Tumour perfusion assessment during regional hyperthermia treatment: Comparison of temperature probe measurement with H215O-PET perfusion

MR Thermometry Data Correlate with Pathological Response for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Lower Extremity in a Single Center Analysis of Prospectively Registered Patients

Background: There is a strong biologic rationale for using locoregional hyperthermia in soft tissue sarcoma and a randomized trial reported significant improvements with hyperthermia. The aim of this study was to describe the opportunities of magnetic resonance (MR)-based thermometry in a cohort of soft tissue sarcoma patients undergoing combined radiotherapy and locoregional hyperthermia. Patients and Methods: For eleven evaluable patients, tumor volume (V_Tu) and a separate volume for temperature analysis with reliable temperature distribution (V_therm) were contoured for every hyperthermia treatment (103 therapies). Temperature data were recorded for all tumors and were correlated with clinical features and pathologic response data. Results: Of 48 patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcomas treated with radio(chemo)therapy and locoregional hyperthermia, MR thermometry was possible in 11 (23%) patients. For all patients, the temperature superseded by 90% of V_Tu (T90(V_Tu)) and T90 (V_therm) were in the range of 37–43 °C and 40–45 °C, respectively. Larger tumors tended to reach higher temperatures. For tumors showing a pathologic response in the resection specimen after preoperative treatment, temperature (T90 (V_therm)) was significantly higher than in tumors without pathologic response. Conclusion: Lower extremity sarcomas undergoing preoperative treatment with locoregional hyperthermia are especially suitable for MR thermometry. MR thermometry is a promising non-invasive way for temperature measurement during locoregional hyperthermia, showing a positive dose-response relationship.

A moderate thermal dose is sufficient for effective free and TSL based thermochemotherapy

Hyperthermia, i.e. heating the tumor to a temperature of 40-43 °C is considered by many a valuable treatment to sensitize tumor cells to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In recent randomized trials the great potential of adding hyperthermia to chemotherapy was demonstrated for treatment of high risk soft tissue sarcoma: +11.4% 5 yrs. overall survival (OS) and for ovarian cancer with peritoneal involvement nearly +12 months OS gain. As a result interest in combining chemotherapy with hyperthermia, i.e. thermochemotherapy, is growing. Extensive biological research has revealed that hyperthermia causes multiple effects, from direct cell kill to improved oxygenation, whereby each effect has a specific temperature range. Thermal sensitization of the tumor cell for chemotherapy occurs for many drugs at temperatures ranging from 40 to 42 °C with little additional increase of sensitization at higher temperatures. Increasing perfusion/oxygenation and increased extravasation are two other important hyperthermia induced mechanisms. The combination of free drug and hyperthermia has not been found to increase tumor drug concentration. Hence, enhanced effectiveness of free drug will depend on the thermal sensitization of the tumor cells for the applied drug. In contrast to free drugs, experimental animal studies combining hyperthermia and thermo-sensitive liposomal (TSL) drugs delivery have demonstrated to result in a substantial increase of the drug concentration in the tumor. For TSL based chemotherapy, hyperthermia is critical to both increase perfusion and extravasation as well as to trigger TSL drug release, whereby the temperature controlled induction of a local high drug concentration in a highly permeable vessel is driving the enhanced drug uptake in the tumor. Increased drug concentrations up to 26 times have been reported in rodents. Good control of the tissue temperature is required to keep temperatures below 43 °C to prevent vascular stasis. Further, careful timing of the drug application relative to the start of heating is required to benefit optimal from the combined treatment. From the available experimental data it follows that irrespective whether chemotherapy is applied as free drug or using a thermal sensitive liposomal carrier, the optimal thermal dose for thermochemotherapy should be 40-42 °C for 30-60 min, i.e. equivalent to a CEM43 of 1-15 min. Timing is critical: most free drug should be applied simultaneous with heating, whereas TSL drugs should be applied 20-30 min after the start of hyperthermia.

Mild hyperthermia influence on Herceptin(®) properties

Background

Mild hyperthermia (mHT) increases the tumor perfusion and vascular permeability, and reduces the interstitial fluid pressure, resulting in better intra-tumoral bioavailability of low molecular weight drugs. This approach is potentially also attractive for delivery of therapeutic macromolecules, such as antibodies. Here, we investigated the effects of mHT on the stability, immunological and pharmacological properties of Herceptin^®, a clinically approved antibody, targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) overexpressed in breast cancer.

Results

Herceptin^® was heated to 37°C (control) and 42°C (mHT) for 1 hour. Formation of Herceptin^® aggregates was measured using Nile Red assay. mHT did not result in additional Herceptin^® aggregates compared to 37°C, showing the Herceptin^® stability is unchanged. Immunological and pharmacological properties of Herceptin^® were evaluated following mHT using HER-2 positive breast cancer cells (BT-474). Exposure of Herceptin^® to mHT preserved recognition and binding affinity of Herceptin^® to HER-2. Western-blot and cell proliferation assays on BT-474 cells showed that mHT left the inhibitory activities of Herceptin^® unchanged.

Conclusions

The stability, and the immunological and pharmacological properties of Herceptin^® are not negatively affected by mHT. Further in-vivo studies are required to evaluate the influence of mHT on intra-tumoral bioavailability and therapeutic effectiveness of Herceptin^®.