Evidence-based Review of Recommendations for Visual Function Testing in Patients Treated with Vigabatrin

Electroretinogram as a Screening Tool to Assess Vigabatrin-Induced Retinal Toxicity in Children With Infantile Spasms

PURPOSE

To assess the utility of electroretinogram (ERG) as a screening tool for vigabatrin-induced retinal toxicity in children with infantile spasms.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study including children with infantile spasms receiving treatment with vigabatrin. A 30-Hz flicker potential ERG, using the RETeval system (LKC Technologies), was done at baseline before starting vigabatrin at 6 months and 1 year. The amplitudes were recorded.

RESULTS

Eleven children were included in the study. The most common etiologic factor for infantile spasms was tuberous sclerosis (36.4%) followed by West syndrome (27.3%). The mean age of the children was 7.14 ± 2.9 months, with a range of 3 to 16 months. The mean difference in amplitude was 3.21 ± 2.45 and 5.72 ± 4.18 µV at 6 and 12 months follow-up, respectively (P < .001). Eight of the 11 children (72.7%) showed vigabatrin-induced retinal toxicity, and all 8 children were receiving vigabatrin for more than 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

ERG can be used for vigabatrin-induced retinal toxicity monitoring in children with infantile spasms. Vigabatrin-induced retinal toxicity is related to the duration of treatment rather than cumulative dosage. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(4):273-278.].

Clinical Utility of Electroretinograms for Evaluating Vigabatrin Toxicity in Children

PURPOSE

To determine changes in the clinical treatment of pediatric patients taking vigabatrin for seizure control in response to results of electroretinogram (ERG) performed for retinal toxicity screening.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who received ERGs at Children's Hospital of Colorado from 2009 to 2012. Age, indication for ERG, ERG data, and clinical management of vigabatrin were extracted from the records. ERGs were interpreted according to LKC Technologies normative values. A physician trained in ERG analysis interpreted each ERG.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy ERGs were performed during the study period, and 147 ERGs were available for analysis. Every patient received general anesthesia for the procedure. Thirty-three ERGs were performed in 29 patients specifically as screening for retinal toxicity due to vigabatrin use, and 30 were available for analysis. Within this cohort, only 2 ERGs were normal (6.6%), and 28 were abnormal (93.3%). In patients who received abnormal results, 1 patient discontinued vigabatrin in response to the screening.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study cohort, clinical management generally did not change in response to an abnormal screening result. Given the need for general anesthesia in the pediatric population receiving ERG testing, and minimal change in clinical decision-making in the face of abnormal results, ERG screening for retinal toxicity due to vigabatrin in the pediatric cohort should be reconsidered. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2021;58(3):174-179.].

Vigabatrin-related adverse events for the treatment of epileptic spasms: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: Although vigabatrin (VGB) is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of epileptic spasms, there are safety concerns. The aim of this systematic review and metaanalysis was to assess adverse events of VGB for the treatment of epileptic spasms. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched. The population was infants treated with VGB for epileptic spasms. The outcomes were VGB-related adverse events. Meta-analyses of VGB-related MRI abnormalities, retinal toxicity as measured by electroretinogram (ERG), visual field defect as measured by perimetry, and other adverse events were conducted. Results: Fifty-seven articles were included in the systematic review. The rate of VGB-related MRI abnormalities was 21% (95% CI: 15-29%). Risk factors for MRI abnormalities were age younger than 12 months and higher VGB dose. VGB-related retinal toxicity and visual field defect occurred in 29% (95% CI: 7-69%) and 28% (95% CI: 4-78%) respectively. Other adverse events occurred in 23% (95% CI: 16-34%), consisting predominantly of central nervous system symptoms, and the majority of these did not require therapeutic modification. Conclusion: This study will inform physicians and families on the risk profile of VGB for the treatment of epileptic spasms and will help decisions on treatment options.

Retinal Diseases that Can Masquerade as Neurological Causes of Vision Loss

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to discuss retinal diseases that may masquerade as neurological causes of vision loss and highlights modern ophthalmic ancillary testing that can help to establish these diagnoses.

