The management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): A national postal questionnaire survey in hospitals in the UK

Midterm complications after primary obstetrical anal sphincter injury repair in France

BACKGROUND

Incidence of complications following obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASI) during vaginal delivery are poorly defined. They are only studied in high level maternities, small cohorts, all stages of perineal tear or in low-income countries. The aim of our study was to describe complications after primary OASI repair following a vaginal delivery in all French maternity wards at short and midterm and to assess factors associated with complication occurrence.

METHODS

We conducted a historical cohort study using the French nationwide claim database (PMSI) from January 2013 to December 2021. All women who sustained an OASI repair following a vaginal delivery were included and virtually followed-up for 2 years. Then, we searched for OASIS complications. Finally, we evaluated factors associated with OASIS complication repaired or not and OASIS complication repairs.

RESULTS

Among the 61,833 included women, 2015 (2.8%) had an OASI complication and 842 (1.16%) underwent an OASI complication repair. Women were mainly primiparous (71.6%) and 44.3% underwent an instrumental delivery. During a follow-up of 2 years, 0.6% (n = 463), 0.3% (n = 240), 0.2% (n = 176), 0.1% (n = 84), 0.06% (n = 43) and 0.01% (n = 5) of patients underwent second surgery for a perineal repair, a fistula repair, a sphincteroplasty, a perineal infection, a colostomy and a sacral nervous anal stimulation, respectively. Only one case of artificial anal sphincter was noticed. Instrumental deliveries (OR = 1.56 CI95%[1.29;1.9]), private for-profit hospitals (OR = 1.42 [1.11;1.82], reference group "public hospital"), obesity (OR = 1.36 [1;1.84]), stage IV OASIS (OR = 2.98 [2.4;3.72]), perineal wound breakdown (OR = 2.8 [1.4;5.48]), ages between 25 and 29 years old (OR = 1.59 [1.17;2.18], refence group "age between 13 and 24 years old") and 30 and 34 years old (OR = 1.57 [1.14; 2.16], refence group "age between 13 and 24 years old") were factors associated with OASIS complication repairs.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal age, stage IV OASIS, obesity, instrumental deliveries and private for-profit hospitals seemed to predict OASIS complications. Understanding factors associated with OASIS complications could be beneficial for the patient to inform them and to influence the patient's follow-up in order to prevent complications, repairs and maternal distress.

The postnatal effects of perineal trauma on maternal psychological and emotional wellbeing: A longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the postnatal psychological health and parenting adjustment of primiparous women experiencing perineal trauma.

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study assessing body image, perceptions of traumatic birth, psychological distress, perineal pain, impact upon parental tasks and mother-infant bonding at 6-12 weeks (n = 103) and 6-10 months postnatally (n = 91). Primiparous women were recruited following vaginal birth and perineal suturing in a UK-based maternity hospital. al. Comparisons made according to the objective classification of perineal trauma experienced; 1st/2nd degree tear, episiotomy, and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASI).

RESULTS

At 6-12 weeks women with an episiotomy reported a more negative perception of their body image than those with OASI. Women with OASI or an episiotomy were more likely to have experienced birth as traumatic, and those with OASI reported more avoidance symptoms of post-traumatic stress and a greater negative impact on parenting tasks. At 6-10 months significantly more avoidance symptoms continued to be reported by those with OASI, whereas those with an episiotomy reported more anxiety related symptoms in general than those with OASI.

CONCLUSIONS

OASI, whilst associated with traumatic birth and some early parenting impacts, may not be linked to general negative psychological outcomes when specialist routine follow-up care is provided. Psychological impacts for women with episiotomy may merit further input than currently provided. Consideration should be given with regards to widening the access to postnatal perineal care by extending the criteria for specialist follow up beyond those sustaining OASI.

UK survey of colorectal surgeons on the management of acute obstetric anal sphincter injuries

AIM

The role of colorectal surgeons in the management of acute obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is an ongoing debate. Their expertise in operating in the anorectal region lends itself to assisting in OASI repair. The aim of this study was to establish the current involvement and recommended management of acute OASI by colorectal surgeons.

