1
|
Van der Speeten K, Kusamura S, Villeneuve L, Piso P, Verwaal VJ, González-Moreno S, Glehen O. The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: HIPEC Technologies. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:7090-7110. [PMID: 39037523 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15513-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
This manuscript reports the results of an international consensus on technologies of hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) performed with the following goals: To provide recommendations for the technological parameters to perform HIPEC. To identify the role of heat and its application forms in treating peritoneal metastases. To provide recommendations regarding the correct dosimetry of intraperitoneal chemotherapy drugs and their carrier solutions. To identify for each intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen the best dosimetry and fractionation. To identify areas of future research pertaining to HIPEC technology and regimens. This consensus was performed by the Delphi technique and comprised two rounds of voting. In total, 96 of 102 eligible panelists replied to both Delphi rounds (94.1%) with a consensus of 39/51 questions on HIPEC technical aspects. Among the recommendations that met with the strongest consensus were those concerning the dose of HIPEC drug established in mg/m2, a target temperature of at least 42°C, and the use of at least three temperature probes to pursue hyperthermia. Ninety minutes as the ideal HIPEC duration seemed to make consensus. These results should be considered when designing new clinical trials in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Van der Speeten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
- Faculty of Life Sciences, BIOMED Research Institute, University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
| | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, PSM unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Vic J Verwaal
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy and HIPEC Institute for Regional Sundhedforskning, Syddansk University, Odense, Sweden
| | | | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kusamura S, Delhorme JB, Taibi A, Villeneuve L, Deraco M, Dico RL, Glehen O, Moran B. The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Pseudomyxoma Peritonei. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:6262-6273. [PMID: 39008204 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15646-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) constitutes the established standard of care for pseudomyxoma peritonei patients. However, the role of HIPEC lacks validation through randomized trials, leading to diverse proposed treatment protocols. This consensus seeks to standardize HIPEC regimens and identify research priorities for enhanced clarity. METHODS The steering committee applied the patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome method to formulate crucial clinical questions. Evaluation of evidence followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Consensus on HIPEC regimens and research priorities was sought through a two-round Delphi process involving international experts. RESULTS Out of 90 eligible panelists, 71 (79%) participated in both Delphi rounds, resulting in a consensus on six out of seven questions related to HIPEC regimens. An overwhelming 84% positive consensus favored combining HIPEC with CRS, while a 70% weak positive consensus supported HIPEC after incomplete CRS. Specific HIPEC regimens also gained consensus, with 53% supporting Oxaliplatin 200 mg/m2 and 51% favoring the combination of cisplatin (CDDP) associated with mitomycin-C (MMC). High-dose MMC regimens received an 89% positive recommendation. In terms of research priorities, 61% of panelists highlighted the importance of studies comparing HIPEC regimens post CRS. The preferred regimens for such studies were the combination of CDDP/MMC and high-dose MMC. CONCLUSIONS The consensus recommends the application of HIPEC following CRS based on the available evidence. The combination of CDDP/MMC and high-dose MMC regimens are endorsed for both current clinical practice and future research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeki Kusamura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, PSM Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| | - Jean-Baptiste Delhorme
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Abdelkader Taibi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Dupuytren University Hospital, CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, Limoges, France
| | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Service de Recherche et d'Epidémiologie Cliniques, Pierre-Bénite, France
- CICLY, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Marcello Deraco
- Department of Surgical Oncology, PSM Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Rea Lo Dico
- Department of General Surgery, Emergency, and New Technologies, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Olivier Glehen
- CICLY, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Brendan Moran
- Peritoneal Malignancy Unit, Basingstoke Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Langellotti L, Fiorillo C, D’Annibale G, Panza E, Pacelli F, Alfieri S, Di Giorgio A, Santullo F. Efficacy of Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) + HIPEC in Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1929. [PMID: 38792007 PMCID: PMC11119026 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal carcinomatosis is one of deadliest metastatic patterns of gastric cancer, being associated with a median overall survival (OS) of 4 months. Up to now, palliative systemic chemotherapy (pSC) has been the only recommended treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate a potential survival benefit after CRS + HIPEC compared to pSC. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines in March 2024. Manuscripts reporting patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer treated with CRS + HIPEC were included. A meta-analysis was performed, comparing the survival results between the CRS + HIPEC and pSC groups, and the primary outcome was the comparison in terms of OS. We performed random-effects meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs). We assessed heterogeneity using the Q2 statistic. RESULTS Out of the 24 papers included, 1369 patients underwent CRS + HIPEC, with a median OS range of 9.8-28.2 months; and 103 patients underwent pSC, with a median OS range of 4.9-8 months. CRS + HIPEC was associated with significantly increased survival compared to palliative systemic chemotherapy (-1.8954 (95% CI: -2.5761 to -1.2146; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS CRS + HIPEC could provide survival advantages in gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis compared to pSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lodovica Langellotti
- General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.L.); (G.D.); (E.P.); (F.P.); (S.A.)
| | - Claudio Fiorillo
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio D’Annibale
- General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.L.); (G.D.); (E.P.); (F.P.); (S.A.)
| | - Edoardo Panza
- General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.L.); (G.D.); (E.P.); (F.P.); (S.A.)
| | - Fabio Pacelli
- General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.L.); (G.D.); (E.P.); (F.P.); (S.A.)
- Department of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (F.S.)
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- General Surgery Department, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (L.L.); (G.D.); (E.P.); (F.P.); (S.A.)
