa group achieved better therapeutic effects than those in the VR group (P = .017). Patients who received VR + GnRHa had a shorter menstruation duration and a greater increment of TRM postoperatively than did patients treated with VR alone (P = .021; P = .002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

VR + GnRHa therapy has a greater potential to improve scar healing and reduce the number of menstruation days than VR alone for symptomatic women with CSD. PRéCIS: Vaginal Repair Combined with GnRHa Creates Better Therapeutic Effects of CSD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Date of registration: October 13, 2016, Date of initial participant enrollment: December 20, 2016, Clinical trial identification number: NCT02932761, URL of the registration site: ClinicalTrials.gov, Figshare DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24117114 LINK TO THE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02932761.

Reproductive outcomes after vaginal repair of isthmocele: A preliminary study and systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Although vaginal repair of isthmocele is an effective and safe surgical option, data on reproductive and obstetrical outcomes are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate reproductive outcomes of women undergone vaginal repair of isthmocele. We also systematically reviewed the existent literature to offer a general view of available data.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a database prospectively collected between January 2018 and January 2022 at San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. We included secondary infertile women with ultrasound documented isthmocele who undergone vaginal repair. Post-surgical clinical, reproductive and obstetric outcomes were recorded. An advanced systematic search of the literature up to January 2023 was conducted.

RESULTS

17 women were included. The mean age of the included patients was 37.2 ± 2.7 years. The median of previous caesarian sections was 1 (1-2). One intra-operative complication (5.9 %) was reported (bladder injury, repaired at the time of surgery). At follow up, bleeding was successfully treated in 8 women (8/10; 80 %). Pregnancy was obtained in 7 women (7/17; 41.2 %): the conception was spontaneous in 4 women (4/7; 57.1 %) and trough assisted reproductive technology in 3 patients (3/7; 42.9 %). The mean time from surgery to pregnancy was 10.8 (±6.7) months. One spontaneous abortion was reported (1/7; 14.3 %), while live birth was achieved in 6 pregnancies (6/7; 85.7 %). All deliveries were by caesarian section at a median gestational age of 37.5 (36-38.25) weeks. No obstetrical complications were reported. At the time of caesarean section, no defects on the lower segment were retrieved. Regarding the systematic research, among the 21 studies screened, only 4 articles were included in the review. Pregnancy rate was around 60-70 % with very few obstetrical complications (0.01 %) such as abnormal placentation or preterm birth.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal repair of isthmocele is a minimally invasive, safe and effective surgical approach in terms of postsurgical residual myometrium tichness. Systematic review to date has found low-quality evidences on the impact of vaginal surgery in the management of secondary infertility and obstetrics outcomes in women with isthmocele.

New Efficient Method for Hysteroscopic Isthmoplasty: Four Simple Steps Lead to a Significant Improvement in Bleeding Status

We demonstrate an effective reduction in postmenstrual spotting after our novel hysteroscopic isthmoplasty. This study included 66 patients with isthmocele-related postmenstrual spotting confirmed by sonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy between 2000 and 2017. Our new interventions included the following four steps: (1) make a resection gradient of the distal edge of the isthmocele from the ape of the isthmocele down to the cervical outer orifice; (2) resect the distal and proximal niches of the isthmocele; (3) electrocauterize the distal and proximal sides (not only the niche bottom) of the small cave on the scar side of the isthmocele; (4) manage the isthmocele until it is largely connected to the cavity. In our results, all patients underwent extensive hysteroscopic repair of newly hysteroscopic isthmoplasty without any intra- or postoperative complications. After final hysteroscopic repair modification, prolonged menstrual spotting was significantly decreased in 98.2% (53/54) of the patients, and the total number of bleeding days per menstrual cycle significantly decreased from a mean of 15.38 ± 3.3 days to 6.4 ± 1.9 days postoperatively (p < 0.001). Our four-step hysteroscopic technique successfully resolved prolonged menstrual spotting in over 90% of the patients, exceeding the resolution rates of 60−85% achieved with other hysteroscopic techniques used to treat symptomatic isthmocele. No patients experience recurrence after long-term follow up. Four simple steps led to a significant improvement in bleeding status.