RECENT FINDINGS

Retinal diseases with signs and symptoms overlapping with neurological causes of vision loss include central serous chorioretinopathy, retinal ischemia, acute macular neuroretinopathy, Acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR) complex diseases, paraneoplastic retinopathy, retinal dystrophy, and toxic retinopathy. Diagnosis is facilitated by electrophysiologic studies and multimodal ophthalmic imaging including optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence imaging. Looking into the future, translation of adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy into clinical practice may facilitate early detection of microscopic retinal abnormalities that characterize these conditions. With conventional methods of physical examination, diagnosis of retinal diseases that may masquerade as neurological causes of vision loss can be challenging. Current advance in multimodal ophthalmic imaging along with electrophysiologic studies enhances the provider's ability to make early diagnosis and monitor progression of these conditions.

A case report on the efficacy of vigabatrin analogue (1S, 3S)-3-amino-4-difluoromethylenyl-1-cyclopentanoic acid (CPP-115) in a patient with infantile spasms

West Syndrome is characterized by infantile spasms, a hypsarrhythmic electroencephalogram (EEG) pattern, and a poor neurodevelopmental prognosis. First-line treatments include adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) and vigabatrin, but adverse effects often limit their use. CPP-115 is a high-affinity vigabatrin analogue developed to increase therapeutic potency and to limit retinal toxicity. Here, we present a child treated with CPP-115 through an investigational new drug protocol who experienced a marked reduction of seizures with no evidence of retinal dysfunction. Given the potential consequences of ongoing infantile spasms and the limitations of available treatments, further assessment of CPP-115 is warranted.

Vigabatrin can enhance electroretinographic responses in pigmented and albino rats

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of the antiepileptic medication vigabatrin (VGB) on the retina of pigmented rats.

METHODS

Scotopic and photopic electroretinograms were recorded from dark- and light-adapted Long-Evans (pigmented) and Sprague Dawley (albino) rats administered, daily, 52-55 injections of 250 mg·kg(-1)·day(-1) VGB or 25-26 injections of 500 mg·kg(-1)·day(-1) VGB, or a corresponding number of sham injections. Sensitivity and saturated amplitude of the rod photoresponse (S, Rm(P3)) and postreceptor response (1/σ, Vm) were derived, as were sensitivity and amplitude of the cone-mediated postreceptor response (1/σ(cone), Vm(cone)). The oscillatory potentials and responses to a series of flickering lights (6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 Hz) were studied in the time and frequency domains. A subset of rats' eyes was harvested for Western blotting or histology.

RESULTS

Of the parameters derived from dark-adapted ERG responses, in both pigmented and albino rats, VGB repeatedly and reliably enhanced electroretinographic parameters; no significant ERG deficits were noted. No significant alterations were observed in ER/oxidative stress or in the Akt cell death/survival pathway. There were migrations of photoreceptor nuclei toward the RPE and outgrowths of bipolar cell dendrites into the outer nuclear layer in VGB-treated rats; these were never observed in sham-treated animals.

CONCLUSIONS

Although VGB is associated with retinal dysfunction in patients and VGB toxicity has been demonstrated by other laboratories in the albino rat, in our pigmented and albino rats, VGB did not induce deficits in, but rather enhanced, retinal function. Nonetheless, retinal neuronal dysplasia was observed.

Visual field and ocular safety during short-term vigabatrin treatment in cocaine abusers

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ocular safety of short-term vigabatrin treatment of cocaine abuse.

DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, parallel assignment study.

METHODS

Cocaine addicts were randomized to receive vigabatrin 3000 mg/day, cumulative dose 218 g (n = 92), or placebo (n = 94) for 12 weeks. Subjects underwent examination of visual acuity (ETDRS) and peripheral visual field (PVF) by Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 60-4 program before and after treatment. Reliable PVF tests (fixation loss, false positive, and false negative <33%) for 103 subjects were included for the analysis. The threshold visual sensitivity (TVS) was analyzed by points, rings and zones. Main outcome measures included visual acuity decrease by 15 letters and/or significant PVF alteration, defined as 5 or more visual field location points having greater than or equal to 15 dB reduction in TVS or decline (≥33% loss) in posttreatment TVS for 1 or more rings.