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Department of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (F.S.)
| | - Francesco Santullo
- Department of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.D.G.); (F.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Acs M, Piso P, Glockzin G. Peritoneal Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Local Treatment Options and Recommendations. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1445-1459. [PMID: 38534942 PMCID: PMC10969192 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastasis is a common finding in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Beyond systemic chemotherapy, additive local treatments such as cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy are considered an inherent part of different multimodal treatment concepts for selected patients with peritoneal metastatic gastric cancer. This review article discusses the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, including HIPEC, NIPS, and PIPAC, as additive therapeutic options with curative and palliative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miklos Acs
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg, 93049 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Gabriel Glockzin
- Department of Surgery, Muenchen Klinik Bogenhausen, 81925 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kopetskyi V, Antoniv M, Yarema R, Maksymovskyi V, Chetverikova-Ovchinnik V, Kryzhevskyi V, Volodko N, Gushchin V, Nikiforchin A. Building an Efficient Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Program Despite the Lower-Middle-Income Barriers: Ukraine Experience. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300432. [PMID: 38330272 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) programs are often limited to centers in developed countries because of extensive requirements. We aimed to analyze efficacy and challenges of CRS/HIPEC centers in lower-middle-income settings in the Ukraine example. METHODS A multicenter descriptive study was conducted using data sets (2008-2022) from Kyiv, Lviv, and Odesa centers. Patients with appendiceal neoplasm (AN); colorectal cancer (CRC); malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM); and epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer (EOC) treated with CRS ± HIPEC were included. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed for N ≥ 20 cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS We included 596 patients. At Kyiv and Lviv centers, 37 and 28 patients with AN had completeness of cytoreduction (CC-0/1) rates of 84% and 71%, respectively. Thirty-day major morbidity stood at 24% and 18%, respectively. Median OS was not reached (NR) at both centers. Nineteen patients with CRC from Kyiv, 11 from Lviv, and 156 from Odesa had CC-0/1 rates of 84%, 91%, and 86%, respectively. Thirty-day major complications occurred in 16%, 18%, and 8%, respectively. Median OS in the Odesa cohort was 35 (95% CI, 32 to 38) months. Among 15 Kyiv, five Lviv, and six Odesa patients with MPM, CC-0/1 rates were 67%, 80%, and 100%, respectively, while major complications occurred in 13%, 0%, and 17%, respectively. OS was not analyzed because of small MPM cohorts. At Kyiv, Lviv, and Odesa centers, 91, 40, and 89 patients, respectively, had primary EOC. CC-0/1 rates were 79%, 100%, and 80%, and 30-day major morbidity rates were 23%, 5%, and 6%, respectively. Median OS was NR, 71 (95% CI, 32 to 110), and 67 (95% CI, 61 to 73) months, respectively. CONCLUSION CRS/HIPEC programs in lower-middle-income environment can achieve safety and survival that meet global standards. Our discussion highlights common obstacles in such settings and proposes effective overcoming strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viacheslav Kopetskyi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Marta Antoniv
- Department of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Roman Yarema
- Department of Oncology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | | | | | - Vitalii Kryzhevskyi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Nataliya Volodko
- Department of Oncology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Vadim Gushchin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jain AJ, Badgwell BD. Current Evidence for the Use of HIPEC and Cytoreductive Surgery in Gastric Cancer Metastatic to the Peritoneum. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6527. [PMID: 37892663 PMCID: PMC10607605 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GCa) is an aggressive malignancy, representing the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The poor prognosis of GCa can be associated with the prevalence of peritoneal metastasis (PM). Current international and national GCa treatment guidelines only recommend palliative treatment options for patients with PM. Since the 1980s there have been multiple single arm trials, randomized controlled trials, and metanalysis investigating the use of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with advanced GCa, with or without PM. Results from these studies have been encouraging, with some large-volume centers even incorporating HIPEC into their treatment algorithms for patients with advanced GCa. Additionally, there are several ongoing trials that, when completed, will increase our understanding of the efficacy of CRS & HIPEC in patients with GCa metastatic to the peritoneum. Herein we review the current evidence, ongoing trials, consensus guidelines, and future considerations regarding the use of CRS & HIPEC in patients suffering from GCa with PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anish J. Jain
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Brian D. Badgwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yu P, Huang X, Huang L, Dai G, Xu Q, Fang J, Ye Z, Chai T, Du Y. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) plus systemic chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy alone in locally advanced gastric cancer after D2 radical resection: a randomized-controlled study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:11491-11498. [PMID: 37392201 PMCID: PMC10465671 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05019-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, there is a lack of an effective strategy for the prevention of peritoneal metastasis (PM) from locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This randomized-controlled study aimed to evaluate the outcome of D2 radical resection with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) plus systemic chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy alone in locally AGC patients. METHODS All enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive HIPEC plus systemic chemotherapy (HIPEC group) or systemic chemotherapy alone (non-HIPEC group) after radical gastrectomy. HIPEC was performed intraperitoneally with cisplatin (40 mg/m2) within 72 h after surgery, while systemic chemotherapy based on the SOX regimen (S-1 combined with oxaliplatin) was administered 4-6 weeks after radical surgery. Patterns of recurrence, adverse events, 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 134 patients were enrolled in the present study. The 3-year DFS rate was 73.8% in the HIPEC group, which was significantly higher than that in the non-HIPEC group (61.2%, P = 0.031). The 3-year OS rate was 73.9% in the HIPEC group and 77.6% in the non-HIPEC group, with no significant difference (P = 0.737). PM was the most common distant metastasis in both groups. The occurrence rate of PM in the HIPEC group was statistically lower than that in the non-HIPEC group (20.9% vs. 40.3%, P = 0.015). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 19 (14.2%) patients, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION Radical surgery followed by HIPEC combined with systemic chemotherapy is a safe and feasible strategy for locally AGC patients and could effectively improve DFS and reduce the occurrence of PM. However, more prospective randomized studies with a large sample size are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered with www.medresman.org.cn as ChiCTR2200055966 on 10/12/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengfei Yu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xingmao Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ling Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China
| | - Gaiguo Dai
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qi Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jingquan Fang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zeyao Ye
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tengjiao Chai
