Complex visual problems in childhood

Increasing a Functional Skill for an Adolescent with Cortical Visual Impairment

The effectiveness of two treatment strategies—verbal prompts and a physical prompt—on the the independent drinking skills of a 17-year-old girl with cortical visual impairment was investigated using a single-subject alternating treatments design in two settings. Ten natural drinking opportunities were observed in 43 sessions in the student's school and home. It was found that the physical prompt was highly effective in promoting the target behavior, whereas verbal prompts were less effective. Independent drinking behaviors appeared to have been maintained in both settings.

Observations on the Habilitation of Children with Cortical Visual Impairment

There is a radical difference between the visual habilitation of children with cortical visual impairment (CVI) and those with ocular visual loss. This article presents the experiences of a developmental psychologist, a child neurologist, and a teacher of the visually impaired who worked with CVI children for a number of years.

Early visual-evoked potential acuity and future behavioral acuity in cortical visual impairment

PURPOSE

Cortical Visual Impairment (CVI) is bilateral visual impairment caused by damage to the posterior visual pathway. Both preferential looking and sweep visual-evoked potential (VEP) can be used to measure visual acuity. The purpose of this study was to determine if an early VEP measure of acuity is related to a young patient's future behavioral acuity.

METHODS

The visual acuity of 33 patients with CVI was assessed using the sweep VEP and a behavioral measure on two occasions. The median age of the patients at the initial visit was 4.8 years (range: 1.3 to 19.2 years), and they were followed for an average of 6.9 years (SD: 3.5 years).

RESULTS

The mean initial VEP acuity was 20/135 (0.735 logMAR), and the mean initial behavioral acuity was 20/475 (1.242 logMAR). The average difference between the two initial measures of acuity was 0.55 log unit, with the behavioral measure reporting a poorer visual acuity in all patients. However, the mean final behavioral acuity was 20/150 (0.741 logMAR), and the average difference between the initial VEP acuity and the final behavioral acuity was only 0.01 log unit. Therefore, the initial VEP measure was not statistically different from the final behavioral measure (t = 0.11; dF = 32; p = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the initial VEP measure was much better than the initial behavioral measure, the initial VEP measure was similar to the behavioral visual acuity measured approximately 7 years later. Sweep VEP testing can be used as a predictive tool for at least the lower limit of future behavioral acuity in young patients with CVI.

Longitudinal Quantitative Assessment of Vision Function in Children with Cortical Visual Impairment

PURPOSE

Cortical visual impairment (CVI) is bilateral visual impairment caused by damage to the posterior visual pathway, the visual cortex, or both. Current literature reports great variability in the prognosis of CVI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate change in vision function in children with CVI over time using a quantitative assessment method.

METHODS

The visual acuity and contrast sensitivity of children with CVI were retrospectively assessed using the sweep visual evoked potential (VEP). Thirty-nine children participated in the visual acuity assessment and 34 of the 39 children participated in the contrast threshold assessment. At the time of the first VEP, the children ranged in age from 1 to 16 years (mean: 5.0 years). The time between measures ranged from 0.6 to 13.7 years (mean: 6.5 years).

RESULTS

Forty-nine percent of the children studied showed significant improvement of visual acuity. The average improvement was 0.43 log unit (mean change: 20/205 to 20/76) in those who improved. The initial visual acuity was worse in those who improved compared with those who did not improve (p < 0.001). Forty-seven percent of the children studied showed significant improvement of contrast threshold. In those who improved, the average amount of improvement was 0.57 log unit (10 to 2.6% Michelson). The initial contrast threshold was significantly worse in those who improved compared with those who did not improve (p = 0.001). Also, the change in contrast threshold was related to age of the child (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant improvement in vision function can occur over time in children with CVI. In the present study, approximately 50% of the children improved and the remainder remained stable. No relation was found between etiology and improvement. Further investigation is warranted to better understand the prognosis for visual recovery in children with CVI.