Therapeutic potential of using the vascular disrupting agent OXi4503 to enhance mild temperature thermoradiation

Does the combination of hyperthermia with low LET (linear energy transfer) radiation induce anti-tumor effects equivalent to those seen with high LET radiation alone?

INTRODUCTION

The combination of hyperthermia with low LET (linear energy transfer) radiation may have similar anti-tumor effects as high LET radiation alone. This pre-clinical study determined the optimal heating temperature and time interval between radiation and heat to achieve this equivalent effect.

METHODS

C3H mammary carcinomas (200 mm³ in size) growing in the right rear foot of CDF1 mice was used in all experiments. Tumors were locally irradiated with graded doses of either 240 kV ortho- or 6 MV mega-voltage X-rays to produce full dose-response curves. Heating (41.0-43.5 °C; 60 min) was achieved by immersing the tumor bearing foot in a water-bath applied at the same time, or up to 4-hours after, irradiating. The endpoint was the percentage of mice showing local tumor control at 90 days, with enhancements calculated from the ratios of the radiation doses causing 50% tumor control (± 95% confidence intervals).

RESULTS

Previous published results in this tumor model reported that carbon ions were 1.3-1.7 times more effective than low LET radiation at inducing tumor control. Similar enhancements occurred with a temperature of only 41.0 °C with a simultaneous heat and radiation treatment. However, higher temperatures were needed with the introduction of any interval; at 42.5 °C, the enhancement was 2.5 with a simultaneous treatment, decreasing to a value within the carbon ion range with a 4-hour interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining hyperthermia with low LET radiation can be as effective as high LET at inducing tumor control, but the temperature needed depended on the time interval between the two modalities.

Tumors Resistant to Checkpoint Inhibitors Can Become Sensitive after Treatment with Vascular Disrupting Agents

Immune therapy improves cancer outcomes, yet many patients do not respond. This pre-clinical study investigated whether vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) could convert an immune unresponsive tumor into a responder. CDF1 mice, with 200 mm³ C3H mammary carcinomas in the right rear foot, were intraperitoneally injected with combretastatin A-4 phosphate (CA4P), its A-1 analogue OXi4503, and/or checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4 antibodies), administered twice weekly for two weeks. Using the endpoint of tumor growth time (TGT5; time to reach five times the starting volume), we found that none of the checkpoint inhibitors (10 mg/kg) had any effect on TGT5 compared to untreated controls. However, CA4P (100 mg/kg) or OXi4503 (5–50 mg/kg) did significantly increase TGT5. This further significantly increased by combining the VDAs with checkpoint inhibitors, but was dependent on the VDA, drug dose, and inhibitor. For CA4P, a significant increase was found when CA4P (100 mg/kg) was combined with anti-PD-L1, but not with the other two checkpoint inhibitors. With OXi4503 (50 mg/kg), a significant enhancement occurred when combined with anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4, but not anti-PD-1. We observed no significant improvement with lower OXi4503 doses (5–25 mg/kg) and anti-CTLA-4, although 30% of tumors were controlled at the 25 mg/kg dose. Histological assessment of CD4/CD8 expression actually showed decreased levels up to 10 days after treatment with OXi4503 (50 mg/kg). Thus, the non-immunogenic C3H mammary carcinoma was unresponsive to checkpoint inhibitors, but became responsive in mice treated with VDAs, although the mechanism remains unclear.

FB-15 inhibits MGC-803 cells growth by regulating energy metabolism

In this study, we scrutinized the anticancer effects of FB-15 on human gastric carcinoma MGC-803 cells in vitro and vivo, and its preliminary effect on tubulin and HIF-1α. We confirmed that FB-15 not only inhibited the proliferation of a large number of cells in a concentration and time-dependent manner but also inhibited proliferation of a single cell to form clones. FB-15 manifested little cytotoxicity for normal stomach cells GES-1. The flow cytometry analysis displayed that FB-15 induced apoptosis MGC-803 cells and mainly arrested cells in the S phase in a concentration-dependent manner. The results of the wound healing assay indicated that FB-15 suppressed cell migration. Furthermore, the western blotting showed that FB-15 down-regulated the expression of β3-tubulin and HIF-1α, consistent with Immunohistochemical assay. The binding modes of FB-15 with tubulin were clarified by molecular docking. FB-15 significantly suppressed the growth of MGC-803 gastric cancer tumors. The inhibitory effect of FB-15 on tumor growth was superior to 5-Fu. Taken together, these results provided evidence for FB-15 to be used as an effective anticancer drug candidate for gastric cancer.

