Preserved visual evoked potential in infancy cortical blindness: Relationship to blindsight

Cortical visual impairment in children

Cortical visual impairment (CVI) in children is most commonly caused by peri- or post-natal hypoxia-ischemia, but may also occur following other insults, e.g., trauma, epilepsy, infections, drugs or poisons, and certain neurologic diseases. The disorder differs considerably in etiology, physical findings, and, perhaps, prognosis, from the cortical blindness seen in adults. The same event that causes CVI by damaging the geniculate and/or extrageniculate visual pathways may also damage other areas of the brain, or the retina, optic nerves, or chiasm. Thus, children with CVI often have other neurological problems. Diagnosis may require the participation of a multidisciplinary team and the use of special visual testing techniques. Due to the uncertainty concerning the prognosis in CVI, clinicians should remain optimistic about the child's potential for some vision recovery.

The visual-evoked response in infants with central visual impairment

We studied ten children with central visual impairment with a known neurologic defect and an abnormal visual-evoked response who had results of repeat electrophysiologic testing evaluated at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from December 1989 through July 1991. Central visual impairment is defined as poor visual function with a normal anterior visual pathway. Age at first examination ranged from 5 to 48 months with a followup of two to 31 months. Repeat visual-evoked response testing showed improvement in seven patients and no change in three. Grating acuity as measured by the Teller acuity card procedure, performed in nine of ten patients, improved in seven, showed no change in one, and declined in one. We found a potentially favorable prognosis for those infants with central visual impairment, despite an initially abnormal visual-evoked response. We used a clinical approach to this disorder to improve diagnostic categorization and prognostic capabilities in central visual impairment.

Flash and pattern-reversal visual evoked potential abnormalities in infants and children with cerebral blindness

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded of 60 infants and children with cerebral blindness, aged between six weeks and 10 years, and compared with age-matched normative data. Every patient had abnormal VEPs. 18 had absent flash and pattern VEPs and 13 had atypical or atypical and asymmetrical flash and pattern VEPs. Of the remaining 29, most had greater abnormality of pattern than of flash VEPs and greater abnormalities over parietal and temporal than occipital areas. Eight patients had normal occipital responses to flash and five others had delayed responses with normal morphology. One had normal occipital responses to pattern stimuli. All of these had abnormal late occipital responses or abnormal responses over the parietal and temporal areas. It is recommended that visual assessments using VEPs employ both flash and pattern stimuli, that pre-occipital as well as occipital recordings be made and that tracings be compared with age-specific normative data.