METHOD

An online survey of consultant colorectal surgeons was sent to members of the Pelvic Floor Society to assess current involvement in acute OASI management and repair.

RESULTS

Forty completed surveys were collated and analysed. Sixty-five per cent of respondents had seen an acute OASI since being a consultant and 50% stated they were involved in the repair of OASI less than once per year. 37.5% felt that a de-functioning stoma was still necessary sometimes. Many agreed with current guidelines for OASI repair in terms of antibiotics, laxatives and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Colorectal surgeons have varied opinions on the management of OASI. We suggest that multidisciplinary training of obstetricians and colorectal surgeons could lead to more collaboration regarding the management of women with acute OASI.

Diagnosis, management and training in perineal trauma: a UK national survey of obstetricians

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Perineal trauma during vaginal delivery is very common. Training in diagnosis and repair of trauma, including obstetric anal sphincter injuries, varies in the UK. We aimed to investigate the current knowledge and training received by obstetric physicians.

METHODS

A national, validated survey was conducted online, using Qualtrics. The National Trainees Committee distributed the survey. It was also sent directly to consultants via email.

RESULTS

A total of 302 physicians completed the survey and were included in the analysis. 3.9% of participants described their training in obstetric perineal trauma as "very poor" or "poor". 20.5% said they have not received training. 8.6% of physicians practising for more than 10 years had not had training for over 10 years. 70.5% responded "somewhat agree" or "strongly agree" when asked if they would like more training. Identification of first, second, third-, and fourth-degree tears from images and descriptions was very good (more than 80% correct for all categories). Classification of other perineal trauma was less consistent, with many incorrectly using the Sultan Classification. "Manual perineal support" and "Controlled or guided delivery" were the most frequently selected methods for the prevention of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI).

CONCLUSIONS

Training experience for physicians in obstetric perineal trauma varies. Further improvement in training and education in perineal trauma, particularly in OASI, is needed for physicians. Perineal trauma that is not included in the Sultan Classification is often misclassified.

The role of anal manometry in the follow-up of women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI)

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Mode of birth (MOB) following OASI is determined by choice, symptoms and anorectal study results in asymptomatic women. Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) is the gold-standard imaging modality. EAUS use in MOB counselling is supported by strong evidence. Less is understood about how anal manometry (AM) influences MOB counselling.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted from 2007 to 2020. Women underwent symptom assessment using validated ePAQ and St Mark's incontinence score (SMIS). Anorectal studies using EAUS and AM were performed. The case group was the normal ultrasound group and the control group was the abnormal ultrasound group. Both groups were compared with normal and abnormal AM result groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1348 women were included over 13 years. Among these, 454 women were symptomatic, 894 were asymptomatic; 274 (31%) asymptomatic women had isolated abnormal AM results, 313 (35%) had two abnormal anorectal results and 221 (24.7%) had normal anorectal results. Eighty-six asymptomatic women (10.4%) had isolated abnormal EAUS results, 138 (30.4%) symptomatic women had isolated abnormal AM, 221 (48.7%) had two abnormal anorectal results and 57 (12.6%) had normal anorectal results. Thirty-eight symptomatic women (8.4%) had an isolated abnormal EAUS result.

CONCLUSIONS

AM identifies more women with sphincter function impairment than EAUS alone. Without AM, almost one third of asymptomatic women would not have been identified and could have been inadequately counselled. Performing AM and EAUS together captured most women with compromised anal sphincter function. We conclude that AM should be performed in all women with OASI alongside EAUS to enable accurate MOB counselling.

Use of antibiotics in women undergoing correction of an obstetric anal sphincter injury: Results from a national Israeli survey

OBJECTIVE

Obstetric anal sphincter injures (OASIS) have long-term implications on women's health. Administration of antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment following OASIS repair is controversial. We conducted a national survey to provide data about practice routines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment following OASIS repair in Israeli labor and delivery units.