RESULTS

Visual acuity decrease was detected in 1 eye of a subject receiving placebo and in none receiving vigabatrin. Posttreatment reduction in TVS more than 15 dB in 5 or more adjacent visual field location points combined with reduction in TVS greater than 33% in 1 or more of the rings was detected in 2 of 54 subjects (3.7%) from the vigabatrin group and in 1 of 49 subjects (2%) from the placebo group (P = .9, NS). None of the PVF changes were bilateral or concentric.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term use of vigabatrin did not cause a decrease in visual acuity or significant peripheral visual field changes in cocaine abusers.

Infantile spasms (West syndrome): update and resources for pediatricians and providers to share with parents

BACKGROUND

Infantile spasms (IS; West syndrome) is a severe form of encephalopathy that typically affects infants younger than 2 years old. Pediatricians, pediatric neurologists, and other pediatric health care providers are all potentially key early contacts for families who have an infant with IS. The objective of this article is to assist pediatric health care providers in the detection of the disease and in the counseling and guidance of families who have an infant with IS.

METHODS

Treatment guidelines, consensus reports, and original research studies are reviewed to provide an update regarding the diagnosis and treatment of infants with IS. Web sites were searched for educational and supportive resource content relevant to providers and families of patients with IS.

RESULTS

Early detection of IS and pediatrician referral to a pediatric neurologist for further evaluation and initiation of treatment may improve prognosis. Family education and the establishment of a multidisciplinary continuum of care are important components of care for the majority of patients with IS. The focus of the continuum of care varies across diagnosis, initiation of treatment, and short- and long-term needs. Several on-line educational and supportive resources for families and caregivers of patients with IS were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the possibility of poor developmental outcomes in IS, including the emergence of other seizure disorders and cognitive and developmental problems, early recognition, referral, and treatment of IS are important for optimal patient outcomes. Dissemination of and access to educational and supportive resources for families and caregivers across the lifespan of the child with IS is an urgent need. Pediatric health care providers are well positioned to address these needs.

Primer on visual field testing, electroretinography, and other visual assessments for patients treated with vigabatrin

Vigabatrin, an irreversible inhibitor of γ-aminobutyric acid transaminase, is an antiepileptic drug indicated in the United States as adjunctive therapy for adult patients with refractory complex partial seizures who have responded inadequately to several alternative treatments and for monotherapy treatment of infantile spasms in patients 1 month to 2 years of age. Approval of vigabatrin in the United States was contingent on the implementation of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) to manage the threat of a progressive, permanent bilateral concentric peripheral visual field defects (pVFDs) that may occur in patients treated with vigabatrin. The REMS is designed to promote compliance with evidence-based recommendations for baseline (within 4 weeks of the start of treatment) ophthalmologic evaluations and ongoing vision monitoring in all patients treated with vigabatrin. In view of the challenges associated with visual field testing in patients with epilepsy and in infants, clinicians must understand the qualitative (pattern of damage), quantitative (degree of damage), electrophysiologic, and adjunctive techniques recommended for monitoring vigabatrin-treated patients. The objectives of ongoing research are to characterize the onset, progression, and risk of developing vision loss during the first year of vigabatrin treatment and to evaluate the potential of noninvasive imaging as a method for monitoring retinal changes corresponding to the pVFD. This article provides an overview of visual field testing procedures and electroretinography, summarizes the clinical characteristics of vigabatrin-associated pVFDs, and provides recommendations for visual field and visual electrophysiology testing relevant to both adult and infant patients treated with vigabatrin.