Fantastic niches and where to find them: the current diagnosis and management of uterine niche

Background

Caesarean section (CS) scar niche is a well recognised complication of caesarean delivery and is defined as an indentation at the site of the CS scar with a depth of at least 2mm.

Objectives

To review systematically the medical literature regarding the current diagnosis and management of uterine niche

Materials and methods

We carried out a systematic review using MeSH terms ‘niche’ OR ‘sacculation’ OR ‘caesarean scar defect’ OR ‘caesarean section scar’ OR ‘uterine defect’ OR ‘isthmocele.’ Articles included were peer-reviewed and in English language.

Main outcome measures

Prevalence, symptoms, diagnosis, pathophysiology and management of uterine niche.

Results

CS scar niche is common and, in a subgroup, produces a range of symptoms including post-menstrual bleeding, dyspareunia and subfertility. It may be linked to use of locked sutures during CS closure. Niche repair can be achieved laparoscopically or hysteroscopically and appears to improve symptoms, although solid conclusions regarding fertility outcomes cannot be drawn.

Conclusions

CS scar niche is associated with a range of symptoms. Repair may aid subfertile patients and those with post-menstrual spotting. The presence of a niche is probably irrelevant in the absence of symptoms.

What is new?

LNG-IUS and surgical repair appear to improve symptoms in those with a niche.

Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus hysteroscopic approach in patients with previous cesarean scar defect: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and obstetric outcomes of laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery in patients with previous cesarean scar defect (PCSD).

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on women who underwent laparoscopic or hysteroscopic surgery for PCSD from 2016 to 2019 at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Among these participants, 13 underwent laparoscopic surgery and 33 received hysteroscopic surgery.

Results

Significant differences were displayed in the operative times (156.9±42.3 vs. 40.7±38.9 min, P<0.05), intra-operative blood loss (80.0±61.0 vs. 17.9±51.2 mL, P<0.05), hospital stay (7.1±1.6 vs. 4.1±2.1 days, P<0.05), postoperative hospital stay (4.3±0.8 vs. 1.5±1.1 days, P<0.05), and hospitalization expenses (22,240.3±249.9 vs. 9,547.1±4,747.2 yuan, P<0.05) between the laparoscopic surgery and hysteroscopic group. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of clinical efficacy between the laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery group. A total of 2 of the 4 patients in the laparoscopic surgery group, and 9 of 11 patients in the hysteroscopic surgery group delivered successfully. All 2 participants in the laparoscopic surgery group and 2 participants in the hysteroscopic surgery group were diagnosed with placenta previa. No uterine rupture was reported in our study.

Conclusions

Both laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery are safe and effective treatments for PCSD patients, and hysteroscopic surgery is more efficient for PCSD patients.

Caesarean section defects may affect pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective study

Background

Caesarean section rates are rising worldwide. One adverse effect of caesarean section reported in some studies is an increased risk of subfertility. Only a few studies have assessed the relationship between the previous mode of delivery and in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) reproductive outcomes. In this study, we primarily investigated the impact of a history of caesarean section with or without defects on IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes compared to a vaginal delivery history.

Methods

This retrospective study included 834 women who had a IVF or ICSI treatment at our centre between 2015 and 2019 with a delivery history. In total, 401 women with a previous vaginal delivery (VD) were assigned to the VD group, and 433 women with a history of delivery by caesarean section were included, among whom 359 had a caesarean scar (CS) without a defect and were assigned to the CS group and 74 had a caesarean section defect (CSD) and were assigned to the CSD group. Baseline characteristics of the three groups were compared and analysed. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between clinical outcomes and different delivery modes.

Results

There were no significant differences in the live birth rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, mean implantation rate or abnormal pregnancy rate between the CS and VD groups However, the live birth rate and mean implantation rate in the CSD group were significantly lower than those in the VD group (21.6 vs 36.4%, adjusted OR 0.50 [0.27–0.9]; 0.25 ± 0.39 vs 0.35 ± 0.41, adjusted OR 0.90 [0.81–0.99]). Among women aged ≤ 35 years, the subgroup analyses showed that the live birth rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and mean implantation rate in the CSD group were all significantly lower than those in the VD group (21.4 vs 45.8%, adjusted OR 0.35[0.15 ~ 0.85]; 38.1 vs 59.8%, adjusted OR 0.52[0.24–0.82]; 31.0 vs 55.6%, adjusted OR 0.43[0.19–0.92]; 0.27 ± 0.43 vs 0.43 ± 0.43, adjusted OR 0.85[0.43 ± 0.43]). For women older than 35 years, there was no statistically significant difference in any pregnancy outcome among the three groups.