METHODS

A national survey was performed among obstetricians and gynecologists from 24 university-affiliated delivery centers within the jurisdiction of the Israeli Ministry of Health during 2020. Representatives from each center completed the "Google form" electronic survey. For each questionnaire item, the most common answer was chosen to represent the center's answer.

RESULTS

The number of physicians who responded per center varied from 1 to 14 (median, 3.5). Preoperative and postoperative antibiotic treatment was given in 75% and 92% of the centers, respectively. While most centers (58.3%) recommend pelvic floor physical therapy on release, recommendations about functional radiologic tests vary. In all centers, there is a designated clinic for postpartum follow-up of OASIS. Most centers (83%) allow trial of vaginal delivery in the subsequent pregnancy, on an individual basis.

CONCLUSION

Heterogeneity exists in managing OASIS in Israel, particularly regarding administration of antibiotics. Further studies are needed to examine the consequences of different management protocols.

A review of levator ani avulsion after childbirth: Incidence, imaging and management

Key Content • Levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion injury occurs occultly during childbirth, most commonly during operative vaginal deliveries. • Injuries of levator ani have long term sequelae for pelvic floor health. As life expectancy increases the burden of disease upon urogynaecology services will need to be considered. • Diagnosis of this condition can be difficult as there is no agreed 'gold standard' imaging modality. • There is no consensus regarding surgical management of LAM avulsion. Learning objectives • Review anatomy and function of levator ani muscle • Identify the risk factors for levator ani avulsion injury • Role of imaging to appropriately identify LAM injury and current management options including appropriate follow up • Management of subsequent pregnancy following LAM avulsion Ethical issues • Is there value to the patient in diagnosing levator ani avulsion when there is no recommended treatment for these injuries?

Establishing a peripartum perineal trauma clinic: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is not rare, and its consequences are multiple and potentially severe, especially for young women. Some dedicated perineal clinics have been established to improve the management of OASI. Despite their obvious importance, these specific clinics are underrepresented and underdeveloped. The objectives of this review are to explore various options for developing a peripartum perineal clinic and to compare the different practices regarding the mode of delivery for subsequent pregnancies after an OASI.

METHODS

This narrative review covers information from patients' questionnaires specific to anal incontinence, anal physiology assessment, pelvic floor and anal sphincter imaging, and the arguments for choosing the mode of delivery after an OASI.

RESULTS

This review highlights the extensive range of practices regarding the delivery mode after an OASI throughout national professional organizations and experienced perineal clinics.

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes the different choices in developing a perineal clinic to facilitate their development in promoting health care and education specific for peripartum women concerning the perineal consequences of delivery for obstetrician-gynaecologists, family doctors, and residents.

Perineal trauma management and follow-up: Are we meeting the standard of care?

BACKGROUND

Birth-related third- and fourth-degree perineal trauma is common and associated with short- and long-term complications.

AIM

To conduct a review of clinical audits investigating management of women with perineal trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all audits undertaken in eight New Zealand public hospitals between 2005 and 2014 that investigated whether women with birth-related third- and fourth-degree perineal trauma were receiving care according to clinical guidelines. We aggregated audit results and calculated the proportion of women receiving the recommended standard of care.

RESULTS

During the review period, 25 audits investigated intra-operative (n = 11), post-operative (n = 14) and outpatient care (n = 18). Baseline audits showed variation in care by site; intra-operative care (range 39-96% for repair conducted under anaesthesia, 60-96% for repair by or under supervision of a senior clinician, and 33-54% for completion of Accident Compensation Corporation forms); post-operative care (range 40-93% for prescribed antibiotics and 33-96% for stool softeners) and outpatient care (45-84% for referral to outpatient clinic and 54-78% for physiotherapy follow-up). Sustained high quality of care and improvements in adherence with recommendations were seen for most of the follow-up audits (eg 90% adherence for prescribed stool softeners over three audits; over 50% increase in prescribed antibiotics over seven years).

