Visual evoked potentials in compressive lesions of the optic chiasm

Atrial myxoma masquerading as Takayasu's arteritis

We describe the case of a 48-year-old woman whose atrial myxoma was mistaken for vasculitis. The case report highlights the reasons why these two disorders may become confused, the dangers of initiating the wrong treatment and a simple means of avoiding misdiagnosis.

Visual electrophysiology in the clinical evaluation of optic neuritis, chiasmal tumours, achiasmia, and ocular albinism: an overview

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

In routine clinical evaluation of optic neuritis and chiasmal tumours, pattern electroretinography and visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to pattern-reversal stimulation are useful examinations. Similarly, in achiasmia and ocular albinism, VEPs to flash and pattern-onset stimulation provide relevant information.

RESULTS

The role of visual electrophysiology in these diseases is to assess potential dysfunction of the visual pathway: (a) at the acute stage of optic neuritis, to determine the magnitude of conduction block of the optic nerve fibres; (b) at the clinical recovery stage of optic neuritis, to determine optic nerve conduction delay due to demyelination, and to follow possible remyelination; (c) at the recovery of optic neuritis when visual acuity does not normalise, to define loss of optic nerve fibres and retrograde degeneration of retinal ganglion cells; (d) in tumours at the chiasm, to detect abnormal conduction along the crossed and/or uncrossed fibres; and (e) in achiasmia or albinism, which are both congenital disorders associated with nystagmus, to detect achiasmia and absence of or reduced optic nerve fibre decussation at the chiasm, or to detect ocular albinism and excess of optic nerve fibre decussation at the chiasm. In optic neuritis, two recent examinations have been used to detect retrograde axonal degeneration: photopic negative response of the electroretinogram, to assess dysfunction of ganglion cell axons; and optic coherence tomography, to measure thinning of the retinal nerve fibre layer. In optic neuritis, multifocal VEPs provide a promising clinical examination, because this can show areas that are associated with normal or abnormal optic nerve fibre function.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual electrophysiology defines function of the visual pathway and is relevant: (1) in optic neuritis, when visual acuity does not recover well; (2) in tumours of the chiasm with normal visual fields, as in paediatric patients who cannot adequately perform perimetry; and (3) in children with congenital nystagmus and suspected achiasmia or ocular albinism.

VEP asymmetry with ophthalmological and MRI findings in two achiasmatic children

Achiasmia is a rarely diagnosed visual pathway maldevelopment where all or the majority of nasal retinal fibres fail to decussate at the optic chiasm. It has been identified by neuroimaging and also by visual evoked potential (VEP) asymmetry. VEP asymmetry has not been defined consistently in previous studies. The aim was to study VEP asymmetry to flash stimulation in two children with maldevelopment of the optic chiasm in comparison to control children. Both children had congenital nystagmus, optic nerve hypoplasia with a bilateral small double ring, bitemporal visual field defect and normal colour vision. In child 1 visual acuity in both eyes was 0.1, in child 2 it was 0.2. MRI showed reduced chiasmal size in child 1, while in child 2 it was combined with other midline abnormalities. VEP to monocular flash stimulation showed in both children distinctive occipital distribution, which was not observed in control children. The N2 wave was distributed asymmetrically over the ipsilateral hemisphere to the stimulated eye, while the P2 wave was distributed over both hemispheres. The P2 wave was however better defined over the ipsilateral hemisphere. Flash VEP occipital distribution remained similar in child 1, who was followed from 10 months to 9 years. These cases of achiasmia demonstrate a distinctive VEP asymmetry in the distribution of the flash VEP N2 wave, as well as the expected structural defect determined by neuroimaging.

Electrodiagnostics of chiasmal compressive lesions

Recording of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) is not yet a routine test in patients with suspected chiasmal compressive lesions, but has proved useful to a clinician in assessing and following-up visual pathway dysfunctions. Abnormalities of VEPs can be found even in patients without clinical evidence of the visual impairment: VEP delays and alterations of the waveform, asymmetric distribution in one eye or in both eyes (crossed asymmetry) can indicate chiasmal compressive lesion. Simultaneous recording of pattern electroretinograms (PERGs) can additionally provide useful information about the patient's cooperation as well as about eventual retrograde degeneration of the ganglion cells. Electrophysiologic tests can be regarded as an integral part of diagnostic procedures--ocular diagnostic tests and neuroimaging--in suspected compressive lesions of the optic chiasm.