Balancing clinical benefits of vigabatrin with its associated risk of vision loss

Vigabatrin is an effective and well-tolerated antiepileptic drug (AED) for the treatment of refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) and infantile spasms (IS), but its benefits must be evaluated in conjunction with its risk of retinopathy with the development of peripheral visual field defects (pVFDs). Vigabatrin should be considered for rCPS if a patient has failed appropriate trials of other AEDs or is not a suitable candidate for other AEDs, is not an optimal surgical candidate, and continues to experience debilitating effects from seizures. Vigabatrin is indicated as monotherapy for pediatric patients with IS. Its efficacy in achieving improved seizure control should be apparent within 12 weeks in patients with rCPS and within 2-4 weeks after attaining appropriate dosage for patients with IS. Because 12 weeks is well less than the known time of onset of visual defects, the risk of developing pVFDs may be minimized by discontinuing vigabatrin early during the course of therapy for patients with inadequate response. Appropriate vision screening is recommended at baseline, every 3 months during continued vigabatrin treatment, and at 3-6 months after discontinuation (if therapy has spanned more than a few months). If a pVFD is detected at any point and the decision is made to discontinue therapy, the pVFD is not likely to progress after discontinuation of vigabatrin. Although some patients will be at risk of retinopathy, vigabatrin is an appropriate treatment option for patients who achieve substantial clinical benefit, especially given the severe consequences of rCPS and uncontrolled IS. While retinopathy with the development of pVFDs is a serious adverse event, it is not life-threatening and its risk can be effectively managed.

Electroretinographic (ERG) responses in pediatric patients using vigabatrin

The antiepileptic drug vigabatrin is known to cause retinal and visual dysfunction, particularly visual field defects, in some patients. Electroretinography (ERG) is used in an attempt to identify adverse effects of vigabatrin (VGB) in patients who are not candidates for conventional perimetry. We report data from 114 pediatric patients taking VGB referred for clinical evaluation; median age at test was 22.9 (2.4 to 266.1) months, and median duration of VGB use was 9.7 (0.3 to 140.7) months. Twenty-seven of them were tested longitudinally (3 to 12 ERG tests). ERG responses to full-field stimuli were recorded in scotopic and photopic conditions, and results were compared to responses from healthy control subjects. We found that abnormalities of photoreceptor and post-receptor ERG responses are frequent in these young patients. The most frequently abnormal scotopic parameter was post-receptor sensitivity, log σ, derived from the b-wave stimulus-response function; the most frequently abnormal photopic parameter was the implicit time of the OFF response (d-wave) to a long (150 ms) flash. Abnormal 30-Hz flicker response amplitude, previously reported to be a predictor of visual field loss, occurred infrequently. For the group as a whole, none of the ERG parameters changed significantly with increasing duration of VGB use. Four of the 27 patients tested longitudinally showed systematic worsening of log σ with duration of VGB use. In a subset of patients who underwent perimetry (N = 39), there was no significant association of any ERG parameter with visual field defects. We cannot determine whether the ERG abnormalities we found were due solely to the effects of VGB. We caution against over-reliance on the ERG to monitor pediatric patients for VGB toxicity and recommend further development of a reliable test of peripheral vision to supplant ERG testing.

Vigabatrin for childhood partial-onset epilepsies

To determine vigabatrin's effectiveness and the prevalence of symptomatic visual impairment (i.e., impairment affecting the ability to perform everyday activities) associated with its therapy in pediatric epilepsy, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of 156 patients receiving vigabatrin at Cincinnati Children's Medical Center from 1998-2010. In addition to demographics and vigabatrin dosing information, data included seizure type/frequency at presentation and subsequent follow-up. Of 156 patients, we excluded 35 because their medical records were insufficient to permit verification of the exact duration or timing of vigabatrin treatment. To evaluate efficacy (n = 121/135), we used a 5-point scale (0-4) to compare seizure frequency at several time points. To evaluate visual impairment (n = 63), we reviewed serial ophthalmologic evaluations at baseline and during treatment for patients in whom they were clinically indicated. Mean age at treatment initiation was 1.8 years (range, 0.1-29.2 years). Treatment duration ranged from 0.7-101.0 months, with an estimated average daily dose of 79 mg/kg/day. Tuberous sclerosis complex was the commonest seizure etiology (83%). Partial-onset seizure, alone or with infantile spasms, was the commonest seizure type (84%). Seizure frequency decreased from 3.7 ± 0.6 S.D. at baseline to 1.8 ± 1.7 S.D. at 6 months (P < 0.001). Responses to vigabatrin did not differ by tuberous sclerosis complex or nontuberous sclerosis complex etiology, and were sustained for 5 years. Sixty-three patients (∼50% of all patients evaluated) underwent clinically indicated ophthalmologic assessments during the review period. In our clinical judgment, no cases of clinically relevant vigabatrin-associated visual impairment occurred. Vigabatrin was effective for refractory childhood partial-onset epilepsy, and was not associated with symptomatic vision loss.

