5
|
Meijerink MR, Ruarus AH, Vroomen LGPH, Puijk RS, Geboers B, Nieuwenhuizen S, van den Bemd BAT, Nielsen K, de Vries JJJ, van Lienden KP, Lissenberg-Witte BI, van den Tol MP, Scheffer HJ. Irreversible Electroporation to Treat Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases (COLDFIRE-2): A Phase II, Two-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Trial. Radiology 2021; 299:470-480. [PMID: 33724066 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021203089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Irreversible electroporation (IRE), an ablative technique that uses high-voltage electrical pulses, has shown promise for eradicating tumors near critical structures, including blood vessels and bile ducts. Purpose To investigate the efficacy and safety of IRE for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) unsuitable for resection or thermal ablation because of proximity to critical structures and for further systemically administered treatments. Materials and Methods Between June 2014 and November 2018, participants with fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-avid CRLMs measuring 5.0 cm or smaller, unsuitable for partial hepatectomy and thermal ablation, underwent percutaneous or open IRE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02082782). Follow-up included tumor marker assessment and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging. For the primary end point to be met, at least 50% of treated participants had to be alive without local tumor progression (LTP) at 12 months, defined as LTP-free survival. Secondary aims were safety, technical success, local control allowing for repeat procedures, disease-free status, and overall survival. Results A total of 51 participants (median age, 67 years [interquartile range, 62-75 years]; 37 men) underwent IRE. Of these 51 participants, 50 with a total of 76 CRLMs (median tumor size, 2.2 cm; range, 0.5-5.4 cm) were successfully treated in 62 procedures; in one participant, treatment was stopped prematurely because of pulse-induced cardiac arrhythmia. With a per-participant 1-year LTP-free survival of 68% (95% CI: 59, 84) according to competing risk analysis, the primary end point was met. Local control following repeat procedures was achieved in 74% of participants (37 of 50). Median overall survival from first IRE was 2.7 years (95% CI: 1.6, 3.8). Twenty-three participants experienced a total of 34 adverse events in 25 of the 62 procedures (overall complication rate, 40%). One participant (2%), who had an infected biloma after IRE, died fewer than 90 days after the procedure (grade 5 adverse event). Conclusion Irreversible electroporation was effective and relatively safe for colorectal liver metastases 5.0 cm or smaller that were unsuitable for partial hepatectomy, thermal ablation, or further systemic treatment. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Goldberg in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn R Meijerink
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| | - Alette H Ruarus
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| | - Laurien G P H Vroomen
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| | - Robbert S Puijk
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| | - Bart Geboers
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| | - Sanne Nieuwenhuizen
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| | - Bente A T van den Bemd
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| | - Karin Nielsen
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| | - Jan J J de Vries
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| | - Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| | - M Petrousjka van den Tol
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| | - Hester J Scheffer
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (M.R.M., A.H.R., L.G.P.H.V., R.S.P., B.G., S.N., B.A.T.v.d.B., J.J.J.d.V., H.J.S.) and Department of Surgery (K.N., M.P.v.d.T.), Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.P.v.L.); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.I.L.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu J, Wu Y, Xu E, Huang Q, Ye H, Tan L, Zheng R, Zeng Q, Li K. Risk factors of intrahepatic biloma and secondary infection after thermal ablation for malignant hepatic tumors. Int J Hyperthermia 2020; 36:980-985. [PMID: 31544547 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1660422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors of biloma formation and secondary infection after thermal ablation for malignant hepatic tumors. Patients and methods: A total of 58 patients with 68 bilomas after thermal ablation were recruited as the complication group, and 61 patients with 72 lesions without major complications were selected randomly as the control group. The potential risk factors for biloma formation were analyzed with the chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis. To determine the optimum management method for biloma, patients with secondary infection were included for the subgroup analysis of risk factors. Results: A history of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment (odds ratio [OR]: 3.606, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.165-11.156, p = .026) and tumor location (OR: 37.734, 95% CI: 13.058-109.034, p = .000) were independent predictors of biloma formation. Among the 58 patients with biloma, 49 (84.5%) showed no symptoms (i.e., the asymptomatic group), while the remaining 9 (15.5%) developed symptoms related to secondary infections (i.e., the symptomatic group). There were significant differences in the history of biliary manipulation (p = .031) between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. Conclusion: A history of TACE treatment and the distance from the biliary tract were independent predictors of biloma formation after thermal ablation. Therefore, protecting the bile duct (i.e., cooling of the bile duct and combing thermal ablation with chemical ablation) should be considered for high-risk patients. Moreover, active monitoring and management should be performed for patients with bilomas who underwent biliary surgery before.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Liu
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , PR China
| | - Yuxuan Wu
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , PR China
| | - Erjiao Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , PR China
| | - Qiannan Huang
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , PR China
| | - Huolin Ye
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , PR China
| | - Lei Tan
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , PR China
| | - Rongqin Zheng
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , PR China
| | - Qingjing Zeng
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , PR China
| | - Kai Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , PR China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chang W, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Lee DH, Lee SM, Lee KB, Kim BR, Kim TH, Lee S, Han JK. No-touch radiofrequency ablation using multiple electrodes: An in vivo comparison study of switching monopolar versus switching bipolar modes in porcine livers. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0176350. [PMID: 28445542 PMCID: PMC5405985 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the in vivo technical feasibility, efficiency, and safety of switching bipolar (SB) and switching monopolar (SM) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as a no-touch ablation technique in the porcine liver. Materials and methods The animal care and use committee approved this animal study and 16 pigs were used in two independent experiments. In the first experiment, RFA was performed on 2-cm tumor mimickers in the liver using a no-touch technique in the SM mode (2 groups, SM1: 10 minutes, n = 10; SM2: 15 minutes, n = 10) and SB-mode (1 group, SB: 10 minutes, n = 10). The technical success with sufficient safety margins, creation of confluent necrosis, ablation size, and distance between the electrode and ablation zone margin (DEM), were compared between groups. In the second experiment, thermal injury to the adjacent anatomic organs was compared between SM-RFA (15 minutes, n = 13) and SB-RFA modes (10 minutes, n = 13). Results The rates of the technical success and the creation of confluent necrosis were higher in the SB group than in the SM1 groups (100% vs. 60% and 90% vs. 40%, both p < 0.05). The ablation volume in the SM2 group was significantly larger than that in the SB group (59.2±18.7 cm3 vs. 39.8±9.7 cm3,p < 0.05), and the DEM in the SM2 group was also larger than that in the SB group (1.39±0.21 cm vs. 1.07±0.10 cm, p < 0.05). In the second experiment, the incidence of thermal injury to the adjacent organs and tissues in the SB group (23.1%, 3/13) was significantly lower than that in the SM group (69.2%, 8/13) (p = 0.021). Conclusion SB-RFA was more advantageous for a no-touch technique for liver tumors, showing the potential of a better safety profile than SM-RFA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Won Chang
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail:
| | - Jeong Hee Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoung Bun Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bo Ram Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Hyung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seunghyun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Koo Han
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|