Safety and Tolerability of Anti-Angiogenic Protein Kinase Inhibitors and Vascular-Disrupting Agents in Cancer: Focus on Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Angiogenesis is an essential process for tumor growth and metastasis. Inhibition of angiogenesis as an anticancer strategy has shown significant results in a plethora of tumors. Anti-angiogenic agents are currently part of many standard-of-care options for several metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. Bevacizumab, aflibercept, ramucirumab, and regorafenib have significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival in different lines of treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. Second-line ramucirumab and third-line apatinib are effective anti-angiogenic treatments for patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Unfortunately, the anti-angiogenic strategy has major practical limitations: resistance inevitably develops through redundancy of signaling pathways and selection for subclonal populations adapted for hypoxic conditions. Anti-angiogenic agents may be more effective in combination therapies, with not only cytotoxics but also other emerging compounds in the anti-angiogenic class or in the separate class of the so-called vascular-disrupting agents. This review aims to provide an overview of the approved and "under development" anti-angiogenic compounds as well as the vascular-disrupting agents in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers, focusing on the actual body of knowledge available on therapy challenges, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic mechanisms, safety profiles, promising predictive biomarkers, and future perspectives.

Hyperthermia: The Optimal Treatment to Overcome Radiation Resistant Hypoxia

Regions of low oxygenation (hypoxia) are a characteristic feature of solid tumors, and cells existing in these regions are a major factor influencing radiation resistance as well as playing a significant role in malignant progression. Consequently, numerous pre-clinical and clinical attempts have been made to try and overcome this hypoxia. These approaches involve improving oxygen availability, radio-sensitizing or killing the hypoxic cells, or utilizing high LET (linear energy transfer) radiation leading to a lower OER (oxygen enhancement ratio). Interestingly, hyperthermia (heat treatments of 39⁻45 °C) induces many of these effects. Specifically, it increases blood flow thereby improving tissue oxygenation, radio-sensitizes via DNA repair inhibition, and can kill cells either directly or indirectly by causing vascular damage. Combining hyperthermia with low LET radiation can even result in anti-tumor effects equivalent to those seen with high LET. The various mechanisms depend on the time and sequence between radiation and hyperthermia, the heating temperature, and the time of heating. We will discuss the role these factors play in influencing the interaction between hyperthermia and radiation, and summarize the randomized clinical trials showing a benefit of such a combination as well as suggest the potential future clinical application of this combination.

Thermoradiotherapy planning: Integration in routine clinical practice

Planning of combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatments should be performed taking the synergistic action between the two modalities into account. This work evaluates the available experimental data on cytotoxicity of combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatment and the requirements for integration of hyperthermia and radiotherapy treatment planning into a single planning platform. The underlying synergistic mechanisms of hyperthermia include inhibiting DNA repair, selective killing of radioresistant hypoxic tumour tissue and increased radiosensitivity by enhanced tissue perfusion. Each of these mechanisms displays different dose-effect relations, different optimal time intervals and different optimal sequences between radiotherapy and hyperthermia. Radiosensitisation can be modelled using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model to account for DNA repair inhibition by hyperthermia. In a recent study, an LQ model-based thermoradiotherapy planning (TRTP) system was used to demonstrate that dose escalation by hyperthermia is equivalent to ∼10 Gy for prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. The first step for more reliable TRTP is further expansion of the data set of LQ parameters for normally oxygenated normal and tumour tissue valid over the temperature range used clinically and for the relevant time intervals between radiotherapy and hyperthermia. The next step is to model the effect of hyperthermia in hypoxic tumour cells including the physiological response to hyperthermia and the resulting reoxygenation. Thermoradiotherapy planning is feasible and a necessity for an optimal clinical application of hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy in individual patients.