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yian Du
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patel M, Arora A, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee S. Effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy on survival and recurrence rates in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2023; 109:2435-2450. [PMID: 37158149 PMCID: PMC10442139 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Around 5-20% of patients who undergo surgery for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), which invades into the muscularis propria or beyond, have peritoneal carcinomatosis. The peritoneal recurrence rate is 10-54%, which is associated with a poor prognosis. The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in AGC with and without peritoneal carcinomatosis is not clearly defined. METHODS The authors conducted a meta-analysis, in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, of the clinical trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies evaluating the role of HIPEC in AGC over the last 10 years. The studies were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases between January 2011 to December 2021. Clinical data including overall survival, recurrence free survival, overall recurrence rate, peritoneal recurrence rate, and complications analyzed using RevMan 5.4. RESULTS Six randomized controlled trials and 10 nonrandomized studies, comprising a total of 1700 patients were included. HIPEC was associated with significantly improved OS at 3 [odd ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% CI: 1.17-3.05] and 5 years (OR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.29-2.71). HIPEC was associated with reduced overall recurrence (OR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31-0.80) and peritoneal recurrence (OR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.11-0.47). HIPEC was not associated with increased complications. The occurrence of postoperative renal dysfunction was significantly higher in the HIPEC group (OR 3.94, 95% CI: 1.85-8.38). CONCLUSION The role of HIPEC in AGC has evolved over the past decade. HIPEC may improve survival rates and reduce recurrence rates in patients with AGC, without significant increase in complications and with a favorable impact on 3 and 5-year survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maitreyi Patel
- Department of General Surgery, Queen’s and King George’s Hospital, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University NHS Trust, Rom Valley Way, Romford, United Kingdom
| | - Amandeep Arora
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Dipankar Mukherjee
- Department of General Surgery, Queen’s and King George’s Hospital, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University NHS Trust, Rom Valley Way, Romford, United Kingdom
| | - Samrat Mukherjee
- Department of General Surgery, Queen’s and King George’s Hospital, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University NHS Trust, Rom Valley Way, Romford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen Z, Ali M, Kai Z, Wang Y, Wang C. HIPEC with CRS versus cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for the gastric cancer metastasis to peritoneum. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:1011-1016. [PMID: 36401054 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-03004-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal metastases (PM) have a poor prognosis in gastric cancer (GC). Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) gives favorable outcomes, but the influence of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains contentious. We designed to distinguish results between CRS versus HIPEC-CRS in patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane library accessed to collect data and language is restricted to English. RevMan 5.4 was used to perform statistical analysis. The outcomes for categorical variables are mentioned in the risk ratio. RESULTS Ten trials involving 1367 patients in which 707 were CRS-HIPEC, while 660 CRS. We got significant results in 3rd year survival (P < 0.05), while 1st and 5th years are not statistically significant P > 0.05. CONCLUSION To compare with CRS, CRS-HIPEC has improved survival rate in deprived of further morbidity or mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuming Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Muhammad Ali
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
- Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Zhe Kai
- Department of General Surgery, Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
- Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Chaohui Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gronau F, Feldbruegge L, Oberwittler F, Gonzalez-Moreno S, Villeneuve L, Eveno C, Glehen O, Kusamura S, Rau B. HIPEC in Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Origin: A Systematic Review of Regimens and Techniques. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11051456. [PMID: 35268546 PMCID: PMC8911234 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Complete cytoreductive surgery including gastrectomy and complete removal of all peritoneal lesions followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) achieves promising results. There exists an immersive variety of approaches for HIPEC that makes it difficult to weigh different results obtained in the literature. In order to enable standardization and development of HIPEC, we here present a systematic review of different drug regimens and technical approaches. (2) Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched on 26 May 2021 using the mesh terms “intraperitoneal chemotherapy AND gastric cancer”. Under consideration of systematic review guidelines, articles reporting on HIPEC in combination with CRS were selected. Data on duration, drugs, dosage, and other application parameters as well as morbidity and long term survival data were extracted for subsequent statistical analysis, tabulation, and descriptive synthesis. We assessed the risk of bias due to inhomogeneity of the patient cohort and incompleteness of report of HIPEC parameters. (3) Results: Out of 1421 screened publications, 42 publications presenting data from 1325 patients met the criteria. Most of the publications were single institutional retrospective cohort studies. The most common HIPEC regimen is performed after gastrointestinal anastomosis and consists of 50–200 mg/m2 cisplatinum and 30–40 mg/m2 mytomycin C at 42–43 °C for 60–90 min in a closed abdomen HIPEC system with three tubes. Almost every study reported incompletely on HIPEC parameters. Lower rates of anastomotic leakage were reported in studies that performed HIPEC after gastrointestinal anastomosis. Studies that performed open HIPEC and integrated a two-drug regimen indicated better overall survival rates. (4) Discussion: This is an exhaustive overview of the use of drug regimens and techniques for HIPEC after CRS for gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis. Other indications and application modes of intraperitoneal chemotherapy such as prophylactic or palliative HIPEC apart from CRS were not addressed. (5) Conclusion: Complete report of HIPEC parameters should be included in every publication. A consensus for dose expression either per BSA or as flat dose is desirable for comparison of the drug regimens. Despite numerous variations, we identified the most common regimens and techniques and their advantages and disadvantages according to the data in the literature. More phase I/II studies are needed to identify the best approach for HIPEC. (6) Other: This review was not supported by third parties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Gronau
- Department of Surgery, Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte|Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.G.); (L.F.); (F.O.)
| | - Linda Feldbruegge
- Department of Surgery, Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte|Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.G.); (L.F.); (F.O.)
| | - Frauke Oberwittler
- Department of Surgery, Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte|Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.G.); (L.F.); (F.O.)
| | | | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Réseau National de Prise en Charge des Tumeurs Rares du Péritoine, French National Registry of Rare Peritoneal Surface Malignancies, 69002 Lyon, France;
| | - Clarisse Eveno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France; (C.E.); (O.G.)
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France; (C.E.); (O.G.)
| | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto Nazionale Tumori dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy;
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery, Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte|Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.G.); (L.F.); (F.O.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-622-214
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang JF, Lv L, Zhao S, Zhou Q, Jiang CG. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Combined with Surgery: A 12-Year Meta-Analysis of this Promising Treatment Strategy for Advanced Gastric Cancer at Different Stages. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3170-3186. [PMID: 35175455 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11316-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis was designed to systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with surgery for different stages of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) during the last 12 years. METHODS The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched online, and papers were retrieved from other sources. Next, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and high-quality nonrandomized controlled trials (NRCTs) were selected for this analysis. The meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan5.4 software. RESULT The 10 RCTs and 13 NRCTs selected for the study included 1892 patients. The overall survival rates were higher in the HIPEC group at 1 year (risk ratio [RR], 0.52; P = 0.004) and 3 years (RR, 0.63; P < 0.00001) than in the control group for the patients without peritoneal cancer, and the HIPEC group had a significant reduction in the recurrence rate (RR, 0.60; p < 0.00001). Among the patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), the HIPEC group had significantly higher overall survival rates at 1 year (RR, 0.62; P = 0.00001), 2 years (RR, 0.85; P = 0.002), and 3 years (RR, 0.87; P = 0.0001), with an increase in the overall median survival time of 4.67 months. The two groups showed no statistically significant difference in terms of complications for patients with PC (RR, 1.03; P = 0.93) or without PC (RR, 1.15; P = 0.51). CONCLUSION For local AGC without PC, standard surgery combined with prophylactic HIPEC could prolong survival and reduce the recurrence rate without more complications. The prognosis of this treatment strategy for patients with PC is closely related to patient selection. Complete cytoreduction combined with therapeutic HIPEC could prolong survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Feng Zhang
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Ling Lv
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Shuai Zhao
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Qian Zhou
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Cheng-Gang Jiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors, Ministry of Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may benefit the long-term survival of patients after radical gastric cancer surgery. Sci Rep 2022; 12:2583. [PMID: 35173230 PMCID: PMC8850581 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06417-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been proven to improve the survival rate of gastric cancer and reduce peritoneal recurrence. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic HIPEC after radical gastric cancer surgery in this study. Researchers searched for studies published in PubMed, Embase, Web of science, Scopus, Cochrane, Clinical key databases and Microsoft Academic databases to identify studies that examine the impact of prophylactic HIPEC on the survival, recurrence and adverse events of patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery. RevMan 5.3 was used to analyze the results and risk of bias. The PROSERO registration number is CRD42021262016. This meta-analysis included 22 studies with a total of 2097 patients, 12 of which are RCTs. The results showed that the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rate was significantly favorable to HIPEC (OR 5.10, 2.07, 1.96 respectively). Compared with the control group, the overall recurrence rate and peritoneal recurrence rate of the HIPEC group were significantly lower (OR 0.41, 0.24 respectively). Significantly favorable to the control group in terms of renal dysfunction and pulmonary dysfunction complications (OR 2.44, 6.03 respectively). Regarding the causes of death due to postoperative recurrence: liver recurrence, lymph node and local recurrence and peritoneal recurrence, the overall effect is not significantly different (OR 0.81, 1.19, 0.37 respectively). 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival follow-up may be incremented by the prophylactic HIPEC, and which reduce the overall recurrence rate and peritoneal recurrence rate. HIPEC may have high-risk of pulmonary dysfunction and renal dysfunction complications. No difference has been found in the deaths due to recurrence after surgery.
Collapse
|
13
|
Mazurek M, Szlendak M, Forma A, Baj J, Maciejewski R, Roviello G, Marano L, Roviello F, Polom K, Sitarz R. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:681. [PMID: 35055500 PMCID: PMC8776178 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis tend to achieve poor clinical outcomes. Until recently, the treatment options were limited mainly to either palliative chemotherapy or radiation therapy in exceptional cases. Currently, these patients benefit from multimodal treatment, such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Despite good overall results, this treatment modality is still widely debated. The following study is designed to assess the papers about the possible application and utility of HIPEC in GC. A search in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was performed to assess the papers devoted to the role of HIPEC in GC treatment; a literature search was performed until March 21st; and, finally, 50 studies with a total number of 3946 patients were analyzed. According to the most recent data, it seems to be reasonable to limit the duration of HIPEC to the shortest effective time. Moreover, the drugs used in HIPEC need to have equal concentrations and the same solvent. Perioperative chemotherapy needs to be reported in detail and, furthermore, the term "morbidity" should be defined more clearly by the authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Mazurek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Voivodship Hospital in Siedlce, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland;
| | - Małgorzata Szlendak
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
- Department of Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Alicja Forma
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Jacek Baj
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
| | - Ryszard Maciejewski
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
| | | | - Luigi Marano
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (F.R.)
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (F.R.)
| | - Karol Polom
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-070 Gdansk, Poland;
| | - Robert Sitarz
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, St. John’s Cancer Center, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Xiang L, Jin S, Zheng P, Maswikiti EP, Yu Y, Gao L, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Chen H. Risk Assessment and Preventive Treatment for Peritoneal Recurrence Following Radical Resection for Gastric Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 11:778152. [PMID: 35047394 PMCID: PMC8763009 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.778152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
As the most common recurrence pattern after radical gastric cancer resection, peritoneal recurrence is a major cause of mortality, which affects the prognosis of patients to a very large extent. Peritoneal status and risk of peritoneal recurrence can be evaluated by peritoneal lavage cytology, photodynamic diagnosis, imaging examination, and pathologic analysis. Presently, there is no standard approach for preventing peritoneal recurrence after radical surgery; furthermore, controversies exist regarding the effects of some preventive methods. Among the preventive methods, there are high expectations about the potential of preoperative therapy, surgical skill improvement, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and postoperative treatment to reduce the incidence of peritoneal recurrence after radical gastrectomy. This study aimed to analyze the results of previous studies on the risk assessment and preventive methods of peritoneal recurrence after radical gastrectomy in recent years. We hope to provide references for better approach to clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies for peritoneal recurrence after radical gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Xiang
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Pathology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shuai Jin
- Department of Technology, Beijing Weitai’an Pharmaceutical Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Zheng
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | | | - Yang Yu
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Lei Gao