Registry initiated to characterize vision loss associated with vigabatrin therapy

The vigabatrin patient registry was implemented in August 2009 in conjunction with Food and Drug Administration approval of vigabatrin. All US vigabatrin-treated patients must enroll in the registry. Data on prescriber specialty/location, patient demographics, and clinical characteristics are collected. Benefit-risk assessments are required early in the course of therapy. Vision assessments are required at baseline (≤4 weeks after therapy initiation), every 3 months during therapy, and 3 to 6 months after discontinuation. As of February 1, 2011, 2473 patients (1500 with infantile spasms, 846 with refractory complex partial seizures, 120 with other diagnoses) had enrolled; 30.4% were previously exposed to vigabatrin. Kaplan-Meier analysis of time in registry indicated that 83 and 97% of all enrolled patients with refractory complex partial seizures and infantile spasms remained beyond 3 and 1 month, respectively. The ongoing registry will provide visual status and other information on vigabatrin-treated patients for both the infantile spasm and refractory complex partial seizure indications.

Understanding and interpreting vision safety issues with vigabatrin therapy

Vigabatrin is an irreversible inhibitor of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transaminase. It is effective as adjunctive therapy for adult patients with refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) who have inadequately responded to several alternative treatments and as monotherapy for children aged 1 month to 2 years with infantile spasms. The well-documented safety profile of vigabatrin includes risk of retinopathy characterized by irreversible, bilateral, concentric peripheral visual field constriction. Thus, monitoring of visual function to understand the occurrence and manage the potential consequences of peripheral visual field defects (pVFDs) is now required for all patients who receive vigabatrin. However, screening for pVFDs for patients with epilepsy was conducted only after the association between vigabatrin and pVFDs was established. We examined the potential association between pVFDs and epilepsy in vigabatrin-naïve patients and attempted to identify confounding factors (e.g., concomitant medications, method of vision assessment) to more accurately delineate the prevalence of pVFDs directly associated with vigabatrin. Results of a prospective cohort study as well as several case series and case reports suggest that bilateral visual field constriction is not restricted to patients exposed to vigabatrin but has also been detected, although much less frequently, in vigabatrin-naïve patients with epilepsy, including those who received treatment with other GABAergic antiepileptic therapy. We also reviewed published data suggesting an association between vigabatrin-associated retinal toxicity and taurine deficiency, as well as the potential role of taurine in the prevention of this retinopathy.

Recommendations for visual evaluations of patients treated with vigabatrin

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although vigabatrin has been used for many years in Europe, this antiepileptic medication was approved for use in the USA only 1 year ago because of concerns for irreversible peripheral visual field loss that can result in functional visual disability.

RECENT FINDINGS

Visual function testing involves both subjective and objective techniques, some of which can be standardized across multiple centers. With these subjective and objectives issues as a reference, the current literature about the pathogenesis of vigabatrin visual toxicity is reviewed in order to develop a practical and reliable testing program for detecting peripheral visual field changes early in their course; thereby, hopefully limiting disabling visual field loss.

SUMMARY

Based upon the existing literature as well as the currently available data about the evaluation of visual function, an algorithm has been developed to serve as a starting point for clinicians to evaluate patients treated with vigabatrin for refractory epilepsy.