Conclusions

This study suggested that the existence of a CS without a defect does not decrease the live birth rate after IVF or ICSI compared with a previous VD. However, the presence of a CSD in women, especially young women (age ≤ 35 years), significantly impaired the chances of subsequent pregnancy.

Safety and feasibility of trial of labor in pregnant women with cesarean scar diverticulum

OBJECTIVE

Literature on trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) in women with isthmoceles is scarce because of complications associated with the procedure. This study investigated TOLAC's safety and feasibility in patients with isthmoceles.

METHODS

The study group comprised 34 pregnant women with isthmoceles who vaginally delivered. The control group comprised 102 pregnant women without isthmoceles who vaginally delivered during the same period. Scar diverticula were measured using color Doppler ultrasonography; between-group delivery outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Of the study group patients, 27/34 had isthmoceles diagnosed by ultrasound before pregnancy. Nineteen (70.37%) of these patients had mild defects and eight (29.63%) had moderate defects. The scar diverticula's mean length, depth, and width were 1.05 ± 0.62, 0.54 ± 0.28, and 1.20 ± 0.70 cm, respectively. The residual muscle layer's mean thickness was 0.27 ± 0.07 cm. The mean diverticulum depth/residual muscular thickness ratio was 2.39 ± 2.58. The duration of the first stage of labor was significantly shorter and the neonatal weight was significantly lower in the study group than control group.

CONCLUSION

Successful vaginal delivery is possible for women with mild and moderate isthmoceles. Further large-scale studies are needed to improve TOLAC's safety in pregnant women with isthmoceles.

Reproductive Outcomes Following Surgical Management for Isthmoceles: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of surgical management for isthmoceles in patients presenting with secondary infertility.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to May 2020. The search was limited to studies published in English.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

After the removal of duplicates, 3380 articles were screened for inclusion independently by 2 authors. These 2 authors assessed for studies which focused on women of reproductive age with a diagnosed isthmocele and secondary infertility who underwent any surgical intervention for defect repair with at least 1 of the goals being fertility restoration.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

A total of 13 studies, comprising of 1 randomized controlled trial, 6 prospective case series, and 6 retrospective case series describing 234 patients who underwent surgical management for an isthmocele and secondary infertility were included. The methodologic quality of the included studies was assessed independently by both reviewers. Next, the data extraction was performed independently and then compared to ensure no discrepancies. A total of 188 patients were treated by hysteroscopy, 36 by laparoscopy, 7 by laparotomy, and 3 through a vaginal approach. In total, 153 of the 234 patients (65.4%) achieved pregnancy across all studies within their respective study periods. Pregnancy rates in the randomized controlled trial were 21 of 28 (75%) for those treated by hysteroscopy compared with 9 of 28 (32%) for those untreated. Among the studies reporting pregnancy outcomes, 101 of 116 (87.1%) pregnancies resulted in a live birth. The incidence of adverse events was 2%, including the risk of reoperation.

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review suggest that the surgical treatment of an isthmocele, particularly through hysteroscopy, in patients with residual myometrial thickness of at least 2.5 mm, may be effective in treating isthmocele-associated secondary infertility with a relatively low complication rate. Further high-quality studies are needed because of the small sample sizes and observational nature of most available data.

Feasibility analysis of different surgical methods for uterine cesarean section scar diverticulum

AIM

This study analyses the effects of surgical indicators and clinical efficacy of different surgical methods for uterine cesarean section scar diverticulum.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 65 patients who underwent surgery and postoperative follow-up at Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-care Hospital from 1 January 2013 to 31 February 2019.