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Chen
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Tumor Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- The Key Laboratory of the Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Götze TO, Piso P, Lorenzen S, Bankstahl US, Pauligk C, Elshafei M, Amato G, Reim D, Bechstein WO, Königsrainer A, Mönig SP, Rau B, Schwarzbach M, Al-Batran SE. Preventive HIPEC in combination with perioperative FLOT versus FLOT alone for resectable diffuse type gastric and gastroesophageal junction type II/III adenocarcinoma - the phase III "PREVENT"- (FLOT9) trial of the AIO /CAOGI /ACO. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1158. [PMID: 34715810 PMCID: PMC8555172 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08872-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The main reason for treatment failure after curative surgical resection of gastric cancer is intra-abdominal spread, with 40-50% peritoneal seeding as primary localization of recurrence. Peritoneal relapse is seen in 60-70% of tumors of diffuse type, compared to only 20-30% of intestinal type. Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemoperfusion (HIPEC) is an increasingly used therapy method for patients with peritoneal metastases. The preventive use of HIPEC could represent an elegant approach for patients (pts) before macroscopic peritoneal seeding, since pts. with operable disease are fit and may have potential risk of microscopic involvement, thus having a theoretical chance of cure with HIPEC even without the need for cytoreduction. No results from a PCRT from the Western hemisphere have yet been published. METHODS This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label study including a total of 200 pts. with localized and locally advanced diffuse or mixed type (Laurens's classification) adenocarcinoma of the stomach and Type II/III GEJ. All enrolled pts. will have received 3-6 pre-operative cycles of biweekly FLOT (Docetaxel 50 mg/m2; Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2; Leucovorin 200 mg/m2; 5-FU 2600 mg/m2, q2wk). Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive surgery only and postoperative FLOT (control arm) or surgery + intraoperative HIPEC (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 solution administered at a temperature of 42 °C for 90 min) and postoperative FLOT (experimental arm). Surgery is carried out as gastrectomy or transhiatal extended gastrectomy. Primary endpoint is PFS/DFS, major secondary endpoints are OS, rate of pts. with peritoneal relapse at 2 and 3 years, perioperative morbidity/mortality and quality of life. The trial starts with a safety run-in phase. After 20 pts. had curatively intended resection in Arm B, an interim safety analysis is performed. Recruitment has already started and first patient in was on January 18th, 2021. DISCUSSION If the PREVENT concept proves to be effective, this could potentially lead to a new standard of therapy. On the contrary, if the outcome is negative, pts. with gastric cancer and no peritoneal involvement will not be treated with HIPEC during surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is registered on June 25th, 2020 under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04447352 ; EudraCT: 2017-003832-35 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten O Götze
- Institute of Clinical Cancer Research (IKF) at Krankenhaus Nordwest, UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt, Germany
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF GmbH am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department for General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brueder, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sylvie Lorenzen
- Third Department of Internal Medicine (Hematology/Medical Oncology), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universitat Munchen, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulli S Bankstahl
- Institute of Clinical Cancer Research (IKF) at Krankenhaus Nordwest, UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Claudia Pauligk
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF GmbH am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Moustafa Elshafei
- Bariatrische und Metabolische Chirurgie, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Amato
- Department of General Surgery and Emergency, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Daniel Reim
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolf O Bechstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General-, Visceral Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stefan P Mönig
- Service de Chirurgie viscérale, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum CCM/CVK, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Schwarzbach
- Clinic for General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
- Institute of Clinical Cancer Research (IKF) at Krankenhaus Nordwest, UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt, Germany
- Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF GmbH am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ji ZH, Zhang Y, Li Y. Intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for prevention and treatment of peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer: a narrative review. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:S70-S78. [PMID: 33968427 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC) has long been regarded as the terminal disease, lacking of effective treatments. In recent 40 years, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, including hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS), and early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC), has been recommended as a preferred treatment option for some selected patients with GCPM. Intraperitoneal free cancer cells were recognized as the pathological cause of PM and the primary target for intraperitoneal chemotherapy. There were a lot of evidence demonstrating that HIPEC could effectively eradiate intraperitoneal free cancer cells and prolong overall survival in GCPM. However, there are still no standard HIPEC protocols. This review summarized the current HIPEC regimens used in GCPM from a literature search, trying to conclude the optimal HIPEC in GCPM, and indicate the future direction of HIPEC study. Moreover, the new data on the exploration of HIPEC in GCPM at Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University was shared. In conclusion, there was not enough evidence from publications and our own experience to conclude a recommended HIPEC regimen for GCPM. There is urgent need for standardizing HIPEC protocols worldwide. Accordingly, more international collaborations focusing on pharmacology and HIPEC-related parameters to generate high level evidence are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong-He Ji
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Cancer Center of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Cancer Center of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Department of Pathology, Cancer Center of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Parray A, Gupta V, Chaudhari VA, Shrikhande SV, Bhandare MS. Role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer. SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2020.100025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
18
|
Lu Y, Jin Z, Zheng S, Bai Y, Sun Y. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e20973. [PMID: 32629710 PMCID: PMC7337564 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis (GCPC) remains poor despite recent advances in systemic chemotherapy (SC) with an average survival less than 6 months. Current evidence supporting the utility of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with SC for GCPC is limited. We plan to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the comparative effects and safety of HIPEC combined with SC in the management of GCPC. METHODS Randomized controlled trials evaluating HIPEC combined with SC versus SC as first-line treatment for GCPC will be searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar, from database inception to April 30, 2020. Data on study design, participant characteristics, intervention details, and outcomes will be extracted. Primary outcomes to be assessed are: median progression-free survival; secondary outcomes are: median survival time, 1- year survival rate, 2-year survival rate, objective response rate, and adverse events. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan V.5.3 statistical software. Data will be combined with a random effect model. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Heterogeneity will be assessed, and if necessary, a subgroup analysis will be performed to explore the source of heterogeneity. RESULTS The results will provide useful information about the effectiveness and safety of HIPEC combined with systemic chemotherapy regimens in patients with gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis. CONCLUSION The findings of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal. THE REGISTRATION NUMBER INPLASY202050006. DOI NUMBER 10.37766/inplasy2020.5.0006.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yidan Lu
- Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
- Hangzhou Cancer Hospital
| | - Zheng Jin
- Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
| | - Song Zheng
- Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
- Hangzhou Cancer Hospital
- Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
- Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yurong Bai
- Hangzhou Cancer Hospital
- Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yangcheng Sun
- Hangzhou Cancer Hospital
- Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chia DKA, So JBY. Recent Advances in Intra-peritoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer. J Gastric Cancer 2020; 20:115-126. [PMID: 32595996 PMCID: PMC7311211 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2020.20.e15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastasis (PM) frequently occurs in patients with gastric cancer (GC) and confers a dismal prognosis despite advances in systemic chemotherapy. While systemic chemotherapy has poor peritoneal penetration, intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy remains sequestered, resulting in high peritoneal drug concentrations with less systemic side-effects. The first application of IP treatment was hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis (GCPM); but was associated with an increased morbidity and mortality rate without significantly improving overall survival (OS). While CRS confers limited benefit, the potential role of prophylactic HIPEC and laparoscopic neoadjuvant HIPEC are currently being evaluated. Combination systemic and IP chemotherapy (SIPC) gained popularity in the 1990s, since it provided the benefits of IP treatment while reducing surgical morbidity, demonstrating promising early results in multiple Phase II trials. Unfortunately, these findings were not confirmed in the recent PHOENIX-GC randomized controlled trial; therefore, the appropriate treatment for GCPM remains controversial. Small observational studies from Japan and Singapore have reported successful downstaging of PM in GC patients receiving SIPC who subsequently underwent conversion gastrectomy with a median OS of 21.6–34.6 months. Recently, the most significant development in IP-directed therapy is pressurized IP aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Given that aerosol chemotherapy achieves a wider distribution and deeper penetration, the outcomes of multiple ongoing trials assessing its efficacy are eagerly awaited. Indeed, IP-directed therapy has evolved rapidly in the last 3 decades, with an encouraging trend toward improved outcomes in GCPM, and may offer some hope for an otherwise fatal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl K A Chia
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Jimmy B Y So
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.,Division of General Surgery (Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery), Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.,Division of Surgical Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
miR-338-3p functions as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer by targeting PTP1B. Cell Death Dis 2018; 9:522. [PMID: 29743567 PMCID: PMC5943282 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-018-0611-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors and peritoneal metastasis is the primary cause for advanced GC’s mortality. Protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) functions as an oncogene and involves in carcinogenesis and cancer dissemination. However, the function and regulation of PTP1B in GC remain poorly understood. In this study, we found that PTP1B was upregulated in GC tissues and overexpression of PTP1B in vitro promoted cell migration and prevented apoptosis. Then, we predicted that PTP1B was a target of miR-338-3p and we revealed an inverse correlation between miR-338-3p levels and PTP1B protein levels in GC tissues. Next, we verified that PTP1B was inhibited by miR-338-3p via direct targeting to its 3′-untranslated regions. Moreover, overexpression of miR-338-3p in vitro attenuated GC cell migration and promoted apoptosis, and these effects could be partially reversed by reintroduction of PTP1B. Finally, we established an orthotopic xenograft model and a peritoneal dissemination model of GC to demonstrate that miR-338-3p restrained tumor growth and dissemination in vivo by targeting PTP1B. Taken together, our results highlight that PTP1B is an oncogene and is negatively regulated by miR-338-3p in GC, which may provide new insights into novel molecular therapeutic targets for GC.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ji ZH, Peng KW, Yu Y, Li XB, Yonemura Y, Liu Y, Sugarbaker PH, Li Y. Current status and future prospects of clinical trials on CRS + HIPEC for gastric cancer peritoneal metastases. Int J Hyperthermia 2018; 33:562-570. [PMID: 28124576 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1283065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is no standard treatment for peritoneal metastases (PM) from gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this review is to evaluate the clinical trials on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for GC PM. MATERIALS AND METHODS The published clinical trials on CRS + HIPEC for GC PM are critically evaluated, and survival and safety are the primary endpoints. In addition, the registered ongoing clinical trials are summarised. RESULTS The natural course of GC PM is <5 months. CRS + HIPEC could improve the overall survival (OS). In prospective studies, the median OS was 11.0 months in the CRS + HIPEC group vs. 5.4 months in the CRS alone group. In case-control studies, the median OS was 13.3 months in the CRS + HIPEC group vs. 7.9 months in the CRS alone group. In cohort studies, the median OS after CRS + HIPEC was 13.3. The median 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates after CRS + HIPEC were 50.0%, 35.8% and 13.0%, respectively. There is no statistically significant increase in serious adverse events that are directly attributed to CRS + HIPEC. CONCLUSIONS The combination of CRS and HIPEC is a promising integrated treatment strategy for GC PM that has encouraging initial results, calling for urgent further evaluation of this strategy in randomised control trials (RCTs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong-He Ji
- a Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery , Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , China
| | - Kai-Wen Peng
- b Department of Oncology , Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors and Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center , Wuhan , China
| | - Yang Yu
- a Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery , Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , China
| | - Xin-Bao Li
- a Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery , Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , China
| | - Yutaka Yonemura
- c NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment , Kishiwada, Osaka , Japan
| | - Yang Liu
- c NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment , Kishiwada, Osaka , Japan
| | | | - Yan Li
- a Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery , Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , China.,b Department of Oncology , Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors and Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center , Wuhan , China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Desiderio J, Chao J, Melstrom L, Warner S, Tozzi F, Fong Y, Parisi A, Woo Y. The 30-year experience-A meta-analysis of randomised and high-quality non-randomised studies of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 2017; 79:1-14. [PMID: 28456089 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2016] [Revised: 03/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/26/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been used within various multimodality strategies for the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis. OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the role of HIPEC in gastric cancer and clarify its effectiveness at different stages of peritoneal disease progression. DATA SOURCES Medline and Embase databases between January 1, 1985 and June 1, 2016. STUDY SELECTION Randomised control trials and high-quality non-randomised control trials selected on a validated tool (methodological index for non-randomised studies) comparing HIPEC and standard oncological management for the treatment of advanced stage gastric cancer with and without peritoneal carcinomatosis were considered. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS A random-effects network meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were overall survival and disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes were overall complications, type of complications, and sites of recurrence. RESULTS A total of 11 RCTs and 21 non-randomised control trials (2520 patients) were included. For patients without the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), the overall survival rates between the HIPEC and control groups at 3 or 5 years resulted in favour of the HIPEC group (risk ratio [RR] = 0.82, P = 0.01). No difference in the 3-year overall survival (RR = 0.99, P = 0.85) in but a prolonged median survival of 4 months in favour of the HIPEC group (WMD = 4.04, P < 0.001) was seen in patients with PC. HIPEC was associated with significantly higher risk of complications for both patients with PC (RR = 2.15, P < 0.01) and without (RR = 2.17, P < 0.01). This increased risk in the HIPEC group was related to systemic drugs toxicity. Anastomotic leakage rates were found to be similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates a survival advantage of the use of HIPEC as a prophylactic strategy and suggests that patients whose disease burden is limited to positive cytology and limited nodal involvement may benefit the most from HIPEC. For patients with extensive carcinomatosis, the completeness of cytoreductive surgery is a critical prognostic factor for survival. Future RCTs should better define patient selection criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Desiderio
