Ultrastructure of Popliteal Vein Aneurysm

Closed plication is a safe and effective method for treating popliteal vein aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Popliteal vein aneurysms are a rare vascular anomaly first reported in the 1980s. Degeneration of elastic fibers and smooth muscle cell reduction, possibly secondary to inflammation, are implicated as integral steps in the development of these aneurysms. Given the rarity of this clinical entity, significant controversy exists regarding ideal treatment strategies, including the role of observation, medical management with anticoagulation, and surgical intervention. Retrospective reviews have demonstrated a failure rate of >40% with anticoagulation alone, with patients often presenting with pulmonary embolism. This has prompted our institutional preference for surgical management once the aneurysm is identified. Surgical management involves tangential repair with lateral venorrhaphy most commonly, followed in prevalence by aneurysm resection and end-to-end anastomosis either primarily or with vein interposition. Herein, we report our results with venous plications, through both closed and open techniques.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for 10 patients undergoing popliteal vein plication for treatment of popliteal vein aneurysms. Patient-level characteristics and operative details were examined from periprocedural and follow-up records.

RESULTS

We identified 10 patients undergoing popliteal vein plication, including 9 closed plications and 1 open plication. The average aneurysm size at presentation was 2.35 ± 0.69 cm for closed plication and 4.74 cm for the one open plication. After treatment, the average popliteal vein size was significantly reduced to 1.12 ± 0.45 cm for the closed plications (P < .001 from preprocedural size) and 1.13 cm for the open plication with 100% primary patency. Average follow-up for patients treated with closed plication was 35.0 ± 25.2 months, during which seven (78%) patients had a stable, normal popliteal vein size. One patient with recurrence was diagnosed with Klippel-Trénaunay syndrome. The other had degeneration of the popliteal vein cranial to the previous repair at 39 months after the original operation that required additional plication. The open plication patient experienced a hematoma requiring washout and resulting in a transient peroneal mononeuropathy. There was one case of cellulitis after closed plication but no hematomas within this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Closed plication demonstrated favorable primary patency rates and low recurrence rates, avoiding technical issues or need for early institution of systemic anticoagulation associated with tangential repair and venorrhaphy or resection methods. Closed plication represents an attractive option in patients without luminal thrombus to limit the risk of these postoperative complications and obviates the need for bypass conduit and postoperative anticoagulation.