RESULTS

All participants were treated surgically. Among them, patients in Group A underwent combined laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery (n = 45), Group B underwent transvaginal surgery (n = 11), Group C underwent laparotomy (n = 9). The primary outcomes were surgical indicators. The secondary outcomes were clinical efficacy. Bleeding, operation time and hospitalization expenses were significantly different among the three groups (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the hospital stay among the three groups P = 0.22). The menstrual period before and after surgery was significantly different among the groups (P < 0.05). The recurrence outcome was no significantly different (P = 0.16), but the pregnancy outcome was not (P = 0.78).

CONCLUSION

The three surgical methods are effective for treating cesarean section scar diverticulum with favorable effects. Laparoscopic combined with hysteroscopic surgery is minimally invasive with less bleeding compared with the other two techniques and it is easier for patients to accept. It is the most widely used surgical method.

Efficacy of adjunctive azithromycin versus single-dose cephalosporin prophylaxis for caesarean scar defect: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Perioperative infections may be considered predictors of caesarean scar defect (CSD), and multidose antibiotics have a protective effect against CSD. However, the ability of adjunctive azithromycin combined with cephalosporin to reduce the prevalence of CSD remains unclear. The planned study aims to clarify the protective effect of antibiotics against CSD and to assess the effectiveness of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis for CSD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a double-blind, parallel-control randomised clinical trial that will be carried out at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital. A total of 220 eligible patients will be randomised (1:1) to receive either adjunctive azithromycin or single-dose cephalosporin 30 min before the incision. The evaluation criteria are the prevalence and characteristics of CSD as assessed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) and saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) at 42 days, 6 months and 12 months after delivery. The primary outcome will be the prevalence of CSD, and the characteristics of CSD will be assessed by TVU and SIS 42 days after delivery; all other outcomes are secondary.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol received authorisation from the Medical Research Ethics Committee of International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital on 25 April 2018 (approval no. GKLW2017-84). The findings will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR-INR-17013272.

Development and internal validation of a Nomogram for preoperative prediction of surgical treatment effect on cesarean section diverticulum

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop and validate an individualized score based on preoperative parameters to predict patient outcomes after vaginal repair of cesarean section diverticulum.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Patients were enrolled between Jun 11, 2012, to May 27, 2016. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to construct the predictive model. Then, we generated a nomogram to assess the individualized risk of poor prognosis after operation. This prediction model included information from 167 eligible patients diagnosed with cesarean section diverticulum who underwent vaginal repair. Class-A healing group was defined as CSD patients who had menstruation duration of no more than 7 days and a thickness of the remaining muscular layer of no less than 5.8 mm after vaginal repair according to conferences. Others were included in the non-class-A healing group. A final nomogram was computed using a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The factors contained in the individualized prediction nomogram included the depth/ the thickness of the remaining muscular layer ratio, number of menstruation days before surgery, White blood cell and fibrinogen. This model demonstrated adequate discrimination and calibration (C-index = 0.718). There was a significant difference in the number of postmenstrual spotting days (12.98 ± 3.86 VS 14.46 ± 2.86, P = 0.022) and depth/ the thickness of the remaining muscular layer ratio (2.81 ± 1.54 VS 4.00 ± 3.09, P = 0.001) between two groups. Decision curve analysis showed that this nomogram was clinically useful.

CONCLUSIONS

This cesarean section diverticulum score can predict the outcomes of cesarean section diverticulum and can be useful for counseling patients who are making treatment decisions.

The prevalence and risk predictors of cesarean scar defect at 6 weeks postpartum in Shanghai, China: A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence and predictors of cesarean scar defect (CSD) at 6 weeks postpartum in Shanghai, China.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Women scheduled to receive a cesarean section (CS) were recruited from a university hospital. Surgery-related factors, pregnancy complications, routine examinations, perioperative medications, and physical signs were collected and transvaginal ultrasonography was performed to assess the presence of a CSD at 6 weeks postpartum. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify the predictors for CSD.