CONCLUSIONS

These clinical audits exemplify the need to measure patient care against standards, learn from the findings, implement changes to improve patient experience and reduce life-long sequelae from perineal trauma. This review showed some progress in some care services and highlighted where further changes are needed to close evidence-practice gaps.

A one-stop perineal clinic: our eleven-year experience

Introduction and hypothesis

The perineal clinic is a dedicated setting offering assessment for various childbirth-related presentations including obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs), perineal wound complications, pelvic floor dysfunction and other conditions such as female genital mutilation(FGM). We describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of women from a tertiary perineal clinic based on data collected over an 11-year period.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study. A one-stop outpatient service was offered to all women who sustained OASIs (postnatally and antenatally in a subsequent pregnancy), perineal complications (within 16 weeks postpartum), FGM and/or peripartum symptoms of urinary/anal incontinence or prolapse. Assessment included history with validated questionnaires, examination and anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound when appropriate. Outcomes were compared among different grades of OASIs. Management of each type of presentation was reported with outcomes.

Results

There were 3254 first attendance episodes between 2006 and 2016. The majority (58.1%) were for OASIs, followed by perineal wound complications. Compared to the lower grades, the higher grades of OASI were associated with poorer outcomes in terms of symptoms, investigations and complications. Women with OASIs had unrelated symptoms such as urinary incontinence, perineal pain and wound infections that needed further intervention. A high proportion(42%) of wound complications required further specialist management.

Conclusion

We describe a dedicated, one-stop perineal clinic model for antenatal and postnatal women for management of perineal and pelvic floor disorders. This comprehensive and novel data will enable clinicians to better counsel women regarding of outcomes after OASI and focus training to minimize risks of morbidities.

Management of subsequent pregnancies following fourth-degree obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)

OBJECTIVES

The management of subsequent pregnancy in women who sustained OASIS remains an enigma. Nearly all studies include all grades of OASIS including fourth-degree tears. In addition, most protocols require endoanal ultrasound and anal manometric assessment to provide advice regarding mode of delivery. In reality, most women who sustain an OASI do not undergo these investigations. The aims of our study were firstly to evaluate outcomes of fourth-degree OASIS in terms of sphincter defects, anal manometry and anal incontinence symptoms. Secondly, we wished to review recommendations made regarding subsequent mode of delivery after fourth-degree OASIS according to different published protocols.

STUDY DESIGN

An observational study of all women who had undergone a primary repair of a fourth-degree tear and seen in the perineal clinic of a tertiary urogynaecology unit between January 2006 and December 2017. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry were performed on all women, and symptoms assessed using the validated modified St Mark's Score for anal incontinence. Diagnostic test accuracy analysis was performed for use of symptoms in predicting abnormal investigations.

RESULTS

74 fourth-degree tears were identified (mean follow-up 5.9 months; SD 11.5). Endoanal scan showed an internal anal sphincter defect in 77 % and an external anal sphincter defect in 49 %. Only 18 % had no defect. The mean incremental pressure rise was 12.6 mmHg (SD 15.5). 61 % were asymptomatic with a mean St Mark's Score of 3.8 (SD 5.4). The presence of symptoms alone had poor accuracy in predicting abnormal investigations. Based on Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidance, only 7% would not be offered a caesarean section as they are asymptomatic women with normal scan and manometry findings and would be counselled for a vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that only a few units offer these specialist investigations to their OASI population, it would be reasonable to offer caesarean section to all women who have sustained a fourth-degree tear. However, in centres where endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry are available, individualised counselling can be offered.

Predictors of patient preference for mode of delivery following an obstetric anal sphincter injury