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Centre, Duarte, CA, USA; Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Joseph Chao
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Centre, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Laleh Melstrom
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Centre, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Susanne Warner
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Centre, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Federico Tozzi
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Centre, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Centre, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Amilcare Parisi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Yanghee Woo
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Centre, Duarte, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rau B, Brandl A, Pascher A, Raue W, Sugarbaker P. Oligometastatic Disease in the Peritoneal Space with Gastrointestinal Cancer. Visc Med 2017; 33:42-46. [PMID: 28612016 DOI: 10.1159/000454694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Treatment options for patients with gastrointestinal cancer and oligometastastic disease remain the domain of the medical oncologist. However, in selected cases, attempts to remove or destroy the tumor burden seem appropriate. BACKGROUND DATA During the last decade, the treatment of localized and isolated tumor nodules, such as lung, liver or peritoneal metastasis, has changed. Previously, these patients with metastatic disease only received palliative chemotherapy. Combined treatment approaches and new techniques demonstrate that additional surgery to destroy or remove the metastases seem to be of major benefit to patients. METHODS The recently published important literature regarding peritoneal metastases and oligometastases in gastrointestinal cancer was analyzed. RESULTS The most important factor in the treatment of peritoneal metastases and in cytoreductive surgery is patient selection. Resection of peritoneal metastases should be considered. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is feasible. However, further results of randomized trials are necessary. Several randomized trials are on the way and will be available in 1-2 years. Systemic chemotherapy alone as an adequate management plan for all sites of metastatic disease is not compatible with a high standard of care. Formulating an optimal plan combining re-operative surgery with regional plus systemic chemotherapy is a necessary task of the multidisciplinary team. CONCLUSIONS In oligometastastic disease of gastrointestinal cancer origin, the selection process is the most important factor for survival. Further studies are needed to determine optimal treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beate Rau
- Department of General Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Berlin, Germany, DC, USA
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Department of General Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Berlin, Germany, DC, USA
| | - Andreas Pascher
- Department of General Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Berlin, Germany, DC, USA
| | - Wieland Raue
- Department of General Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow and Mitte, Berlin, Germany, DC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Miao ZF, Xu H, Xu HM, Wang ZN, Zhao TT, Song YX, Xu YY. DLL4 overexpression increases gastric cancer stem/progenitor cell self-renewal ability and correlates with poor clinical outcome via Notch-1 signaling pathway activation. Cancer Med 2016; 6:245-257. [PMID: 27891816 PMCID: PMC5269703 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2016] [Revised: 10/12/2016] [Accepted: 10/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant diseases, and poses a serious threat to the quality of human life. Gastric cancer stem/progenitor cells (GCSPCs) have critical effects on tumor formation, affecting specific features of self‐renewal and differentiation and playing a critical role in metastasis. The Notch‐1 pathway is crucially important to GCSPCs and is regulated by DLL4. In this study, DLL4 and Nestin levels were measured in 383 gastric cancer tissue samples by immunohistochemistry, and the clinico‐pathological features of patients assessed. After DLL4 silencing in selected gastric cancer cell lines, the expression of GCSPC markers and colony formation ability were analyzed and the self‐renewal and differentiation capacities of the cells were evaluated. The relationship between DLL4 levels and Notch‐1 signaling pathway effector amounts was assessed via Western blotting and immunofluorescence. Finally, the tumor formation ability of the gastric cancer cells was evaluated with different levels of DLL4 and multiple cell densities in vivo. Our results indicate that DLL4 expression is associated with TNM stage and cancer metastasis, with high amounts of DLL4 leading to poor outcome. DLL4 silencing inhibited the self‐renewal ability of GCSPCs and increased their multidifferentiation capacity, resulting in reduced GCSPC ratios. DLL4 knockdown also blocked the Notch‐1 pathway, weakening invasion ability and resistance to 5‐FU chemotherapy. In vivo, DLL4 silencing inhibited the tumor formation ability of GCSPCs. In conclusion, DLL4 affects GCSPC stemness, altering their pathological behavior. DLL4 silencing inhibits GCSPC metastatic potential both in vitro and in vivo by impeding Notch‐1 signaling pathway activation, indicating that DLL4 may be a new potential therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Feng Miao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Hao Xu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Hui-Mian Xu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Zhen-Ning Wang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Ting-Ting Zhao
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yong-Xi Song
- Department of Surgical Oncology, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Ying-Ying Xu
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ji ZH, Peng KW, Li Y. Intraperitoneal free cancer cells in gastric cancer: pathology of peritoneal carcinomatosis and rationale for intraperitoneal chemotherapy/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 1:69. [PMID: 28138635 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2016.08.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is one of the most common causes of death in gastric cancer patients. Intraperitoneal free cancer cells (IFCCs) play a very important role in forming PC, but the administration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) and/or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) could be an effective treatment for IFCCs. This review focuses on the origin of IFCCs, the mechanism of PC formatting, the rationale of IPC/HIPEC, and the current clinical trials on IPC/HIPEC to treat advanced gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong-He Ji
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Cancer Center of Beijing Shijitan Hospital affiliated to the Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China
| | - Kai-Wen Peng
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Cancer Center of Beijing Shijitan Hospital affiliated to the Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Cancer Center of Beijing Shijitan Hospital affiliated to the Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tu Y, Tian Y, Fang Z, Ruan Q, Tang H, Zhang X, Wu Y, Ding Y, Cui S. Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion for the treatment of gastric cancer: A single-centre retrospective study. Int J Hyperthermia 2016; 32:587-94. [PMID: 27362668 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2016.1190987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) is the treatment regime most likely to achieve prolonged survival in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastroenteric cancer. To date, few publications have focused on the treatment of patients with gastric cancer alone. Several controversies remain unsolved, including the safety and effectiveness of the CRS-HIPEC combination regime, particularly in cases where HIPEC is used as adjuvant treatment after CRS. Therefore, in the current study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of CRS combined with HIPEC in patients with gastric cancer. METHOD Data from 231 patients with a median age of 55.1 years treated with the CRS-HIPEC combination regime between January 2009 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent the combination therapy (mean of 2.4 cycles per patient, range, 1 to 4 cycles). RESULTS Median overall survival was 37.0 months, with 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates recorded as 83.4%, 68.5%, and 38.7%, respectively. The serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) were significantly decreased after combination therapy in the completeness of cytoreduction (CCR)-0 and CCR-1 groups, while no significant changes observed in marker levels were observed in the CC ≥2 group. The post-operative morbidity and mortality rates were 6.9% and 0.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed low TNM tumour stage, ascites condition and CCR score as independent predictors for better survival. CONCLUSION In view of the acceptable morbidity and mortality rates we propose that CRS combined with HIPEC presents an effective and safe treatment modality for patients with gastric cancer, especially in cases where optimal cytoreduction is achieved before the HIPEC procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinuo Tu