RESULTS

A CSD was detected in 223 of 514 women (43.4%, 95% CI 39.1%-47.7%) by transvaginal ultrasonography. Of women with normal temperature (T < 37.5°C, CSD prevalence 33.9%, 95% CI 28.4%-39.5%), women with postpartum fever (T ≥ 38°C, CSD 44.1%, 95% CI 31.0%-57.1%), and women who were subfebrile in the postpartum (37.5 ≤ T ≤ 38.0°C, CSD 58.3%, 95% CI 50.9%-65.7%), the latter two had significantly increased risk for CSD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.2 and aOR 3.3, 95% CI 2.1-5.3, respectively). In comparison to single-dose antibiotic administration (CSD 49.0%, 95% CI 43.8%-54.3%), multi-dose antibiotic administration (CSD 31.1%, 95% CI 23.8%-38.3%) had a protective effect (aOR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.7). Postpartum fever, intrapartum infection, emergency CS, and cervical dilation ≥ 3 cm were found to be the main predictors of multi-dose antibiotics management. Low platelet count postpartum (defined as ≤ 150 × 10⁹ /L) and high fibrinogen pre-CS (defined as ≥ 4.5 g/L) increased CSD risk (aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.6 and 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of CSD in the Chinese population is high enough to be a concern. Perioperative infection and hypercoagulability should be considered CSD predictors, and multi-dose antibiotics have a protective effect.

Reproductive outcomes in women with prior cesarean section undergoing in vitro fertilization: A retrospective case-control study

The impact of prior cesarean section (CS) on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 144 patients with prior CS between January 2013 and December 2015. The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes of patients who had previous CS delivery and received IVF-ET were analyzed. The control group comprised 166 patients who had only previous vaginal delivery (VD) and received IVF-ET during the same period. The results showed that the basal follicle stimulating hormone level, estradiol level on human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day, gonadotrophin dosage, duration of stimulation, retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, multiple birth rate, abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate had no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The pregnancy rate (40.28% vs. 54.22%) and implantation rate (24.01% vs. 34.67%) were significantly lower (P<0.05), and the ratio of embryo difficulty transfer (9/144 vs. 0/166) was significantly higher in CS group than in VD group. The risk of pernicious placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in twin deliveries was significantly increased in CS group as compared with that in VD group (P<0.05), and gestational age and neonatal birth weight were significantly reduced in twin deliveries as compared with singleton deliveries in both groups (P<0.05). It was suggested that the existence of CS scar may impact embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy outcome, and increase the difficulty of ET. We should limit the number of transfer embryos to avoid multiple pregnancies and strengthen gestational supervision in patients with cesarean scar.

Efficacy of caesarean scar defect repair in improving postmenstrual bleeding and factors associated with poor effect

Caesarean scar defect (CSD) can cause postmenstrual bleeding. Defect repair is an effective technique to improve this symptom, but there are still a few patients getting little improvement. This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of scar repair and explores the factors associated with poor effect. In total, 123 patients were involved in the final analysis. All of them complained about menstruation period >7 days due to postmenstrual bleeding. Before surgery, 87.8% of patients had a menstruation period more than 10 days and 20.3% had a period more than 15 days. After surgery, a normal menstruation period (< =7 days) was achieved in 46.3% (95%CI 37.3%-55.6%) of patients and a menstruation period lasting no more than 10 days was achieved in 74.8% (95%CI 66.2%-82.2%). Through multivariate logistic analysis, four factors were found dependently associated with poor effect (defined as menstruation period >10 days after surgery): repeated caesarean section (OR 9.75, 95%CI 2.30-41.36, 0.002) was a risk factor, while defect volume >600 mm³ (OR 0.14, 95%CI 0.03-0.56, 0.006), interval from caesarean section to symptom emerging >3 months (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.07-0.94, 0.041) and straight or retroflexed uterus (OR 0.19, 95%CI 0.05-0.79, 0.022) were protective factors. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Caesarean scar defect can cause postmenstrual bleeding. Defect repair can improve this symptom, but there are still a few patients getting little improvement after surgery. What do the results of this study add? Defect volume >600 mm³, interval from caesarean section to symptom emerging >3 months and straight or retroflexed uterus are protective factors of poor effect (defined as menstruation period >10 days after surgery), and repeated caesarean section is a risk factor. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings may help in counselling the patients and in medical decision. Further researches are needed to explore other factors associated with surgical effect and build prediction models.