OBJECTIVES

Patients who sustain an Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (OASI) have the opportunity to select an elective caesarean section over a vaginal delivery in subsequent pregnancies. It remains unclear whether there are identifiable factors which predict expectant mothers' choices. The primary aim of our study was to explore this issue further in a consecutive group of patients who had suffered OASI.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were retrospectively collected for patients attending a specialist OASIS clinic between July 2016 and February 2018. Information routinely collected in clinical practice was considered including mode of previous delivery, severity of OASI, combined with anal incontinence symptoms and endoanal ultrasound results. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between these variables and the preferred mode of delivery.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients were identified of whom 153 had complete data for analysis. Approximately 30% (n = 45) of patients preferred to have a caesarean section in their subsequent pregnancy. Bivariate analysis revealed significant associations between choosing a caesarean section in subsequent pregnancy and individuals with major tears (p = 0.001), high anal incontinence scores (p = 0.001) and defects on endoanal ultrasound (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed statistically significant associations between Caucasian ethnicity (Odds ratio (OR) 12.6, 95% CI 2.4-69.9) and endoanal ultrasound results (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.7-3.2) with preference for caesarean section.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that emphasis is placed by patients on endoanal ultrasound results when making their decision about mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy, suggesting a useful application of this tool. Ethnicity is a strong predictor of choice of delivery after OASI and may be potentially useful in forecasting maternity unit services.

Effect of subsequent vaginal delivery on bowel symptoms and anorectal function in women who sustained a previous obstetric anal sphincter injury

Introduction and hypothesis

Our primary objective was to prospectively evaluate anorectal symptoms, anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) in women who followed the recommended mode of subsequent delivery following index obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) using our unit’s standardised protocol. Our secondary objectives were to evaluate the role of internal anal sphincter defects and also to compare outcomes in a subgroup of symptomatic women with normal anorectal physiology.

Methods

This is a prospective follow-up study of pregnant women with previous OASIs who were counselled regarding subsequent mode of delivery between January 2003 and December 2014. Assessment involved the St Mark’s Incontinence Score (SMIS), anal manometry and EAUS at both antepartum and 3-month postpartum visits. Data were analysed using Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney U tests.

Results

Three hundred and fifty women attended the perineal clinic over the study period, of whom 122 met the inclusion criteria (99 vaginal delivery [VD], 23 caesarean section). No significant worsening of anorectal symptoms was observed following subsequent delivery in the VD group (p = 0.896), although a reduced squeeze pressure was observed at 3 months postpartum (p < 0.001). There were no new defects on EAUS in either group.

Conclusions

This study showed no significant worsening of bowel symptoms and sphincter integrity apart from lower squeeze pressures at 3 months postpartum in the VD group when our standardised protocol was used to recommend subsequent mode of delivery. In the absence of a randomised study, use of this protocol can aid clinicians in their decision-making.

Mode of delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injury

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of vaginal delivery and caesarean section on faecal symptoms and structure and function of anal sphincter in women who sustained obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in their previous pregnancy and were advised about the mode of delivery based on faecal incontinence symptoms, anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound.

STUDY DESIGN

It is a descriptive study on a cohort of women who had OASIS from 2006 to 2013. They were assessed after OASIS and during subsequent pregnancy with a questionnaire, endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry. Vaginal delivery was recommended to asymptomatic women with normal investigations. Elective caesarean section was recommended to women with faecal symptoms, anal sphincter defects of more than 30° or low resting or incremental anal pressures. All women were reassessed after subsequent delivery.

RESULTS

Fifty women who had pregnancies after OASIS, were seen after OASIS, during subsequent pregnancy and after the second delivery. 15 women had faecal symptoms after OASIS. The external, internal and combined anal sphincter defects were seen in 13, 11 and 9 women respectively. Low resting and incremental pressure were seen in 15 and 11 women respectively. Caesarean section was done in 22 women and 28 women delivered vaginally. Worsening of faecal symptoms and reduction in anal pressures were not observed in planned vaginal delivery or elective caesarean section groups. Faecal symptoms were worse with reduced anal pressures in three women from the planned caesarean section group. One of the women had a vaginal delivery and two women had emergency caesarean section at 7cm and 10cm dilatation. There were no new sphincter defects or recurrent OASIS in any of the women in the study group.

CONCLUSION

Decision about the mode of delivery of pregnancy after OASIS based on symptoms, anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound helps in preserving the anal sphincter function and avoiding unnecessary caesarean sections. Further follow-up of these patients is essential to evaluate the long-term effects of this decision.