- a Cancer Centre of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong Province , China
| | - Yunhong Tian
- a Cancer Centre of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong Province , China
| | - Zhiyuan Fang
- a Cancer Centre of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong Province , China
| | - Qiang Ruan
- a Cancer Centre of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong Province , China
| | - Hongsheng Tang
- a Cancer Centre of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong Province , China
| | - Xiangliang Zhang
- a Cancer Centre of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong Province , China
| | - Yinbing Wu
- a Cancer Centre of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong Province , China
| | - Yan Ding
- a Cancer Centre of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong Province , China
| | - Shuzhong Cui
- a Cancer Centre of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong Province , China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sun JH, Ji ZH, Peng KW, Wu HT, Zhang Q, Yonemura Y, Li Y. Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of primary peritoneal serous carcinoma: Results of a Chinese retrospective study. Int J Hyperthermia 2016; 32:289-97. [DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2016.1146802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
|
28
|
Korakianitis O, Daskalou T, Alevizos L, Stamou K, Mavroudis C, Iatrou C, Vogiatzaki T, Eleftheriadis S, Tentes AA. Lack of significant intraoperative coagulopathy in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) indicates that epidural anaesthesia is a safe option. Int J Hyperthermia 2015; 31:857-62. [DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1075606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
|
29
|
Ohguri T, Kunugita N, Yahara K, Imada H, Uemura H, Shinya N, Youjirou G, Takashi C, Okazaki R, Ootsuyama A, Korogi Y. Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with mild hyperthermia for improving the anti-tumour effects of carboplatin. Int J Hyperthermia 2015; 31:643-8. [PMID: 26156211 DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1055832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) on the enhancement of hyperthermic chemosensitisation to carboplatin at mild temperatures in experimental tumours. METHODS SCCVII carcinoma in C3H/He mice was used to assess tumour growth delay. The mice received intraperitoneal injections of carboplatin. For HBO treatment, the mice were exposed to HBO at 2.0 atmospheres of absolute oxygen for 60 min. For mild hyperthermia (HT), treatment at 41.5 °C for 30 min was performed. The tumour tissue pO2 levels were measured with a digital pO2 monitor during and immediately after treatment. RESULTS The average time taken to reach a threefold relative tumour size was significantly longer after treatment with carboplatin combined with mild HT and HBO than after treatment with carboplatin and mild HT. The relative sizes of the tumours after the combined treatment were smallest when the treatment sequence was carboplatin, mild HT, and HBO. The tumour tissue pO2 values were significantly higher immediately after mild HT followed by HBO than immediately after HBO followed by mild HT. The tumour tissue pO2 levels during mild HT and HBO generally increased, although the patterns of the increases varied. CONCLUSION The administration of HBO increased the effects of hyperthermic chemosensitisation to carboplatin at mild temperatures on experimental tumours, particularly when given in the sequence of carboplatin, mild HT, and HBO, a finding that supports previous clinical outcomes for a novel combined therapy using carboplatin plus HT and HBO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Ohguri
- a Department of Radiology , University of Occupational and Environmental Health , Kitakyushu , Japan
| | - Naoki Kunugita
- b Department of Environmental Health , National Institute of Public Health , Wako , Japan
| | - Katsuya Yahara
- a Department of Radiology , University of Occupational and Environmental Health , Kitakyushu , Japan
| | - Hajime Imada
- c Department of Cancer Therapy Centre , Tobata Hospital , Kitakyushu , Japan
| | - Hidehiko Uemura
- d Department of Medical Electronics , University of Occupational and Environmental Health , Kitakyushu , Japan
| | - Nadayoshi Shinya
- c Department of Cancer Therapy Centre , Tobata Hospital , Kitakyushu , Japan
| | - Gotou Youjirou
- c Department of Cancer Therapy Centre , Tobata Hospital , Kitakyushu , Japan
| | - Chijiwa Takashi
- c Department of Cancer Therapy Centre , Tobata Hospital , Kitakyushu , Japan
| | - Ryuji Okazaki
- e Department of Radiological Health Science , University of Occupational and Environmental Health , Kitakyushu , Japan , and
| | - Akira Ootsuyama
- f Department of Radiation Biology and Health , University of Occupational and Environmental Health , Kitakyushu , Japan
| | - Yukunori Korogi
- a Department of Radiology , University of Occupational and Environmental Health , Kitakyushu , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Slimen IB, Najar T, Ghram A, Dabbebi H, Ben Mrad M, Abdrabbah M. Reactive oxygen species, heat stress and oxidative-induced mitochondrial damage. A review. Int J Hyperthermia 2015; 30:513-23. [PMID: 25354680 DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2014.971446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 455] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years there has been enormous interest in researching oxidative stress. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are derived from the metabolism of oxygen as by-products of cell respiration, and are continuously produced in all aerobic organisms. Oxidative stress occurs as a consequence of an imbalance between ROS production and the available antioxidant defence against them. Nowadays, a variety of diseases and degenerative processes such as cancer, Alzheimer's and autoimmune diseases are mediated by oxidative stress. Heat stress was suggested to be an environmental factor responsible for stimulating ROS production because of similarities in responses observed following heat stress compared with that occurring following exposure to oxidative stress. This manuscript describes the main mitochondrial sources of ROS and the antioxidant defences involved to prevent oxidative damage in all the mitochondrial compartments. It also deals with discussions concerning the cytotoxic effect of heat stress, mitochondrial heat-induced alterations, as well as heat shock protein (HSP) expression as a defence mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imen Belhadj Slimen
- Laboratory of Materials, Molecules and Application, Preparatory Institute for Scientific and Technical Studies , Tunisia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Arjona-Sanchez A, Muñoz-Casares C, Ortega-Salas R, Casado-Adam A, Sanchez-Hidalgo JM, Rufián-Peña S. Long-term survival with peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis from intraductal mucinous papillary pancreatic carcinoma treated with complete cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Int J Hyperthermia 2014; 30:408-11. [PMID: 25256894 DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2014.952251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditionally, peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) was regarded as an untreatable condition; however, the introduction of locoregional therapies combining cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) approximately two decades ago has changed this view. There is controversy, however, when a PC arises from pancreatic cancer. We have reported on an extraordinary case of an aggressive pseudomixoma peritonei arising from an invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) treated with complete cytoreduction and HIPEC. This combination of treatments has not been previously described. Moreover, a very long-term disease-free survival of up to 70 months has been achieved by this combined approach. This approach may provide some optimism for considerable life extension in selected patients who present with an aggressive peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis of pancreatic origin considered suitable only for palliative care.
Collapse
|